2012 Fisker Karma Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 2012 Fisker Karma is a luxury electric car with extended range, produced by Fisker Automotive. It featured a distinctive four-door coupe body style and was produced from 2011 to 2012. While there were no distinct trims, the single model was known for its radical styling and innovative hybrid powertrain. New, it was priced around $100,000. Its popularity stemmed from its striking design and its positioning as an eco-conscious luxury vehicle, appealing to those who wanted to make a statement.
The Good
The 2012 Fisker Karma's primary advantage lies in its breathtaking, futuristic design that garners significant attention. Emotionally, it offers a unique ownership experience. Practically, its electric-first powertrain offers quiet operation and instant torque, while the range extender provides flexibility.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of the 2012 Fisker Karma's questionable long-term reliability, particularly concerning its battery and electrical systems. Limited dealer support and parts availability are also significant concerns. The infotainment system can be buggy.
2012 Fisker Karma: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2012 Fisker Karma features a unique range-extended electric vehicle (REx) powertrain. It has two electric motors powering the rear wheels, and a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder gasoline engine that acts solely as a generator to recharge the battery pack. There is no direct mechanical link between the gasoline engine and the wheels.
- Horsepower: The combined output from the electric motors is approximately 402 horsepower.
- Torque: The electric motors deliver a substantial 960 lb-ft of torque.
- Fuel Economy:
- Electric-only range: Estimated around 32 miles.
- Combined MPGe (electric + gas): Estimated around 52 MPGe (though real-world figures varied significantly).
- Gasoline-only operation (when battery is depleted): Fuel economy was considerably lower, often in the low 20s MPG.
- Electric-only range: Estimated around 32 miles.
- 0-60 Times: Approximately 5.9 seconds in Sport mode.
- Towing Capacity: The Fisker Karma is not designed for towing and has no official towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features: As there was essentially one main model, features were extensive and indicative of its luxury positioning. Key standard features included:
- Premium leather upholstery.
- Bespoke interior materials, often including reclaimed wood.
- A sophisticated infotainment system with a touchscreen display.
- Navigation system.
- Heated and ventilated front seats.
- Push-button start.
- LED lighting.
- 19-inch alloy wheels (optional 20-inch wheels were available).
- Bi-xenon headlights.
- Bose premium audio system.
- Sun-roof with integrated solar panels designed to power auxiliary systems like ventilation.
- Premium leather upholstery.
2012 Fisker Karma Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2012 |
| Make | Fisker |
| Model | Karma |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Finland |
| Manufacturing City | UUSIKAUPUNKI |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 5600 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.0-L L-4 Turbo Hybrid |
| Engine Size | 2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | Direct Drive |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $115,000 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | $1,000 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2012 Fisker Karma Have?
The 2012 Fisker Karma is notorious for its significant reliability concerns, largely stemming from the company's financial instability and the ambitious nature of its technology for the time. Frequently reported problems often revolved around the sophisticated electrical and hybrid systems. Owners have reported issues with the battery pack, including premature degradation and failure. The charging system has also been a source of complaints, with inconsistencies in charging performance and connection problems.
The integration of the gasoline generator with the electric drivetrain proved to be complex, leading to issues with the engine not starting, running poorly, or the system failing to switch between power sources smoothly. The infotainment system, while advanced for its time, was often described as glitchy and unresponsive. Electrical gremlins were common, affecting various components from sensors to interior electronics. Software updates were infrequent due to the company's struggles, leaving many bugs unaddressed.
While specific model year variations in problems for the 2012 model are not distinctly documented in the way they might be for more established manufacturers, the entire production run of the 2012 Karma suffered from these underlying issues. Fisker Automotive faced bankruptcy and restructuring, which meant limited dealer support and a scarcity of specialized technicians. Finding replacement parts, especially for the unique hybrid components, became a significant challenge for owners.
Recalls, though not extensive, did occur. One notable recall involved a potential issue with the battery coolant lines, which could leak and cause a short circuit, posing a fire risk. Another addressed a potential problem with the steering system. The long-term reliability is heavily impacted by the lack of consistent maintenance and the difficulty in sourcing parts and expertise, making it a high-risk proposition for buyers seeking dependable transportation.
The integration of the gasoline generator with the electric drivetrain proved to be complex, leading to issues with the engine not starting, running poorly, or the system failing to switch between power sources smoothly. The infotainment system, while advanced for its time, was often described as glitchy and unresponsive. Electrical gremlins were common, affecting various components from sensors to interior electronics. Software updates were infrequent due to the company's struggles, leaving many bugs unaddressed.
While specific model year variations in problems for the 2012 model are not distinctly documented in the way they might be for more established manufacturers, the entire production run of the 2012 Karma suffered from these underlying issues. Fisker Automotive faced bankruptcy and restructuring, which meant limited dealer support and a scarcity of specialized technicians. Finding replacement parts, especially for the unique hybrid components, became a significant challenge for owners.
Recalls, though not extensive, did occur. One notable recall involved a potential issue with the battery coolant lines, which could leak and cause a short circuit, posing a fire risk. Another addressed a potential problem with the steering system. The long-term reliability is heavily impacted by the lack of consistent maintenance and the difficulty in sourcing parts and expertise, making it a high-risk proposition for buyers seeking dependable transportation.
How long will the 2012 Fisker Karma last?
Estimating average mileage or years of service for a 2012 Fisker Karma is challenging due to its limited production and the inherent reliability issues. Many owners, likely enthusiasts or early adopters, might have driven them less than a typical luxury car, perhaps averaging 5,000-10,000 miles per year. Consequently, many surviving Karmas might have accumulated between 40,000 and 80,000 miles. Long-term durability is significantly compromised by the battery's lifespan and the complexity of the hybrid system. Weaknesses that emerge over time include battery degradation, potential failure of the generator, and electrical system malfunctions. The car's future serviceability and longevity are heavily dependent on the availability of specialized mechanics and parts, which are scarce, making extensive long-term ownership uncertain.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2012 Fisker Karma boasted a tech and features list that aimed to position it at the forefront of luxury innovation, though its implementation was sometimes a challenge. The centerpiece of the interior tech was a large touchscreen infotainment system that controlled navigation, audio, climate, and vehicle settings. Standard entertainment features included a premium Bose audio system with multiple speakers, designed to deliver a rich sound experience. Bluetooth connectivity for hands-free calling and audio streaming was also integrated.
Driver-assistance features were relatively limited by modern standards. While it offered essential systems like anti-lock brakes (ABS), traction control, and stability control, advanced aids like adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, or lane-keeping assist were not widely available, if at all. Parking assistance, such as a rearview camera, was often included.
Safety features were standard for a luxury vehicle of its era. It was equipped with a suite of airbags, including front, side, and curtain airbags. The robust structure of the car was designed to protect occupants. However, official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 2012 Fisker Karma are not readily available. This lack of independent safety verification is a notable point. Optional features might have included larger alloy wheels and perhaps enhanced interior trim packages. The unique solar panel integrated into the roof was a technological highlight, intended to power auxiliary systems like the ventilation fan to keep the cabin cool when parked, reducing the load on the main battery.
Driver-assistance features were relatively limited by modern standards. While it offered essential systems like anti-lock brakes (ABS), traction control, and stability control, advanced aids like adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, or lane-keeping assist were not widely available, if at all. Parking assistance, such as a rearview camera, was often included.
Safety features were standard for a luxury vehicle of its era. It was equipped with a suite of airbags, including front, side, and curtain airbags. The robust structure of the car was designed to protect occupants. However, official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 2012 Fisker Karma are not readily available. This lack of independent safety verification is a notable point. Optional features might have included larger alloy wheels and perhaps enhanced interior trim packages. The unique solar panel integrated into the roof was a technological highlight, intended to power auxiliary systems like the ventilation fan to keep the cabin cool when parked, reducing the load on the main battery.
What Colors Options are Available?
2012 Fisker Karma Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2012 Fisker Karma carried a hefty price tag, starting around $95,900 and quickly escalating to over $100,000 with options. This positioned it squarely in the luxury and exotic car market. The used market prices for a 2012 Fisker Karma have plummeted dramatically since its launch. Today, you can find examples ranging from approximately $30,000 to $50,000, depending heavily on mileage, condition, and history. This represents significant depreciation, a common trait for low-volume, technologically complex, and company-challenged vehicles. Factors affecting resale value include the lingering concerns about long-term reliability, the scarcity of qualified service centers, limited parts availability, and the car's unique and polarizing nature. While its design can be a draw, the practicalities of ownership heavily influence its value.
2012 Fisker Karma Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2012 Fisker Karma is decidedly costly. Insurance premiums will be high, reflecting its luxury status and the cost of potential repairs. Fuel costs can be moderate if driven primarily on electric power for short commutes, but significantly increase when relying on the gasoline generator. Maintenance and repair are the biggest financial burdens. Due to its unique hybrid system and limited support network, expect specialized mechanic fees and potentially expensive parts. Finding replacement components for the battery or electrical systems can be a major challenge and very costly. Overall, the Fisker Karma is not an economical vehicle to own; it is a costly proposition with significant financial risks tied to its upkeep and long-term viability.
2012 Fisker Karma Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Electric
Fuel Capacity
9.5 gallons
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2012 Fisker Karma Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2012 Fisker Karma Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2012 Fisker Karma Insurance
Insurance for a 2012 Fisker Karma is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2012 Fisker Karma Compare to Other Sedan?
The 2012 Fisker Karma occupied a unique niche, aiming to blend luxury sedan comfort with cutting-edge electric propulsion. Its direct competitors were few but notable. In terms of performance, the Karma offered brisk acceleration thanks to its electric torque, with a 0-60 time around 5.9 seconds. This was competitive with other luxury sedans of the era, though its top speed was less impressive. Its standout feature was its design and range-extended electric concept. However, this is where its weaknesses became apparent when stacked against rivals.
Key Rivals:
Features: The Karma's interior design was striking and luxurious, often using unique materials. However, its infotainment system was less intuitive and more prone to glitches than the systems found in established luxury brands or Tesla. Its safety features, while adequate, lacked the advanced driver-assistance systems becoming standard elsewhere.
Reliability: This is where the Karma falls significantly short. Compared to the more robust engineering of Porsche, BMW, and the rapidly improving reliability of Tesla, the Karma was plagued with electrical and powertrain issues. The company's financial instability exacerbated these problems.
Price: At its new price point, the Karma was competitive with other high-end luxury sedans. However, its current used market value is significantly lower due to its aforementioned issues, making it a niche proposition for enthusiasts aware of the risks.
Recommendations: For buyers prioritizing reliability, a robust charging network, and cutting-edge technology, a used Tesla Model S (from 2012 onwards) would be a more practical and dependable alternative. If a luxury hybrid with a focus on driving dynamics and proven engineering is desired, a used Porsche Panamera Hybrid or a BMW ActiveHybrid 7 offers a more secure ownership experience. The Fisker Karma is best suited for collectors or enthusiasts who understand and are willing to accept the significant risks associated with its maintenance and long-term viability.
Key Rivals:
- Tesla Model S (early models): Launched shortly after the Karma, the Model S offered a more conventional all-electric experience with a focus on advanced technology and a growing charging infrastructure. The Model S generally surpassed the Karma in terms of pure electric range, software reliability, and overall technological advancement. While initially pricier, its depreciation was often more predictable.
- Porsche Panamera Hybrid: The Panamera Hybrid offered a more traditional performance luxury experience with a focus on driving dynamics and established German engineering. While it may have been less revolutionary in its hybrid approach, its reliability and build quality were far superior. Its performance was also more consistently sporty.
- BMW ActiveHybrid 7: This offered a more established luxury sedan experience with a hybrid powertrain focused on efficiency and refinement rather than outright performance innovation. It benefited from BMW's extensive dealer network and proven reliability.
Features: The Karma's interior design was striking and luxurious, often using unique materials. However, its infotainment system was less intuitive and more prone to glitches than the systems found in established luxury brands or Tesla. Its safety features, while adequate, lacked the advanced driver-assistance systems becoming standard elsewhere.
Reliability: This is where the Karma falls significantly short. Compared to the more robust engineering of Porsche, BMW, and the rapidly improving reliability of Tesla, the Karma was plagued with electrical and powertrain issues. The company's financial instability exacerbated these problems.
Price: At its new price point, the Karma was competitive with other high-end luxury sedans. However, its current used market value is significantly lower due to its aforementioned issues, making it a niche proposition for enthusiasts aware of the risks.
Recommendations: For buyers prioritizing reliability, a robust charging network, and cutting-edge technology, a used Tesla Model S (from 2012 onwards) would be a more practical and dependable alternative. If a luxury hybrid with a focus on driving dynamics and proven engineering is desired, a used Porsche Panamera Hybrid or a BMW ActiveHybrid 7 offers a more secure ownership experience. The Fisker Karma is best suited for collectors or enthusiasts who understand and are willing to accept the significant risks associated with its maintenance and long-term viability.
Final Verdict: Is the 2012 Fisker Karma a Good Sedan?
The 2012 Fisker Karma is ideal for a very specific type of buyer: a collector or enthusiast who prioritizes unique, head-turning design and the concept of an early luxury range-extended electric vehicle, and who has a significant budget for potential repairs and maintenance. It is generally not worth buying for someone seeking reliable daily transportation. If considering a purchase, it must be done with eyes wide open to its significant reliability concerns and the scarcity of parts and service. Buying used is the only practical option, as new prices were prohibitively high. A thorough pre-purchase inspection by a specialist familiar with hybrid powertrains is absolutely essential. This is a car for the passionate, not the practical.