The 1996 Ford Contour, a compact sedan/wagon, was part of Ford's global Mondeo platform, produced from 1995 to 2000. Key trims included the GL, SE, and the sportier SVT. New, it ranged from approximately $15,000 to $21,000. Its standout feature was its European-derived chassis, offering sharper handling than many American contemporaries, appealing to those seeking a more engaging driving experience.
The Good
The 1996 Ford Contour boasted responsive handling and available potent V6 power, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Its European-inspired design offered a sleek look, while decent fuel economy provided practicality. For value-conscious buyers, its competitive pricing and comfortable interior made it a sensible choice.
The Bad
Owners should watch out for potential transmission issues, particularly with automatic transmissions. Rear suspension components, like bushings and struts, can wear out. Electrical gremlins and cooling system problems are also reported. Interior plastic quality can degrade over time.
1996 Ford Contour: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.0L DOHC I4 (Zetec)
- 2.5L DOHC V6 (Duratec)
- Horsepower:
- 2.0L I4: 125 hp
- 2.5L V6: 170 hp
- 2.5L V6 (SVT): 195 hp
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates - Varies by transmission and configuration):
- 2.0L I4 (Manual): approx. 22 MPG City / 30 MPG Highway
- 2.5L V6 (Automatic): approx. 19 MPG City / 26 MPG Highway
- 2.5L V6 (Manual): approx. 18 MPG City / 25 MPG Highway
- 0-60 Times (Approximate):
- 2.0L I4: 9.5 - 10.5 seconds
- 2.5L V6: 7.5 - 8.5 seconds
- 2.5L V6 (SVT): 6.5 - 7.5 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Not applicable for this vehicle.
- Key Trim-Level Features:
- GL: Base model, often with manual windows, cloth seats, basic stereo system.
- SE: Added features like power windows, power locks, cruise control, upgraded interior trim, and often a better audio system.
- SVT (Special Vehicle Team): Performance-oriented trim with the 2.5L V6 engine, sport-tuned suspension, unique body kit, Recaro seats, larger wheels, and upgraded brakes.
1996 Ford Contour Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1996 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Contour |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Mexico |
| Manufacturing City | CUAUTITLAN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2813 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 54.50 inches |
| Overall Length | 183.90 inches |
| Overall Width | 69.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 106.50 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5-L V-6 DOHC 24V |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,925 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1996 Ford Contour Have?
The 1996 Ford Contour, while praised for its driving dynamics, is not without its reported issues that can affect long-term reliability. A significant concern for many owners revolves around the automatic transmission. Failures, particularly with the AX4S and AX4N transmissions, have been frequently reported, often manifesting as slipping, hard shifting, or complete failure. While some of these issues may have been addressed in later model years, it remains a common point of concern for 1996 models.
Cooling system problems are another recurring theme. Radiator leaks, thermostat issues, and hose failures can lead to overheating, which can exacerbate other engine-related problems. The plastic components in the cooling system are particularly prone to degradation over time.
Front suspension components, especially bushings and control arm mounts, are known to wear out, leading to clunking noises and degraded handling. Rear strut mounts and bushings can also develop issues, impacting ride quality and stability.
Electrical gremlins, while not specific to any single component, can be a source of frustration. This can include issues with the instrument cluster, power windows, door locks, and interior lighting. Some owners have also reported problems with the alternator and starter motor.
While there weren't widespread recalls impacting the core powertrain in 1996, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding safety recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the Contour can offer an enjoyable driving experience, potential buyers should be aware of these common mechanical and electrical issues and factor in potential repair costs when considering a purchase.
Cooling system problems are another recurring theme. Radiator leaks, thermostat issues, and hose failures can lead to overheating, which can exacerbate other engine-related problems. The plastic components in the cooling system are particularly prone to degradation over time.
Front suspension components, especially bushings and control arm mounts, are known to wear out, leading to clunking noises and degraded handling. Rear strut mounts and bushings can also develop issues, impacting ride quality and stability.
Electrical gremlins, while not specific to any single component, can be a source of frustration. This can include issues with the instrument cluster, power windows, door locks, and interior lighting. Some owners have also reported problems with the alternator and starter motor.
While there weren't widespread recalls impacting the core powertrain in 1996, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding safety recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the Contour can offer an enjoyable driving experience, potential buyers should be aware of these common mechanical and electrical issues and factor in potential repair costs when considering a purchase.
How long will the 1996 Ford Contour last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1996 Ford Contour can realistically reach 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more. However, its long-term durability is significantly impacted by the issues mentioned previously, particularly the automatic transmission and cooling system. Cars that have had regular fluid changes for the transmission and coolant, along with prompt attention to any leaks or strange noises, are far more likely to achieve higher mileage. Conversely, neglected vehicles, especially those with automatic transmissions, may face premature failure. The chassis and body generally hold up well against rust in drier climates, but the interior components, like dashboard plastics and seat fabric, can show significant wear over time. The engine, particularly the V6, is generally robust if properly maintained.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1996 Ford Contour's technology and safety features were fairly standard for its era, with a focus on essential functionality rather than cutting-edge innovation. Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Optional upgrades could bring a CD player and a premium audio system with more speakers, offering a more immersive listening experience for the time. Air conditioning was standard on most trims, with automatic climate control being a rare, optional luxury.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 1996 Contour was quite basic. Features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, and often standard on higher trims or as an option on lower trims, providing improved stopping power in emergency situations. Cruise control was also a common convenience option.
Safety was a priority, though advanced features were limited. Standard safety equipment included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelt pretensioners were also standard, designed to tighten the belts during a collision to reduce occupant movement. Some models might have offered optional side-impact airbags, but these were not commonplace.
Crash-test ratings for the 1996 Ford Contour were somewhat mixed. In NHTSA frontal crash tests, it generally received good marks, often four out of five stars for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact tests, however, could be less impressive, particularly for the rear passenger, sometimes receiving three or fewer stars, reflecting the limitations of safety technology in that period. It's important to note that specific ratings can vary slightly based on the exact configuration and testing protocols of the time. For those seeking a vehicle with contemporary tech and advanced safety, the 1996 Contour would be considered very basic by today's standards.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 1996 Contour was quite basic. Features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, and often standard on higher trims or as an option on lower trims, providing improved stopping power in emergency situations. Cruise control was also a common convenience option.
Safety was a priority, though advanced features were limited. Standard safety equipment included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelt pretensioners were also standard, designed to tighten the belts during a collision to reduce occupant movement. Some models might have offered optional side-impact airbags, but these were not commonplace.
Crash-test ratings for the 1996 Ford Contour were somewhat mixed. In NHTSA frontal crash tests, it generally received good marks, often four out of five stars for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact tests, however, could be less impressive, particularly for the rear passenger, sometimes receiving three or fewer stars, reflecting the limitations of safety technology in that period. It's important to note that specific ratings can vary slightly based on the exact configuration and testing protocols of the time. For those seeking a vehicle with contemporary tech and advanced safety, the 1996 Contour would be considered very basic by today's standards.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1996 Ford Contour Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1996 Ford Contour had an MSRP ranging from approximately $15,000 for base models to just over $21,000 for the SVT trim. Like most vehicles of its age, the Contour experienced significant depreciation in its early years. Today, the used market prices for a 1996 Ford Contour are generally quite low, typically ranging from $1,000 to $4,000, depending heavily on condition, mileage, and trim level. Well-maintained SVT models in excellent condition can command slightly higher prices, but still remain affordable. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the presence of maintenance records, the absence of major mechanical issues (especially transmission problems), overall cosmetic condition, and a clean vehicle history report. Vehicles with fewer miles and original components tend to hold their value better, though depreciation has largely plateaued for this model.
1996 Ford Contour Cost of Ownership
The 1996 Ford Contour is generally economical to own, especially considering its low used purchase price. Insurance premiums are typically low due to its age and market value. Fuel costs can be moderate; the 2.0L engine offers respectable MPG, while the V6 will consume more. Maintenance costs are relatively standard for an older domestic sedan, with oil changes and routine checks being affordable. However, long-term ownership costs can be significantly impacted by potential repairs, particularly concerning the automatic transmission and cooling system. If these components require replacement, repair bills can become substantial, potentially outweighing the initial low cost of the vehicle. Despite this, with careful buying and proactive maintenance, it remains an economical choice.
1996 Ford Contour Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
14.50 gallons
City Mileage
23 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
32 miles/gallon
1996 Ford Contour Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1996 Ford Contour Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1996 Ford Contour Insurance
Insurance for a 1996 Ford Contour is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1996 Ford Contour Compare to Other Sedan?
In 1996, the Ford Contour competed in the compact sedan segment against rivals like the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Nissan Sentra, and its American counterparts such as the Chevrolet Cavalier and Pontiac Sunfire. In terms of performance, the Contour, especially with the V6 engine and the SVT variant, offered a superior driving experience with sharper handling and more power than most of its Japanese and American competitors. The European-derived chassis gave it a more sophisticated feel.
Features-wise, the Contour was competitive for its time. While base models were spartan, higher trims like the SE offered amenities like power accessories and cruise control, aligning with what rivals offered. The SVT trim was a standout, offering sport-focused features like Recaro seats and a body kit that few competitors could match at that price point.
Reliability is where the Contour often fell short compared to its Japanese rivals. While the engines were generally decent with proper care, the notorious issues with its automatic transmissions and cooling systems gave it a less stellar reputation than the bulletproof reliability of the Corolla or Civic. American rivals like the Cavalier also had their share of reliability concerns, but perhaps not as consistently reported for specific major components as the Contour's transmissions.
Price was a strong point for the Contour, often offering more performance and a more European driving feel for a comparable or slightly lower price than similarly equipped Japanese models. However, the potential for higher repair costs due to reliability issues could offset some of the initial value.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing bulletproof reliability and lower long-term running costs, the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla remain excellent, though less engaging to drive, alternatives. For a similar blend of driving dynamics and practicality with potentially better reliability, later model year contours might be slightly better, or one could consider the Mazda Protege, which also offered good handling for its class. If outright performance is the goal and budget is tight, the SVT Contour remains a unique proposition, but requires careful inspection for known issues.
Features-wise, the Contour was competitive for its time. While base models were spartan, higher trims like the SE offered amenities like power accessories and cruise control, aligning with what rivals offered. The SVT trim was a standout, offering sport-focused features like Recaro seats and a body kit that few competitors could match at that price point.
Reliability is where the Contour often fell short compared to its Japanese rivals. While the engines were generally decent with proper care, the notorious issues with its automatic transmissions and cooling systems gave it a less stellar reputation than the bulletproof reliability of the Corolla or Civic. American rivals like the Cavalier also had their share of reliability concerns, but perhaps not as consistently reported for specific major components as the Contour's transmissions.
Price was a strong point for the Contour, often offering more performance and a more European driving feel for a comparable or slightly lower price than similarly equipped Japanese models. However, the potential for higher repair costs due to reliability issues could offset some of the initial value.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing bulletproof reliability and lower long-term running costs, the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla remain excellent, though less engaging to drive, alternatives. For a similar blend of driving dynamics and practicality with potentially better reliability, later model year contours might be slightly better, or one could consider the Mazda Protege, which also offered good handling for its class. If outright performance is the goal and budget is tight, the SVT Contour remains a unique proposition, but requires careful inspection for known issues.
Final Verdict: Is the 1996 Ford Contour a Good Sedan?
The 1996 Ford Contour is ideal for the budget-conscious enthusiast who values sharp handling and a European driving feel over absolute long-term reliability. It is worth buying if found in excellent condition with a thorough maintenance history, particularly if it's a manual transmission SVT model. For those seeking daily commuting without potential headaches, it's probably not the best choice. Buying used is the only option. Focus on models with documented maintenance, minimal transmission issues, and a clean chassis. Avoid cars with signs of neglect. It's a car for someone who enjoys driving and is willing to accept the potential for higher repair costs in exchange for its engaging dynamics and low purchase price.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma