1982 Chevrolet Citation Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 1982 Chevrolet Citation was part of a popular front-wheel-drive compact car line produced by Chevrolet from 1980 to 1985. Available as a two-door hatchback, two-door coupe, and four-door hatchback, it aimed to offer fuel efficiency and practicality. Key trims included the base, sporty X-11, and the more luxurious Bell Air. Its popularity stemmed from its modern FWD layout and competitive pricing in the early 1980s, making it a notable offering from GM during that era.
The Good
The 1982 Citation offered a practical and efficient package, with decent fuel economy appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Its compact FWD design provided good maneuverability, and some trims offered a sporty appeal for those seeking a bit of flair. It was a value-oriented choice for everyday transportation.
The Bad
Potential owners of the 1982 Chevrolet Citation should be aware of common issues such as transmission problems, particularly with automatic transmissions, and potential rust issues, especially in colder climates. Electrical gremlins and aging suspension components are also areas to inspect.
1982 Chevrolet Citation: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Chevrolet Citation was available with a range of engines to suit different needs and budgets.
- 2.5L (151 cu in) Iron Duke inline-four: This was a common base engine, known for its fuel efficiency. Horsepower typically ranged around 90 hp.
- 2.8L (173 cu in) LE2 V6: A more powerful option, offering a noticeable boost in performance. Horsepower for this engine was generally around 115 hp.
- 3.0L (181 cu in) V6: In some configurations, a slightly larger V6 might have been available, offering similar or slightly higher power output.
- 2.5L (151 cu in) Iron Duke inline-four: This was a common base engine, known for its fuel efficiency. Horsepower typically ranged around 90 hp.
- Horsepower: Ranged from approximately 90 hp for the base four-cylinder to around 115 hp for the V6 options.
- Fuel Economy: While exact EPA figures vary by engine and transmission, the Citation was designed for good fuel economy. Expect figures in the range of 20-25 MPG city and 28-35 MPG highway for the four-cylinder, with the V6 being slightly lower.
- 0-60 Times: These were not a strong suit for the Citation, especially with the base engine. Expect times in the 12-15 second range for the four-cylinder, with V6 models being a bit quicker, perhaps in the 10-12 second range.
- Towing Capacity: The Chevrolet Citation was not designed for towing. It had a very limited or non-existent official towing capacity, intended primarily for passenger and light cargo transport.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Typically featured standard manual transmission, basic interior appointments, and essential features.
- Bell Air: Often denoted a more comfort-oriented trim with enhanced interior materials, possibly upgraded upholstery, and additional amenities like a better radio.
- X-11: This was the performance-oriented trim. It usually came with the V6 engine, sportier suspension tuning, upgraded wheels and tires, distinct exterior badging, and often interior sport accents. It was the most engaging version of the Citation.
- Base: Typically featured standard manual transmission, basic interior appointments, and essential features.
1982 Chevrolet Citation Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1982 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Citation |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2-Door |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SLEEPY HOLLOW |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.8L V6 |
| Engine Size | 2.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1982 Chevrolet Citation Have?
The 1982 Chevrolet Citation, like many vehicles of its era, is known for a few recurring issues that prospective owners should be aware of. One of the most frequently reported problems centers around the transmission, particularly the automatic transmissions. Many owners have experienced premature failure or a decline in performance over time. This can manifest as slipping gears, harsh shifting, or complete loss of drive. The front-wheel-drive system, while innovative for its time, can also be a source of concern, with CV joints sometimes requiring replacement due to wear and tear.
Rust is another significant long-term reliability concern, especially for vehicles that have spent their lives in areas with harsh winters and road salt. Common areas for rust to form include the wheel wells, rocker panels, floor pans, and around the windows. Addressing rust early is crucial to prevent it from compromising the structural integrity of the vehicle.
Electrical issues are not uncommon in vehicles of this vintage. Owners have reported problems with the instrument cluster, lighting systems, and various sensors. These can be frustrating to diagnose and repair. The suspension system, including ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings, can also wear out over time, leading to sloppy handling and potential safety issues if not maintained.
While specific widespread recalls for major powertrain or safety defects directly tied to the 1982 model year that are universally problematic are not as prominent as some other vehicles, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any recalls that may have been issued. General wear and tear on components like the radiator, exhaust system, and brake components are also to be expected with age and mileage. Long-term reliability largely depends on the level of maintenance the vehicle has received throughout its life.
Rust is another significant long-term reliability concern, especially for vehicles that have spent their lives in areas with harsh winters and road salt. Common areas for rust to form include the wheel wells, rocker panels, floor pans, and around the windows. Addressing rust early is crucial to prevent it from compromising the structural integrity of the vehicle.
Electrical issues are not uncommon in vehicles of this vintage. Owners have reported problems with the instrument cluster, lighting systems, and various sensors. These can be frustrating to diagnose and repair. The suspension system, including ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings, can also wear out over time, leading to sloppy handling and potential safety issues if not maintained.
While specific widespread recalls for major powertrain or safety defects directly tied to the 1982 model year that are universally problematic are not as prominent as some other vehicles, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any recalls that may have been issued. General wear and tear on components like the radiator, exhaust system, and brake components are also to be expected with age and mileage. Long-term reliability largely depends on the level of maintenance the vehicle has received throughout its life.
How long will the 1982 Chevrolet Citation last?
Estimating the average mileage or years of service for a 1982 Chevrolet Citation is challenging due to its age and the wide variability in maintenance. However, well-maintained examples, particularly those with the V6 engine and regular oil changes, could realistically achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more. Cars that received consistent care, including timely transmission fluid changes and addressing rust promptly, would undoubtedly last longer. Conversely, neglected Citations often succumb to transmission failures, significant rust damage, or electrical problems well before reaching higher mileages. The long-term durability is significantly influenced by the owner's commitment to preventative maintenance and their willingness to address common wear-and-tear items as they arise. Without proper upkeep, its weaknesses can drastically shorten its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Chevrolet Citation was a product of its time, meaning its technological offerings were relatively basic compared to today's standards. The built-in tech primarily consisted of the core functions of driving. Entertainment options were typically limited to an AM/FM radio, with an optional cassette player being a more premium feature for those seeking enhanced audio playback. Some models might have offered a premium speaker system.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the modern sense. There were no advanced cruise control systems, lane departure warnings, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on fundamental vehicle operation. Standard safety features included seat belts (lap belts in the rear), padded dashboards, and energy-absorbing steering columns, all designed to meet the safety regulations of the early 1980s.
Optional safety features might have included power steering and power brakes, which were not always standard on base models, making the vehicle easier to handle and stop. Some models could have been equipped with intermittent windshield wipers, a convenience feature that offered a slight improvement in driver comfort during varied weather conditions.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this era are often difficult to find or less detailed than modern tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) was in its early stages of development, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided frontal crash test data. However, comprehensive side-impact and rollover testing as we know it today was not as prevalent. It's reasonable to assume that the Citation, like many cars of its era, would not perform as well in modern crash tests as contemporary vehicles due to advancements in safety cell design, airbags (which were not available on this model), and restraint systems.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the modern sense. There were no advanced cruise control systems, lane departure warnings, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on fundamental vehicle operation. Standard safety features included seat belts (lap belts in the rear), padded dashboards, and energy-absorbing steering columns, all designed to meet the safety regulations of the early 1980s.
Optional safety features might have included power steering and power brakes, which were not always standard on base models, making the vehicle easier to handle and stop. Some models could have been equipped with intermittent windshield wipers, a convenience feature that offered a slight improvement in driver comfort during varied weather conditions.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this era are often difficult to find or less detailed than modern tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) was in its early stages of development, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided frontal crash test data. However, comprehensive side-impact and rollover testing as we know it today was not as prevalent. It's reasonable to assume that the Citation, like many cars of its era, would not perform as well in modern crash tests as contemporary vehicles due to advancements in safety cell design, airbags (which were not available on this model), and restraint systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Chevrolet Citation Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1982 Chevrolet Citation had a starting price that was competitive for its class, generally ranging from around $7,000 to $9,000 depending on the trim level and options chosen. Today, current used market prices for the 1982 Citation are typically very low, often falling between $2,000 and $5,000 for examples in decent, drivable condition. However, pristine, low-mileage, or exceptionally well-maintained X-11 models might command slightly higher prices. The vehicle experienced significant depreciation from new, which is typical for mass-produced cars of that era. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, originality, mileage, the presence of rust, and mechanical soundness. The X-11 trim tends to hold its value slightly better due to its sportier appeal, but it remains a budget-friendly classic.
1982 Chevrolet Citation Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1982 Chevrolet Citation is generally economical. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and modest value. Fuel costs are reasonable, especially with the four-cylinder engine, offering decent MPG. Maintenance and repair costs can be relatively affordable, as many parts are readily available and mechanics are familiar with these vehicles. However, unexpected repairs on aging components like transmissions or rust-related issues can arise. Overall, for a well-maintained example, it's an economical car to own, especially when compared to more complex or specialized vehicles. It is not considered costly to own, provided one is prepared for potential age-related repairs.
1982 Chevrolet Citation Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1982 Chevrolet Citation Recalls & Defects
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe and CAP
Recall date
1982-03-08
Recall no.
82v021000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Under Certaain Conditions, THE Hose Clamps ON THE Fuel Tank Filler Pipe and Fuel Tank Filler Vent Pipe Could Fracture. THE Fracture OF These Clamps Could Cause Fuel Leakage AT ANY OF THE Four Pipe TO Hose Connections. Leakage CAN Occur During Refueling, or While Driving, IF THE Fuel Tank IS Above 3/4 Full.
Consequence
Remedy
Dealer Will Inspect and Replace THE Hose Clamps ON THE Fuel Tank Filler Pipe and Vent Pipe AT NO Cost TO Owner.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Fuel; Fuel Tank, Filler and Vent Pipes.consequences OF Defect: IF AN Ignition Source IS Present When Fuel Leakageoccurs, A Fire Could Start and Cause Vehicle Damage and Serious Personalinjury.note: Until THE Vehicle CAN BE Inspected and THE Necessary Modifications Aremade, THE Fuel Tank Should NOT BE Filled More Than 3/4 Full. Also, THE Dealershould BE Contacted Immediately IF ANY Fuel Leakage IS Detected.
Power Train:clutch Assembly:pedal/Hand Lever(Motorcycle)
Recall date
1982-03-02
Recall no.
82v018000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Clutch Cable MAY RUB Against THE Master Cylinder Brake Pipe When THE Clutch Pedal IS Operated. Continued Operation OF THE Vehicle MAY Result IN Wear Through OF THE Insulation ON THE Clutch Cable. THE Resulting Metal ON Metal Contact Could Lead TO Failure OF THE Brake Pipe, Loss OF Brake Fluid, and Partial Loss OF Brake Action.
Consequence
Remedy
Dealer Will Inspect And, IF Necessary, Correct System BY Providing A Minimum 1/2 Inch Clearance Between Clutch Cable and Brake Pipe TO Avoid Metal ON Metal Contact.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped With Four Speed Manualtransmission and Power Brakes.system: Power Train; Clutch Assembly Linkage, Flexible.consequences OF Defect: Partial Loss OF Brake Action Could Lead TO Loss Ofvehicle Control and AN Accident.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1983-01-01
Recall no.
83v007000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Rear Brake Hoses MAY Have Been Manufactured Incorrectly When THE Metal END Fittings Were Installed. Some Rear Brake Hoses MAY Separate From THE Metal END Fittings When Subjected TO THE Pulling Force Specified BY Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 106, "brake Hoses".
Consequence
Remedy
THE Dealer Will Inspect and Replace, IF Necessary, THE Rear Brake Hoses AT NO Charge TO Owners.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Service Brakes; Rear Brake Hoses.consequences OF Defect: A Separation MAY Result IN A Loss OF Brake Fluid and Apartial Loss OF Braking Action. A Partial Loss OF Braking Action Could Resultin A Vehicle Crash IN Situations IN Which A Minimum Stopping Distance Isrequired.
1982 Chevrolet Citation Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1982 Chevrolet Citation Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Chevrolet Citation is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Chevrolet Citation Compare to Other Hatchback?
The 1982 Chevrolet Citation competed in a crowded compact car segment against rivals like the Ford Escort, Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon, and various Japanese imports such as the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla. In terms of performance, the Citation's base four-cylinder was generally underpowered compared to some competitors, though the X-11 with its V6 offered a more spirited driving experience. The sporty versions of the Escort (like the XR-3) and the Omni/Horizon (especially with optional engines) could often match or exceed its performance.
Features were relatively standard across the class, with most offering basic amenities. The Citation aimed for practicality and fuel efficiency, much like its rivals. Reliability was a mixed bag; while some Citations proved durable, many suffered from transmission issues and rust, which was a common complaint for American cars of this era. Japanese imports, particularly the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, were often lauded for their superior long-term reliability and build quality.
Price-wise, the Citation was competitive, often offering a lower entry price or more features for the money than some imports. However, the long-term cost of ownership could be higher for the Citation if transmission problems or significant rust repairs were needed.
Alternatives:
* Similar: Ford Escort, Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon. These offered similar practicality and price points, with varying degrees of sportiness and reliability.
* Better Alternatives (especially for reliability): Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla. These Japanese compacts generally offered better long-term reliability, better build quality, and often more refined driving dynamics, though they might have been slightly more expensive or offered less aggressive styling. For those seeking a sportier feel on a budget, a well-maintained X-11 can still be an interesting option, but overall, the Japanese competitors often provided a more dependable ownership experience.
Features were relatively standard across the class, with most offering basic amenities. The Citation aimed for practicality and fuel efficiency, much like its rivals. Reliability was a mixed bag; while some Citations proved durable, many suffered from transmission issues and rust, which was a common complaint for American cars of this era. Japanese imports, particularly the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, were often lauded for their superior long-term reliability and build quality.
Price-wise, the Citation was competitive, often offering a lower entry price or more features for the money than some imports. However, the long-term cost of ownership could be higher for the Citation if transmission problems or significant rust repairs were needed.
Alternatives:
* Similar: Ford Escort, Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon. These offered similar practicality and price points, with varying degrees of sportiness and reliability.
* Better Alternatives (especially for reliability): Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla. These Japanese compacts generally offered better long-term reliability, better build quality, and often more refined driving dynamics, though they might have been slightly more expensive or offered less aggressive styling. For those seeking a sportier feel on a budget, a well-maintained X-11 can still be an interesting option, but overall, the Japanese competitors often provided a more dependable ownership experience.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Chevrolet Citation a Good Hatchback?
The 1982 Chevrolet Citation is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking basic, economical transportation or collectors with a fondness for 1980s automotive history. It's worth buying primarily as a used vehicle, especially if found in good condition and at a low price. The X-11 trim is the most compelling option for those seeking a bit more driving engagement. A purchase is most advisable under conditions of thorough inspection, focusing on transmission health, rust prevalence, and overall mechanical soundness. It is not recommended for buyers prioritizing cutting-edge technology, robust long-term reliability without significant upkeep, or high performance. As a simple, functional classic, it can be a rewarding ownership experience with proper care.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.