The 1983 Buick Skylark, part of the sixth generation (1980-1985), offered a front-wheel-drive platform and a range of body styles including coupe and sedan. Key trims included the base Skylark, the sporty Skylark T-Type, and the luxurious Skylark Limited. Its popularity stemmed from its comfortable ride, fuel efficiency for its era, and Buick's reputation for refinement. Pricing at launch typically ranged from the low $8,000s to over $10,000 depending on trim and options.
The Good
The 1983 Skylark offered a smooth, comfortable ride and decent fuel economy, appealing to practical buyers. Emotionally, its refined styling and Buick badge provided a sense of quiet luxury and reliability for its time, making it a sensible choice.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1983 Skylark include susceptibility to rust, particularly in the lower body panels and wheel wells. Electrical issues, such as faulty sensors or wiring harnesses, and carburetor problems on some engine variants are also points to watch out for.
1983 Buick Skylark: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L 4-cylinder (Tech IV)
- 3.0L V6
- 3.8L V6 (Naturally Aspirated and Turbocharged for T-Type)
- Horsepower:
- 2.5L 4-cylinder: Approximately 90-100 hp
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 115 hp
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 110 hp
- 3.8L Turbo V6 (T-Type): Approximately 165 hp
- Fuel Economy:
- Varies by engine and transmission, but generally in the range of 20-25 MPG city / 30-35 MPG highway for 4-cylinder and base V6 models. Turbo V6 would be less efficient.
- 0-60 Times:
- Not widely documented for base models, but typically in the 10-15 second range. The T-Type with the turbo V6 could achieve closer to 9-10 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- Towing was not a primary focus for the Skylark, and specific towing capacities are generally not advertised or applicable for typical consumer use.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Skylark: Standard amenities, cloth or vinyl seating, basic AM/FM radio, power steering, power brakes.
- Skylark Limited: Upgraded interior fabrics, more sound insulation, cruise control, power windows and locks (often optional), upgraded stereo, tilt steering wheel.
- Skylark T-Type: Sport-tuned suspension, distinctive exterior badging and trim, bucket seats with console, performance-oriented steering wheel, the more powerful 3.8L turbo V6 engine, often a 4-speed automatic transmission.
1983 Buick Skylark Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1983 |
| Make | Buick |
| Model | Skylark |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Coupe |
| Type | Coupe |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | YPSILANTI TWP |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5L I4 |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1983 Buick Skylark Have?
The 1983 Buick Skylark, like many vehicles of its era, has some common issues that owners report. One of the most prevalent concerns is related to corrosion, particularly in areas exposed to road salt and moisture. This can manifest as rust on the rocker panels, lower door skins, wheel wells, and around the trunk lid. Early signs of rust should be addressed promptly to prevent further deterioration.
Powertrain reliability can be a mixed bag. The 4-cylinder engines, while economical, could sometimes suffer from carburetor issues or intake manifold gasket leaks. The V6 engines, especially the 3.8L, were generally more robust, but still susceptible to common wear-and-tear items. Transmission problems, particularly with the automatic transmissions, could include slipping or hard shifting, often due to fluid leaks or internal wear. Regular fluid changes are crucial for longevity.
Electrical gremlins are also frequently mentioned. This can range from minor annoyances like malfunctioning power windows, interior lights, or gauge cluster issues, to more significant problems with the ignition system or alternator. The wiring harnesses from this period can become brittle over time, leading to intermittent electrical faults. Specific model year recalls for the 1983 Skylark are not extensively documented as major widespread safety defects, but as with any older vehicle, it's wise to check for any outstanding manufacturer service bulletins or recall campaigns that may apply.
Suspension and steering components can also wear out over time, leading to noises, sloppy handling, or vibrations. Worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and power steering leaks are not uncommon. The overall long-term reliability of a 1983 Skylark heavily depends on its maintenance history, climate it has lived in, and how it was driven.
Powertrain reliability can be a mixed bag. The 4-cylinder engines, while economical, could sometimes suffer from carburetor issues or intake manifold gasket leaks. The V6 engines, especially the 3.8L, were generally more robust, but still susceptible to common wear-and-tear items. Transmission problems, particularly with the automatic transmissions, could include slipping or hard shifting, often due to fluid leaks or internal wear. Regular fluid changes are crucial for longevity.
Electrical gremlins are also frequently mentioned. This can range from minor annoyances like malfunctioning power windows, interior lights, or gauge cluster issues, to more significant problems with the ignition system or alternator. The wiring harnesses from this period can become brittle over time, leading to intermittent electrical faults. Specific model year recalls for the 1983 Skylark are not extensively documented as major widespread safety defects, but as with any older vehicle, it's wise to check for any outstanding manufacturer service bulletins or recall campaigns that may apply.
Suspension and steering components can also wear out over time, leading to noises, sloppy handling, or vibrations. Worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and power steering leaks are not uncommon. The overall long-term reliability of a 1983 Skylark heavily depends on its maintenance history, climate it has lived in, and how it was driven.
How long will the 1983 Buick Skylark last?
Based on available owner data and the typical lifespan of vehicles from this era, a well-maintained 1983 Buick Skylark could reasonably be expected to reach 150,000 to 200,000 miles or serve for 20-25 years. Long-term durability is highly dependent on consistent maintenance, particularly fluid changes (engine oil, transmission fluid, coolant) and addressing minor issues before they escalate. Weaknesses like rust and aging electrical components can limit its lifespan if not proactively managed. Vehicles kept in drier climates or garaged tend to fare much better over time, showcasing good fundamental build quality when protected.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Buick Skylark offered a blend of technology and comfort features that were considered contemporary for its time, though they pale in comparison to modern standards. Built-in tech primarily revolved around the powertrain and convenience items.
Entertainment options were relatively basic. Standard equipment usually included an AM radio, with an AM/FM radio being a common upgrade. Higher trims or optional packages could add a cassette player, offering a step up in audio fidelity. Speakers were typically limited to two or four, strategically placed in the doors and rear deck.
Driver-assistance features were rudimentary. Power steering was standard, making maneuvering easier. Cruise control was a popular optional feature, enhancing comfort on longer journeys. Power windows and power door locks were also optional on most trims, adding a touch of convenience.
Safety features for 1983 included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts in the front), padded dashboards, and energy-absorbing steering columns. Antilock brakes (ABS) were not available on the Skylark in 1983. Some models might have offered intermittent windshield wipers. Side-impact protection was becoming more emphasized, but advanced driver-assistance systems like airbags or traction control were decades away.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this specific model year are not readily available in the standardized format we see today from organizations like the NHTSA. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side impacts compared to modern cars. The Skylark's unibody construction and lack of advanced safety structures meant it was more susceptible to significant damage in severe collisions. Overall, the technology was geared towards comfort and basic functionality rather than advanced electronic aids or comprehensive safety systems.
Entertainment options were relatively basic. Standard equipment usually included an AM radio, with an AM/FM radio being a common upgrade. Higher trims or optional packages could add a cassette player, offering a step up in audio fidelity. Speakers were typically limited to two or four, strategically placed in the doors and rear deck.
Driver-assistance features were rudimentary. Power steering was standard, making maneuvering easier. Cruise control was a popular optional feature, enhancing comfort on longer journeys. Power windows and power door locks were also optional on most trims, adding a touch of convenience.
Safety features for 1983 included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts in the front), padded dashboards, and energy-absorbing steering columns. Antilock brakes (ABS) were not available on the Skylark in 1983. Some models might have offered intermittent windshield wipers. Side-impact protection was becoming more emphasized, but advanced driver-assistance systems like airbags or traction control were decades away.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this specific model year are not readily available in the standardized format we see today from organizations like the NHTSA. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side impacts compared to modern cars. The Skylark's unibody construction and lack of advanced safety structures meant it was more susceptible to significant damage in severe collisions. Overall, the technology was geared towards comfort and basic functionality rather than advanced electronic aids or comprehensive safety systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Buick Skylark Prices and Market Value
When new in 1983, the Buick Skylark had a starting price in the low $8,000 range for base models, with higher trims like the Limited or the performance-oriented T-Type reaching well over $10,000. Like most vehicles from this era, the Skylark experienced significant depreciation in its initial years. Today, current used market prices for a 1983 Buick Skylark can vary dramatically. Well-preserved examples, especially the T-Type models in good condition, might fetch anywhere from $3,000 to $8,000 or more. More common sedans or coupes in average condition are often found for $1,000 to $3,000. Factors affecting resale value include condition (rust, interior wear), mileage, originality, and the specific trim level. The T-Type is the most sought-after by collectors.
1983 Buick Skylark Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1983 Buick Skylark is generally economical. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and lower market value. Fuel costs depend heavily on the chosen engine, with the 4-cylinder being the most fuel-efficient. Maintenance is relatively straightforward and affordable, with parts readily available for common wear items. Repairs can be cost-effective for routine issues, though finding specialized parts for less common problems or the T-Type's turbo system might incur higher costs. Overall, the Skylark is considered an economical car to own, especially if well-maintained.
1983 Buick Skylark Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1983 Buick Skylark Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1983 Buick Skylark Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Buick Skylark is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Coupe with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Buick Skylark Compare to Other Coupe?
The 1983 Buick Skylark competed in the compact/mid-size sedan and coupe market against rivals like the Chevrolet Celebrity, Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera, Pontiac 6000 (all sharing GM's X/A-body platform), Ford Fairmont/Tempo, and Dodge Aries K-car. In terms of performance, the base Skylark with its 4-cylinder engine was unremarkable, similar to its GM siblings and the K-cars. The optional V6 engines offered more pep, and the Skylark T-Type's turbocharged 3.8L V6 provided competitive acceleration, often outperforming the base V6s and K-car engines, but was generally not as quick as performance-oriented coupes from other brands.
Features were broadly similar across GM's offerings. The Skylark, particularly in Limited trim, aimed for a more refined and comfortable experience with more sound deadening and plush interiors compared to its Chevrolet counterpart. The Ford Tempo and Dodge Aries offered a more utilitarian approach, though the Aries could be optioned with more comfort features.
Reliability is a point of contention. While the V6 engines were generally decent, electrical issues and rust were common across many competitors of this era. The K-cars were known for their fuel efficiency but could have transmission and electrical problems. GM's front-wheel-drive platforms from this period had mixed reliability records.
Price-wise, the Skylark sat in the middle to upper end of its segment, reflecting Buick's positioning as a more premium brand than Chevrolet. The T-Type was a premium performance option.
Similar alternatives include the Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera for a more comfort-oriented experience, or the Pontiac 6000 for a slightly sportier feel. If performance is a higher priority and a more engaging driving experience is desired, one might look at rear-wheel-drive alternatives from the late 70s or early 80s that were phased out, or perhaps a slightly larger, more powerful sedan from another manufacturer if the budget allows. For pure economy, the Dodge Aries or Ford Tempo could be considered, though often with compromises in refinement and build quality.
Features were broadly similar across GM's offerings. The Skylark, particularly in Limited trim, aimed for a more refined and comfortable experience with more sound deadening and plush interiors compared to its Chevrolet counterpart. The Ford Tempo and Dodge Aries offered a more utilitarian approach, though the Aries could be optioned with more comfort features.
Reliability is a point of contention. While the V6 engines were generally decent, electrical issues and rust were common across many competitors of this era. The K-cars were known for their fuel efficiency but could have transmission and electrical problems. GM's front-wheel-drive platforms from this period had mixed reliability records.
Price-wise, the Skylark sat in the middle to upper end of its segment, reflecting Buick's positioning as a more premium brand than Chevrolet. The T-Type was a premium performance option.
Similar alternatives include the Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera for a more comfort-oriented experience, or the Pontiac 6000 for a slightly sportier feel. If performance is a higher priority and a more engaging driving experience is desired, one might look at rear-wheel-drive alternatives from the late 70s or early 80s that were phased out, or perhaps a slightly larger, more powerful sedan from another manufacturer if the budget allows. For pure economy, the Dodge Aries or Ford Tempo could be considered, though often with compromises in refinement and build quality.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Buick Skylark a Good Coupe?
The 1983 Buick Skylark is ideal for individuals seeking a comfortable, reasonably fuel-efficient, and understated classic car that offers a touch of vintage American comfort. It's particularly suited for those who appreciate the nostalgic appeal of 1980s automotive design and the Buick brand's reputation for a smooth ride. It is generally worth buying as a used vehicle, especially for enthusiasts or those looking for an affordable classic project or daily driver. The base and Limited trims offer practicality and comfort, while the T-Type appeals to those seeking a bit more spirited performance and unique styling. Buying a well-maintained example with minimal rust is crucial for a positive ownership experience. Avoid cars with significant rust or extensive, unaddressed electrical issues, as these can quickly escalate ownership costs.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.