The 1982 Kenworth K100 is an iconic Class 8 conventional truck, part of a lineage dating back to the 1960s. Known for its distinctive long-hood design and robust construction, it primarily served as a heavy-duty highway tractor. While specific trims for 1982 aren't distinctly categorized like modern SUVs, the K100's popularity stemmed from its legendary durability, driver comfort, and powerful performance, making it a workhorse favored by owner-operators and fleet managers alike.
The Good
The 1982 Kenworth K100 offers exceptional reliability and commanding performance, built to endure punishing hauls. Its spacious, driver-centric cabin provides surprising comfort for long-distance journeys, appealing to practical needs. Emotionally, its classic, imposing design evokes a sense of pride and proven capability, representing enduring value.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for a 1982 Kenworth K100 often revolve around age-related wear. Watch out for rust, particularly on frame rails and cab corners, and inspect the suspension and braking systems thoroughly for any signs of fatigue or necessary overhauls. Older electrical systems can also be a concern.
1982 Kenworth K100: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Kenworth K100 was offered with a range of powerful diesel engines from Cummins and Caterpillar, catering to various hauling needs. Common options included the Cummins NTC series (e.g., NTC-230, NTC-290, NTC-400) and Caterpillar 3406 variants.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings typically ranged from approximately 230 hp to over 400 hp, depending on the specific engine model and tune. High-performance configurations could exceed this.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy in these heavy-duty trucks is highly variable, influenced by engine, transmission, load, terrain, and driving style. Estimates for this era and model typically fell in the range of 4-6 miles per gallon (MPG).
- 0-60 Times: Official 0-60 mph times are not typically published for commercial heavy-duty trucks as they are not a primary performance metric. With a full load, acceleration would be gradual.
- Towing Capacity: As a Class 8 tractor, the K100 was designed for heavy hauling. Its Gross Combination Weight Rating (GCWR) would typically range from 80,000 lbs up to 130,000 lbs or more, depending on configuration and specific application (e.g., flatbed, tanker, van trailers).
- Trim-Level Features: While Kenworth K100s weren't sold in distinct trims like passenger cars, customization and options were extensive. Buyers could specify different wheelbase lengths, axle configurations (e.g., single or tandem rear axles), suspension types (air or mechanical), and various cab configurations (e.g., day cab, extended or raised roof sleepers). Interior appointments could range from basic utilitarian setups to more comfortable arrangements with amenities for long-haul drivers. Optional features included auxiliary power units (APUs), upgraded seating, and advanced (for the time) instrumentation.
1982 Kenworth K100 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1982 |
| Make | Kenworth |
| Model | K100 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | CHILLICOTHE |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 57000 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 14.6L L6 DIESEL |
| Engine Size | 14.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | 6x4 |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1982 Kenworth K100 Have?
For a 1982 Kenworth K100, the most frequently reported issues are generally related to the natural wear and tear associated with a vehicle of its age and intended use. Rust is a common concern, particularly in areas exposed to road salt and moisture, affecting frame rails, cab corners, and wheel wells. The electrical system, while generally robust for its time, can develop issues like corroded connections, failing switches, or intermittent wiring problems as components age. The drivetrain, including the engine and transmission, can require significant maintenance over time. Specific engine models like older Cummins or Cat engines might have known quirks or require specialized knowledge for repairs, but they are generally considered very durable if properly maintained. Clutch wear, brake component aging, and suspension wear (leaf springs, air bags if equipped) are also common as these are high-stress components. Fuel and oil leaks can develop over time due to aging seals and hoses. Recalls are less common for a vehicle of this vintage unless they address a critical safety defect that was identified and mandated. However, individual components or subsystems might have had service bulletins issued by manufacturers. Long-term reliability is highly dependent on the initial build quality, the specific components used (e.g., engine choice), and, most importantly, the maintenance history. A well-maintained K100 can still be exceptionally reliable, while one that has been neglected will likely present numerous challenges. There are no widely publicized model-year specific major flaws for the 1982 K100 that stand out, as Kenworth was known for consistent quality, but rather the accumulation of age-related issues across the board.
How long will the 1982 Kenworth K100 last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1982 Kenworth K100 is challenging as many were used for heavy-duty, long-haul trucking, accumulating hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of miles. A well-maintained K100 could realistically serve for 1 to 1.5 million miles or more before major overhauls become extensive. Their long-term durability is legendary, a hallmark of Kenworth engineering. However, weaknesses emerge over time: frame rust, aging electrical harnesses, and wear on suspension and braking components are significant considerations. Engine and transmission life depends heavily on diligent maintenance, oil changes, and proper operation. While mechanically robust, the accumulation of age means that continuous investment in repairs and refurbishment is often necessary to keep them in prime operating condition.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Kenworth K100 predates the widespread adoption of advanced technology seen in modern vehicles. Built as a utilitarian workhorse, its focus was on functionality and driver control rather than sophisticated electronics. Built-in tech was minimal by today's standards, typically comprising a robust analog gauge cluster displaying engine vitals (speed, RPM, oil pressure, temperature, fuel level), turn signals, and warning lights. Entertainment options were basic; most trucks featured an AM/FM radio, and perhaps an 8-track or early cassette player as an optional upgrade. There were no integrated infotainment systems or touchscreens. Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was not standard and likely a rare, expensive option for this model year, if available at all. Features like cruise control might have been available as an option. Safety features were primarily mechanical: sturdy frame construction, effective hydraulic or air-over-hydraulic braking systems (depending on configuration), seat belts (though often basic lap belts), and robust exterior lighting. Air conditioning and power steering were common options that greatly enhanced driver comfort and safety by reducing fatigue. There were no crash-test ratings available for commercial trucks like the K100 in the same way passenger vehicles are tested by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Their safety was judged by their ability to withstand the rigors of heavy-duty operation and their onboard mechanical safety systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Kenworth K100 Prices and Market Value
When new in 1982, a Kenworth K100 tractor could have cost anywhere from $60,000 to over $100,000 depending on engine, drivetrain, and cab specifications. As a commercial vehicle, its depreciation curve was different from passenger cars; they were work tools whose value was tied to their earning potential. Currently, used prices for a 1982 Kenworth K100 vary dramatically. Well-maintained, operational units can range from $20,000 to $50,000+, while project trucks or those needing significant restoration might be found for less. Factors affecting resale value include: the specific engine and transmission, overall condition (frame rust is a major detractor), mileage, maintenance history, and whether it's a desirable configuration for collectors or classic truck enthusiasts. Restored or immaculately preserved examples command premium prices.
1982 Kenworth K100 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1982 Kenworth K100 is generally not economical in the way a modern pickup truck might be. Insurance costs can be substantial, especially for specialized classic truck policies or commercial use. Fuel costs are high due to the large diesel engines and the nature of the vehicle, often achieving single-digit MPG. Maintenance and repair are significant; while parts are available, they are often specialized and labor-intensive. Routine maintenance (oil changes, filter replacements, brake checks) is critical but costly. Unexpected repairs can be expensive due to the complexity of heavy-duty components. It is a costly vehicle to own, demanding a significant budget for upkeep, but its durability can provide value if used for its intended purpose.
1982 Kenworth K100 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1982 Kenworth K100 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1982 Kenworth K100 Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Kenworth K100 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Kenworth K100 Compare to Other Truck?
The 1982 Kenworth K100 competed against other top-tier Class 8 conventional tractors of its era, such as Peterbilt 359/379, Freightliner FLC120/FLC112, and Mack R-Model trucks. In terms of performance, the K100, equipped with powerful Cummins or Caterpillar engines, offered comparable hauling power and torque to its rivals. Reliability was a strong suit for Kenworth, often considered on par with or superior to many competitors, known for its robust chassis and build quality. Driver comfort was also a Kenworth hallmark, with well-designed cabins offering good visibility and ergonomics for the time, though specific features would vary greatly by customer specification. Price-wise, Kenworths typically occupied the premium end of the market, reflecting their perceived quality and durability, often being more expensive than comparable Freightliners or some Mack models. As for alternatives:
Similar:
- Peterbilt 359/379: A direct competitor known for its classic styling and robust build. Often considered to have a slightly more 'driver-friendly' feel and aesthetics by some.
- Mack R-Model: Known for its bulldog durability and often powerful engines, though interior comfort might have been slightly less refined than Kenworth or Peterbilt.
- Freightliner FLC Series: Could offer a more modern (for the time) design and potentially slightly better fuel efficiency in some configurations, though some drivers perceived them as less robust than Kenworth.
- Later Models (e.g., 1990s Kenworth T600/T800): If looking for more advanced (though still dated) technology, improved aerodynamics, and potentially better fuel economy, a newer used truck from the 1990s would be a significant step up, though at a higher purchase price.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Kenworth K100 a Good Truck?
The 1982 Kenworth K100 is ideal for classic truck enthusiasts, collectors, or owner-operators who appreciate its iconic styling, legendary durability, and the experience of driving a robust, analog machine. It is worth buying for those with the mechanical aptitude and budget to maintain an older heavy-duty vehicle. This truck is not for the faint of heart or those seeking low maintenance. It is best purchased as a used vehicle, with thorough inspection of the frame, engine, and transmission being paramount. Look for well-maintained examples with clear service records. Restored or low-mileage units command higher prices but offer a more reliable starting point. It's a significant investment in time and money, but for the right person, it offers an unparalleled connection to trucking history and a capable, albeit demanding, workhorse.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.