The 2013 Thomas School Bus, a cornerstone of student transportation, boasts a legacy of safety and durability. This iconic Type C bus, often referred to as a conventional bus, has been a familiar sight on school routes for decades, with continuous model years ensuring its ongoing relevance. While specific trims are less defined by luxury and more by functionality (e.g., standard, activity bus), its robust construction and passenger-focused design make it perpetually popular. Pricing for a used 2013 model can vary significantly based on condition and mileage, but they represent a significant investment in reliable student transport.
The Good
The 2013 Thomas School Bus excels in unwavering reliability and safety, offering peace of mind for parents and administrators. Its robust build ensures durability, while its spacious, functional design prioritizes passenger well-being, making it a practical and emotionally reassuring choice for student transport.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 2013 Thomas School Bus include older engine technology which may not be as fuel-efficient as modern alternatives. Rust and corrosion can be significant concerns, especially in regions with harsh weather. Interior wear and tear from years of student use is common.
2013 Thomas School Bus: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2013 Thomas School Bus was typically offered with powerful, heavy-duty diesel engines designed for consistent performance under load. Common options included Cummins ISB and Caterpillar C7 engines. Specific engine variants would depend on the chassis manufacturer (e.g., Freightliner, International).
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings for these diesel engines generally ranged from approximately 200 to 300 horsepower, providing ample power for hauling large numbers of students up inclines and maintaining speed on highways.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for a vehicle of this size and purpose is not a primary design metric and is significantly lower than passenger vehicles. Expect figures in the range of 8-12 miles per gallon (MPG), heavily dependent on load, terrain, and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph acceleration times are not a relevant specification for school buses, as their design prioritizes safe, steady movement rather than rapid acceleration. Performance is measured in ability to maintain speed with a full load.
- Towing Capacity: School buses are not designed for towing. Their purpose is to transport passengers, and towing is not a feature or consideration.
- Trim-Level Features: Trim levels are minimal and focus on functionality and safety. Key features typically include:
- Heavy-duty chassis construction
- Full-size passenger seating with high-backrests and seat belts (often lap belts, but increasingly 3-point belts in newer models)
- Emergency exits (roof hatches, rear emergency door, side emergency windows)
- Flashing warning lights and stop sign system
- Robust HVAC system for climate control
- Durable interior materials designed for easy cleaning and longevity
- Durable, high-visibility exterior paint (typically 'National School Bus Glossy Yellow')
- Robust braking systems suitable for heavy loads
- Undercoating and rustproofing for durability
- Public address system
Optional features might include specialized seating for students with disabilities (wheelchair lifts and tie-downs), interior monitoring cameras, and enhanced communication systems. The focus remains on safety, durability, and operational efficiency.
2013 Thomas School Bus Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2013 |
| Make | Thomas |
| Model | School Bus |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Bus |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | HIGH POINT |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 32360 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | Cummins ISL |
| Engine Size | 5.2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Forward Control Bus (Engine in Front) |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 Thomas School Bus Have?
The 2013 Thomas School Bus, while generally robust, can exhibit common issues associated with vehicles of its age and intended use. One frequent concern is related to the chassis and body, particularly rust and corrosion. This is especially prevalent in regions that use road salt during winter months. Areas around wheel wells, the undercarriage, and door frames are susceptible. Drivetrain components, such as the transmission and diesel engine, can also present issues if not meticulously maintained. Common problems might include premature wear on certain transmission parts or issues with fuel injectors or EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) systems on diesel engines, though these are often related to maintenance rather than inherent flaws.
Electrical systems can also be a source of trouble. Wiring harnesses, especially those powering the extensive lighting system (headlights, taillights, warning lights, interior lights), can degrade over time, leading to intermittent failures or shorts. The stop arm and associated warning lights are critical safety features and can malfunction, requiring prompt repair.
Brake systems, given the constant heavy loads, are subject to significant wear and tear. Regular inspection and replacement of brake pads, rotors, and hydraulic components are essential. Suspension components, including leaf springs and shock absorbers, can also wear out, impacting ride quality and handling.
Recalls for school buses of this era are typically focused on safety-critical systems. While specific recalls for the 2013 Thomas School Bus would need to be verified through NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) databases, common recall areas for buses in general include issues with steering components, brake system integrity, seat belt anchorages, and fire suppression systems.
Long-term reliability hinges heavily on the maintenance schedule followed. A bus that has been regularly serviced, with fluid changes, filter replacements, and inspections performed promptly, is far more likely to remain reliable. Conversely, deferred maintenance can lead to cascading failures. For a 2013 model, a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic specializing in heavy-duty vehicles is highly recommended to identify potential upcoming repairs. Issues like worn engine mounts or fatigued body panels can also appear over time, affecting both ride comfort and structural integrity.
Electrical systems can also be a source of trouble. Wiring harnesses, especially those powering the extensive lighting system (headlights, taillights, warning lights, interior lights), can degrade over time, leading to intermittent failures or shorts. The stop arm and associated warning lights are critical safety features and can malfunction, requiring prompt repair.
Brake systems, given the constant heavy loads, are subject to significant wear and tear. Regular inspection and replacement of brake pads, rotors, and hydraulic components are essential. Suspension components, including leaf springs and shock absorbers, can also wear out, impacting ride quality and handling.
Recalls for school buses of this era are typically focused on safety-critical systems. While specific recalls for the 2013 Thomas School Bus would need to be verified through NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) databases, common recall areas for buses in general include issues with steering components, brake system integrity, seat belt anchorages, and fire suppression systems.
Long-term reliability hinges heavily on the maintenance schedule followed. A bus that has been regularly serviced, with fluid changes, filter replacements, and inspections performed promptly, is far more likely to remain reliable. Conversely, deferred maintenance can lead to cascading failures. For a 2013 model, a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic specializing in heavy-duty vehicles is highly recommended to identify potential upcoming repairs. Issues like worn engine mounts or fatigued body panels can also appear over time, affecting both ride comfort and structural integrity.
How long will the 2013 Thomas School Bus last?
The 2013 Thomas School Bus is engineered for longevity, with many units serving for 15 to 20 years or more. Average mileage can range widely, but it's not uncommon for these buses to accumulate between 150,000 to 300,000 miles during their operational life. The inherent durability of their heavy-duty chassis and powertrain components contributes significantly to this lifespan. However, long-term durability is strongly tied to maintenance. Buses with consistent, proactive maintenance schedules, including regular fluid changes, filter replacements, and chassis lubrication, will far outlast those neglected. Weaknesses that emerge over time often relate to rust and corrosion, especially in rust-belt states, and wear on brake and suspension components due to constant heavy use. Electrical system aging and potential failures also become more probable with age and mileage.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2013 Thomas School Bus prioritizes safety and functionality over advanced technology and entertainment. Built-in tech is generally limited to essential operational systems. This includes the robust lighting control panel for warning lights, headlights, and interior illumination. A public address (PA) system is standard for driver communication with passengers. The instrument cluster provides vital driver information such as speed, engine RPM, fuel level, oil pressure, and coolant temperature, all displayed with clear, large gauges suitable for quick glances. Older models might feature a basic analog radio, but entertainment systems are not a focus.
Driver-assistance features in a 2013 school bus are minimal compared to modern passenger vehicles. Some models may have optional backup cameras or proximity sensors, but these were not standard. The primary driver-assistance is the bus's inherent design: its large size, high seating position, and extensive visibility, coupled with audible turn signals and large side mirrors, are designed to aid the driver in maneuvering this substantial vehicle safely.
Safety features are paramount and form the core of the bus's design. This includes:
Crash-test ratings for school buses are not typically conducted and published in the same manner as for passenger cars by organizations like the IIHS or NHTSA. Instead, school buses are built to stringent federal and state safety standards (e.g., FMVSS - Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) that dictate specific performance requirements related to structural integrity, occupant protection, and emergency egress. These standards ensure a high level of safety for the unique purpose of transporting children.
Driver-assistance features in a 2013 school bus are minimal compared to modern passenger vehicles. Some models may have optional backup cameras or proximity sensors, but these were not standard. The primary driver-assistance is the bus's inherent design: its large size, high seating position, and extensive visibility, coupled with audible turn signals and large side mirrors, are designed to aid the driver in maneuvering this substantial vehicle safely.
Safety features are paramount and form the core of the bus's design. This includes:
- High-strength steel construction: Provides a protective cage around passengers.
- Reinforced roof structure: Designed to withstand rollovers.
- Engineered seating: High-back seats with impact-absorbing padding are designed to restrain passengers in case of sudden stops or collisions. Seat belts are increasingly common, with lap belts being standard on many earlier models and 3-point belts becoming more prevalent.
- Emergency exits: Multiple escape routes, including roof hatches, a rear emergency door, and operable emergency windows, are mandated by safety regulations.
- Flashing warning lights: Red flashing lights and a stop sign that extends from the driver's side are critical safety features to alert other traffic when loading or unloading students.
- Low-entry steps: Designed for easier and safer boarding for young children.
Crash-test ratings for school buses are not typically conducted and published in the same manner as for passenger cars by organizations like the IIHS or NHTSA. Instead, school buses are built to stringent federal and state safety standards (e.g., FMVSS - Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) that dictate specific performance requirements related to structural integrity, occupant protection, and emergency egress. These standards ensure a high level of safety for the unique purpose of transporting children.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2013 Thomas School Bus Prices and Market Value
When new, a 2013 Thomas School Bus would have had a price range typically between $70,000 and $120,000, depending on specifications, customization, and optional equipment. These are commercial vehicles with specialized construction. The used market for a 2013 Thomas School Bus varies significantly. Prices can range from as low as $5,000 to over $25,000. Factors heavily influencing resale value include mileage, overall condition (especially rust and mechanical health), maintenance history, and the presence of features like wheelchair lifts. Buses that have been well-maintained and have lower mileage will command higher prices. Due to their robust construction, school buses tend to depreciate slower than passenger vehicles, especially when converted for other uses or purchased by organizations that value their inherent durability and safety features. However, the specialized nature means resale is often to other school districts, municipalities, or individuals looking for conversion projects.
2013 Thomas School Bus Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2013 Thomas School Bus is generally considered costly due to its size and commercial nature. Insurance premiums are substantial, reflecting the high value and risk associated with transporting children. Fuel costs are significant, with diesel consumption typically ranging from 8-12 MPG. Maintenance and repair costs are also elevated; specialized diesel mechanics are required, and parts for heavy-duty vehicles are more expensive than for passenger cars. Regular, preventative maintenance is crucial but adds to the overall expense. While the initial purchase price might be lower on the used market, the ongoing operational costs for fuel, insurance, and maintenance make it less economical than a standard vehicle, particularly for private ownership.
2013 Thomas School Bus Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2013 Thomas School Bus Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2013 Thomas School Bus Insurance
Insurance for a 2013 Thomas School Bus is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 Thomas School Bus Compare to Other Truck?
The 2013 Thomas School Bus operates in a highly specialized segment dominated by a few key manufacturers. Its primary rivals include buses from companies like Blue Bird (e.g., Blue Bird Vision) and IC Corporation (e.g., IC CE Series).
Performance: In terms of performance, these buses are designed for similar tasks: safe, efficient, and reliable student transport. Engine options (typically Cummins or International diesel engines) and horsepower ratings are generally comparable across these brands for the 2013 model year, offering robust power for their intended use rather than speed. Fuel economy is similarly low across the board, hovering around 8-12 MPG.
Features: Safety features are a core competency for all major school bus manufacturers and are mandated by federal regulations. Expect similar levels of structural integrity, emergency exits, and warning light systems. Comfort and interior amenities are basic and utilitarian, focusing on durability and ease of cleaning. Options for wheelchair accessibility are available from all manufacturers. Technology is minimal, focusing on operational necessities.
Reliability: All three brands have a strong reputation for reliability, built on decades of experience in the demanding school bus industry. Long-term reliability heavily depends on maintenance. Thomas Built Buses, Blue Bird, and IC are all known for durable construction, designed to withstand years of rigorous daily use. The choice between them often comes down to dealer support, specific chassis configurations, and regional preferences.
Price: When new, pricing for comparable models from Thomas, Blue Bird, and IC would have been in a similar bracket, typically $70,000-$120,000. On the used market, prices are highly dependent on condition and mileage. A 2013 model from any of these manufacturers could be found in a similar price range ($5,000-$25,000).
Alternatives: If the need is for student transport, these three are the primary contenders. If a school district or organization is looking for buses with more modern features or alternative powertrains, newer models from these same manufacturers would offer options like enhanced safety technology, more fuel-efficient engines, or even electric powertrains, albeit at a significantly higher price point. For conversion projects (e.g., RVs, tiny homes), the choice might come down to specific dimensions, chassis availability, or aesthetics, but the core functionality and build quality are comparable.
Performance: In terms of performance, these buses are designed for similar tasks: safe, efficient, and reliable student transport. Engine options (typically Cummins or International diesel engines) and horsepower ratings are generally comparable across these brands for the 2013 model year, offering robust power for their intended use rather than speed. Fuel economy is similarly low across the board, hovering around 8-12 MPG.
Features: Safety features are a core competency for all major school bus manufacturers and are mandated by federal regulations. Expect similar levels of structural integrity, emergency exits, and warning light systems. Comfort and interior amenities are basic and utilitarian, focusing on durability and ease of cleaning. Options for wheelchair accessibility are available from all manufacturers. Technology is minimal, focusing on operational necessities.
Reliability: All three brands have a strong reputation for reliability, built on decades of experience in the demanding school bus industry. Long-term reliability heavily depends on maintenance. Thomas Built Buses, Blue Bird, and IC are all known for durable construction, designed to withstand years of rigorous daily use. The choice between them often comes down to dealer support, specific chassis configurations, and regional preferences.
Price: When new, pricing for comparable models from Thomas, Blue Bird, and IC would have been in a similar bracket, typically $70,000-$120,000. On the used market, prices are highly dependent on condition and mileage. A 2013 model from any of these manufacturers could be found in a similar price range ($5,000-$25,000).
Alternatives: If the need is for student transport, these three are the primary contenders. If a school district or organization is looking for buses with more modern features or alternative powertrains, newer models from these same manufacturers would offer options like enhanced safety technology, more fuel-efficient engines, or even electric powertrains, albeit at a significantly higher price point. For conversion projects (e.g., RVs, tiny homes), the choice might come down to specific dimensions, chassis availability, or aesthetics, but the core functionality and build quality are comparable.
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 Thomas School Bus a Good Truck?
The 2013 Thomas School Bus is ideal for school districts, religious organizations, or non-profits requiring robust, reliable, and safe transportation for groups, primarily students. It is worth buying for its proven durability and safety features, especially when procured on the used market, offering significant value compared to new. However, it is not suitable for private individuals seeking everyday transportation due to its size, fuel consumption, and operational complexity. For organizations, a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a heavy-duty vehicle specialist is crucial. Investing in a well-maintained used model with documented service history significantly enhances its purchase justification. New models are generally too expensive for most private buyers, while older models require careful assessment of their mechanical and structural integrity.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.