The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 is part of GM's "GMT400" platform, which defined American full-size pickup trucks from 1988 to 2002. This robust workhorse typically featured Regular or Extended Cab body styles with various bed lengths. Key trims for the C/K series generally included Cheyenne, Silverado, and Work Truck variants, offering a range from basic utility to more creature comforts. When new, prices typically ranged from approximately $19,000 to $28,000, depending on configuration and options. It stood out for its powerful engine options, impressive towing capacity, and reputation for rugged dependability, making it a popular choice for contractors, farmers, and anyone needing a reliable heavy-duty truck.
The Good
The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 boasts impressive performance with its V8 engine options, offering strong towing and hauling capabilities for practical buyers. Its legendary reliability and simple, maintainable design provide peace of mind. While not luxurious, the interior offers functional comfort and a commanding view. Emotionally, it represents classic American truck toughness and a "get-the-job-done" attitude, delivering excellent long-term value due to its enduring build and readily available parts.
The Bad
Common weaknesses for the 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 include issues with rust, particularly on body panels and frame components, brake line corrosion, and occasional electrical gremlins like malfunctioning gauges. Fuel pump failures are also frequently reported. Watch out for worn front suspension components, steering play, and transmission issues, especially in trucks with hard service lives, during inspection.
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 offered a robust selection of V8 engines designed for heavy-duty work. The primary options included the 5.7L Vortec 350 V8 (L31), a highly popular and reliable choice; the larger 7.4L Vortec 454 V8 (L29), known for its substantial torque and towing prowess; and for those requiring exceptional fuel economy and immense low-end torque, the 6.5L Turbo Diesel V8 (L56/L65) was available. These engines were paired with either a 4-speed automatic transmission (4L60E or heavier-duty 4L80E depending on engine and application) or a 5-speed manual transmission. - Horsepower:
5.7L Vortec 350 V8: Approximately 255 hp @ 4600 rpm
7.4L Vortec 454 V8: Approximately 290 hp @ 4000 rpm
6.5L Turbo Diesel V8: Approximately 190-215 hp @ 3400 rpm (depending on specific tune/variant) - Fuel Economy:
Official EPA ratings for heavy-duty trucks of this era were often less specific than for passenger cars, and varied greatly with configuration (2WD/4WD, transmission, engine). Estimates typically ranged from 10-14 MPG for gasoline V8s and 13-17 MPG for the 6.5L Diesel in combined driving. Heavy towing or hauling significantly impacted these figures. - 0-60 Times:
Performance for a heavy-duty truck is not primarily focused on acceleration. Estimates for the gasoline V8s (5.7L and 7.4L) could be in the 8-11 second range, while the diesel would be notably slower, often in the 12-15 second range, reflecting their torque-focused nature. These figures are highly dependent on payload and gearing. - Towing Capacity:
Towing capacities were a strong suit of the C/K 2500. Depending on the engine, axle ratio, and specific configuration (e.g., 2WD vs. 4WD, Regular Cab vs. Extended Cab), capacities could range from roughly 6,000 lbs to over 10,000 lbs, with the 7.4L V8 and 6.5L Diesel offering the highest ratings, making them suitable for substantial trailers. - Trim-Level Features:
Trim levels typically included the base Work Truck (WT), offering vinyl seats, manual windows/locks, and basic radio. The Cheyenne trim added cloth upholstery, AM/FM stereo, and possibly air conditioning. The top-tier Silverado trim provided more comfort and convenience with features like power windows and locks, cruise control, tilt steering, upgraded cloth or optional leather seats, chrome exterior accents, and a cassette or CD player. Optional features across trims included 4WD, heavy-duty towing packages, larger fuel tanks, and various bed liners.
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1998 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | C/K 2500 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD 4-Speed Automatic |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Standard Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ROANOKE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4337 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 7200 pounds |
| Overall Height | 71.20 inches |
| Overall Length | 213.10 inches |
| Overall Width | 76.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 131.50 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5.7-L V-8 OHV 16V |
| Engine Size | 5.7L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $17,932 |
| Invoice Price | $15,691 |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Have?
The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500, while renowned for its durability, does have several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that potential owners should be aware of. A common issue across many GMT400 trucks, including the 1998 model, is rust and corrosion. This often affects the rocker panels, cab corners, fender wells, and crucially, the brake lines and fuel lines, which can lead to dangerous failures if not addressed. Frame rust can also be a significant concern, especially in regions with heavy road salt usage.
Fuel system issues are another frequent complaint. Fuel pumps, located inside the fuel tank, are known to fail, often without warning, requiring a costly replacement that involves dropping the fuel tank. Fuel sending units can also become inaccurate, leading to incorrect fuel gauge readings.
For trucks equipped with the 6.5L Turbo Diesel engine, specific problems include failures of the PMD (Pump Mounted Driver), often referred to as the "FSD" (Fuel Solenoid Driver). This module controls the fuel injection pump and is prone to overheating, leading to sudden engine stalling or no-start conditions. Relocating the PMD away from the engine heat is a common aftermarket fix. Other diesel-specific concerns include issues with the vacuum pump, glow plugs, and harmonic balancer.
Electrical problems, though often minor, can be irritating. These include malfunctioning gauges (especially the speedometer and odometer), inconsistent interior lighting, and issues with power accessories like windows and door locks due to aging wiring or faulty switches.
The brakes are another area of concern. Beyond line corrosion, worn calipers, rotors, and ABS sensor failures are not uncommon. Steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and idler/pitman arms, tend to wear out over time, leading to loose steering and poor handling. Transmissions, particularly the 4L60E, can experience issues, especially if the vehicle has been used for heavy towing or has neglected fluid changes; the heavier-duty 4L80E is generally more robust.
Regarding recalls, it's important to check specific VINs, but common recalls for the GMT400 platform around 1998 included issues related to fuel tank straps and brake light switches. No major systemic recalls unique to the 1998 C/K 2500 stand out as catastrophic, but older vehicles always carry a higher risk of component fatigue.
Fuel system issues are another frequent complaint. Fuel pumps, located inside the fuel tank, are known to fail, often without warning, requiring a costly replacement that involves dropping the fuel tank. Fuel sending units can also become inaccurate, leading to incorrect fuel gauge readings.
For trucks equipped with the 6.5L Turbo Diesel engine, specific problems include failures of the PMD (Pump Mounted Driver), often referred to as the "FSD" (Fuel Solenoid Driver). This module controls the fuel injection pump and is prone to overheating, leading to sudden engine stalling or no-start conditions. Relocating the PMD away from the engine heat is a common aftermarket fix. Other diesel-specific concerns include issues with the vacuum pump, glow plugs, and harmonic balancer.
Electrical problems, though often minor, can be irritating. These include malfunctioning gauges (especially the speedometer and odometer), inconsistent interior lighting, and issues with power accessories like windows and door locks due to aging wiring or faulty switches.
The brakes are another area of concern. Beyond line corrosion, worn calipers, rotors, and ABS sensor failures are not uncommon. Steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and idler/pitman arms, tend to wear out over time, leading to loose steering and poor handling. Transmissions, particularly the 4L60E, can experience issues, especially if the vehicle has been used for heavy towing or has neglected fluid changes; the heavier-duty 4L80E is generally more robust.
Regarding recalls, it's important to check specific VINs, but common recalls for the GMT400 platform around 1998 included issues related to fuel tank straps and brake light switches. No major systemic recalls unique to the 1998 C/K 2500 stand out as catastrophic, but older vehicles always carry a higher risk of component fatigue.
How long will the 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 last?
Based on owner data and proper maintenance habits, a 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 can easily achieve an average mileage of 200,000 to 300,000 miles, with many well-maintained examples exceeding 400,000 miles, particularly those equipped with the 5.7L or 7.4L gasoline V8s, or the 6.5L diesel with PMD relocation. This translates to 20-30+ years of service. Its long-term durability stems from robust frame construction, heavy-duty axles, and generally over-engineered driveline components. However, weaknesses emerge over time. Rust becomes a pervasive enemy, attacking body panels, frame, and critical brake/fuel lines. Electrical issues, while often minor, accumulate. Suspension components require regular replacement. Transmissions, if abused or neglected, are a weak point. Ultimately, diligent rust prevention and proactive maintenance are crucial for extending its impressive service life well into classic territory.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
As a 1998 model, the Chevrolet C/K 2500's built-in technology and driver-assistance features are rudimentary by modern standards, reflecting the era's focus on utility rather than digital integration.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard features typically included an AM/FM radio, often with a simple two-speaker setup. Higher trim levels, like the Silverado, could be optioned with an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, and sometimes a single-disc CD player. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional upgrades, significantly enhancing convenience. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature for highway driving, as was air conditioning, which was often standard on higher trims or included in comfort packages. An optional tilt steering wheel and intermittent wipers also added to driver comfort and convenience. The instrument cluster provided analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and battery voltage.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were essentially non-existent. The most advanced system was the standard 4-wheel anti-lock braking system (ABS) on all 2500 models, which was a significant safety advancement for the time, helping prevent wheel lock-up during hard braking and maintaining steering control.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts for front outboard occupants and lap belts for middle seats. A driver's side airbag became standard in 1995 for the C/K series, and a passenger's side airbag became standard in 1998, offering crucial frontal impact protection. Side-impact door beams were also incorporated into the design to enhance occupant protection in side collisions. These basic passive safety measures were the industry standard at the time for pickups.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official, comprehensive crash-test ratings for heavy-duty trucks like the C/K 2500 from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS were less prevalent and detailed in 1998 compared to today. However, general data from NHTSA for the lighter C/K 1500 regular cab showed a 3-star rating for the driver in frontal impact and a 4-star rating for the passenger. It's important to note that these ratings are for lighter versions and may not directly reflect the 2500, but they indicate a reasonable level of protection for the era, particularly with the inclusion of dual airbags.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard features typically included an AM/FM radio, often with a simple two-speaker setup. Higher trim levels, like the Silverado, could be optioned with an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, and sometimes a single-disc CD player. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional upgrades, significantly enhancing convenience. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature for highway driving, as was air conditioning, which was often standard on higher trims or included in comfort packages. An optional tilt steering wheel and intermittent wipers also added to driver comfort and convenience. The instrument cluster provided analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and battery voltage.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were essentially non-existent. The most advanced system was the standard 4-wheel anti-lock braking system (ABS) on all 2500 models, which was a significant safety advancement for the time, helping prevent wheel lock-up during hard braking and maintaining steering control.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts for front outboard occupants and lap belts for middle seats. A driver's side airbag became standard in 1995 for the C/K series, and a passenger's side airbag became standard in 1998, offering crucial frontal impact protection. Side-impact door beams were also incorporated into the design to enhance occupant protection in side collisions. These basic passive safety measures were the industry standard at the time for pickups.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official, comprehensive crash-test ratings for heavy-duty trucks like the C/K 2500 from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS were less prevalent and detailed in 1998 compared to today. However, general data from NHTSA for the lighter C/K 1500 regular cab showed a 3-star rating for the driver in frontal impact and a 4-star rating for the passenger. It's important to note that these ratings are for lighter versions and may not directly reflect the 2500, but they indicate a reasonable level of protection for the era, particularly with the inclusion of dual airbags.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Prices and Market Value
When new in 1998, the Chevrolet C/K 2500 had an MSRP that typically ranged from approximately $19,000 for a basic Work Truck regular cab 2WD to upwards of $28,000 for a well-equipped Extended Cab Silverado 4WD with the larger V8 or diesel engine. This reflected a competitive price for a heavy-duty pickup of its class.
Today, its depreciation has largely bottomed out, and in some cases, well-preserved or highly desirable configurations (e.g., Extended Cab 4x4 with the 7.4L V8 or a well-maintained 6.5L Diesel) can see slight appreciation. Current used market prices can vary wildly, from $3,000 for a high-mileage, rust-affected work truck to $15,000 or even more for an exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or recently restored example. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, rust levels, engine type (diesels and 7.4L gas engines often command a premium), 4x4 capability, and documented maintenance history. While depreciation was steep initially, these trucks now hold their value remarkably well as reliable, no-frills utility vehicles.
Today, its depreciation has largely bottomed out, and in some cases, well-preserved or highly desirable configurations (e.g., Extended Cab 4x4 with the 7.4L V8 or a well-maintained 6.5L Diesel) can see slight appreciation. Current used market prices can vary wildly, from $3,000 for a high-mileage, rust-affected work truck to $15,000 or even more for an exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or recently restored example. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, rust levels, engine type (diesels and 7.4L gas engines often command a premium), 4x4 capability, and documented maintenance history. While depreciation was steep initially, these trucks now hold their value remarkably well as reliable, no-frills utility vehicles.
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 generally presents a mixed bag of ownership costs. Insurance is typically quite affordable due to its age and commonality. Fuel costs can be high, especially with the large gasoline V8s, which are not fuel-efficient by modern standards; the diesel offers better MPG but often higher fuel prices. Maintenance is relatively economical because parts are widely available and often inexpensive, and many repairs are DIY-friendly. However, repairs can become frequent due to age-related wear, and major issues like transmission rebuilds or diesel engine specific repairs can be costly. Long-term, it's an economical vehicle to own if you're handy and can tackle basic repairs, but costly if you rely solely on shop work for every age-related problem and rust mitigation.
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
34.00 gallons
City Mileage
14 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
18 miles/gallon
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Insurance
Insurance for a 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 competed fiercely with contemporaries like the Ford F-250 (F-Series "OBS" or "Super Duty" transition) and the Dodge Ram 2500 (2nd Generation), each offering distinct strengths and weaknesses.
Performance: The C/K 2500's 5.7L and 7.4L Vortec gasoline V8s offered strong, reliable power, competitive with Ford's 5.8L and 7.5L engines. The 6.5L Turbo Diesel, while offering good economy and low-end torque, was generally considered less powerful and reliable than Ford's legendary 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel or Dodge's highly acclaimed 5.9L Cummins Turbo Diesel. Both the Ford and Dodge diesels often outclassed the GM 6.5L in terms of raw power and longevity, making them preferred for serious heavy hauling.
Features: All three trucks offered similar levels of basic features for the era – manual/power options, basic radios, and air conditioning. The Ram 2500 was often praised for its more modern and spacious interior design that debuted in 1994, giving it a slight edge in comfort and perceived refinement. The C/K and F-Series interiors were more traditional and rugged, perhaps less aesthetically pleasing but highly functional. The C/K's dual airbags were a good safety feature for the time, matching its rivals.
Reliability: The C/K 2500 gasoline engines are highly regarded for reliability, on par with Ford's offerings. The 6.5L Diesel in the GM truck suffered from PMD and cooling issues that somewhat tarnished its reputation compared to the extremely robust 7.3L Power Stroke and virtually indestructible 5.9L Cummins. Frame and brake line rust can affect all three, but GM and Ford trucks generally showed better overall body integrity than some Rams of the era which could have issues with ball joints and steering components.
Price: When new, prices were competitive across the board. In the used market today, the C/K 2500 generally offers excellent value. However, Cummins-powered Ram 2500s and Power Stroke F-250s often command a significant premium due to their highly sought-after diesel engines. A gasoline C/K 2500 offers a great balance of capability and affordability.
Alternatives: For maximum diesel power and reliability, the 1998-2002 Dodge Ram 2500 with the 5.9L Cummins or the 1999-2003 Ford F-250 Super Duty with the 7.3L Power Stroke are objectively "better" alternatives if diesel is a priority and budget allows. However, for a capable, reliable, and more affordable gasoline heavy-duty truck, the 1998 C/K 2500 remains an excellent and highly recommended option, particularly with the 7.4L V8, offering similar utility at a potentially lower entry cost than its diesel rivals.
Performance: The C/K 2500's 5.7L and 7.4L Vortec gasoline V8s offered strong, reliable power, competitive with Ford's 5.8L and 7.5L engines. The 6.5L Turbo Diesel, while offering good economy and low-end torque, was generally considered less powerful and reliable than Ford's legendary 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel or Dodge's highly acclaimed 5.9L Cummins Turbo Diesel. Both the Ford and Dodge diesels often outclassed the GM 6.5L in terms of raw power and longevity, making them preferred for serious heavy hauling.
Features: All three trucks offered similar levels of basic features for the era – manual/power options, basic radios, and air conditioning. The Ram 2500 was often praised for its more modern and spacious interior design that debuted in 1994, giving it a slight edge in comfort and perceived refinement. The C/K and F-Series interiors were more traditional and rugged, perhaps less aesthetically pleasing but highly functional. The C/K's dual airbags were a good safety feature for the time, matching its rivals.
Reliability: The C/K 2500 gasoline engines are highly regarded for reliability, on par with Ford's offerings. The 6.5L Diesel in the GM truck suffered from PMD and cooling issues that somewhat tarnished its reputation compared to the extremely robust 7.3L Power Stroke and virtually indestructible 5.9L Cummins. Frame and brake line rust can affect all three, but GM and Ford trucks generally showed better overall body integrity than some Rams of the era which could have issues with ball joints and steering components.
Price: When new, prices were competitive across the board. In the used market today, the C/K 2500 generally offers excellent value. However, Cummins-powered Ram 2500s and Power Stroke F-250s often command a significant premium due to their highly sought-after diesel engines. A gasoline C/K 2500 offers a great balance of capability and affordability.
Alternatives: For maximum diesel power and reliability, the 1998-2002 Dodge Ram 2500 with the 5.9L Cummins or the 1999-2003 Ford F-250 Super Duty with the 7.3L Power Stroke are objectively "better" alternatives if diesel is a priority and budget allows. However, for a capable, reliable, and more affordable gasoline heavy-duty truck, the 1998 C/K 2500 remains an excellent and highly recommended option, particularly with the 7.4L V8, offering similar utility at a potentially lower entry cost than its diesel rivals.
Final Verdict: Is the 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1998 Chevrolet C/K 2500 is ideal for individuals or small businesses needing a no-frills, highly capable, and relatively affordable heavy-duty work truck. It's perfect for contractors, farmers, or anyone regularly towing trailers, hauling heavy loads, or navigating rough terrain, especially with a 4x4 configuration. It's absolutely worth buying as a used vehicle today, particularly if you prioritize mechanical simplicity, readily available parts, and proven longevity.
Look for examples with the 5.7L or 7.4L gasoline V8s for maximum reliability and ease of maintenance; the 6.5L Diesel is viable if its common issues (like the PMD) have been addressed. Prioritize a vehicle with minimal rust, especially on the frame and brake lines, and a documented maintenance history. Trims like the Silverado offer more comfort, but even a Work Truck can be a fantastic value. It's a durable, honest truck that provides exceptional utility for its current market price, making it a smart purchase for those seeking raw capability over modern amenities.
Look for examples with the 5.7L or 7.4L gasoline V8s for maximum reliability and ease of maintenance; the 6.5L Diesel is viable if its common issues (like the PMD) have been addressed. Prioritize a vehicle with minimal rust, especially on the frame and brake lines, and a documented maintenance history. Trims like the Silverado offer more comfort, but even a Work Truck can be a fantastic value. It's a durable, honest truck that provides exceptional utility for its current market price, making it a smart purchase for those seeking raw capability over modern amenities.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.