1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T is a heavy-duty commercial vehicle, primarily designed for vocational applications like construction, waste management, and industrial hauling. Its robust chassis and powerful drivetrain made it a workhorse in its era. While specific trims and pricing varied significantly based on configuration, its core appeal lay in its unparalleled durability and specialized functionality for demanding tasks, making it a respected name in its niche.
The Good
The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T excels in raw performance and legendary reliability for tough jobs. Its no-nonsense, functional design inspires confidence in its capability, while its sheer brute strength offers practical value for demanding work, appealing to those who appreciate dependable, hard-working machinery.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses of the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T include its basic cabin ergonomics, potentially leading to driver fatigue on long hauls. Fuel efficiency is not a strong suit, and older models may exhibit wear and tear on specialized hydraulic or drivetrain components, requiring diligent maintenance.
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T was typically equipped with powerful, large-displacement diesel engines from manufacturers like Cummins or Caterpillar. Specific engine models varied widely depending on the chassis configuration and intended application. Common options included inline-six configurations known for their torque.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings for these diesel engines generally ranged from approximately 200 hp to over 350 hp, depending on the specific engine and tune. These engines were designed for sustained power delivery under heavy loads rather than peak speed.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for a vehicle of this class and era, especially when operating under load, was inherently low. Expect figures in the range of 5-10 miles per gallon, heavily influenced by terrain, load weight, and driving style.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times are not a relevant metric for the Oshkosh Tilt T. These vehicles are engineered for slow, steady work and load hauling, not acceleration. Performance is measured in torque and ability to move heavy payloads.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity varied dramatically based on the specific model, axle configurations, and chassis build. These vehicles were often configured with heavy-duty fifth-wheel hitches or gooseneck hitches and could tow well over 50,000 pounds, sometimes significantly more for specialized applications.
- Trim-Level Features: As a commercial and vocational vehicle, the Oshkosh Tilt T did not have traditional consumer 'trim levels.' Features were dictated by the vocational application. Common configurations included specialized body types such as dump beds, flatbeds, utility bodies, or specialized towing equipment. Standard features in the cab typically focused on functionality and durability, with basic instrumentation, manual controls, and robust seating. Optional features often included enhanced suspension, auxiliary power take-off (PTO) systems, specialized lighting, and more robust cooling systems for extreme conditions.
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1987 |
| Make | Oshkosh |
| Model | Tilt T |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Commercial Vehicle |
| Category | - |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | OSHKOSH |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 33000 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 13.9L V12 |
| Engine Size | 13.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | 6x6 |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Have?
Given the age and specialized nature of the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T, specific, widely reported 'problems' in the consumer sense are less common than general maintenance and wear-and-tear issues inherent to heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Recalls, if any, would have been issued decades ago and are unlikely to be readily available for a vehicle of this vintage. Long-term reliability is overwhelmingly dependent on its operational history and maintenance regimen.
Common areas that owners and operators would have historically watched out for include:
Specific model year issues are difficult to pinpoint without access to historical Oshkosh service bulletins. However, as a general rule with older heavy-duty vehicles, consistent lubrication, fluid changes, and prompt attention to any unusual noises or performance changes are paramount to maintaining long-term reliability.
Common areas that owners and operators would have historically watched out for include:
- Drivetrain Components: The transmission, differential, and drive axles are subjected to immense stress. Wear on gears, bearings, and seals is a common concern, especially if the vehicle has been used for its intended heavy-duty purpose consistently. Clutch wear (if manual transmission) would also be a factor.
- Hydraulic Systems: For models equipped with hydraulic functions like tilt beds, lifting mechanisms, or power steering, leaks, pump failures, and cylinder seal degradation are potential issues. The complexity and power of these systems require specialized maintenance.
- Engine Overheating: Under heavy load and prolonged operation, especially in warm climates, the cooling system (radiator, water pump, thermostat, hoses) can be a point of failure if not meticulously maintained. Overheating can lead to significant engine damage.
- Brake System Wear: The braking systems on these heavy vehicles are robust but subject to significant wear from frequent stops under load. Issues with brake drums, shoes, air system components (if air brakes are equipped), and hydraulic lines are possible.
- Corrosion and Frame Integrity: Like any vehicle of this age, especially those operating in harsh environments (e.g., construction sites, areas with salt exposure), rust and corrosion can affect the chassis, body panels, and even structural integrity. Regular inspection for frame damage or significant rust is crucial.
- Electrical System: While generally simpler than modern vehicles, aging wiring harnesses, alternators, starter motors, and batteries can still present issues. Corrosion in electrical connectors is also a common problem.
Specific model year issues are difficult to pinpoint without access to historical Oshkosh service bulletins. However, as a general rule with older heavy-duty vehicles, consistent lubrication, fluid changes, and prompt attention to any unusual noises or performance changes are paramount to maintaining long-term reliability.
How long will the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T is challenging as they are workhorses, not daily drivers. A well-maintained unit could easily accumulate 200,000 to 500,000 miles or more over its service life. Many are retired from heavy service rather than failing outright. Long-term durability is a hallmark, with their robust construction designed for longevity. However, weaknesses emerge over time, primarily related to the wear and tear on heavy-duty components like the transmission, axles, and hydraulic systems. Regular, diligent maintenance is the critical factor in determining how many years of service an Oshkosh Tilt T provides. Neglect will accelerate wear on these specialized parts, leading to premature failure.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T, by modern standards, is exceptionally basic in terms of technology, entertainment, and driver-assistance features. Its focus was purely on utility and function.
Built-in Tech: The technology present would have been limited to essential operational controls and diagnostics. This includes robust analog gauges for engine monitoring (oil pressure, temperature, fuel level, voltmeter), transmission status, and air brake pressure (if applicable). A simple AM/FM radio might have been an option, but sophisticated infotainment systems were non-existent.
Entertainment: Entertainment features were minimal to non-existent. Some models might have offered a basic radio and speaker system. The concept of integrated navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, or touchscreens was not part of the automotive landscape for commercial vehicles of this era.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were largely absent. The primary 'assistance' came from the vehicle's power steering and potentially power brakes. Features like anti-lock braking systems (ABS), traction control, or stability control were not standard, if available at all, in this segment in 1987. The driver was expected to manage the vehicle's operation entirely through skill and awareness.
Safety Features: Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment would have included seat belts (though their sophistication and mandatory use varied by region and regulation at the time), basic headlights, taillights, turn signals, and potentially side marker lights. The robust frame and chassis provided a degree of passive safety through structural integrity. Mirrors were essential for visibility.
Optional Features: Optional equipment might have included upgraded lighting packages, heavy-duty suspension options for specific terrains, auxiliary heaters, or perhaps a tachometer.
Crash-Test Ratings: Crash-test ratings for commercial vehicles of this type from 1987 are generally not available in the same way consumer vehicle safety ratings are published. The focus was on structural integrity under operational loads rather than occupant protection in high-speed collisions, as these vehicles operate at lower speeds and in different environments. Regulatory bodies focused more on mechanical safety and operational standards.
Built-in Tech: The technology present would have been limited to essential operational controls and diagnostics. This includes robust analog gauges for engine monitoring (oil pressure, temperature, fuel level, voltmeter), transmission status, and air brake pressure (if applicable). A simple AM/FM radio might have been an option, but sophisticated infotainment systems were non-existent.
Entertainment: Entertainment features were minimal to non-existent. Some models might have offered a basic radio and speaker system. The concept of integrated navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, or touchscreens was not part of the automotive landscape for commercial vehicles of this era.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were largely absent. The primary 'assistance' came from the vehicle's power steering and potentially power brakes. Features like anti-lock braking systems (ABS), traction control, or stability control were not standard, if available at all, in this segment in 1987. The driver was expected to manage the vehicle's operation entirely through skill and awareness.
Safety Features: Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment would have included seat belts (though their sophistication and mandatory use varied by region and regulation at the time), basic headlights, taillights, turn signals, and potentially side marker lights. The robust frame and chassis provided a degree of passive safety through structural integrity. Mirrors were essential for visibility.
Optional Features: Optional equipment might have included upgraded lighting packages, heavy-duty suspension options for specific terrains, auxiliary heaters, or perhaps a tachometer.
Crash-Test Ratings: Crash-test ratings for commercial vehicles of this type from 1987 are generally not available in the same way consumer vehicle safety ratings are published. The focus was on structural integrity under operational loads rather than occupant protection in high-speed collisions, as these vehicles operate at lower speeds and in different environments. Regulatory bodies focused more on mechanical safety and operational standards.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Prices and Market Value
The original price of a 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T would have varied enormously based on its specific configuration and vocational equipment, easily ranging from $50,000 to over $150,000 when new. These were not mass-produced consumer vehicles but specialized industrial tools.
Current used market prices are highly variable and dependent on condition, hours of operation, and remaining service life. A well-maintained, functional unit can still command several thousand dollars, potentially $10,000 to $30,000 or more for exceptional examples, especially those with desirable body configurations or low usage. Conversely, a project vehicle needing significant work could be acquired for much less.
Depreciation for such vehicles is not linear like cars. Their value is tied to their utility. A working unit retains value as a tool. Resale value is heavily influenced by the condition of the engine, transmission, hydraulics, and chassis integrity. Specialized equipment (like a functional dump bed or specialized crane) also significantly impacts value. Rust and structural damage are major detriments.
Current used market prices are highly variable and dependent on condition, hours of operation, and remaining service life. A well-maintained, functional unit can still command several thousand dollars, potentially $10,000 to $30,000 or more for exceptional examples, especially those with desirable body configurations or low usage. Conversely, a project vehicle needing significant work could be acquired for much less.
Depreciation for such vehicles is not linear like cars. Their value is tied to their utility. A working unit retains value as a tool. Resale value is heavily influenced by the condition of the engine, transmission, hydraulics, and chassis integrity. Specialized equipment (like a functional dump bed or specialized crane) also significantly impacts value. Rust and structural damage are major detriments.
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T is generally costly. Insurance will be higher than for a standard vehicle, requiring commercial or specialized policies. Fuel consumption is high due to its powerful diesel engine and heavy-duty design. Maintenance and repair costs are significant; specialized mechanics and parts are required, and regular servicing of its heavy-duty components (engine, transmission, hydraulics) is essential. While its initial purchase price might be lower on the used market than a new equivalent, the ongoing operational and maintenance expenses make it a costly vehicle to own, best suited for businesses or individuals with a clear, continuous need for its capabilities.
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Insurance
Insurance for a 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Commercial Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T Compare to Other Commercial Vehicle?
The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T operated in a niche segment of heavy-duty vocational trucks. Key rivals would include other manufacturers offering specialized chassis for dump trucks, utility trucks, or heavy haulers, such as Peterbilt, Kenworth, Mack, and Ford's heavy truck lines (e.g., F-Series Super Duty, Louisville Line).
Performance: In terms of raw performance for its intended purpose (hauling heavy loads, operating specialized equipment), the Oshkosh Tilt T was generally on par with its contemporaries. Competitors like Peterbilt and Kenworth were known for their robust drivetrains and high torque output, similar to Oshkosh. Mack trucks often boasted legendary durability in their engines and transmissions. Ford offered a wide range of options, though perhaps not always reaching the extreme heavy-duty specifications of Oshkosh for the most demanding tasks.
Features: As previously noted, features were basic. Driver comfort and technology were secondary to utility. All rivals in this class would have offered similarly spartan cabins. The 'features' were dictated by the vocational body and equipment installed, where Oshkosh specialized. Competitors would offer similar customization options for dump beds, flatbeds, cranes, etc.
Reliability: Oshkosh built a reputation for extreme durability and reliability in harsh conditions. Competitors like Kenworth and Peterbilt also have strong reputations for longevity and robust construction. Mack was known for its 'Iron Mack' moniker, signifying toughness. Ford, while a major player, might have had slightly less consistent heavy-duty specialization compared to the others in the most extreme applications.
Price: New pricing varied significantly based on configuration and manufacturer. Oshkosh vehicles, being highly specialized, could be at the higher end of the price spectrum for custom builds. Used market prices are dictated by condition and hours, with all these brands experiencing depreciation that makes them affordable as work tools today.
Alternatives:
The choice between them often comes down to availability, specific vocational requirements, and the condition of the individual used vehicle. For extreme duty and specialized applications, Oshkosh remains a strong contender, but its direct competitors offer very similar capabilities.
Performance: In terms of raw performance for its intended purpose (hauling heavy loads, operating specialized equipment), the Oshkosh Tilt T was generally on par with its contemporaries. Competitors like Peterbilt and Kenworth were known for their robust drivetrains and high torque output, similar to Oshkosh. Mack trucks often boasted legendary durability in their engines and transmissions. Ford offered a wide range of options, though perhaps not always reaching the extreme heavy-duty specifications of Oshkosh for the most demanding tasks.
Features: As previously noted, features were basic. Driver comfort and technology were secondary to utility. All rivals in this class would have offered similarly spartan cabins. The 'features' were dictated by the vocational body and equipment installed, where Oshkosh specialized. Competitors would offer similar customization options for dump beds, flatbeds, cranes, etc.
Reliability: Oshkosh built a reputation for extreme durability and reliability in harsh conditions. Competitors like Kenworth and Peterbilt also have strong reputations for longevity and robust construction. Mack was known for its 'Iron Mack' moniker, signifying toughness. Ford, while a major player, might have had slightly less consistent heavy-duty specialization compared to the others in the most extreme applications.
Price: New pricing varied significantly based on configuration and manufacturer. Oshkosh vehicles, being highly specialized, could be at the higher end of the price spectrum for custom builds. Used market prices are dictated by condition and hours, with all these brands experiencing depreciation that makes them affordable as work tools today.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternatives: For a vehicle of similar purpose and build quality, consider other heavy-duty vocational trucks from the same era by Peterbilt (e.g., Model 330, 340 series), Kenworth (e.g., T600, T800), or Mack (e.g., R-Model, CH-Series). These offer comparable toughness and specialization.
- Potentially More Common Alternatives: If the specialized Oshkosh tilt bed functionality isn't strictly required, heavy-duty Ford, Chevrolet/GMC (e.g., Kodiak/Topkick), or International/Navistar trucks from the late 80s and early 90s could serve as alternatives for general heavy hauling, though they might not match the specific chassis strengths of Oshkosh for extreme duty.
The choice between them often comes down to availability, specific vocational requirements, and the condition of the individual used vehicle. For extreme duty and specialized applications, Oshkosh remains a strong contender, but its direct competitors offer very similar capabilities.
Final Verdict: Is the 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T a Good Commercial Vehicle?
The 1987 Oshkosh Tilt T is ideal for businesses or individuals requiring a robust, specialized workhorse for demanding vocational tasks, such as construction, heavy equipment transport, or specialized material handling. It is not suited for daily driving or general transportation due to its utilitarian nature and poor fuel economy.
It is worth buying if you have a specific, ongoing need for its capabilities and possess the resources for its upkeep. Buying it used is the only realistic option. Focus on vehicles with documented maintenance history, good structural integrity (minimal rust), and functional drivetrain and hydraulic systems. Avoid units with extensive wear or visible damage. If its specific tilt function is crucial and well-maintained, it can be a valuable, cost-effective tool compared to a modern equivalent. Otherwise, for simpler heavy-duty needs, other brands might offer broader availability and simpler maintenance.
It is worth buying if you have a specific, ongoing need for its capabilities and possess the resources for its upkeep. Buying it used is the only realistic option. Focus on vehicles with documented maintenance history, good structural integrity (minimal rust), and functional drivetrain and hydraulic systems. Avoid units with extensive wear or visible damage. If its specific tilt function is crucial and well-maintained, it can be a valuable, cost-effective tool compared to a modern equivalent. Otherwise, for simpler heavy-duty needs, other brands might offer broader availability and simpler maintenance.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.