The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 is a popular Class 8 truck known for its aerodynamic design and driver-focused features. Part of the Cascadia model line, which debuted in 2007, this specific year offers a conventional cab body style. Key trims often revolve around engine and spec configurations, with pricing varying significantly based on new or used status, configuration, and mileage. Its popularity stems from its blend of fuel efficiency, driver comfort, and Freightliner's reputation for reliability, making it a common sight on highways.
The Good
The 2016 Cascadia 113 excels with impressive fuel efficiency and robust reliability, appealing to the practical buyer's bottom line. Emotionally, drivers appreciate its comfortable, quiet cab designed for long hauls, fostering a sense of well-being and productivity. Its aerodynamic design contributes to its efficiency, enhancing value over time.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of the possibility of electrical system glitches, particularly with sensors and warning lights, which can be a common concern. Some owners have also reported issues with DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid) system components, requiring attention. Transmission issues, though not universal, are also something to monitor.
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 typically offered a range of Detroit Diesel engines, known for their power and efficiency. Common options included the Detroit DD13 and DD15. The DD13 is a 12.8-liter inline-6 engine, while the DD15 is a larger 14.8-liter inline-6. Variants within these models provided different power and torque outputs to suit various hauling needs.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings for the Detroit engines in the 2016 Cascadia 113 generally ranged from approximately 350 hp to over 500 hp, depending on the specific engine model and configuration. For example, a DD13 might be spec'd from 350-450 hp, while a DD15 could offer 400-505 hp.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy in Class 8 trucks like the Cascadia 113 is highly dependent on load, terrain, driving style, and specific engine/transmission configurations. However, the Cascadia 113 was praised for its aerodynamic design, which significantly contributes to better fuel efficiency compared to less streamlined trucks. A reasonable expectation for highway driving might be in the range of 5.5 to 7.5 miles per gallon (MPG), though this is a very broad estimate.
- 0-60 Times: Traditional 0-60 mph acceleration times are not a primary metric for heavy-duty commercial trucks. Their focus is on sustained power and torque for hauling, not rapid acceleration.
- Towing Capacity: As a Class 8 tractor, the 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 is designed for heavy-duty hauling. Its towing capacity is substantial and determined by its Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) and Gross Combination Weight Rating (GCWR), which can exceed 80,000 pounds and often go much higher depending on the application (e.g., van trailers, flatbeds, tankers). Specific capacities are configured based on the chassis, axle ratings, and trailer type.
- Trim-Level Features: Trims and configurations vary widely, but common features that distinguish models often include:
- Cab configurations: Day cabs (shorter for local/regional work) versus various sleeper cab options (e.g., 48-inch, 57-inch, 72-inch) offering amenities for long-haul drivers.
- Interior amenities: Upgrades might include premium seating, enhanced infotainment systems, larger sleeper berths with more storage, and auxiliary heating/cooling.
- Aerodynamic packages: Different bumper, fairing, and chassis skirt options to optimize airflow and fuel efficiency.
- Powertrain specifications: Choice of engines, transmissions (e.g., manual, automated manual, automatic), and axle ratios.
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2016 |
| Make | Freightliner |
| Model | Cascadia 113 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Mexico |
| Manufacturing City | SANTIAGO |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 12.8-L L-6 Diesel |
| Engine Size | 12.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Have?
The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113, like many heavy-duty trucks, has had its share of reported issues and recalls, though overall reliability is generally considered strong for its class. One of the more frequently mentioned areas of concern across various model years, including 2016, involves the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system and Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF). Issues can include clogging of the DPF, leading to reduced engine performance and increased regeneration cycles, or problems with the EGR valve itself, potentially causing performance issues and increased emissions. These can be costly to repair and require diligent maintenance.
Another area that has seen attention is the electrical system. Owners have reported instances of intermittent electrical gremlins, such as malfunctioning sensors, dashboard warning lights appearing without obvious cause, and issues with various electronic control modules. This can sometimes be frustrating for diagnostics and repairs.
The transmission system, particularly automated manual transmissions (AMTs) like the Detroit DT12, can also be a point of concern. While offering efficiency benefits, these complex systems can sometimes experience electronic or mechanical faults that require specialized diagnosis and repair.
Recalls for the 2016 Cascadia have been issued for various reasons, often related to safety components. For instance, recalls might address potential issues with braking systems, steering components, or electrical wiring harnesses that could pose a fire risk or affect vehicle operation. Specific recall campaigns would need to be checked against the vehicle's VIN through NHTSA or Freightliner's database.
Long-term reliability is heavily influenced by how the truck has been maintained. Consistent oil changes, DPF cleaning cycles, and adherence to recommended service intervals are critical. Trucks used in severe duty cycles or those that have been poorly maintained are more likely to experience significant issues over time. Owners should be vigilant about any changes in engine performance, unusual noises, or warning lights.
Another area that has seen attention is the electrical system. Owners have reported instances of intermittent electrical gremlins, such as malfunctioning sensors, dashboard warning lights appearing without obvious cause, and issues with various electronic control modules. This can sometimes be frustrating for diagnostics and repairs.
The transmission system, particularly automated manual transmissions (AMTs) like the Detroit DT12, can also be a point of concern. While offering efficiency benefits, these complex systems can sometimes experience electronic or mechanical faults that require specialized diagnosis and repair.
Recalls for the 2016 Cascadia have been issued for various reasons, often related to safety components. For instance, recalls might address potential issues with braking systems, steering components, or electrical wiring harnesses that could pose a fire risk or affect vehicle operation. Specific recall campaigns would need to be checked against the vehicle's VIN through NHTSA or Freightliner's database.
Long-term reliability is heavily influenced by how the truck has been maintained. Consistent oil changes, DPF cleaning cycles, and adherence to recommended service intervals are critical. Trucks used in severe duty cycles or those that have been poorly maintained are more likely to experience significant issues over time. Owners should be vigilant about any changes in engine performance, unusual noises, or warning lights.
How long will the 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 last?
The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 is built for longevity and can typically serve for 500,000 to over 1,000,000 miles or more with diligent maintenance. Average annual mileage for long-haul trucks can range from 50,000 to 120,000 miles, meaning a 2016 model could have accumulated anywhere from 300,000 to well over 700,000 miles by now. Its long-term durability is generally strong, with the chassis and core mechanical components designed for extensive service life. However, like all complex machinery, weaknesses can emerge over time. Electrical components, EGR/DPF systems, and exhaust after-treatment systems are areas that may require attention as the vehicle ages and accumulates mileage. Regular and proactive maintenance is key to extending its service life and minimizing costly repairs.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 offered a functional and driver-centric technology suite, prioritizing productivity and safety. Standard features typically included a basic AM/FM radio, a digital clock, and essential instrumentation display. Optional upgrades significantly enhanced the in-cab experience, with options for enhanced infotainment systems featuring larger displays, Bluetooth connectivity for hands-free calling and audio streaming, and integrated navigation. USB ports and auxiliary power outlets were also common for charging devices.
Driver-assistance features on the 2016 model were more focused on core safety and operational aids rather than the advanced autonomous systems found in newer vehicles. These could include features like cruise control for efficient highway driving, an engine brake for controlled descents, and various warning systems. While not standard on all models, optional enhancements could include features such as lane departure warning systems, adaptive cruise control (though less common and sophisticated than today's systems), and advanced telematics for fleet management and driver monitoring.
Safety features were paramount. The Cascadia 113 was built with a strong, durable frame designed to withstand significant impact. Standard safety equipment included robust braking systems, multiple airbags (driver and passenger), anti-lock braking systems (ABS), and advanced lighting for visibility. Optional safety features could include stability control systems and improved mirror setups for enhanced situational awareness.
Crash-test ratings for heavy-duty commercial trucks like the Cascadia 113 are typically not rated by agencies like the IIHS or NHTSA in the same way passenger vehicles are. Instead, safety is evaluated through internal engineering standards, compliance with federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS), and specific testing conducted by Freightliner. The design emphasizes occupant protection through its structural integrity and integrated safety systems. It's crucial to check specific build sheets for the exact technology and safety features present on any given 2016 Cascadia 113, as options varied considerably based on original customer specifications.
Driver-assistance features on the 2016 model were more focused on core safety and operational aids rather than the advanced autonomous systems found in newer vehicles. These could include features like cruise control for efficient highway driving, an engine brake for controlled descents, and various warning systems. While not standard on all models, optional enhancements could include features such as lane departure warning systems, adaptive cruise control (though less common and sophisticated than today's systems), and advanced telematics for fleet management and driver monitoring.
Safety features were paramount. The Cascadia 113 was built with a strong, durable frame designed to withstand significant impact. Standard safety equipment included robust braking systems, multiple airbags (driver and passenger), anti-lock braking systems (ABS), and advanced lighting for visibility. Optional safety features could include stability control systems and improved mirror setups for enhanced situational awareness.
Crash-test ratings for heavy-duty commercial trucks like the Cascadia 113 are typically not rated by agencies like the IIHS or NHTSA in the same way passenger vehicles are. Instead, safety is evaluated through internal engineering standards, compliance with federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS), and specific testing conducted by Freightliner. The design emphasizes occupant protection through its structural integrity and integrated safety systems. It's crucial to check specific build sheets for the exact technology and safety features present on any given 2016 Cascadia 113, as options varied considerably based on original customer specifications.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Brilliant White
Graphite Gray
Midnight Black
Ruby Red
Sky Blue
Forest Green
Silverstone Metallic
Interior Colors
Tan Cloth
Gray Vinyl
Black Leatherette
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Prices and Market Value
When new, a 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 could range significantly in price, typically starting around $100,000 and easily climbing to $150,000 or more for heavily optioned sleeper configurations.
Currently, the used market prices for a 2016 Cascadia 113 vary greatly based on mileage, condition, engine, transmission, and overall configuration. Expect to find them generally priced between $30,000 and $70,000, though exceptional low-mileage or highly specialized units could fall outside this range.
Freightliner Cascadias hold their value relatively well compared to some other commercial vehicles, especially those with reliable powertrains and good maintenance records. Depreciation is steepest in the first few years. Factors influencing resale value include engine hours, remaining tire tread, overall cosmetic and mechanical condition, absence of major frame damage or rust, and the presence of desirable options like spacious sleeper cabs or fuel-efficient drivetrains. A well-maintained truck with a strong service history will command a higher price.
Currently, the used market prices for a 2016 Cascadia 113 vary greatly based on mileage, condition, engine, transmission, and overall configuration. Expect to find them generally priced between $30,000 and $70,000, though exceptional low-mileage or highly specialized units could fall outside this range.
Freightliner Cascadias hold their value relatively well compared to some other commercial vehicles, especially those with reliable powertrains and good maintenance records. Depreciation is steepest in the first few years. Factors influencing resale value include engine hours, remaining tire tread, overall cosmetic and mechanical condition, absence of major frame damage or rust, and the presence of desirable options like spacious sleeper cabs or fuel-efficient drivetrains. A well-maintained truck with a strong service history will command a higher price.
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 involves significant costs. Insurance premiums for commercial trucks are substantial, influenced by coverage levels, driver history, and operating radius. Fuel is a major ongoing expense, with MPG heavily dependent on load, terrain, and driving habits. Maintenance costs are also considerable, encompassing regular fluid changes, filter replacements, tire wear, and potential repairs to complex systems like the engine, transmission, and emissions equipment. Repair costs for diesel engines and heavy-duty components can be high. Overall, while the Cascadia 113 is designed for efficiency, its long-term ownership costs are substantial and can be considered costly, requiring careful budgeting and robust operational planning. It is an economical choice for its intended purpose due to its fuel efficiency relative to its power, but not inherently cheap to own.
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Insurance
Insurance for a 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 Compare to Other Truck?
The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 competes fiercely in the Class 8 vocational and over-the-road truck market. Its primary rivals include models from Volvo Trucks (like the VNL series), Kenworth (T680/T880), Peterbilt (579/567), and International (ProStar/LT Series).
Performance: The Cascadia 113, particularly with Detroit Diesel engines, generally offers competitive performance in terms of power and torque for its class. Its aerodynamic design is a standout feature contributing to strong fuel efficiency, often matching or exceeding many competitors. Volvo's I-Save technology or Kenworth's PACCAR engines also offer excellent fuel economy and performance profiles.
Features: In 2016, the Cascadia was lauded for its driver-focused interior and aerodynamic improvements. While features like advanced infotainment and comprehensive driver-assistance systems were becoming more prevalent, the Cascadia offered a solid suite of comfort and productivity tools. Competitors like the Kenworth T680 and Peterbilt 579 were also pushing boundaries in cab design and technology for driver comfort and efficiency. International's ProStar was also a strong contender in the fuel-efficiency and driver comfort space.
Reliability: Freightliner has a strong reputation for reliability, and the Cascadia line is no exception. However, like all modern trucks, specific issues can arise. Competitors like Kenworth and Peterbilt are often perceived as having an edge in long-term ruggedness and build quality by some owner-operators, though this can be subjective and depend heavily on specific configurations and maintenance. Volvo trucks also boast a solid reputation for reliability, particularly in terms of powertrain components.
Price: New pricing for these trucks is generally in a similar range, with variations depending on brand prestige, specific configurations, and dealer incentives. On the used market, the 2016 Cascadia 113 offers a strong value proposition due to its widespread availability and reputation for efficient operation.
Recommendations:
Ultimately, the best choice depends on specific operational needs, driver preferences, and budget.
Performance: The Cascadia 113, particularly with Detroit Diesel engines, generally offers competitive performance in terms of power and torque for its class. Its aerodynamic design is a standout feature contributing to strong fuel efficiency, often matching or exceeding many competitors. Volvo's I-Save technology or Kenworth's PACCAR engines also offer excellent fuel economy and performance profiles.
Features: In 2016, the Cascadia was lauded for its driver-focused interior and aerodynamic improvements. While features like advanced infotainment and comprehensive driver-assistance systems were becoming more prevalent, the Cascadia offered a solid suite of comfort and productivity tools. Competitors like the Kenworth T680 and Peterbilt 579 were also pushing boundaries in cab design and technology for driver comfort and efficiency. International's ProStar was also a strong contender in the fuel-efficiency and driver comfort space.
Reliability: Freightliner has a strong reputation for reliability, and the Cascadia line is no exception. However, like all modern trucks, specific issues can arise. Competitors like Kenworth and Peterbilt are often perceived as having an edge in long-term ruggedness and build quality by some owner-operators, though this can be subjective and depend heavily on specific configurations and maintenance. Volvo trucks also boast a solid reputation for reliability, particularly in terms of powertrain components.
Price: New pricing for these trucks is generally in a similar range, with variations depending on brand prestige, specific configurations, and dealer incentives. On the used market, the 2016 Cascadia 113 offers a strong value proposition due to its widespread availability and reputation for efficient operation.
Recommendations:
- Similar Alternatives: The Kenworth T680 and Peterbilt 579 are excellent, often considered premium alternatives with comparable or superior cab amenities and often a slightly higher perceived resale value. The Volvo VNL series offers strong performance and reliability, with a focus on driver comfort.
- Potentially Better Alternatives (depending on need): If absolute ruggedness for vocational use is prioritized, a Peterbilt 567 or Kenworth T880 might be considered, though they sacrifice some aerodynamic efficiency for durability. For fleets prioritizing extensive dealer support and proven technology, the Cascadia 113 remains a top choice.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on specific operational needs, driver preferences, and budget.
Final Verdict: Is the 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 a Good Truck?
The 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 113 is an ideal choice for owner-operators and fleet managers prioritizing fuel efficiency, reliable performance, and a comfortable driver environment for long-haul operations. It represents a strong value proposition, especially on the used market, where its initial depreciation has already occurred.
It is absolutely worth buying if acquired with a thorough pre-purchase inspection, focusing on its maintenance history and any potential issues related to the emissions system or electronics. Specific trims with larger sleeper cabs are better suited for drivers who spend extended periods on the road. Buying used is generally recommended to maximize value. While not the absolute most premium option available, its blend of cost-effectiveness, proven reliability, and fuel efficiency makes it a highly sensible and often superior choice for many trucking applications. It remains a workhorse capable of delivering strong ROI when properly maintained.
It is absolutely worth buying if acquired with a thorough pre-purchase inspection, focusing on its maintenance history and any potential issues related to the emissions system or electronics. Specific trims with larger sleeper cabs are better suited for drivers who spend extended periods on the road. Buying used is generally recommended to maximize value. While not the absolute most premium option available, its blend of cost-effectiveness, proven reliability, and fuel efficiency makes it a highly sensible and often superior choice for many trucking applications. It remains a workhorse capable of delivering strong ROI when properly maintained.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.