2005 Arctic Cat 400 Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is a versatile all-terrain vehicle (ATV) known for its robust utility and off-road capability. Produced as part of Arctic Cat's popular 400 series, which saw numerous model years, the 2005 iteration typically features a four-wheel-drive, single-rider chassis. It gained popularity for offering a strong balance of performance and affordability. Pricing for a used 2005 Arctic Cat 400 can range significantly based on condition and trim, but often falls within the $2,000-$5,000 bracket.
The Good
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 offers impressive off-road prowess and a smooth ride, appealing to those seeking adventure. Its reliable engine and durable construction provide peace of mind for practical buyers, while its utilitarian design makes it a dependable workhorse.
The Bad
Owners should be aware of potential issues with the CVT belt, especially under heavy load or prolonged use. Electrical system glitches and occasional carburetor problems can also arise. Regular maintenance is key to mitigating these common weaknesses.
2005 Arctic Cat 400: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 typically featured a 375cc liquid-cooled, four-stroke, single-cylinder engine. Some variations might have offered slightly different displacements within the 400 class.
- Horsepower: Horsepower figures generally hovered around 25-30 hp, providing adequate power for trail riding and moderate utility tasks.
- Fuel Economy: Specific MPG ratings are not readily available for ATVs of this era, but owners report a reasonable fuel consumption, generally in the range of 15-25 miles per gallon depending on riding conditions and throttle input.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph acceleration times are not a standard metric for ATVs and are generally not published. The focus is on low-end torque and maneuverability rather than top speed.
- Towing Capacity: The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 typically boasts a robust towing capacity, often rated around 1,050 pounds. This makes it suitable for hauling small trailers, equipment, or for light farm and ranch work.
- Trim-Level Features: Common trims for the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 often included the standard model and a TRV (Traction, Recreation, Velocity) version. Key features could include:
- 4WD System: Selectable 2WD/4WD with front differential lock for enhanced traction in challenging terrain.
- Suspension: Independent front suspension and a swingarm rear suspension, often with adjustable shocks for a comfortable ride and good ground clearance.
- Braking: Hydraulic disc brakes on all wheels for reliable stopping power.
- Storage: Front and rear racks for carrying gear, with capacities typically around 100 lbs front and 250 lbs rear.
- Instrumentation: Digital display with odometer, trip meter, fuel gauge, and indicator lights.
- Seating: Single rider seat, designed for comfort during extended rides.
- TRV Specifics: The TRV models often included features like a longer wheelbase for two-up riding capabilities (though primarily designed for one), enhanced suspension, and sometimes more aggressive tires.
2005 Arctic Cat 400 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2005 |
| Make | Arctic Cat |
| Model | 400 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Recreational Vehicle |
| Category | Low Speed Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | THIEF RIVER FALLS |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | - |
| Engine Size | - |
| Engine Cylinders | - |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 Have?
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400, while generally a reliable machine, has some common issues that owners frequently report. One of the most consistent concerns revolves around the Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) system. The drive belts can wear out prematurely or even snap, particularly if the ATV is subjected to heavy loads, frequent aggressive riding, or if proper maintenance such as belt inspection and replacement is neglected. Some owners have also noted issues with the starter motor and solenoid, leading to difficulties in starting the engine. Electrical system problems are another area of concern, with some riders experiencing intermittent issues with lights, gauges, or charging systems. This can sometimes be traced back to corrosion in connectors or faulty wiring harnesses. The carburetor, being a mechanical component, can also be a source of trouble, sometimes requiring cleaning or adjustment due to debris or wear, which can affect idling and overall performance. Water pump leaks have also been mentioned by a subset of owners, though this is often addressable with a seal replacement.
Regarding recalls, specific recalls for the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 are not as widely documented or prevalent as for some other vehicle categories. However, it's always prudent for owners to check the official Arctic Cat website or the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) database for any potential recalls that may have been issued and are still applicable.
In terms of long-term reliability, the Arctic Cat 400 series is generally considered durable if well-maintained. The engine and drivetrain are robust for their intended use. However, like any machine, longevity is directly tied to the quality and consistency of maintenance. Neglecting fluid changes (engine oil, differential fluids, coolant), failing to clean air filters, or ignoring early signs of wear on components like the CVT belt or suspension bushings will significantly shorten its lifespan and increase the likelihood of costly repairs. The frame and suspension components are typically sturdy, but like many ATVs, they can be susceptible to damage from hard impacts or extreme off-road abuse.
Regarding recalls, specific recalls for the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 are not as widely documented or prevalent as for some other vehicle categories. However, it's always prudent for owners to check the official Arctic Cat website or the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) database for any potential recalls that may have been issued and are still applicable.
In terms of long-term reliability, the Arctic Cat 400 series is generally considered durable if well-maintained. The engine and drivetrain are robust for their intended use. However, like any machine, longevity is directly tied to the quality and consistency of maintenance. Neglecting fluid changes (engine oil, differential fluids, coolant), failing to clean air filters, or ignoring early signs of wear on components like the CVT belt or suspension bushings will significantly shorten its lifespan and increase the likelihood of costly repairs. The frame and suspension components are typically sturdy, but like many ATVs, they can be susceptible to damage from hard impacts or extreme off-road abuse.
How long will the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 last?
Estimating average mileage for ATVs like the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is challenging as usage varies dramatically. However, with diligent maintenance, these machines can easily see 5,000 to 10,000 miles or more over 10-15 years of service. Owners who perform regular oil changes, keep the air filter clean, regularly inspect and maintain the CVT system, and address minor issues promptly will experience the best long-term durability. The engine and chassis are robust and can last a very long time. The primary weaknesses that tend to emerge over time are related to wear-and-tear on the CVT belt and clutch components, potential issues with the starter or electrical system, and seals in the water pump or differentials. Addressing these wear items proactively is crucial for maximizing the vehicle's lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is a utilitarian off-road vehicle, and as such, its built-in technology, entertainment, and driver-assistance features are very basic, reflecting the era and its primary purpose. There are no sophisticated infotainment systems, navigation, or advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) found in modern vehicles.
Built-in Tech: The primary technology incorporated is functional rather than for comfort or entertainment. This includes a digital instrument cluster that typically displays essential information such as speed, odometer, trip meter, fuel level, and indicator lights for 2WD/4WD engagement, neutral, reverse, and engine status. A reliable lighting system, usually a halogen headlight and taillight, is standard for visibility.
Entertainment: There is no built-in entertainment system, such as a radio or audio player. The focus is on the riding experience and the sounds of the trail.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features in the traditional automotive sense do not exist. The ATV's design inherently focuses on stability and control for off-road conditions. Features like selectable 2WD/4WD with front differential lock are the closest equivalent to a form of assistance, providing enhanced traction when needed. The engine braking system also aids in controlling descents.
Safety Features: Safety on the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 primarily relies on its robust chassis, durable suspension, and effective braking system. Hydraulic disc brakes at all wheels provide strong stopping power. The sturdy frame and bodywork offer some protection. Safety is also heavily reliant on the rider's skill, proper protective gear (helmet, gloves, boots, etc.), and responsible operation.
Optional Features: Depending on the specific trim and dealer additions, optional features might have included things like handguards for protection from debris, a winch for recovery or utility tasks, upgraded tires for specific terrains, or a basic cargo box.
Crash-Test Ratings: Like most ATVs, the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 does not undergo formal crash-test ratings in the same way passenger cars do from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Safety is evaluated more through design integrity, stability characteristics, and manufacturer guidelines for operation and maintenance.
Built-in Tech: The primary technology incorporated is functional rather than for comfort or entertainment. This includes a digital instrument cluster that typically displays essential information such as speed, odometer, trip meter, fuel level, and indicator lights for 2WD/4WD engagement, neutral, reverse, and engine status. A reliable lighting system, usually a halogen headlight and taillight, is standard for visibility.
Entertainment: There is no built-in entertainment system, such as a radio or audio player. The focus is on the riding experience and the sounds of the trail.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features in the traditional automotive sense do not exist. The ATV's design inherently focuses on stability and control for off-road conditions. Features like selectable 2WD/4WD with front differential lock are the closest equivalent to a form of assistance, providing enhanced traction when needed. The engine braking system also aids in controlling descents.
Safety Features: Safety on the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 primarily relies on its robust chassis, durable suspension, and effective braking system. Hydraulic disc brakes at all wheels provide strong stopping power. The sturdy frame and bodywork offer some protection. Safety is also heavily reliant on the rider's skill, proper protective gear (helmet, gloves, boots, etc.), and responsible operation.
Optional Features: Depending on the specific trim and dealer additions, optional features might have included things like handguards for protection from debris, a winch for recovery or utility tasks, upgraded tires for specific terrains, or a basic cargo box.
Crash-Test Ratings: Like most ATVs, the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 does not undergo formal crash-test ratings in the same way passenger cars do from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Safety is evaluated more through design integrity, stability characteristics, and manufacturer guidelines for operation and maintenance.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2005 Arctic Cat 400 Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 typically retailed in the range of $6,000 to $7,500, depending on the specific trim level and any dealer-added accessories. As a nearly two-decade-old ATV, it has undergone significant depreciation. Current used market prices for a 2005 Arctic Cat 400 in good condition can range from approximately $2,000 to $5,000. Factors heavily influencing resale value include the overall condition of the machine, mileage (or hours of use), the presence of aftermarket upgrades, and whether it has been meticulously maintained. ATVs with extensive modifications, significant cosmetic damage, or a history of neglect will command lower prices. Conversely, a well-maintained, low-hour unit with original parts can still fetch a respectable sum within the used market.
2005 Arctic Cat 400 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is generally considered economical compared to newer or larger ATVs. Fuel costs are moderate, with consumption around 15-25 MPG depending on usage. Insurance is typically affordable, often significantly less than for a car, especially if purchased as a rider. Routine maintenance, including oil changes and filter replacements, is straightforward and cost-effective. However, repairs can become more costly if major components like the engine or CVT require attention. Overall, with careful maintenance, the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is an economical choice for recreational use and light utility work.
2005 Arctic Cat 400 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2005 Arctic Cat 400 Insurance
Insurance for a 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Recreational Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 Compare to Other Recreational Vehicle?
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 competed in a crowded mid-size utility ATV market. Key rivals included the Polaris Sportsman 400, Yamaha Kodiak 400, and Honda FourTrax 400 (or Foreman 450).
Performance: In terms of raw power, the Arctic Cat 400's 375cc engine offered respectable performance, often comparable to or slightly above the Polaris 400 and Yamaha 400 of the same year. The Honda Foreman 450, with its larger displacement, generally held an edge in torque and overall power. The Arctic Cat's selectable 4WD system was a strong point, offering good traction.
Features: Features across these mid-size utility ATVs were generally similar for 2005. All typically offered independent front suspension, hydraulic disc brakes, and racks for cargo. The Arctic Cat's and Polaris's 4WD systems were often lauded for their effectiveness. Honda was renowned for its simpler, more robust shaft-drive systems, sometimes perceived as more reliable but less capable in extreme conditions than selectable systems. Yamaha often focused on smooth power delivery and comfort.
Reliability: Honda has historically held the crown for bulletproof reliability, and a used Honda FourTrax or Foreman is often a safe bet. Polaris and Yamaha also had strong reputations, though specific model years could have isolated issues. Arctic Cat's reliability was generally good, but as noted, some owners experienced CVT-related issues more frequently than with certain Japanese competitors.
Price: The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 was typically priced competitively, often slightly lower than comparable Yamaha or Honda models when new, making it an attractive value proposition. Used prices reflect this, with the Arctic Cat often being more affordable than equivalent Hondas or Yamahas.
Recommendations:
Performance: In terms of raw power, the Arctic Cat 400's 375cc engine offered respectable performance, often comparable to or slightly above the Polaris 400 and Yamaha 400 of the same year. The Honda Foreman 450, with its larger displacement, generally held an edge in torque and overall power. The Arctic Cat's selectable 4WD system was a strong point, offering good traction.
Features: Features across these mid-size utility ATVs were generally similar for 2005. All typically offered independent front suspension, hydraulic disc brakes, and racks for cargo. The Arctic Cat's and Polaris's 4WD systems were often lauded for their effectiveness. Honda was renowned for its simpler, more robust shaft-drive systems, sometimes perceived as more reliable but less capable in extreme conditions than selectable systems. Yamaha often focused on smooth power delivery and comfort.
Reliability: Honda has historically held the crown for bulletproof reliability, and a used Honda FourTrax or Foreman is often a safe bet. Polaris and Yamaha also had strong reputations, though specific model years could have isolated issues. Arctic Cat's reliability was generally good, but as noted, some owners experienced CVT-related issues more frequently than with certain Japanese competitors.
Price: The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 was typically priced competitively, often slightly lower than comparable Yamaha or Honda models when new, making it an attractive value proposition. Used prices reflect this, with the Arctic Cat often being more affordable than equivalent Hondas or Yamahas.
Recommendations:
- Similar Alternatives: If you're looking for a comparable experience, the Polaris Sportsman 400 and Yamaha Kodiak 400 are excellent alternatives to consider. They offer similar utility, capability, and often share comparable price points on the used market.
- Better Alternatives (Reliability Focus): If long-term, hassle-free reliability is your absolute top priority, a used Honda FourTrax 400 or Foreman 450 would be a superior choice, though potentially at a higher used price.
- Higher Performance: For those needing more power for heavy-duty work or more aggressive trail riding, consider looking at 500cc-class ATVs from any of these brands, though expect a higher price point and potentially higher running costs.
Final Verdict: Is the 2005 Arctic Cat 400 a Good Recreational Vehicle?
The 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is ideal for recreational riders, property owners, and hunters who need a capable and versatile ATV without breaking the bank. It's well-suited for moderate trail riding, light farm work, and hauling gear. For buyers on a budget, a used 2005 Arctic Cat 400 is certainly worth considering, provided it has been well-maintained. Thorough inspection is crucial, focusing on the CVT, suspension, and electrical systems. It's a smart purchase for those prioritizing value and functionality over cutting-edge technology. Buying used is the only option, and prioritizing lower mileage and a documented maintenance history will yield the best ownership experience. TRV trims offer added versatility for two-up riding or more demanding tasks.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma