The 1991 Geo Metro was a subcompact car born from a joint venture between General Motors and Suzuki, marketed under GM's Geo brand. Primarily offered as a 3-door or 5-door hatchback, it belonged to the first generation (1989-1994) of the Metro line. Key trims included the Base and LSi models, with new pricing ranging roughly from $6,700 to $9,500. It stood out for its exceptional fuel economy, low purchase price, and no-frills simplicity, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious buyers and commuters.
The Good
The 1991 Geo Metro's greatest advantage is its legendary fuel efficiency, often achieving 40-50+ MPG, appealing immensely to practical buyers. Its low purchase price and minimal maintenance costs offered unparalleled value. Emotionally, its simple, unpretentious design and nimble city performance made it a charming, easy-to-park companion for urban dwellers and those seeking a reliable, economical runabout.
The Bad
Known weaknesses of the 1991 Geo Metro include its underpowered engine, leading to slow acceleration, especially with air conditioning. Its minimalist design translates to a noisy cabin at highway speeds and limited comfort. Safety features are rudimentary by modern standards, and its small size offers less protection. Rust is a significant concern, particularly on body panels and undercarriage components in colder climates.
1991 Geo Metro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
The primary engine for the 1991 Geo Metro was a highly efficient 1.0-liter (993cc) SOHC (Single Overhead Cam) 3-cylinder engine. This engine utilized throttle-body fuel injection (TBI). A less common 1.3-liter (1298cc) SOHC 4-cylinder engine was also available in some specific trims or body styles (like the later LSi Sedan or convertible, though 1991 focused heavily on the 1.0L for hatchbacks), offering slightly more power. - Horsepower:
The 1.0-liter 3-cylinder engine produced approximately 55-58 horsepower at around 5,700 RPM. Torque figures were modest, typically around 58 lb-ft at 3,300 RPM, emphasizing efficiency over raw power. - Fuel Economy:
This was the Metro's standout feature. With the 1.0-liter engine and 5-speed manual transmission, drivers could routinely achieve EPA ratings in the range of 45 MPG city and 50 MPG highway, with some owners reporting even higher numbers under optimal driving conditions. Automatic transmission models typically saw figures in the high 30s to low 40s MPG. - 0-60 MPH Times:
Acceleration was leisurely, reflecting its economy focus. The 1.0-liter manual transmission models typically managed 0-60 mph sprints in the 13-15 second range. Automatic versions were slightly slower. - Towing Capacity:
The 1991 Geo Metro was not rated for towing and is generally not recommended for any towing capacity due to its lightweight construction, small engine, and basic braking system. - Trim-Level Features:
- Base (often referred to as 'Standard' or 'XFi' for the highest MPG variant): This trim emphasized affordability and minimalism. Standard features included manual steering, manual windows, manual door locks, and a basic AM/FM radio (sometimes optional). Air conditioning was an option. The XFi variant typically came as a 3-door hatchback with a slightly detuned 1.0L engine and taller gearing for maximum fuel efficiency, often foregoing power accessories for weight reduction.
- LSi: The LSi trim offered a modest upgrade in comfort and convenience. It typically included more comfortable cloth upholstery, a slightly better AM/FM stereo (sometimes with a cassette player), rear window defroster, and full wheel covers. Air conditioning and power steering were more commonly found as options on the LSi. Exterior accents like body-colored bumpers were also common for the LSi, giving it a slightly more refined appearance than the utilitarian base model.
1991 Geo Metro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1991 |
| Make | Geo |
| Model | Metro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2-Door Hatchback 5-Speed Manual |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Subcompact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | KOSAI |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 1620 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.0-L L-3 SOHC 6V |
| Engine Size | 1L |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1991 Geo Metro Have?
While the 1991 Geo Metro is celebrated for its mechanical simplicity and inherent reliability, age has introduced a set of frequently reported problems and long-term concerns for owners. The most prevalent issue is rust. Due to thinner gauge steel and less sophisticated rust proofing compared to contemporary Japanese rivals, the Metro is highly susceptible to rust on its body panels, particularly around the wheel arches, rocker panels, rear hatch, and floorboards. Significant undercarriage rust can compromise structural integrity, fuel lines, and brake lines, making pre-purchase inspections crucial.
Aging electrical components are another common complaint. Owners may experience issues with dashboard lights, intermittent wipers, faulty gauges, or power window mechanisms (if equipped) due to brittle wiring, corroded connectors, or failing switches over time. The original alternators and starters, while generally robust, are now well past their expected lifespan and can fail.
The exhaust system is prone to premature corrosion and leaks, often requiring replacement of mufflers, pipes, and catalytic converters. Suspension components, such as shocks, struts, and various bushings, wear out, leading to a less stable and comfortable ride. The small brakes are adequate for the car's weight but can develop issues like seized calipers or rusted brake lines.
Engine-wise, the 1.0L 3-cylinder is very durable, but neglecting timing belt replacement (a critical maintenance item) can lead to catastrophic engine failure. Fuel delivery issues, like a failing fuel pump or clogged fuel filter, can also arise from age. Heater cores are known to leak in older models, leading to coolant loss and foggy windows.
Regarding recalls, information specific to the 1991 Geo Metro is somewhat limited compared to modern vehicles. However, Geo Metros and their Suzuki Swift counterparts across various first-generation model years (including potential overlaps with 1991) did see some minor recalls. These typically involved concerns like faulty brake light switches that could prevent brake lights from illuminating (affecting 1989-1994 models), or minor issues with seat belt retractors. It's always advisable for potential buyers to check the NHTSA database for any specific recall notices related to the exact VIN of a vehicle they are considering, although major, widespread safety recalls were not a hallmark of the first-generation Metro.
Aging electrical components are another common complaint. Owners may experience issues with dashboard lights, intermittent wipers, faulty gauges, or power window mechanisms (if equipped) due to brittle wiring, corroded connectors, or failing switches over time. The original alternators and starters, while generally robust, are now well past their expected lifespan and can fail.
The exhaust system is prone to premature corrosion and leaks, often requiring replacement of mufflers, pipes, and catalytic converters. Suspension components, such as shocks, struts, and various bushings, wear out, leading to a less stable and comfortable ride. The small brakes are adequate for the car's weight but can develop issues like seized calipers or rusted brake lines.
Engine-wise, the 1.0L 3-cylinder is very durable, but neglecting timing belt replacement (a critical maintenance item) can lead to catastrophic engine failure. Fuel delivery issues, like a failing fuel pump or clogged fuel filter, can also arise from age. Heater cores are known to leak in older models, leading to coolant loss and foggy windows.
Regarding recalls, information specific to the 1991 Geo Metro is somewhat limited compared to modern vehicles. However, Geo Metros and their Suzuki Swift counterparts across various first-generation model years (including potential overlaps with 1991) did see some minor recalls. These typically involved concerns like faulty brake light switches that could prevent brake lights from illuminating (affecting 1989-1994 models), or minor issues with seat belt retractors. It's always advisable for potential buyers to check the NHTSA database for any specific recall notices related to the exact VIN of a vehicle they are considering, although major, widespread safety recalls were not a hallmark of the first-generation Metro.
How long will the 1991 Geo Metro last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1991 Geo Metro can achieve remarkable longevity, often reaching 150,000 to 200,000 miles, and some well-cared-for examples even surpassing that. Many have provided 15-20 years or more of service, primarily owing to their simple, robust powertrains. The 1.0-liter engine and manual transmission are particularly durable, often outlasting the body. Long-term durability is heavily dependent on rust prevention; vehicles in rust-belt regions rarely survive as long structurally. Weaknesses over time primarily stem from aging components like rubber bushings, seals, and wiring becoming brittle, and exhaust systems rusting out. Interior plastics can also become fragile. Regular fluid changes and addressing rust early are crucial for extending its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1991 Geo Metro embodied a "less is more" philosophy, resulting in an almost entirely minimalist approach to built-in technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features. This reflected its core design principle of affordability and maximum fuel efficiency.
Built-in Tech: There was virtually no advanced technology. The dashboard featured simple analog gauges for speed, fuel level, and coolant temperature. A basic array of warning lights indicated crucial vehicle functions. Climate control was purely mechanical, with sliders for fan speed, temperature, and vent selection. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or complex electronic systems.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment was an AM/FM radio, often a basic unit. An optional upgrade might have included an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, but even this was considered a luxury. CD players, auxiliary inputs, or any form of modern connectivity were decades away from being standard in this class of vehicle.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features were completely absent. There was no anti-lock braking system (ABS), traction control, stability control, or any form of cruise control (though an aftermarket option might exist). Power steering was an optional feature, typically found on LSi trims or those with air conditioning, but many base models had manual steering, demanding more effort at low speeds.
Safety Features: Safety features were fundamental. The primary safety equipment included manual lap and shoulder seat belts for all occupants. The vehicle utilized a basic unibody construction. Airbags were not standard equipment and were only starting to appear as optional features in more premium vehicles of this era; the Metro did not offer them. There were no modern crumple zones, side-impact protection beams, or advanced occupant protection systems. Given its small size and lightweight construction, it offered minimal protection in the event of a collision compared to larger vehicles or even more modern subcompacts.
Crash-Test Ratings: The 1991 Geo Metro was not subjected to the rigorous crash tests performed by modern organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) or contemporary NCAP programs. Older NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) front-impact tests might have been conducted, but its performance would be considered extremely poor by today's standards due to the lack of modern safety technology and its inherent small stature. Its compact footprint, while beneficial for parking and fuel economy, meant less mass and less structural absorption for impact energy.
Built-in Tech: There was virtually no advanced technology. The dashboard featured simple analog gauges for speed, fuel level, and coolant temperature. A basic array of warning lights indicated crucial vehicle functions. Climate control was purely mechanical, with sliders for fan speed, temperature, and vent selection. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or complex electronic systems.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment was an AM/FM radio, often a basic unit. An optional upgrade might have included an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, but even this was considered a luxury. CD players, auxiliary inputs, or any form of modern connectivity were decades away from being standard in this class of vehicle.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features were completely absent. There was no anti-lock braking system (ABS), traction control, stability control, or any form of cruise control (though an aftermarket option might exist). Power steering was an optional feature, typically found on LSi trims or those with air conditioning, but many base models had manual steering, demanding more effort at low speeds.
Safety Features: Safety features were fundamental. The primary safety equipment included manual lap and shoulder seat belts for all occupants. The vehicle utilized a basic unibody construction. Airbags were not standard equipment and were only starting to appear as optional features in more premium vehicles of this era; the Metro did not offer them. There were no modern crumple zones, side-impact protection beams, or advanced occupant protection systems. Given its small size and lightweight construction, it offered minimal protection in the event of a collision compared to larger vehicles or even more modern subcompacts.
Crash-Test Ratings: The 1991 Geo Metro was not subjected to the rigorous crash tests performed by modern organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) or contemporary NCAP programs. Older NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) front-impact tests might have been conducted, but its performance would be considered extremely poor by today's standards due to the lack of modern safety technology and its inherent small stature. Its compact footprint, while beneficial for parking and fuel economy, meant less mass and less structural absorption for impact energy.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1991 Geo Metro Prices and Market Value
When new in 1991, the Geo Metro was one of the most affordable cars on the market, with prices for a base 3-door hatchback starting around $6,700 and the more equipped LSi models potentially reaching $9,500. This represented incredible value.
Today, its value has plummeted significantly due to depreciation over three decades. Current used market prices for a 1991 Geo Metro are highly variable, typically ranging from $1,000 for a running but rough example to $3,000-$5,000+ for a very clean, low-mileage, or meticulously maintained specimen. Pristine examples, especially those with manual transmissions, can sometimes command higher prices from enthusiasts or collectors.
Factors affecting its current resale value include overall body condition (rust is a major detractor), mechanical health, mileage, and maintenance history. Manual transmission models often fetch a slight premium due to their "fun-to-drive" factor and reputation for better fuel economy. While it suffered massive depreciation in its early life, it has now largely "bottomed out," meaning its value is unlikely to fall much further and might even see slight appreciation for exceptionally preserved examples.
Today, its value has plummeted significantly due to depreciation over three decades. Current used market prices for a 1991 Geo Metro are highly variable, typically ranging from $1,000 for a running but rough example to $3,000-$5,000+ for a very clean, low-mileage, or meticulously maintained specimen. Pristine examples, especially those with manual transmissions, can sometimes command higher prices from enthusiasts or collectors.
Factors affecting its current resale value include overall body condition (rust is a major detractor), mechanical health, mileage, and maintenance history. Manual transmission models often fetch a slight premium due to their "fun-to-drive" factor and reputation for better fuel economy. While it suffered massive depreciation in its early life, it has now largely "bottomed out," meaning its value is unlikely to fall much further and might even see slight appreciation for exceptionally preserved examples.
1991 Geo Metro Cost of Ownership
The 1991 Geo Metro is an exceptionally economical vehicle to own in the long term. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its minimal market value, low performance, and cheap repair costs. Fuel costs are remarkably low, thanks to its legendary fuel economy of 40-50+ MPG. Maintenance and repair are also very inexpensive; parts are simple, readily available (often shared with Suzuki Swift), and labor costs are minimal due to straightforward mechanics. Its inherent simplicity means fewer complex systems to fail. The main costs are age-related replacements like tires, brakes, and dealing with rust. Overall, it's one of the most budget-friendly cars to own, making it ideal for those prioritizing thriftiness above all else.
1991 Geo Metro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
10.6 gallons
City Mileage
43 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
51 miles/gallon
1991 Geo Metro Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1991 Geo Metro Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1991 Geo Metro Insurance
Insurance for a 1991 Geo Metro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1991 Geo Metro Compare to Other Hatchback?
When stacking the 1991 Geo Metro against its contemporaries in the subcompact class, vehicles like the Honda Civic hatchback, Toyota Tercel, Nissan Sentra (base models), Hyundai Excel, and Ford Festiva emerge as key rivals. The Metro generally carved out its niche at the extreme end of affordability and fuel efficiency, often sacrificing other attributes.
Performance: The Geo Metro's 1.0L engine with 55-58 horsepower was significantly underpowered compared to the base Honda Civic or Toyota Tercel, which often offered 70-100+ hp, resulting in much quicker acceleration and more confident highway merging. The Metro was more comparable to the Ford Festiva or Hyundai Excel in terms of performance, where acceleration was leisurely. For sheer "get up and go," the Metro lagged behind.
Features: The Metro was notoriously spartan. Its features were basic, with manual windows, locks, and often no power steering or air conditioning in base trims. Even the LSi offered minimal amenities. Rivals like the Honda Civic and Toyota Tercel, even in their entry-level forms, often provided a more refined interior, better sound insulation, and a broader range of available comfort features like power steering and a more robust stereo system. The Hyundai Excel and Ford Festiva were closer in their utilitarian approach but sometimes offered slightly more substantial interiors or optional extras.
Reliability: Surprisingly, the Geo Metro holds its own in terms of mechanical reliability. Its simple 1.0L engine is remarkably robust and durable, often comparable to the legendary reliability of Honda and Toyota engines of the era, provided basic maintenance is performed. However, the Metro's Achilles' heel is its propensity for rust, which can compromise its long-term structural integrity more readily than its Japanese competitors. Hyundai Excels from this period had a reputation for lower long-term reliability compared to the Metro.
Price: This was where the Metro dominated. It was consistently one of the cheapest new cars available, undercutting rivals like the Civic and Tercel significantly. This price advantage carried over into the used market, where it remains one of the most affordable running vehicles one can acquire.
Recommended Alternatives:
Performance: The Geo Metro's 1.0L engine with 55-58 horsepower was significantly underpowered compared to the base Honda Civic or Toyota Tercel, which often offered 70-100+ hp, resulting in much quicker acceleration and more confident highway merging. The Metro was more comparable to the Ford Festiva or Hyundai Excel in terms of performance, where acceleration was leisurely. For sheer "get up and go," the Metro lagged behind.
Features: The Metro was notoriously spartan. Its features were basic, with manual windows, locks, and often no power steering or air conditioning in base trims. Even the LSi offered minimal amenities. Rivals like the Honda Civic and Toyota Tercel, even in their entry-level forms, often provided a more refined interior, better sound insulation, and a broader range of available comfort features like power steering and a more robust stereo system. The Hyundai Excel and Ford Festiva were closer in their utilitarian approach but sometimes offered slightly more substantial interiors or optional extras.
Reliability: Surprisingly, the Geo Metro holds its own in terms of mechanical reliability. Its simple 1.0L engine is remarkably robust and durable, often comparable to the legendary reliability of Honda and Toyota engines of the era, provided basic maintenance is performed. However, the Metro's Achilles' heel is its propensity for rust, which can compromise its long-term structural integrity more readily than its Japanese competitors. Hyundai Excels from this period had a reputation for lower long-term reliability compared to the Metro.
Price: This was where the Metro dominated. It was consistently one of the cheapest new cars available, undercutting rivals like the Civic and Tercel significantly. This price advantage carried over into the used market, where it remains one of the most affordable running vehicles one can acquire.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Better Overall (if budget allows): A Honda Civic (EF or EG generation) or Toyota Tercel (second or third gen) from the early 90s would offer significantly better performance, superior safety (relatively speaking), greater refinement, and often better rust resistance, albeit at a higher purchase price (even used) and potentially slightly lower fuel economy.
- Similar (budget/efficiency focus): The Ford Festiva (essentially a Mazda 121 rebadge) shared a similar philosophy of extreme economy and simplicity. The Suzuki Swift (on which the Metro was based) is virtually identical and offers the same pros and cons. These are good alternatives if the Metro's unique charm isn't a must-have.
Final Verdict: Is the 1991 Geo Metro a Good Hatchback?
The 1991 Geo Metro is ideal for specific, highly practical buyers. It's perfect for the budget-conscious commuter seeking ultimate fuel efficiency and minimal running costs. It also suits city dwellers who value easy parking and nimble maneuverability above all else. For first-time drivers on a tight budget, it can be a simple, forgiving car to learn on, provided its safety limitations are understood.
Is it worth buying today? Absolutely, but only under the right conditions. It is exclusively a used purchase. Look for examples that are as rust-free as possible, especially in the undercarriage and structural components, as rust is its biggest long-term killer. A Metro with a well-documented maintenance history, particularly for timing belt changes, is highly desirable. The 5-speed manual transmission is often preferred for maximum fuel economy and engagement, though a 3-speed automatic is available. While the LSi trim offers minor creature comforts, even a base model serves its purpose well. It is not suitable as a primary family vehicle due to its lack of modern safety features and limited space, but it excels as a secondary car, a cheap daily driver, or a hypermiling project.
Is it worth buying today? Absolutely, but only under the right conditions. It is exclusively a used purchase. Look for examples that are as rust-free as possible, especially in the undercarriage and structural components, as rust is its biggest long-term killer. A Metro with a well-documented maintenance history, particularly for timing belt changes, is highly desirable. The 5-speed manual transmission is often preferred for maximum fuel economy and engagement, though a 3-speed automatic is available. While the LSi trim offers minor creature comforts, even a base model serves its purpose well. It is not suitable as a primary family vehicle due to its lack of modern safety features and limited space, but it excels as a secondary car, a cheap daily driver, or a hypermiling project.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.