The 1989 Ford F700F is a robust Class 7 medium-duty truck, part of Ford's F-Series Super Duty lineup for that era. Primarily serving commercial and industrial needs, it offered a powerful platform for various upfits. While specific trims were less defined than passenger vehicles, its core appeal lay in its sheer capability and Ford's established presence in the truck market. New pricing varied significantly based on configuration but was in the commercial vehicle range.
The Good
The 1989 Ford F700F excels in raw power and brute force, essential for demanding tasks. Its legendary Ford toughness translates to long-term reliability for dedicated owners. While not luxurious, its functional design prioritizes practicality and ease of maintenance, offering undeniable value for businesses and those needing a dependable workhorse.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1989 Ford F700F include typical age-related issues like rust, especially in harsh climates. Older diesel engines may require significant maintenance. Fuel economy is inherently lower than lighter-duty trucks. Furthermore, finding specialized parts can sometimes be a challenge due to its commercial nature.
1989 Ford F700F: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1989 Ford F700F typically featured robust diesel engines designed for commercial duty. Common options included variations of Ford's own diesel powerplants, such as the 7.0L (420 cubic inch) Ford 370 V8 gasoline engine, and more frequently, larger displacement diesel engines like the 6.6L or 7.8L International Harvester/Ford-built diesels (often branded as Navistar).
- Horsepower: Horsepower figures varied significantly depending on the specific engine installed. Gasoline engines generally produced in the range of 180-200 horsepower. Diesel engines offered more torque and generally ranged from approximately 160 horsepower to over 200 horsepower, with higher torque ratings being a primary advantage.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for a Class 7 truck like the F700F is not comparable to light-duty vehicles. Expect figures in the single digits, likely in the 5-8 miles per gallon range, heavily dependent on load, terrain, and driving style.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times are not a standard metric for commercial trucks and are largely irrelevant. Acceleration is prioritized for load hauling and towing, not rapid sprints.
- Towing Capacity: The towing capacity is highly dependent on the specific chassis, axle configurations, and the upfit/body installed. These trucks were designed for substantial hauling, with Gross Vehicle Weight Ratings (GVWR) often exceeding 25,999 lbs, allowing for very high towing and payload capacities, typically in the tens of thousands of pounds when properly equipped and used with appropriate trailers.
- Trim-Level Features: As a commercial vehicle, the F700F did not have traditional 'trim levels' like passenger cars. Features were determined by the intended vocational use and optional equipment selected at the time of purchase. Standard features focused on functionality and durability. Optional equipment could include different transmissions (manual and automatic), air brakes, power steering, air conditioning, upgraded suspension, and various power take-off (PTO) options for auxiliary equipment. The cab itself was designed for work, with durable materials and straightforward controls.
1989 Ford F700F Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1989 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | F700F |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | JEFFERSON COUNTY |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 6.6L I6 |
| Engine Size | 6.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1989 Ford F700F Have?
When discussing frequently reported problems and long-term reliability for a 1989 Ford F700F, it's crucial to understand that these are heavy-duty commercial vehicles, and their issues often stem from their demanding operational environment rather than inherent design flaws of typical passenger cars. For the 1989 model year specifically, there weren't widespread, model-year-specific recalls that significantly impacted the F700F's reputation across the board. However, common issues that owners and fleet managers might encounter over time include:
Engine and Drivetrain: Diesel engines, particularly older ones, can develop issues with fuel injection systems, glow plugs (if equipped), and turbochargers (if present). Overheating is a concern if the cooling system is not meticulously maintained. The robust manual transmissions are generally reliable, but clutch wear is a consumable item. Automatic transmissions, if equipped, can be prone to wear and require regular fluid changes.
Electrical System: Like many vehicles of this era, the electrical system can be a point of concern. Wiring harnesses can degrade over time, leading to intermittent issues with lights, gauges, and accessories. Alternators and starter motors are also subject to wear and tear.
Brakes: If equipped with air brakes, regular inspection and maintenance of the air compressor, air lines, and brake chambers are essential. Leaks in the air system can lead to brake failure. Hydraulic brake systems, if present on lighter configurations, can experience similar issues to passenger vehicles regarding brake lines and calipers/wheel cylinders.
Chassis and Body: Rust is a significant concern, especially for trucks operating in areas with road salt or high humidity. Frame rust, cab corrosion, and corrosion of body panels can compromise structural integrity and appearance. Leaf springs and suspension components are subject to significant stress and can wear out or break under heavy loads.
General Wear and Tear: Due to their heavy-duty nature, many components on an F700F will wear out faster than on lighter vehicles. This includes u-joints, bearings, bushings, and exhaust systems. Regular maintenance and proactive replacement of worn parts are key to long-term reliability.
While specific model year issues for 1989 aren't widely documented as major design flaws, the general age of the vehicle means that any of these potential problems are more likely to arise. Comprehensive inspections and a well-documented maintenance history are paramount when considering a used F700F.
How long will the 1989 Ford F700F last?
The 1989 Ford F700F, when properly maintained, is built for longevity. Owner data and fleet records often show these trucks accumulating well over 200,000 to 400,000 miles, with some reaching much higher figures. Years of service can easily extend to 20-30 years or more, particularly in vocational applications where they are regularly serviced and repaired. The inherent robustness of its heavy-duty chassis and drivetrain contributes significantly to this durability. Weaknesses that appear over time are primarily related to age and wear on components like seals, hoses, and exhaust systems, as well as potential for rust. However, the core structure and engine/transmission, with diligent care, can last for an exceptionally long time, making them a sound investment for those who prioritize endurance over cutting-edge features.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1989 Ford F700F, as a commercial truck from that era, focused on functionality and operator utility rather than advanced technology, entertainment, or driver-assistance systems as we understand them today. Built-in tech was minimal.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment would typically consist of an AM/FM radio, and possibly an optional cassette player. Digital displays or complex infotainment systems were non-existent. The focus was on delivering essential audio without distraction.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent. Systems like anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were beginning to appear on some commercial vehicles but were not standard on most F700F configurations and would have been an expensive, vocational-specific option. Cruise control might have been an option on some models, but not a common feature.
Safety Features: Safety features were basic but essential for commercial use. Standard safety equipment would include seat belts (lap belts were common, with shoulder belts becoming more prevalent), sturdy door construction, and large mirrors for maximum visibility. The robust frame and body offered inherent passive safety. Air brakes, if equipped, provided superior stopping power compared to standard hydraulic brakes, contributing to safety in heavy-duty applications. Fog lights or auxiliary lighting might have been optional for enhanced visibility in adverse conditions.
Optional Features: Beyond the radio, optional features primarily revolved around enhancing work capability and operator comfort. These could include air conditioning, power steering (which was becoming more common), upgraded suspension seats for improved ride quality, and specialized equipment like power take-off (PTO) units for operating auxiliary equipment. Heated mirrors might have been a rare option.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for commercial trucks like the 1989 Ford F700F are not typically available in the same way they are for passenger vehicles from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Commercial vehicles are subject to different regulatory standards and testing protocols focused on operational safety and durability rather than occupant crash protection in the same context as light-duty vehicles. The emphasis was on building a strong, stable platform designed to withstand the rigors of heavy use.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Ford F700F Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1989 Ford F700F's price would have varied significantly based on its configuration, engine, transmission, and any specialized upfits. As a medium-duty commercial truck, new prices could range from tens of thousands to well over $50,000 USD in its era. Due to its nature as a work vehicle, depreciation was relatively steep initially as it entered commercial service. However, in the current used market, prices are highly variable. Well-maintained examples, especially those with desirable configurations or sought-after diesel engines, can command prices from a few thousand dollars for projects or basic utility, up to $10,000-$20,000 or more for well-preserved or uniquely outfitted models. Factors affecting resale value include the condition of the engine and transmission, overall mechanical health, the presence of rust, the type of upfit (e.g., flatbed, box), and the truck's vocational history. Mileage is a significant factor, but maintenance history often outweighs raw mileage for these durable trucks.
1989 Ford F700F Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1989 Ford F700F is generally not economical in terms of initial purchase or running costs compared to light-duty vehicles. Insurance will be higher, often requiring commercial policies. Fuel costs are substantial due to its large diesel or gasoline engines, with fuel economy in the single digits. Maintenance and repair costs can be significant; while parts are generally robust, they are also often larger and more expensive. Specialized mechanics may be required for diesel engines. Routine maintenance like oil changes and filter replacements are critical. Long-term ownership requires a budget for potential repairs and upkeep, especially on older units. It is a costly vehicle to own, but its value lies in its unparalleled capability for specific tasks.
1989 Ford F700F Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1989 Ford F700F Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1989 Ford F700F Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Ford F700F is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Ford F700F Compare to Other Truck?
The 1989 Ford F700F competed in the medium-duty truck segment against formidable rivals like the Chevrolet Kodiak/TopKick, GMC TopKick/Kodiak, and International S-Series trucks. In terms of performance, the F700F typically offered competitive diesel engine options that provided strong torque for hauling and towing, comparable to its peers. Chevrolet and GMC offered similar diesel and gasoline powertrains, often utilizing Detroit Diesel or Cummins engines in their heavier configurations, which were known for their durability. International trucks, being a major commercial vehicle manufacturer, also provided robust powertrains and chassis.
When it comes to features, the F700F, like its competitors, was spartan by modern standards. Comfort and technology were secondary to function. All trucks in this class of the era would have offered basic amenities like radios and heaters, with air conditioning being a desirable, often optional, upgrade. Reliability is where these trucks generally excelled, with a focus on robust construction. Ford's reputation for building tough trucks extended to its commercial line. Chevrolet/GMC offerings were also generally well-regarded for their longevity. International trucks, from a dedicated commercial manufacturer, often boasted exceptional durability.
Price-wise, new, these trucks were in a similar commercial pricing bracket, heavily influenced by specifications. Used, the 1989 Ford F700F often represents good value due to Ford's widespread parts availability and relatively straightforward mechanics.
Alternatives:
* Similar Alternatives: Chevrolet Kodiak/GMC TopKick (similar era) offer comparable performance and durability. International S-Series trucks (e.g., S1700, S1800) are direct competitors known for their industrial-grade construction and reliability.
* Potentially Better Alternatives (depending on needs): For those prioritizing readily available parts and a vast service network, looking at later model Ford Super Duty chassis-cab trucks might be an option, though they would be more modern and expensive. If extreme durability is the absolute priority and specialized applications are involved, a used Freightliner FL-series truck might be considered, though these are often in a higher weight class.
When it comes to features, the F700F, like its competitors, was spartan by modern standards. Comfort and technology were secondary to function. All trucks in this class of the era would have offered basic amenities like radios and heaters, with air conditioning being a desirable, often optional, upgrade. Reliability is where these trucks generally excelled, with a focus on robust construction. Ford's reputation for building tough trucks extended to its commercial line. Chevrolet/GMC offerings were also generally well-regarded for their longevity. International trucks, from a dedicated commercial manufacturer, often boasted exceptional durability.
Price-wise, new, these trucks were in a similar commercial pricing bracket, heavily influenced by specifications. Used, the 1989 Ford F700F often represents good value due to Ford's widespread parts availability and relatively straightforward mechanics.
Alternatives:
* Similar Alternatives: Chevrolet Kodiak/GMC TopKick (similar era) offer comparable performance and durability. International S-Series trucks (e.g., S1700, S1800) are direct competitors known for their industrial-grade construction and reliability.
* Potentially Better Alternatives (depending on needs): For those prioritizing readily available parts and a vast service network, looking at later model Ford Super Duty chassis-cab trucks might be an option, though they would be more modern and expensive. If extreme durability is the absolute priority and specialized applications are involved, a used Freightliner FL-series truck might be considered, though these are often in a higher weight class.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Ford F700F a Good Truck?
The 1989 Ford F700F is ideal for individuals or businesses requiring a heavy-duty workhorse for demanding tasks such as hauling, towing substantial loads, or serving as a chassis for specialized vocational equipment like tow trucks, dump beds, or service bodies. It is absolutely a used vehicle purchase, as new models are long out of production. It's worth buying for those who prioritize ruggedness, raw capability, and long-term durability over modern comforts and fuel efficiency. Buyers should be prepared for higher running costs and the need for diligent maintenance. A thorough mechanical inspection, particularly focusing on the engine, transmission, and chassis integrity (especially rust), is crucial. It's best suited for users who understand the requirements of operating and maintaining a commercial-grade truck and can leverage its immense utility for specific, heavy-duty applications where lighter trucks would fail.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma