1993 Ford F700F Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs
The 1993 Ford F700F is a heavy-duty truck, part of Ford's F-Series Super Duty lineup. Primarily built for commercial use, it served as a chassis cab or bare chassis for custom upfits. While specific trims are less defined than consumer models, its robust construction and versatility made it a popular choice for vocational applications like dump trucks, tow trucks, and service vehicles. Its popularity stemmed from its sheer capability and Ford's reputation for building tough trucks.
The Good
The 1993 Ford F700F excels in raw power and unwavering reliability, offering a dependable workhorse for demanding tasks. Its utilitarian design prioritizes function over form, ensuring durability. For practical buyers, its value lies in its immense capability and longevity. Emotionally, it appeals to those who appreciate brute strength and a truck built to conquer any job.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1993 Ford F700F include a rudimentary interior lacking modern comforts, lower fuel efficiency compared to lighter trucks, and the possibility of extensive wear and tear given its commercial nature. Rust can also be a concern, especially on older units that have seen heavy service in varied climates.
1993 Ford F700F: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1993 Ford F700F was available with a range of powerful diesel engines designed for heavy-duty applications. Common options included Ford's own 7.0L (429 cu in) or 7.8L (475 cu in) inline-six diesel engines, as well as potential offerings from Cummins or Navistar/International, depending on specific configurations and OEM supplier choices for the chassis.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings varied significantly based on the specific engine installed. Ford's 7.0L and 7.8L diesel engines typically produced between 170 to 210 horsepower. Engines from Cummins or other manufacturers could offer higher outputs, often exceeding 200 horsepower, especially in more specialized configurations.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for the F700F is not typically measured in the same way as consumer vehicles and is generally quite low due to its size, weight, and intended use. Expect figures in the single digits (e.g., 5-10 MPG) depending on the engine, load, and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times are not a relevant metric for this class of vehicle. These trucks are built for hauling and working, not for acceleration. When unladen, acceleration would be slow, and with significant loads, it would be considerably slower.
- Towing Capacity: The towing capacity of the 1993 Ford F700F is substantial, designed for heavy-duty commercial towing. While specific ratings depend on the chassis configuration, axle ratios, and installed equipment, these trucks are capable of towing well over 30,000 pounds and can be configured for Gross Combined Weight Ratings (GCWR) much higher.
- Trim-Level Features: As a commercial chassis, the F700F typically offered minimal standard comfort or convenience features in its base form. Buyers would select body styles and upfitters would add specialized equipment. Basic features might include power steering, a durable vinyl interior, and a functional dashboard. Optional features were usually related to vocational applications, such as specialized PTOs, hydraulic systems, or enhanced cooling.
1993 Ford F700F Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1993 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | F700F |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | JEFFERSON COUNTY |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5.9L I6 |
| Engine Size | 5.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1993 Ford F700F Have?
As a commercial-grade vehicle, the 1993 Ford F700F is built for durability, but like any heavy-duty truck, it can encounter specific issues over its lifespan. Frequently reported problems often revolve around components subjected to extreme stress. These can include the drivetrain, such as transmission wear or clutch issues, particularly if used for frequent heavy hauling or towing. The braking system, essential for safety, may require more frequent maintenance and component replacement due to the immense loads it manages. Diesel engines, while generally robust, can develop issues with fuel injectors, glow plugs, or turbochargers over time, especially if regular maintenance is neglected. Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) systems, if equipped, can sometimes become clogged. Electrical systems, while simpler than modern vehicles, can suffer from corroded connections or failing alternators and starters, especially in environments with high moisture or road salt exposure. Rust and corrosion are significant long-term concerns, particularly on the frame, cab corners, and wheel wells, which can compromise structural integrity if not addressed promptly. Given its age and commercial application, it's important to consider the specific usage history of any 1993 F700F. Trucks used as dump trucks or in construction environments may have faced more severe stresses than those used for lighter delivery services. Recalls for this era of heavy-duty trucks were less common and more focused on safety-critical components. Specific model year issues are less documented for commercial chassis compared to consumer vehicles, as maintenance and repair were often handled by fleet services or specialized mechanics. However, general wear and tear on high-mileage, hard-working vehicles is the primary long-term reliability concern, rather than widespread design flaws across the 1993 model year.
How long will the 1993 Ford F700F last?
The 1993 Ford F700F is designed for longevity, with many units accumulating well over 200,000 miles and continuing to serve effectively. With diligent maintenance, including regular oil changes, fuel filter replacements, and proper lubrication of chassis components, these trucks can easily reach 300,000 to 500,000 miles or more. Years of service can extend for decades, particularly for vehicles that haven't been subjected to constant extreme conditions. The primary weaknesses that emerge over time are related to wear and tear on heavy-duty components like the engine, transmission, and suspension, as well as susceptibility to rust, especially in harsher climates. However, the fundamental robust construction of the F700F ensures significant long-term durability when properly cared for.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1993 Ford F700F, being a commercial-grade truck from this era, is characterized by its functional simplicity rather than advanced technology. Built for work, its technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features are basic by modern standards.
Technology: The in-cab technology was primarily focused on engine monitoring and operational controls. Expect analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and battery voltage. There might be indicator lights for various system statuses. Infotainment systems were virtually non-existent, typically limited to an AM/FM radio, possibly with a cassette player as an optional upgrade.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we understand them today were not present. Power steering was a common, though not always standard, feature to aid maneuverability. Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) might have been an option, particularly for the rear axle, enhancing control during hard braking. Cruise control was also a potential option, easing long-haul driving fatigue.
Safety Features: Basic safety features included seat belts. The robust frame and body construction provided a degree of passive safety. Mirrors were essential for visibility, and robust lighting systems were standard for operating in various conditions.
Optional Features: Beyond the radio, optional features were heavily geared towards vocational use. These could include auxiliary lighting, specialized PTO (Power Take-Off) systems for operating equipment, enhanced cooling packages, air brakes (on some models), and various body or chassis upfits.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for commercial chassis like the 1993 Ford F700F are generally not published in the same way as consumer vehicles by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. The focus for these heavy-duty trucks is on their engineered strength and ability to withstand operational stresses rather than undergoing standardized passenger car crash tests. Their sheer mass and heavy-duty construction provide a significant level of occupant protection in many scenarios, but without formal testing, specific ratings are unavailable.
Technology: The in-cab technology was primarily focused on engine monitoring and operational controls. Expect analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and battery voltage. There might be indicator lights for various system statuses. Infotainment systems were virtually non-existent, typically limited to an AM/FM radio, possibly with a cassette player as an optional upgrade.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we understand them today were not present. Power steering was a common, though not always standard, feature to aid maneuverability. Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) might have been an option, particularly for the rear axle, enhancing control during hard braking. Cruise control was also a potential option, easing long-haul driving fatigue.
Safety Features: Basic safety features included seat belts. The robust frame and body construction provided a degree of passive safety. Mirrors were essential for visibility, and robust lighting systems were standard for operating in various conditions.
Optional Features: Beyond the radio, optional features were heavily geared towards vocational use. These could include auxiliary lighting, specialized PTO (Power Take-Off) systems for operating equipment, enhanced cooling packages, air brakes (on some models), and various body or chassis upfits.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for commercial chassis like the 1993 Ford F700F are generally not published in the same way as consumer vehicles by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. The focus for these heavy-duty trucks is on their engineered strength and ability to withstand operational stresses rather than undergoing standardized passenger car crash tests. Their sheer mass and heavy-duty construction provide a significant level of occupant protection in many scenarios, but without formal testing, specific ratings are unavailable.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1993 Ford F700F Prices and Market Value
New pricing for a 1993 Ford F700F would have varied greatly depending on the specific chassis configuration, engine, and any factory-installed options, but typically ranged from $30,000 to $50,000 or more for a bare chassis or basic cab. Used market prices for a 1993 Ford F700F today are highly variable, often ranging from $5,000 to $20,000 or more. This range is dictated by factors such as mileage, overall condition, the type of upfit (e.g., dump body, service body, flatbed), engine type, maintenance history, and regional demand. Depreciation on these commercial vehicles is less about a steady decline and more about value retention based on their work capability. Well-maintained and operational units with desirable upfits can hold their value exceptionally well for decades, while neglected or heavily worn examples will depreciate significantly. The resale value is strongly tied to its utility for specific commercial tasks rather than passenger car norms.
1993 Ford F700F Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1993 Ford F700F involves significant costs. Insurance is typically higher than for consumer vehicles due to its commercial classification and potential for higher repair costs. Fuel economy is poor, often in the single digits, making fuel a substantial ongoing expense. Maintenance and repair costs can be considerable; while durable, components are heavy-duty and specialized, requiring professional service and often expensive parts. This is not an economical vehicle to own for general use. Its cost-effectiveness is realized only when its heavy-duty capabilities are essential for specific commercial or industrial applications where its utility outweighs its high operational expenses.
1993 Ford F700F Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1993 Ford F700F Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1993 Ford F700F Insurance
Insurance for a 1993 Ford F700F is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1993 Ford F700F Compare to Other Truck?
The 1993 Ford F700F competed in the heavy-duty commercial truck segment against formidable rivals like the Chevrolet Kodiak/TopKick, GMC TopKick/Kodiak, and International 4000/7000 series trucks.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, the F700F, equipped with its robust diesel engines, offered comparable power and torque to its competitors. Ford's own engine offerings were generally reliable, though specific Cummins or Detroit Diesel options available in rivals might have offered slightly more power or efficiency depending on the configuration.
Features: Feature-wise, these commercial trucks were utilitarian. Comfort and technology were secondary to function. The F700F was on par with its contemporaries in this regard; interiors were basic, focusing on durability. Rivals might have offered slightly more ergonomic seating or more robust chassis options depending on the specific model and upfit.
Reliability: Ford has a long-standing reputation for building durable trucks, and the F700F was no exception. Its reliability was generally considered strong, comparable to competitors from Chevrolet/GMC and International, provided regular maintenance was performed. These vehicles were engineered for hard work, and their longevity often depended more on operational stress and upkeep than inherent design flaws.
Price: Pricing when new was competitive within the heavy-duty segment. On the used market, the F700F often holds its value well due to Ford's brand recognition and the truck's perceived toughness.
Alternatives: Similar alternatives would be other trucks from the same era like the aforementioned Chevrolet/GMC Kodiak/TopKick, or International S-Series/4000-series trucks. If a buyer needs similar capability but perhaps a more modern platform, newer models within Ford's F-Series Super Duty line (though these are Class 2b/3) or dedicated Class 6-8 trucks from manufacturers like Freightliner (e.g., FL60/FL70) or Kenworth would be the next step, offering potentially better comfort, safety, and efficiency but at a significantly higher cost. For simpler, robust work, a well-maintained F700F remains a solid choice, but newer chassis might offer better emissions compliance and slightly improved fuel economy.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, the F700F, equipped with its robust diesel engines, offered comparable power and torque to its competitors. Ford's own engine offerings were generally reliable, though specific Cummins or Detroit Diesel options available in rivals might have offered slightly more power or efficiency depending on the configuration.
Features: Feature-wise, these commercial trucks were utilitarian. Comfort and technology were secondary to function. The F700F was on par with its contemporaries in this regard; interiors were basic, focusing on durability. Rivals might have offered slightly more ergonomic seating or more robust chassis options depending on the specific model and upfit.
Reliability: Ford has a long-standing reputation for building durable trucks, and the F700F was no exception. Its reliability was generally considered strong, comparable to competitors from Chevrolet/GMC and International, provided regular maintenance was performed. These vehicles were engineered for hard work, and their longevity often depended more on operational stress and upkeep than inherent design flaws.
Price: Pricing when new was competitive within the heavy-duty segment. On the used market, the F700F often holds its value well due to Ford's brand recognition and the truck's perceived toughness.
Alternatives: Similar alternatives would be other trucks from the same era like the aforementioned Chevrolet/GMC Kodiak/TopKick, or International S-Series/4000-series trucks. If a buyer needs similar capability but perhaps a more modern platform, newer models within Ford's F-Series Super Duty line (though these are Class 2b/3) or dedicated Class 6-8 trucks from manufacturers like Freightliner (e.g., FL60/FL70) or Kenworth would be the next step, offering potentially better comfort, safety, and efficiency but at a significantly higher cost. For simpler, robust work, a well-maintained F700F remains a solid choice, but newer chassis might offer better emissions compliance and slightly improved fuel economy.
Final Verdict: Is the 1993 Ford F700F a Good Truck?
The 1993 Ford F700F is ideally suited for commercial operators, small businesses, or individuals who require a robust, no-nonsense workhorse for demanding tasks such as hauling heavy materials, towing large equipment, or serving as a platform for specialized upfits like dump bodies, utility bodies, or service bodies. It is certainly worth buying if its specific capabilities align with your needs and you understand the associated ownership costs. Given its age, purchasing a used 1993 F700F is the only option. It is crucial to buy a vehicle that has been well-maintained, ideally with service records. Inspect thoroughly for rust, drivetrain condition, and the functionality of any upfit. This truck is a tool, and its value is in its ability to perform heavy-duty work reliably, not in comfort or modern amenities.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.