The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando is a compact multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) that offered a unique blend of car-like driving dynamics with SUV versatility. Produced from 2011 to 2018 globally (though discontinued in North America after 2014), it primarily featured a distinctive, car-based crossover styling. Key trims typically included LS, LT, and LTZ. Its popularity stemmed from its stylish, somewhat unconventional design, practical interior space, and approachable price point for a vehicle offering three rows of seating, making it a distinctive choice in its segment.
The Good
The 2013 Orlando offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly refined interior for its class. Its eye-catching, almost European-inspired exterior design appeals to emotional buyers, while its practical seven-seat capacity and decent fuel economy cater to the practical needs of families seeking value.
The Bad
Owners often cite the Orlando's somewhat sluggish acceleration, particularly with the base engine, and the limited cargo space when the third row is in use. Some also note the interior plastics feel less premium than competitors, and the infotainment system can feel dated.
2013 Chevrolet Orlando: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando was primarily offered with two engine choices in North America:
- A standard 2.4-liter Ecotec four-cylinder engine.
- An optional 1.4-liter turbocharged Ecotec four-cylinder engine (often paired with manual transmissions, though automatic was available).
- Horsepower:
- The 2.4-liter engine produced approximately 173 horsepower.
- The 1.4-liter turbocharged engine produced around 138 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates):
- For the 2.4-liter engine (FWD): Around 22 mpg city / 30 mpg highway.
- For the 1.4-liter turbocharged engine (FWD): Around 24 mpg city / 34 mpg highway. (Note: Fuel economy figures can vary slightly based on transmission and drivetrain).
- 0-60 Times:
- Generally, 0-60 mph times were in the range of 9-10 seconds for the 2.4L engine, and slightly slower for the 1.4L turbo, reflecting its focus on economy over performance.
- Towing Capacity:
- The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando was not designed for significant towing. Its towing capacity was typically rated at a modest 1,000 pounds, suitable for very light loads.
- Trim-Level Features:
- LS: Typically included standard features like air conditioning, power windows and locks, a six-speaker audio system, and 16-inch steel wheels.
- LT: Added features such as cruise control, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, upgraded cloth upholstery, and satellite radio. Alloy wheels were often standard or optional.
- LTZ: Represented the top trim and usually included premium features like leather upholstery, heated front seats, automatic climate control, a rearview camera, a 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system (MyLink), and larger alloy wheels (often 18-inch).
2013 Chevrolet Orlando Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2013 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Orlando |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Wagon |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | South Korea |
| Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 5000 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | - |
| Engine Size | - |
| Engine Cylinders | - |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 Chevrolet Orlando Have?
The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando, while generally considered average in terms of reliability for its class and era, has several frequently reported issues and concerns that potential buyers should be aware of. One of the most common complaints revolves around the transmission, with owners reporting rough shifting, hesitation, and occasional failure, particularly in automatic transmissions. This can manifest as the vehicle not shifting out of a particular gear or experiencing jerky transitions. Another area of concern is the cooling system, with reports of coolant leaks, thermostat failures, and overheating, sometimes attributed to faulty water pumps or radiator issues.
Electrical gremlins are also not uncommon. This can include problems with the power windows not working, dashboard warning lights illuminating without a clear cause, and issues with the infotainment system, such as frozen screens or unresponsive touch controls. The turbocharger on the 1.4-liter engine has also been a source of problems for some owners, with reports of reduced power, boost leaks, and premature failure, often related to oil consumption or carbon buildup.
Brakes and suspension components can also show wear and tear earlier than expected in some cases, leading to squealing noises, vibrations, or a less confident braking experience. While there weren't widespread systemic issues that plagued every single 2013 Orlando, these recurring problems suggest areas where maintenance and inspection are particularly crucial. Owners should pay close attention to these potential pitfalls when considering a used 2013 Orlando, as repairs can sometimes be costly. Recalls for the 2013 model year have addressed various issues, including potential problems with the airbags, fuel system, and electrical components. It's advisable to check the NHTSA website for a comprehensive list of recalls specific to the VIN.
Electrical gremlins are also not uncommon. This can include problems with the power windows not working, dashboard warning lights illuminating without a clear cause, and issues with the infotainment system, such as frozen screens or unresponsive touch controls. The turbocharger on the 1.4-liter engine has also been a source of problems for some owners, with reports of reduced power, boost leaks, and premature failure, often related to oil consumption or carbon buildup.
Brakes and suspension components can also show wear and tear earlier than expected in some cases, leading to squealing noises, vibrations, or a less confident braking experience. While there weren't widespread systemic issues that plagued every single 2013 Orlando, these recurring problems suggest areas where maintenance and inspection are particularly crucial. Owners should pay close attention to these potential pitfalls when considering a used 2013 Orlando, as repairs can sometimes be costly. Recalls for the 2013 model year have addressed various issues, including potential problems with the airbags, fuel system, and electrical components. It's advisable to check the NHTSA website for a comprehensive list of recalls specific to the VIN.
How long will the 2013 Chevrolet Orlando last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance, a well-maintained 2013 Chevrolet Orlando can reasonably be expected to last between 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more. Durability often hinges on consistent adherence to the recommended maintenance schedule, particularly for the engine and transmission. Early attention to potential issues like coolant leaks or turbocharger problems can significantly extend its service life. However, as with many vehicles in its segment, the long-term durability can be impacted by the quality of the initial components and the stress placed upon them, especially if used for frequent short trips or in demanding conditions. The transmission and electrical systems tend to be the most common areas of concern that can arise as the mileage increases, potentially limiting its ultimate lifespan if not addressed proactively.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando offered a decent array of technology and safety features for its time, though it may feel somewhat dated compared to modern vehicles. Standard tech on most trims included a six-speaker audio system with an auxiliary input jack. Higher trims, like the LTZ, often came equipped with Chevrolet's MyLink infotainment system, featuring a 7-inch color touchscreen, Bluetooth connectivity for hands-free calling and audio streaming, and USB connectivity. This system was a significant upgrade, offering smartphone integration and the ability to display apps. Optional features could include a rearview camera, which greatly aided in parking and reversing.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 2013 Orlando was relatively basic. It did not typically offer advanced systems like adaptive cruise control or lane departure warnings that are common today. The primary driver assistance was the available rearview camera. However, safety was a strong suit, with the Orlando earning good crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). It achieved "Good" ratings in front-impact, side-impact, and roof-strength tests, and "Acceptable" in rear-impact tests. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) awarded the 2013 Orlando an overall safety rating of 5 stars, including 5 stars for frontal and side crash tests, and 4 stars for rollover resistance. Standard safety equipment included antilock brakes, stability control, traction control, and a suite of airbags (front, side-impact, and curtain airbags). The availability of electronic stability control was a critical safety feature that helped prevent skids and maintain control in emergency maneuvers.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 2013 Orlando was relatively basic. It did not typically offer advanced systems like adaptive cruise control or lane departure warnings that are common today. The primary driver assistance was the available rearview camera. However, safety was a strong suit, with the Orlando earning good crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). It achieved "Good" ratings in front-impact, side-impact, and roof-strength tests, and "Acceptable" in rear-impact tests. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) awarded the 2013 Orlando an overall safety rating of 5 stars, including 5 stars for frontal and side crash tests, and 4 stars for rollover resistance. Standard safety equipment included antilock brakes, stability control, traction control, and a suite of airbags (front, side-impact, and curtain airbags). The availability of electronic stability control was a critical safety feature that helped prevent skids and maintain control in emergency maneuvers.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2013 Chevrolet Orlando Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2013 Chevrolet Orlando had an MSRP that typically ranged from around $19,000 for the base LS trim to upwards of $28,000 for a well-equipped LTZ model. As a used vehicle, current prices for a 2013 Chevrolet Orlando generally fall between $5,000 and $10,000, depending heavily on mileage, condition, trim level, and regional market demand. The Orlando experienced relatively steep depreciation, which is common for vehicles in this segment, particularly those with niche appeal. Factors affecting its resale value include its reliability reputation, the availability of newer models, and its fuel economy compared to more efficient competitors. Higher mileage and evidence of wear and tear will significantly reduce its value, while well-maintained examples with lower mileage and desirable options can command a higher price within the used market.
2013 Chevrolet Orlando Cost of Ownership
The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando is generally considered economical to own. Insurance costs are typically moderate, falling in line with other compact MPVs. Fuel costs are reasonable, especially with the turbocharged engine option, offering competitive MPG. Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and tire rotations, is standard. However, repair costs can become a factor, particularly if known issues like transmission problems or turbocharger failures arise, which can be expensive. Long-term ownership costs are largely dictated by how well the vehicle is maintained and the frequency of significant repairs. With proactive maintenance, it can remain an affordable vehicle to run, but unexpected major repairs could increase its overall cost of ownership.
2013 Chevrolet Orlando Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
-
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2013 Chevrolet Orlando Insurance
Insurance for a 2013 Chevrolet Orlando is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Wagon with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 Chevrolet Orlando Compare to Other Wagon?
The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando competed in a crowded segment with rivals like the Mazda5, Ford C-Max, and to some extent, smaller SUVs and traditional minivans. In terms of performance, the Orlando's base engine was often considered underpowered compared to rivals that offered more spirited acceleration or better engine responsiveness. The optional turbo offered a slight improvement but still lagged behind some competitors.
When it comes to features, the Orlando offered a decent package, especially with the MyLink infotainment system on higher trims, which was competitive for its era. However, rivals like the Mazda5 often provided a more engaging driving experience and sometimes more practical cargo solutions. The Ford C-Max, particularly the hybrid variant, offered superior fuel efficiency, a key advantage for many buyers.
Reliability is where the Orlando faced some challenges. While not universally poor, it generally received average to below-average reliability ratings in consumer surveys, with noted concerns in areas like the transmission and cooling system. Rivals like the Mazda5, despite its age, often had a reputation for robust mechanicals and good long-term reliability. The C-Max also generally fared well in reliability assessments.
Price-wise, the Orlando was often positioned competitively, offering a unique style and three-row seating at a lower price point than some alternatives. However, its resale value tended to be lower than some rivals, reflecting its overall market perception and reliability concerns.
Similar Alternatives:
When it comes to features, the Orlando offered a decent package, especially with the MyLink infotainment system on higher trims, which was competitive for its era. However, rivals like the Mazda5 often provided a more engaging driving experience and sometimes more practical cargo solutions. The Ford C-Max, particularly the hybrid variant, offered superior fuel efficiency, a key advantage for many buyers.
Reliability is where the Orlando faced some challenges. While not universally poor, it generally received average to below-average reliability ratings in consumer surveys, with noted concerns in areas like the transmission and cooling system. Rivals like the Mazda5, despite its age, often had a reputation for robust mechanicals and good long-term reliability. The C-Max also generally fared well in reliability assessments.
Price-wise, the Orlando was often positioned competitively, offering a unique style and three-row seating at a lower price point than some alternatives. However, its resale value tended to be lower than some rivals, reflecting its overall market perception and reliability concerns.
Similar Alternatives:
- Mazda5: Offers a more engaging driving dynamic and decent practicality with sliding rear doors.
- Ford C-Max: Superior fuel economy, especially the hybrid model, and a comfortable ride.
- Toyota Sienna/Honda Odyssey: If pure minivan practicality and reliability are paramount, these are superior choices, though more expensive.
- Compact SUVs (e.g., Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4): Offer more cargo space and often better reliability, though typically lack a third row.
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 Chevrolet Orlando a Good Wagon?
The 2013 Chevrolet Orlando is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a stylish and practical vehicle with flexible seating for up to seven passengers, particularly if they prioritize design over outright performance or class-leading reliability. It's best suited for families needing more space than a typical sedan but not the full size of a minivan, or for individuals who appreciate its unique crossover-SUV styling. While buying new is no longer an option, purchasing a used 2013 Orlando can be a worthwhile endeavor, provided it is thoroughly inspected. Focus on well-maintained examples, ideally with lower mileage and the 2.4-liter engine for better power delivery. Avoid models with documented transmission issues or evidence of poor maintenance. It's a sensible choice if found at a very attractive price point, but buyers should be prepared for potential maintenance needs compared to more highly-rated competitors.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma