The 1982 Subaru Brat, a compact, two-door, four-wheel-drive pickup truck, was produced from 1978 to 1994. Known for its distinctive rear-facing jump seats in the cargo bed, it offered a unique blend of car-like handling and off-road capability. Its popularity stems from its quirky design, affordability, and go-anywhere attitude, making it a cult classic among enthusiasts. Early models, including the 1982 iteration, were often found in base and DL trims.
The Good
The 1982 Subaru Brat excels with its tenacious four-wheel-drive system, offering surprising off-road capability. Its rugged reliability, simple mechanics, and fuel efficiency make it a practical choice, while its iconic, quirky design appeals to those seeking a unique and fun-to-drive vehicle with excellent value.
The Bad
When considering a 1982 Subaru Brat, watch out for significant rust, particularly in the unibody structure, wheel wells, and rocker panels. Clutch wear, carburetor issues, and aging suspension components are also common concerns requiring attention from potential buyers.
1982 Subaru Brat: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Subaru Brat primarily featured a 1.8-liter EA71 horizontally opposed (flat-four) gasoline engine.
- Horsepower: This engine typically produced around 70-73 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Estimated fuel economy for the 1982 Brat was in the range of 20-25 MPG combined, depending on driving conditions and transmission.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was not a strong suit; 0-60 MPH times were generally in the 15-18 second range.
- Towing Capacity: The Brat was not designed for heavy towing. Its towing capacity was very limited, typically around 1,000 pounds when properly equipped with trailer brakes, but often less. It was more suited for light utility trailers.
- Trim-Level Features:
Base Trim: Typically included the essential 4WD system, a simple interior, AM radio, and vinyl seats. Functional and utilitarian. - DL (Deluxe) Trim: Offered a slightly more refined experience with features like upgraded interior trim, potentially a nicer AM/FM radio, carpeting, and sometimes power steering (though often optional). The defining characteristic across all trims was the dual-range 4WD system. Another notable, albeit informal, feature across many models were the rear-mounted, side-facing jump seats, intended to technically classify it as a passenger vehicle for import tariff purposes, avoiding the "chicken tax" on imported small trucks.
1982 Subaru Brat Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1982 |
| Make | Subaru |
| Model | Brat |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | GUNMA |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.8L H4 |
| Engine Size | 1.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Manual Overdrive |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1982 Subaru Brat Have?
The 1982 Subaru Brat, like many vehicles of its era, has its share of known issues and long-term concerns. A primary area of concern is rust. The unibody construction is susceptible to corrosion, especially in areas with harsh winters or coastal climates. Common rust spots include the rocker panels, floor pans, wheel arches, and the rear crossmember. Early inspection for rust is critical.
Mechanical components can also present challenges. The EA71 engine, while generally robust, can suffer from head gasket issues over time, though less commonly than in some other boxer engines. Carburetor problems, ignition system wear, and aging cooling systems are also frequent. The clutch and transmission can wear out, particularly if the vehicle has been used for off-roading or heavy hauling.
Suspension and steering components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, will likely need replacement on higher-mileage examples. The 4WD system, while generally reliable, should be checked for proper engagement and any unusual noises. Power steering, if equipped, can develop leaks or pump issues.
Electrical systems can be temperamental; aging wiring harnesses, corroded connections, and failing alternators or starters are not uncommon. The exterior trim and interior components can also degrade due to age and sun exposure.
While there weren't widespread, model-year-specific recalls that are commonly cited as major issues for the 1982 model year, the general wear and tear associated with a vehicle of this age is the most significant long-term reliability concern. Regular and proactive maintenance is key to mitigating many of these potential problems and ensuring continued longevity. Finding a well-maintained example significantly reduces the risk of immediate, costly repairs.
Mechanical components can also present challenges. The EA71 engine, while generally robust, can suffer from head gasket issues over time, though less commonly than in some other boxer engines. Carburetor problems, ignition system wear, and aging cooling systems are also frequent. The clutch and transmission can wear out, particularly if the vehicle has been used for off-roading or heavy hauling.
Suspension and steering components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, will likely need replacement on higher-mileage examples. The 4WD system, while generally reliable, should be checked for proper engagement and any unusual noises. Power steering, if equipped, can develop leaks or pump issues.
Electrical systems can be temperamental; aging wiring harnesses, corroded connections, and failing alternators or starters are not uncommon. The exterior trim and interior components can also degrade due to age and sun exposure.
While there weren't widespread, model-year-specific recalls that are commonly cited as major issues for the 1982 model year, the general wear and tear associated with a vehicle of this age is the most significant long-term reliability concern. Regular and proactive maintenance is key to mitigating many of these potential problems and ensuring continued longevity. Finding a well-maintained example significantly reduces the risk of immediate, costly repairs.
How long will the 1982 Subaru Brat last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance, a well-maintained 1982 Subaru Brat can realistically achieve 200,000 to 250,000 miles, and some have far exceeded this. Its long-term durability is surprisingly good, owing to its simple mechanical design and robust (for its time) 4WD system. However, weaknesses emerge over time, primarily rust-related structural degradation and wear on drivetrain components, suspension, and the clutch. Owners who diligently address rust prevention and perform regular fluid changes and component checks can extend its service life significantly. Neglect, particularly regarding rust and routine maintenance, will severely limit its lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Subaru Brat is a product of its time, meaning its technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features are decidedly basic. Built-in tech was minimal, typically revolving around the core functions of the vehicle. Standard entertainment often consisted of a simple AM radio, with an optional AM/FM radio available on higher trims like the DL. There was no concept of digital media, Bluetooth, or touchscreen interfaces.
Driver-assistance features as we know them today simply did not exist. There were no ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), traction control, stability control, backup cameras, or lane-keeping assist. The primary driver assistance was the dual-range 4WD system, which, while not a technological feature in the modern sense, significantly enhanced the vehicle's ability to navigate challenging terrain and inclement weather. The availability of power steering was an option that improved maneuverability, making it easier to drive.
Safety features were equally rudimentary. Standard safety equipment generally included three-point seat belts (lap belts were common in the rear jump seats if equipped), and a reinforced passenger cabin. Headrests were standard. The vehicle's structure was designed for basic crash protection, but it lacked the advanced crumple zones, airbags (which were not common in passenger vehicles until much later), or sophisticated safety cell designs found in modern cars.
Specific crash-test ratings for the 1982 Subaru Brat are not readily available in the same way modern vehicles are tested by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Vehicles from this era underwent less stringent testing, and comprehensive data for specific models is often difficult to find. Overall, the Brat prioritizes mechanical simplicity and utility over advanced technology and comprehensive safety systems.
Driver-assistance features as we know them today simply did not exist. There were no ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), traction control, stability control, backup cameras, or lane-keeping assist. The primary driver assistance was the dual-range 4WD system, which, while not a technological feature in the modern sense, significantly enhanced the vehicle's ability to navigate challenging terrain and inclement weather. The availability of power steering was an option that improved maneuverability, making it easier to drive.
Safety features were equally rudimentary. Standard safety equipment generally included three-point seat belts (lap belts were common in the rear jump seats if equipped), and a reinforced passenger cabin. Headrests were standard. The vehicle's structure was designed for basic crash protection, but it lacked the advanced crumple zones, airbags (which were not common in passenger vehicles until much later), or sophisticated safety cell designs found in modern cars.
Specific crash-test ratings for the 1982 Subaru Brat are not readily available in the same way modern vehicles are tested by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Vehicles from this era underwent less stringent testing, and comprehensive data for specific models is often difficult to find. Overall, the Brat prioritizes mechanical simplicity and utility over advanced technology and comprehensive safety systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Subaru Brat Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1982 Subaru Brat typically ranged from approximately $6,000 to $8,000, depending on the trim level and optional equipment. As is typical for vehicles of this age, the Brat experienced significant depreciation in its early years. However, in recent times, the market has seen a resurgence in interest for these quirky 4x4s. Current used market prices can vary widely, from $2,000-$3,000 for vehicles needing significant work, to $8,000-$15,000+ for well-preserved, low-mileage examples in excellent condition. Factors affecting resale value include the extent of rust, mechanical condition, originality, and overall cosmetic appeal. The unique design and off-road capability contribute to its cult status, driving up prices for desirable specimens.
1982 Subaru Brat Cost of Ownership
The 1982 Subaru Brat is generally economical to own. Insurance premiums are typically low due to its age and classification as a classic or enthusiast vehicle. Fuel costs are moderate, with its 1.8L engine achieving decent MPG. Maintenance is relatively inexpensive due to the simplicity of its mechanical components and widespread availability of parts, though specialized mechanics might charge more. Repairs can be affordable for common issues, but rust remediation can significantly increase costs. Overall, it's an economical vehicle to own, provided one finds a solid example and performs regular upkeep.
1982 Subaru Brat Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1982 Subaru Brat Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1982 Subaru Brat Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Subaru Brat is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Subaru Brat Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1982 Subaru Brat occupied a unique niche, often competing indirectly with other compact pickup trucks and small 4x4 utility vehicles of the era. Its key rivals included vehicles like the Datsun/Nissan King Cab, Toyota SR5, and the Suzuki Samurai (introduced later in the decade but capturing a similar spirit).
In terms of performance, the Brat's horizontally opposed engine and standard 4WD offered decent off-road capability and all-weather traction, often surpassing the rear-wheel-drive biased competitors. However, its on-road acceleration and top speed were generally less impressive than more powerful truck offerings.
Regarding features, the Brat was decidedly spartan compared to some rivals, especially by today's standards. While it offered the unique jump seats, it lacked the creature comforts and advanced options available on some Japanese trucks, such as more powerful engine choices or longer bed options. The Suzuki Samurai offered a more dedicated off-road focus but lacked the utility of a pickup bed.
Reliability is a mixed bag. Subaru's reputation for durability was building, and the Brat's simple mechanicals meant many components were robust. However, rust was a significant Achilles' heel for all vehicles in this class, and the Brat was no exception. Datsun and Toyota trucks of this era often had a reputation for being workhorses with bulletproof powertrains, though they might have lacked the Brat's standard 4WD.
In terms of price, the Brat was generally competitively priced when new, offering good value for its 4WD capability. Used market prices for the Brat have seen a significant increase due to its cult status, sometimes exceeding comparable examples of its contemporaries.
Alternatives: For those seeking a similar rugged, compact 4x4 experience, a well-preserved Suzuki Samurai offers extreme off-road prowess but lacks the utility. A Toyota SR5 4x4 or Datsun/Nissan King Cab 4x4 from the same era would offer more traditional pickup truck utility and potentially more refined on-road manners, though often at a higher used price point and with their own rust concerns. For a more modern, but still capable, compact 4x4 utility vehicle, consider a Jeep Wrangler or a Toyota 4Runner, though these are larger and more expensive.
In terms of performance, the Brat's horizontally opposed engine and standard 4WD offered decent off-road capability and all-weather traction, often surpassing the rear-wheel-drive biased competitors. However, its on-road acceleration and top speed were generally less impressive than more powerful truck offerings.
Regarding features, the Brat was decidedly spartan compared to some rivals, especially by today's standards. While it offered the unique jump seats, it lacked the creature comforts and advanced options available on some Japanese trucks, such as more powerful engine choices or longer bed options. The Suzuki Samurai offered a more dedicated off-road focus but lacked the utility of a pickup bed.
Reliability is a mixed bag. Subaru's reputation for durability was building, and the Brat's simple mechanicals meant many components were robust. However, rust was a significant Achilles' heel for all vehicles in this class, and the Brat was no exception. Datsun and Toyota trucks of this era often had a reputation for being workhorses with bulletproof powertrains, though they might have lacked the Brat's standard 4WD.
In terms of price, the Brat was generally competitively priced when new, offering good value for its 4WD capability. Used market prices for the Brat have seen a significant increase due to its cult status, sometimes exceeding comparable examples of its contemporaries.
Alternatives: For those seeking a similar rugged, compact 4x4 experience, a well-preserved Suzuki Samurai offers extreme off-road prowess but lacks the utility. A Toyota SR5 4x4 or Datsun/Nissan King Cab 4x4 from the same era would offer more traditional pickup truck utility and potentially more refined on-road manners, though often at a higher used price point and with their own rust concerns. For a more modern, but still capable, compact 4x4 utility vehicle, consider a Jeep Wrangler or a Toyota 4Runner, though these are larger and more expensive.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Subaru Brat a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1982 Subaru Brat is ideal for automotive enthusiasts, off-road adventurers, and collectors who appreciate quirky, utilitarian vehicles with a unique heritage. It's worth buying for those seeking a fun, capable, and relatively simple 4x4 that stands out from the crowd. However, it is strictly a used vehicle purchase. Buyers should prioritize examples with minimal rust, a well-documented maintenance history, and a functional drivetrain. Condition is paramount; a pristine, original Brat will command a premium, while a project vehicle requires significant investment in restoration. It's not a daily driver for everyone due to its age, basic amenities, and potential for ongoing maintenance. Focus on finding a mechanically sound unit, as that is the Brat's strongest suit.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma