The 1992 Geo Tracker, a subcompact SUV, was part of Suzuki's Sidekick line, rebadged for the North American market. Produced from 1989 to 2004, it offered a rugged, yet affordable, go-anywhere attitude. Key trims included the base and the slightly more equipped LSi. Its popularity stemmed from its compact size, available convertible top, and accessible price point, making it a fun and approachable off-road-capable vehicle for a budget.
The Good
The 1992 Geo Tracker excels in affordability and its agile, lightweight design, making it fun to drive and easy to maneuver. Its charming, utilitarian aesthetic and convertible option appeal to emotional desires for adventure, while its reasonable fuel economy and low purchase price attract practical buyers seeking value.
The Bad
Potential buyers of a 1992 Geo Tracker should be aware of its modest power, somewhat rough ride, and susceptibility to rust, particularly around the wheel wells and frame. Interior noise levels can also be high, and its overall safety features are basic by modern standards.
1992 Geo Tracker: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The primary engine for the 1992 Geo Tracker was a 1.6-liter, 4-cylinder gasoline engine.
- Horsepower: This engine typically produced around 80 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Estimated fuel economy was in the range of 20-25 MPG in the city and 23-28 MPG on the highway, depending on transmission and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was not a strong suit; expect 0-60 mph times to be in the 13-16 second range.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was very limited, generally around 1,000 pounds, suitable for small trailers or utility purposes.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trim: Came equipped with essential features including manual windows and locks, a basic AM/FM radio, and a removable soft top or hardtop. It focused on utility and affordability.
- LSi Trim: Often included upgrades such as power steering, air conditioning, a more advanced stereo system, and sometimes alloy wheels. It offered a slightly more comfortable and convenient experience.
- Common Standard Features (across trims): Four-wheel-drive (4WD) was a popular option, often paired with a manual transmission for enhanced off-road capability. Rear-wheel-drive (RWD) was also available. Features like intermittent wipers, a rear defroster (on hardtop models), and a basic instrument cluster were standard.
- Optional Features: Depending on the specific configuration, options could include automatic transmission, a rear spare tire carrier, and enhanced interior trim.
1992 Geo Tracker Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1992 |
| Make | Geo |
| Model | Tracker |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Convertible 4WD 5-Speed Manual |
| Type | Convertible |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | INGERSOLL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2405 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 65.60 inches |
| Overall Length | 142.50 inches |
| Overall Width | 64.20 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 86.60 inches |
| Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.6-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
| Engine Size | 1.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $11,500 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1992 Geo Tracker Have?
The 1992 Geo Tracker, like many vehicles of its era, has a set of commonly reported issues that owners should be aware of. One of the most prevalent concerns is related to the frame and body rust. Due to its construction and exposure to elements, significant rust can develop, especially in regions where salt is used on roads during winter. This can compromise structural integrity and lead to expensive repairs.
Engine performance can also be a concern. While the 1.6-liter engine is generally robust, it is not particularly powerful, and owners often report a lack of acceleration, especially when encountering inclines or carrying passengers. Over time, the engine may develop oil leaks or consume oil, requiring regular monitoring.
The clutch on manual transmission models can wear out over time, and replacement can be a significant expense. Similarly, the automatic transmission, while less common, can also develop issues with age and mileage.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon. Owners have reported issues with the alternator, starter, and various sensors that can lead to intermittent problems or complete failure. The dashboard lights and gauges can also be prone to flickering or ceasing to function.
The suspension and steering components can also wear out, leading to clunks, rattles, and imprecise steering. Ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings are common wear items that may need replacement.
While there haven't been widespread, major recalls that would define this specific model year as particularly problematic, it is always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website for any applicable recalls for a specific VIN. Long-term reliability is highly dependent on maintenance history. A well-maintained Tracker can provide years of service, but neglect can accelerate wear and tear on these older vehicles.
Engine performance can also be a concern. While the 1.6-liter engine is generally robust, it is not particularly powerful, and owners often report a lack of acceleration, especially when encountering inclines or carrying passengers. Over time, the engine may develop oil leaks or consume oil, requiring regular monitoring.
The clutch on manual transmission models can wear out over time, and replacement can be a significant expense. Similarly, the automatic transmission, while less common, can also develop issues with age and mileage.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon. Owners have reported issues with the alternator, starter, and various sensors that can lead to intermittent problems or complete failure. The dashboard lights and gauges can also be prone to flickering or ceasing to function.
The suspension and steering components can also wear out, leading to clunks, rattles, and imprecise steering. Ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings are common wear items that may need replacement.
While there haven't been widespread, major recalls that would define this specific model year as particularly problematic, it is always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website for any applicable recalls for a specific VIN. Long-term reliability is highly dependent on maintenance history. A well-maintained Tracker can provide years of service, but neglect can accelerate wear and tear on these older vehicles.
How long will the 1992 Geo Tracker last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a 1992 Geo Tracker can realistically achieve between 150,000 and 200,000 miles, and in some cases, even more, if meticulously maintained. Long-term durability is heavily contingent on proactive rust prevention and addressing mechanical issues promptly. Without regular fluid changes, diligent rust proofing, and timely repairs of common wear items like suspension components and clutches, the lifespan can be significantly shorter. The frame's susceptibility to rust is the primary weakness that can drastically limit its service life in corrosive environments. However, with consistent care, its simple mechanical design contributes to its potential for longevity.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1992 Geo Tracker represents a simpler era of automotive technology, and its feature set reflects this.
Technology and Entertainment:
Built-in tech was rudimentary. Standard entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio, often with an optional cassette player. Higher trims might have offered a slightly more refined sound system with more speakers. There were no touchscreens, navigation systems, or Bluetooth connectivity as these were not common in vehicles of this class at the time.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering was an optional upgrade on many models, making low-speed maneuvering easier. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not standard and were rarely, if ever, an option on the 1992 model. Cruise control was also an infrequent feature.
Safety Features:
Safety equipment was very basic. Standard features usually included seatbelts, a collapsible steering column, and potentially an energy-absorbing dashboard. Airbags were not standard equipment on the 1992 Geo Tracker; driver-side airbags became more common in SUVs later in the decade. Side-impact door beams were likely present to offer some protection.
Optional Features:
Beyond power steering and a better radio, optional features often included air conditioning, an automatic transmission, and sometimes different wheel options. For those opting for the convertible, a more robust soft top with clearer windows was an improvement over earlier iterations.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this vintage and type are not readily available or comparable to modern standards. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data from the early 1990s is limited. However, given the Tracker's lightweight construction, body-on-frame design, and lack of advanced safety features, it would likely perform poorly in frontal and side impact tests compared to contemporary sedans or more modern SUVs. The rollover potential inherent in small, tall vehicles was also a significant concern.
Technology and Entertainment:
Built-in tech was rudimentary. Standard entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio, often with an optional cassette player. Higher trims might have offered a slightly more refined sound system with more speakers. There were no touchscreens, navigation systems, or Bluetooth connectivity as these were not common in vehicles of this class at the time.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering was an optional upgrade on many models, making low-speed maneuvering easier. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not standard and were rarely, if ever, an option on the 1992 model. Cruise control was also an infrequent feature.
Safety Features:
Safety equipment was very basic. Standard features usually included seatbelts, a collapsible steering column, and potentially an energy-absorbing dashboard. Airbags were not standard equipment on the 1992 Geo Tracker; driver-side airbags became more common in SUVs later in the decade. Side-impact door beams were likely present to offer some protection.
Optional Features:
Beyond power steering and a better radio, optional features often included air conditioning, an automatic transmission, and sometimes different wheel options. For those opting for the convertible, a more robust soft top with clearer windows was an improvement over earlier iterations.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this vintage and type are not readily available or comparable to modern standards. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data from the early 1990s is limited. However, given the Tracker's lightweight construction, body-on-frame design, and lack of advanced safety features, it would likely perform poorly in frontal and side impact tests compared to contemporary sedans or more modern SUVs. The rollover potential inherent in small, tall vehicles was also a significant concern.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1992 Geo Tracker Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1992 Geo Tracker had a starting MSRP that typically ranged from around $10,000 to $15,000, depending on the trim level and options. As a relatively inexpensive and simple vehicle, it experienced significant depreciation in its early years.
Today, current used market prices for a 1992 Geo Tracker can vary widely, from as low as $1,500 for vehicles needing considerable work to $5,000 or more for exceptionally well-maintained examples, especially those with low mileage and in desirable configurations like 4WD and a convertible top.
Factors significantly affecting resale value include the condition of the frame and body (rust is a major detractor), mileage, the presence and functionality of the 4WD system, whether it's a convertible or hardtop, and the overall maintenance history. Enthusiast interest in quirky, off-road capable vehicles can sometimes bolster prices for good examples.
Today, current used market prices for a 1992 Geo Tracker can vary widely, from as low as $1,500 for vehicles needing considerable work to $5,000 or more for exceptionally well-maintained examples, especially those with low mileage and in desirable configurations like 4WD and a convertible top.
Factors significantly affecting resale value include the condition of the frame and body (rust is a major detractor), mileage, the presence and functionality of the 4WD system, whether it's a convertible or hardtop, and the overall maintenance history. Enthusiast interest in quirky, off-road capable vehicles can sometimes bolster prices for good examples.
1992 Geo Tracker Cost of Ownership
The 1992 Geo Tracker is generally an economical vehicle to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age, limited power, and basic safety features. Fuel costs are also reasonable, with its small 1.6-liter engine achieving decent MPG. Maintenance, if performed regularly by a competent mechanic familiar with older vehicles or through DIY efforts, is relatively inexpensive. Repair costs can be low for common parts, but major issues like rust repair or transmission problems can escalate expenses. Overall, it's an economical choice for those seeking low running costs, provided its age-related wear and tear is managed.
1992 Geo Tracker Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
11.10 gallons
City Mileage
23 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
1992 Geo Tracker Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1992 Geo Tracker Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1992 Geo Tracker Insurance
Insurance for a 1992 Geo Tracker is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Convertible with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1992 Geo Tracker Compare to Other Convertible?
The 1992 Geo Tracker competed in a niche segment of small, affordable, off-road-capable vehicles. Its closest rivals included the Suzuki Samurai (from which it was derived), the Jeep Wrangler, and later, the early models of the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V.
Performance: The Tracker's 80-horsepower 1.6-liter engine was decidedly underpowered compared to most rivals, especially the more robust engines found in the Jeep Wrangler or the initial offerings from Toyota and Honda. Its 0-60 mph times were significantly slower.
Features: In terms of features, the Tracker was basic. Rivals like the early RAV4 and CR-V offered more creature comforts, better safety features (like airbags), and more refined interiors. The Jeep Wrangler, while also utilitarian, often offered more robust build quality and a wider array of off-road accessories. The Tracker's main draw was its optional convertible top, a feature not widely available on its more car-like SUV competitors.
Reliability: While the Tracker's simple mechanicals could be reliable with good maintenance, it was often outclassed by the stellar reliability records of Japanese competitors like Toyota and Honda. Rust was a significant long-term concern for the Tracker and Samurai. Jeep Wranglers of this era could also be prone to various mechanical issues.
Price: The Tracker generally offered a lower entry price than a comparable Jeep Wrangler. The early RAV4 and CR-V were typically positioned at a slightly higher price point and offered more utility and comfort.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Tracker's 80-horsepower 1.6-liter engine was decidedly underpowered compared to most rivals, especially the more robust engines found in the Jeep Wrangler or the initial offerings from Toyota and Honda. Its 0-60 mph times were significantly slower.
Features: In terms of features, the Tracker was basic. Rivals like the early RAV4 and CR-V offered more creature comforts, better safety features (like airbags), and more refined interiors. The Jeep Wrangler, while also utilitarian, often offered more robust build quality and a wider array of off-road accessories. The Tracker's main draw was its optional convertible top, a feature not widely available on its more car-like SUV competitors.
Reliability: While the Tracker's simple mechanicals could be reliable with good maintenance, it was often outclassed by the stellar reliability records of Japanese competitors like Toyota and Honda. Rust was a significant long-term concern for the Tracker and Samurai. Jeep Wranglers of this era could also be prone to various mechanical issues.
Price: The Tracker generally offered a lower entry price than a comparable Jeep Wrangler. The early RAV4 and CR-V were typically positioned at a slightly higher price point and offered more utility and comfort.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternative: The Suzuki Samurai is essentially the same vehicle, offering a comparable experience.
- Better Alternative (if comfort & refinement are key): The early Toyota RAV4 (1995-2000) or Honda CR-V (1997-2001) offer significantly better on-road manners, more safety features, and improved reliability, though they lack the Tracker's convertible option and hardcore off-road capability.
- Better Alternative (for off-road prowess): The Jeep Wrangler (YJ generation, 1987-1995) provides much more potent off-road performance and a legendary reputation, though it often comes with a higher price tag and potentially more mechanical headaches.
Final Verdict: Is the 1992 Geo Tracker a Good Convertible?
The 1992 Geo Tracker is ideal for budget-conscious individuals or families seeking a fun, go-anywhere vehicle for light off-roading, beach trips, or simply enjoying the open air with the top down. It's best suited for those who prioritize affordability and character over modern amenities and blistering performance.
It is worth buying, but with significant caveats. A used 1992 Tracker is the only option, and buyers must be diligent. Focus on examples with minimal rust, especially on the frame and body panels. A 4WD model, particularly with a manual transmission, offers the most traditional Tracker experience. While not a daily driver for everyone due to its basic nature and performance, it can be a rewarding purchase for hobbyists, a second vehicle for recreational use, or for someone who appreciates its unique, unpretentious charm and is prepared for its potential maintenance needs.
It is worth buying, but with significant caveats. A used 1992 Tracker is the only option, and buyers must be diligent. Focus on examples with minimal rust, especially on the frame and body panels. A 4WD model, particularly with a manual transmission, offers the most traditional Tracker experience. While not a daily driver for everyone due to its basic nature and performance, it can be a rewarding purchase for hobbyists, a second vehicle for recreational use, or for someone who appreciates its unique, unpretentious charm and is prepared for its potential maintenance needs.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.