2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 is a cab-over-engine (COE) truck, often utilized for commercial purposes like delivery and specialized work. It falls within the light-duty truck segment, known for its compact yet capable design. Specific trims varied based on upfitting, but the 360 COE 50 generally offered a practical platform. Its popularity stemmed from its maneuverability in urban environments and its adaptable chassis for various vocational needs. Pricing varied significantly based on configuration and equipment.
The Good
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 offers excellent visibility and maneuverability, ideal for tight urban routes. Its robust construction appeals to practical buyers focused on durability, while its utilitarian design and potential for customization can be an emotional draw for owner-operators.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of limited cabin comfort for long-haul driving and the possibility of wear and tear on drivetrain components due to its commercial nature. Rust can also be a concern, especially in regions with harsh weather.
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 was typically powered by a 4.8-liter V8 gasoline engine. Diesel options, often from Mercedes-Benz, were also available, providing more torque and fuel efficiency for commercial applications.
- Horsepower: Gasoline V8 engines generally produced around 200-250 horsepower, while the diesel engines could range from 150 to over 200 horsepower, depending on the specific unit and configuration.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy figures for the Sterling 360 COE 50 were highly dependent on the engine type, transmission, load, and driving conditions. For the gasoline V8, expect figures in the range of 10-15 MPG city and 13-18 MPG highway. Diesel variants would generally offer better mileage, potentially 15-20 MPG combined.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times were not a primary consideration for this class of vehicle and are not typically published. Performance was focused on low-end torque for hauling and maneuvering rather than acceleration.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity varied significantly based on the chassis configuration, axle ratios, and any factory or aftermarket towing packages. Light-duty models might have a towing capacity in the range of 5,000 to 10,000 pounds, while heavier-duty upfits could exceed this.
- Trim-Level Features: As a commercial-oriented vehicle, trim levels were less about luxury and more about functionality. Standard features often included power steering, power brakes, and basic AM/FM radio. Optional features could include air conditioning, power windows and locks (though less common on base models), and upgraded seating or interior materials. The primary 'trim' was often dictated by the body style and upfitting (e.g., dry van, stake bed, chassis cab for customization).
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2007 |
| Make | Sterling |
| Model | 360 COE 50 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | KAWASAKI-SHI |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.9L I6 |
| Engine Size | 4.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Have?
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50, being a commercial vehicle, can exhibit common issues related to its heavy use. One frequently reported concern revolves around the drivetrain, particularly with higher mileage units. Transmission issues, such as slipping or difficulty shifting, can arise, especially if fluid changes have been neglected. Axle seals and bearings may also require attention over time.
The braking system is another area where wear and tear can become noticeable. Brake pads, rotors, and drums will eventually need replacement, and hydraulic lines can develop leaks. For models equipped with air brakes, regular maintenance of the air compressor and associated valves is crucial.
Corrosion is a significant long-term reliability concern, particularly for vehicles operating in areas with salt on the roads. Rust can affect the frame, body panels, and suspension components. Thorough inspection for rust, especially around wheel wells, cab corners, and the underside of the chassis, is highly recommended during a pre-purchase inspection.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon in commercial vehicles that often have auxiliary wiring for various upfits. Issues with lighting, dashboard indicators, or power accessories can occur. Wiring harnesses can become frayed or corroded, leading to intermittent problems.
While specific model year recalls for the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 are not widely documented in a consolidated manner due to its niche commercial nature, owners should always check for any outstanding safety recalls through the NHTSA database using the vehicle's VIN. Generally, the reliability of the Sterling 360 COE 50 is highly dependent on the quality of its initial manufacturing, its intended use, and, most importantly, the rigor of its maintenance schedule. Neglected maintenance will invariably lead to accelerated wear and a higher likelihood of component failures.
The braking system is another area where wear and tear can become noticeable. Brake pads, rotors, and drums will eventually need replacement, and hydraulic lines can develop leaks. For models equipped with air brakes, regular maintenance of the air compressor and associated valves is crucial.
Corrosion is a significant long-term reliability concern, particularly for vehicles operating in areas with salt on the roads. Rust can affect the frame, body panels, and suspension components. Thorough inspection for rust, especially around wheel wells, cab corners, and the underside of the chassis, is highly recommended during a pre-purchase inspection.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon in commercial vehicles that often have auxiliary wiring for various upfits. Issues with lighting, dashboard indicators, or power accessories can occur. Wiring harnesses can become frayed or corroded, leading to intermittent problems.
While specific model year recalls for the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 are not widely documented in a consolidated manner due to its niche commercial nature, owners should always check for any outstanding safety recalls through the NHTSA database using the vehicle's VIN. Generally, the reliability of the Sterling 360 COE 50 is highly dependent on the quality of its initial manufacturing, its intended use, and, most importantly, the rigor of its maintenance schedule. Neglected maintenance will invariably lead to accelerated wear and a higher likelihood of component failures.
How long will the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits for commercial vehicles, a 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 can realistically achieve between 200,000 to 300,000 miles or more. Its long-term durability is heavily influenced by consistent, high-quality maintenance. Vehicles used for frequent, heavy-duty work or those with irregular service intervals might see a significantly shorter service life, potentially below 150,000 miles. Weaknesses that emerge over time include increased susceptibility to rust, wear on the transmission and suspension components, and potential electrical issues. However, with diligent upkeep, the core powertrain and chassis can prove quite robust.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50, primarily designed as a commercial workhorse, offered a functional rather than feature-rich interior. Built-in technology and entertainment were basic, often limited to an AM/FM radio with an optional CD player. Power windows and door locks were not standard on all configurations and would be considered optional upgrades.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the modern sense. Systems like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were available, particularly on models with higher GVWRs, as a crucial safety component for a vehicle of its class. However, features such as traction control, stability control, or advanced driver aids were not typically offered.
Safety features focused on essential passive safety for the era. Standard equipment usually included seat belts and basic interior padding. The cab-over design offered excellent forward visibility, which is a passive safety benefit, allowing the driver to better perceive their surroundings and avoid potential hazards.
Due to its specialized commercial nature, comprehensive crash-test ratings from organizations like the IIHS or NHTSA for the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 are not readily available or comparable to passenger vehicles. The design prioritizes robustness and cargo capacity over the same safety metrics applied to consumer cars and SUVs. Any optional safety equipment would likely have been limited to more robust braking systems or potentially heavy-duty exterior lighting. The focus was on functional safety for its intended vocational use.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the modern sense. Systems like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were available, particularly on models with higher GVWRs, as a crucial safety component for a vehicle of its class. However, features such as traction control, stability control, or advanced driver aids were not typically offered.
Safety features focused on essential passive safety for the era. Standard equipment usually included seat belts and basic interior padding. The cab-over design offered excellent forward visibility, which is a passive safety benefit, allowing the driver to better perceive their surroundings and avoid potential hazards.
Due to its specialized commercial nature, comprehensive crash-test ratings from organizations like the IIHS or NHTSA for the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 are not readily available or comparable to passenger vehicles. The design prioritizes robustness and cargo capacity over the same safety metrics applied to consumer cars and SUVs. Any optional safety equipment would likely have been limited to more robust braking systems or potentially heavy-duty exterior lighting. The focus was on functional safety for its intended vocational use.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50's price varied significantly based on its specific upfitting and configuration, ranging from approximately $30,000 to $50,000 or more for specialized vocational models. As a commercial vehicle, its depreciation curve is different from passenger cars. Initially, it depreciates rapidly as it enters service. However, well-maintained units with desirable upfits can hold their value relatively well in the used market, especially for businesses seeking a reliable work truck. Current used market prices typically range from $5,000 to $15,000, heavily dependent on mileage, condition, and the type of body installed. Factors like rust, engine hours, and overall mechanical health significantly impact resale value.
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 can be moderately costly. Insurance premiums will likely be higher than for a passenger car due to its commercial classification. Fuel costs are a significant factor, especially with gasoline engines, which average 10-15 MPG. Maintenance and repair costs can be substantial, as parts are often heavier-duty and labor rates for commercial vehicles can be higher. Regular maintenance is crucial to avoid more expensive repairs. Overall, it's not an economical vehicle to own for personal use but can be cost-effective for businesses when its utility is factored in.
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Insurance
Insurance for a 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 Compare to Other Truck?
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 competed in a niche segment against other light-duty cab-over-engine trucks. Key rivals would have included models like the Isuzu NPR, Mitsubishi Fuso FE Series, and Hino 155.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, these COE trucks are generally comparable, prioritizing torque and maneuverability over acceleration. The Sterling 360 COE 50 often featured robust gasoline V8s or reliable diesel options that provided adequate power for its intended vocational use. Rivals like Isuzu and Hino also offered strong diesel powertrains, often with a reputation for fuel efficiency and longevity.
Features: Feature sets across this class were typically basic and utilitarian. The Sterling 360 COE 50 offered essential functions, with optional upgrades for comfort. Competitors generally offered similar levels of standard equipment, with options for air conditioning, power accessories, and more comfortable seating. None of these vehicles were known for advanced technology or infotainment systems of the era.
Reliability: Reliability is a mixed bag and highly dependent on maintenance. Isuzu and Hino often have a strong reputation for diesel engine reliability and overall durability in commercial applications. Sterling, being part of the Freightliner/Daimler Trucks family, also benefited from solid engineering, but individual unit maintenance history is paramount. All these trucks require diligent upkeep to avoid costly repairs.
Price: When new, prices were in a similar ballpark. In the used market, the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 can be found at competitive prices, often comparable to or slightly less than equivalent Isuzu, Fuso, or Hino models, especially if mileage or condition is a factor.
Alternatives: For similar utility and maneuverability, similar model years of the Isuzu NPR and Mitsubishi Fuso FE Series are strong alternatives, often favored for their well-regarded diesel engines and widespread parts availability. If budget is the primary concern and a slightly older unit is acceptable, older models of these competitors can also serve as viable options. For those prioritizing modern features, a used conventional pickup truck might be considered, though it would sacrifice the tight turning radius and visibility of a COE design.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, these COE trucks are generally comparable, prioritizing torque and maneuverability over acceleration. The Sterling 360 COE 50 often featured robust gasoline V8s or reliable diesel options that provided adequate power for its intended vocational use. Rivals like Isuzu and Hino also offered strong diesel powertrains, often with a reputation for fuel efficiency and longevity.
Features: Feature sets across this class were typically basic and utilitarian. The Sterling 360 COE 50 offered essential functions, with optional upgrades for comfort. Competitors generally offered similar levels of standard equipment, with options for air conditioning, power accessories, and more comfortable seating. None of these vehicles were known for advanced technology or infotainment systems of the era.
Reliability: Reliability is a mixed bag and highly dependent on maintenance. Isuzu and Hino often have a strong reputation for diesel engine reliability and overall durability in commercial applications. Sterling, being part of the Freightliner/Daimler Trucks family, also benefited from solid engineering, but individual unit maintenance history is paramount. All these trucks require diligent upkeep to avoid costly repairs.
Price: When new, prices were in a similar ballpark. In the used market, the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 can be found at competitive prices, often comparable to or slightly less than equivalent Isuzu, Fuso, or Hino models, especially if mileage or condition is a factor.
Alternatives: For similar utility and maneuverability, similar model years of the Isuzu NPR and Mitsubishi Fuso FE Series are strong alternatives, often favored for their well-regarded diesel engines and widespread parts availability. If budget is the primary concern and a slightly older unit is acceptable, older models of these competitors can also serve as viable options. For those prioritizing modern features, a used conventional pickup truck might be considered, though it would sacrifice the tight turning radius and visibility of a COE design.
Final Verdict: Is the 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 a Good Truck?
The 2007 Sterling 360 COE 50 is ideally suited for small businesses, tradespeople, or individuals requiring a compact, maneuverable commercial vehicle for urban deliveries or specialized upfitting. It is worth buying primarily in the used market, provided it has been well-maintained and inspected thoroughly for rust and mechanical issues. Its primary appeal lies in its tight turning radius and excellent visibility. Purchasing this vehicle is most sensible when its specific utilitarian benefits align with a business need that a conventional truck cannot easily fulfill. It is not recommended for personal use due to its basic comfort and fuel economy. Focus on models with documented maintenance history and ideally a reliable diesel engine for better long-term economy.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.