The 2013 Arctic Cat Arctic Cat represents a robust offering in the utility and recreational ATV segment. Known for its rugged construction and powerful performance, Arctic Cat has a long-standing reputation for building durable off-road vehicles. This model year typically features a range of body styles catering to various needs, from two-seaters to more specialized utility machines. Key trims often include variations like the TRV (for two-up riding) and the Prowler (side-by-side). Pricing for a new 2013 model would have varied significantly by trim and options, but it was generally positioned as a premium, capable machine.
The Good
The 2013 Arctic Cat excels in raw power and off-road prowess, offering thrilling performance for adventure seekers. Its robust build inspires confidence in its reliability for demanding tasks. Comfort features enhance rider experience, while its distinctive design appeals to those who value a capable and stylish machine.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of a few common concerns with the 2013 Arctic Cat. Some owners have reported issues with electrical components and premature wear on certain suspension parts. Fuel efficiency may not be class-leading, and some models might exhibit a stiffer ride compared to competitors.
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2013 Arctic Cat lineup typically featured a range of powerful engines. Common options included single-cylinder, twin-cylinder, and V-twin configurations. For instance, models like the 700 TRV often came equipped with a 695cc liquid-cooled, SOHC, 4-valve, EFI engine. Higher-performance models could offer larger displacement engines up to around 1000cc.
- Horsepower: Horsepower varied significantly depending on the engine size and model. Smaller engines might produce in the range of 40-50 horsepower, while larger V-twin engines could deliver upwards of 70-80 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Specific MPG figures were not always prominently advertised for ATVs as they are for cars. However, fuel economy was generally considered average to slightly below average, especially for larger displacement engines under heavy load. Expect consumption to be higher during aggressive riding or towing.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph acceleration is not a standard metric for ATVs. Their performance is more characterized by their ability to accelerate quickly from a standstill in off-road conditions and their top speed, which could typically reach 50-70 mph depending on the model and terrain.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was a strong suit for many Arctic Cat utility models. Many 2013 models were rated to tow between 1,050 lbs (476 kg) and 1,500 lbs (680 kg), making them suitable for hauling trailers, equipment, or other loads around a farm or worksite.
- Trim-Level Features: Key trim-level features varied widely. Common features across different trims included: 4WD with locking front differential, electronic power steering (EPS) on higher trims, independent rear suspension (IRS), digital dashboards with essential information (speed, odometer, fuel level), automotive-style paint finishes, and robust cargo racks. Two-up models (TRV) featured comfortable passenger seats and backrests. Prowler side-by-sides offered roll cages, bucket seats, and more car-like amenities.
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2013 |
| Make | ARCTIC CAT |
| Model | Arctic Cat |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Recreational Vehicle |
| Category | Off-Road Vehicle Low Speed Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | THIEF RIVER FALLS |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | - |
| Engine Size | - |
| Engine Cylinders | - |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Have?
While the 2013 Arctic Cat generally offers a robust platform, there are some frequently reported issues and long-term considerations to be aware of. One common area of concern for Arctic Cats of this era, and indeed many ATVs, can be the electrical system. Owners have sometimes reported issues with wiring harnesses, battery charging systems, and control modules. These can manifest as intermittent starting problems, accessory malfunctions, or warning lights illuminating on the dashboard. Regular inspection and maintenance of electrical connections are advisable.
Another point sometimes raised is related to the suspension components. While designed for rugged terrain, some riders have experienced premature wear on ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, especially with heavy use or aggressive riding. This can lead to play in the steering or a less precise feel. Upgrading to aftermarket components can sometimes mitigate this.
The CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) system, while generally reliable, can be susceptible to wear if not properly maintained. Belt slippage or premature belt failure can occur if the clutches are not clean or if the belt is worn or damaged. Regular inspection of the belt and clutch system is crucial.
Regarding specific recalls for the 2013 model year, it's always best to check with Arctic Cat or official recall databases for any safety-related campaigns that may have been issued. While not specific to the 2013 model year, some Arctic Cat models across various years have seen recalls related to fuel system components or braking systems. Consumers should always verify the VIN against any active recalls.
In terms of long-term reliability, Arctic Cats are known for their strong drivetrains and frames. However, like any mechanical vehicle subjected to harsh conditions, components will eventually wear. The durability of plastic body panels, the longevity of the paint finish, and the overall condition of the engine and transmission will heavily depend on the owner's maintenance habits and the type of usage the ATV has seen.
Another point sometimes raised is related to the suspension components. While designed for rugged terrain, some riders have experienced premature wear on ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, especially with heavy use or aggressive riding. This can lead to play in the steering or a less precise feel. Upgrading to aftermarket components can sometimes mitigate this.
The CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) system, while generally reliable, can be susceptible to wear if not properly maintained. Belt slippage or premature belt failure can occur if the clutches are not clean or if the belt is worn or damaged. Regular inspection of the belt and clutch system is crucial.
Regarding specific recalls for the 2013 model year, it's always best to check with Arctic Cat or official recall databases for any safety-related campaigns that may have been issued. While not specific to the 2013 model year, some Arctic Cat models across various years have seen recalls related to fuel system components or braking systems. Consumers should always verify the VIN against any active recalls.
In terms of long-term reliability, Arctic Cats are known for their strong drivetrains and frames. However, like any mechanical vehicle subjected to harsh conditions, components will eventually wear. The durability of plastic body panels, the longevity of the paint finish, and the overall condition of the engine and transmission will heavily depend on the owner's maintenance habits and the type of usage the ATV has seen.
How long will the 2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat last?
Estimating average mileage or years of service for a 2013 Arctic Cat ATV is highly dependent on usage and maintenance. For recreational use with regular servicing, these machines can reliably serve owners for 5-10 years or accumulate 5,000-10,000 miles. However, if used for demanding farm work, commercial purposes, or in harsh environments without proper care, their lifespan could be significantly shorter. The long-term durability of the frame and engine is generally good, but components like suspension parts, bearings, and electrical connections may require more frequent attention over time. Neglecting routine maintenance, such as fluid changes, filter replacements, and proper belt care, will undoubtedly shorten the vehicle's effective service life and expose its weaknesses sooner.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2013 Arctic Cat Arctic Cat, being an ATV, focuses on functional technology and essential safety features rather than extensive in-car entertainment or advanced driver assistance systems found in automobiles. Built-in technology primarily revolves around providing the rider with crucial information and control. Standard features typically include a digital instrument cluster displaying speedometer, odometer, trip meter, fuel level, and gear selection.
Many models in 2013 came equipped with electronic fuel injection (EFI), which enhances throttle response, cold starting, and overall engine performance. Some higher-end trims offered electronic power steering (EPS), a significant feature that reduces steering effort, particularly at low speeds and over rough terrain, greatly improving rider comfort and control. Select models might have included auxiliary power outlets for charging devices.
Entertainment features are minimal, with the focus being on the riding experience itself. There are no integrated sound systems or navigation typically found in this class of vehicle. Optional accessories might include aftermarket audio systems or GPS units that can be mounted.
Driver-assistance features are limited to the mechanical advantages offered by the vehicle's design. Features like selectable 2WD/4WD with a locking front differential provide enhanced traction and control in challenging conditions. Independent rear suspension (IRS) on many models contributes to a smoother ride and better handling over uneven surfaces, acting as a form of terrain-assistance.
Safety features are primarily inherent to the ATV design. Sturdy frames, integrated handguards, and well-placed footwells contribute to rider protection. For side-by-side models (like the Prowler), features such as roll cages, seatbelts, and reinforced doors are standard safety equipment. Crash-test ratings are not applicable to ATVs in the same way they are for passenger vehicles, as they operate in a different regulatory environment. The focus is on robust construction and features that minimize the risk of rollovers or loss of control.
Many models in 2013 came equipped with electronic fuel injection (EFI), which enhances throttle response, cold starting, and overall engine performance. Some higher-end trims offered electronic power steering (EPS), a significant feature that reduces steering effort, particularly at low speeds and over rough terrain, greatly improving rider comfort and control. Select models might have included auxiliary power outlets for charging devices.
Entertainment features are minimal, with the focus being on the riding experience itself. There are no integrated sound systems or navigation typically found in this class of vehicle. Optional accessories might include aftermarket audio systems or GPS units that can be mounted.
Driver-assistance features are limited to the mechanical advantages offered by the vehicle's design. Features like selectable 2WD/4WD with a locking front differential provide enhanced traction and control in challenging conditions. Independent rear suspension (IRS) on many models contributes to a smoother ride and better handling over uneven surfaces, acting as a form of terrain-assistance.
Safety features are primarily inherent to the ATV design. Sturdy frames, integrated handguards, and well-placed footwells contribute to rider protection. For side-by-side models (like the Prowler), features such as roll cages, seatbelts, and reinforced doors are standard safety equipment. Crash-test ratings are not applicable to ATVs in the same way they are for passenger vehicles, as they operate in a different regulatory environment. The focus is on robust construction and features that minimize the risk of rollovers or loss of control.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2013 Arctic Cat Arctic Cat models ranged significantly in price, typically from around $7,000 for base models to upwards of $12,000-$15,000 for higher-trim utility or two-up models. Currently, the used market reflects considerable depreciation. Expect to find 2013 models selling anywhere from $3,000 to $7,000, heavily dependent on the specific model, trim level, condition, mileage/hours, and included accessories. Factors significantly affecting resale value include overall maintenance history, the presence of upgrades (like EPS or winches), cosmetic condition, and whether the vehicle has been used for demanding work versus recreational riding. Well-maintained and low-hour units will command a premium.
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2013 Arctic Cat involves several cost considerations. Insurance premiums vary based on coverage, location, and rider history but are generally more affordable than car insurance. Fuel costs can be substantial, especially for larger engines and during heavy use, as they are not particularly fuel-efficient. Routine maintenance, including oil changes, filter replacements, and checking belts, is crucial and will cost a few hundred dollars annually. Repair costs can be moderate to high, particularly for engine or transmission issues, or if specialized parts are needed. Overall, while not as economical as a small car, it's a reasonably priced machine to own if maintained diligently, with repair costs being the main variable.
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Insurance
Insurance for a 2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Recreational Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat Compare to Other Recreational Vehicle?
The 2013 Arctic Cat competed primarily against titans like the Polaris Sportsman and Can-Am Outlander series. In terms of performance, Arctic Cat often offered competitive engine power and robust 4WD systems, frequently matching or exceeding Polaris in raw grunt and Can-Am in certain terrain handling. However, Can-Am sometimes held an edge in advanced suspension technology.
Regarding features, Arctic Cat generally provided a good balance. Electronic Power Steering (EPS) was often available on higher trims, a feature that Polaris and Can-Am also offered, making it a common differentiator. Arctic Cats were known for their sturdy racks and utility-focused designs. Polaris often led in user-friendly interfaces and rider comfort features, while Can-Am frequently pushed boundaries with more sophisticated technology and performance-oriented setups.
In reliability, this is where perceptions can vary. While Arctic Cat builds robust machines, some owners historically reported more frequent electrical gremlins compared to the generally strong reliability of Polaris. Can-Am, while powerful, has sometimes been associated with higher repair costs and complexity. Long-term durability for all three brands heavily depends on maintenance and usage.
Price-wise, Arctic Cat often positioned itself as a strong value proposition, offering comparable performance and features to its competitors at a slightly more accessible price point, especially in the used market. Polaris could sometimes be priced similarly, while Can-Am often sat at the premium end.
Alternatives:
Regarding features, Arctic Cat generally provided a good balance. Electronic Power Steering (EPS) was often available on higher trims, a feature that Polaris and Can-Am also offered, making it a common differentiator. Arctic Cats were known for their sturdy racks and utility-focused designs. Polaris often led in user-friendly interfaces and rider comfort features, while Can-Am frequently pushed boundaries with more sophisticated technology and performance-oriented setups.
In reliability, this is where perceptions can vary. While Arctic Cat builds robust machines, some owners historically reported more frequent electrical gremlins compared to the generally strong reliability of Polaris. Can-Am, while powerful, has sometimes been associated with higher repair costs and complexity. Long-term durability for all three brands heavily depends on maintenance and usage.
Price-wise, Arctic Cat often positioned itself as a strong value proposition, offering comparable performance and features to its competitors at a slightly more accessible price point, especially in the used market. Polaris could sometimes be priced similarly, while Can-Am often sat at the premium end.
Alternatives:
- Polaris Sportsman 850/550 (2013): A very strong contender known for its comfort, reliable engine, and user-friendly features. Often a direct competitor offering similar capability.
- Can-Am Outlander 800R/650 (2013): Frequently lauded for its powerful Rotax engines and advanced suspension systems, offering a more performance-oriented ride, though potentially at a higher price and complexity.
- Honda FourTrax Foreman/Rancher (2013): While typically less powerful than the larger Arctic Cat models, Honda is renowned for its exceptional reliability and durability, often at a lower price point, making it a great choice for those prioritizing longevity and ease of ownership over sheer power.
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 ARCTIC CAT Arctic Cat a Good Recreational Vehicle?
The 2013 Arctic Cat Arctic Cat is an ideal choice for individuals seeking a capable and powerful ATV for a variety of tasks, from recreational trail riding to demanding farm work or hunting expeditions. It's particularly well-suited for those who value robust construction and strong performance without necessarily needing the absolute latest technological advancements. The vehicle is generally worth buying, especially on the used market, where it offers excellent value for money. Buying used is highly recommended given its age. Specific trims like the TRV are excellent for riders who frequently carry a passenger. When purchasing used, prioritize well-maintained examples with lower hours/mileage and a comprehensive service history. It represents a solid investment for utility and adventure if acquired at a fair price and maintained properly.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.