The 1987 Jeep Comanche, part of the MJ series produced from 1986 to 1992, is a compact pickup truck built on Jeep's robust XJ Cherokee platform. Available in various bed lengths and offering a rugged, utilitarian design, it stood out with its Jeep heritage and off-road prowess. Key trims included the base, Custom, X, and the more upscale Pioneer. While exact new pricing varied, it offered a compelling value proposition for its era.
The Good
The 1987 Comanche boasts legendary Jeep off-road capability and a sturdy, reliable drivetrain. Its compact size makes it maneuverable, while the classic Jeep design evokes a sense of adventure and durability. For practical buyers, its value and utility are undeniable; for enthusiasts, it's an icon.
The Bad
Potential buyers should watch for rust, especially in the rocker panels, floor pans, and bed. Electrical gremlins can be an issue in older vehicles, and worn-out suspension components or aging engine parts are common concerns. Transmission issues and cooling system problems can also arise.
1987 Jeep Comanche: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L AMC I4 (4-cylinder)
- 4.0L AMC I6 (inline-6)
- Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 115 hp
- 4.0L I6: Approximately 173 hp
- Fuel Economy: (Estimates, varies with condition and drivetrain)
- 2.5L I4: Around 18-22 MPG city/highway
- 4.0L I6: Around 16-20 MPG city/highway
- 0-60 Times: (Estimates, varies significantly with engine and drivetrain)
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 13-16 seconds
- 4.0L I6: Approximately 9-11 seconds
- Towing Capacity: (Varies by configuration, typically up to 5,000 lbs or more with proper towing package)
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Basic utilitarian features, vinyl seats, rubber floor mats, minimal amenities.
- Custom: Added convenience features like carpet, passenger-side mirror, improved upholstery.
- X: Often included some extra styling cues and slightly more comfort options.
- Pioneer: Typically featured upgraded interior trim, chrome accents, power steering, and sometimes power brakes.
- Optional Features: Air conditioning, power windows/locks (less common), cruise control, automatic transmission, four-wheel drive, limited-slip differentials, upgraded stereo systems, floor mats, bed liners.
1987 Jeep Comanche Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1987 |
| Make | Jeep |
| Model | Comanche |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | TOLEDO |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.0-L L-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1987 Jeep Comanche Have?
The 1987 Jeep Comanche, like many vehicles of its vintage, is prone to certain age-related issues. A primary concern is rust, particularly in areas like the rocker panels, floor pans, cab corners, and around the wheel wells. The frame can also be susceptible.
Electrical issues are frequently reported, including malfunctioning gauges, faulty interior lights, and problems with the starter or alternator. The engine control module (ECM) can also be a point of failure.
The 4.0L inline-six engine is generally considered robust and reliable, often outlasting the rest of the vehicle. However, issues like head gasket failures can occur, especially if the engine has been overheated. The 2.5L four-cylinder is less powerful but also generally reliable, though it can be prone to oil leaks and valve cover gasket issues.
Transmission problems can manifest as slipping gears or difficulty shifting, especially in automatic transmissions. Clutch wear is common in manual transmission models. Cooling system issues, such as radiator leaks or failing water pumps, are also a concern, which can lead to overheating and more severe engine damage.
Suspension components, including leaf springs, bushings, and shock absorbers, will likely be worn on a vehicle of this age and may require replacement. Brake systems can also need attention, with common issues including worn rotors, calipers, or master cylinder leaks.
While specific recalls for the 1987 model year might be limited, it's crucial to check for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply. Overall, the Comanche's long-term reliability hinges heavily on its maintenance history and the owner's willingness to address these common wear-and-tear items proactively.
Electrical issues are frequently reported, including malfunctioning gauges, faulty interior lights, and problems with the starter or alternator. The engine control module (ECM) can also be a point of failure.
The 4.0L inline-six engine is generally considered robust and reliable, often outlasting the rest of the vehicle. However, issues like head gasket failures can occur, especially if the engine has been overheated. The 2.5L four-cylinder is less powerful but also generally reliable, though it can be prone to oil leaks and valve cover gasket issues.
Transmission problems can manifest as slipping gears or difficulty shifting, especially in automatic transmissions. Clutch wear is common in manual transmission models. Cooling system issues, such as radiator leaks or failing water pumps, are also a concern, which can lead to overheating and more severe engine damage.
Suspension components, including leaf springs, bushings, and shock absorbers, will likely be worn on a vehicle of this age and may require replacement. Brake systems can also need attention, with common issues including worn rotors, calipers, or master cylinder leaks.
While specific recalls for the 1987 model year might be limited, it's crucial to check for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply. Overall, the Comanche's long-term reliability hinges heavily on its maintenance history and the owner's willingness to address these common wear-and-tear items proactively.
How long will the 1987 Jeep Comanche last?
A well-maintained 1987 Jeep Comanche can easily surpass 200,000 miles, with many examples exceeding 250,000 or even 300,000 miles. The robust AMC inline-six engine is known for its longevity. However, typical service life is highly dependent on maintenance. Neglected vehicles may succumb to rust or mechanical failures much sooner. Weaknesses that emerge over time include suspension wear, aging electrical components, and the inevitable battle against rust, especially in humid or road-salt-prone regions. With consistent care, including regular fluid changes, addressing minor leaks promptly, and rust prevention, the Comanche demonstrates remarkable long-term durability, often outlasting many of its contemporaries.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1987 Jeep Comanche is a product of its time, meaning its technological offerings are rudimentary by modern standards. Built-in tech and entertainment features were minimal. The standard setup typically included an AM/FM radio, with an optional AM/FM stereo cassette player being a popular upgrade. Power windows and door locks were rare and usually part of higher trim levels or optional packages. Cruise control was also an available option for enhanced highway driving comfort.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in 1987. There were no electronic stability control systems, traction control, or advanced driver aids. The focus was on mechanical function rather than electronic intervention.
Safety features were basic but functional. Standard equipment included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts for front occupants), padded dashboard and steering wheel, and side-impact door beams. Four-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS) were an option, but not universally equipped.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this era are not readily available in the same format as modern NHTSA or IIHS tests. However, the Comanche was built on a body-on-frame chassis, providing a generally sturdy structure. Its relatively simple design meant fewer complex systems to fail, but the lack of airbags (which were not standard on most vehicles until the early 1990s) and advanced crumple zones meant it would not perform as well in severe collisions compared to contemporary vehicles with more advanced safety engineering.
Overall, the 1987 Comanche prioritized mechanical robustness and off-road capability over advanced technology and passive safety systems. Its tech appeal lies in its simplicity and functional utility.
Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in 1987. There were no electronic stability control systems, traction control, or advanced driver aids. The focus was on mechanical function rather than electronic intervention.
Safety features were basic but functional. Standard equipment included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts for front occupants), padded dashboard and steering wheel, and side-impact door beams. Four-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS) were an option, but not universally equipped.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this era are not readily available in the same format as modern NHTSA or IIHS tests. However, the Comanche was built on a body-on-frame chassis, providing a generally sturdy structure. Its relatively simple design meant fewer complex systems to fail, but the lack of airbags (which were not standard on most vehicles until the early 1990s) and advanced crumple zones meant it would not perform as well in severe collisions compared to contemporary vehicles with more advanced safety engineering.
Overall, the 1987 Comanche prioritized mechanical robustness and off-road capability over advanced technology and passive safety systems. Its tech appeal lies in its simplicity and functional utility.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1987 Jeep Comanche Prices and Market Value
When new in 1987, the Jeep Comanche had a base price starting in the roughly $8,000 to $10,000 range, with higher trims and options pushing it upwards of $15,000-$18,000. As a compact pickup, it offered a more affordable entry point compared to larger trucks.
Today, the used market for a 1987 Jeep Comanche varies significantly. Clean, low-mileage examples, especially those with the desirable 4.0L engine and four-wheel drive, can fetch anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 or even more for pristine, collector-quality specimens. Project trucks or those in fair condition might be found for $2,000-$4,000.
Depreciation was moderate during its initial years, typical for trucks. However, its resale value has since stabilized and even appreciated in recent years due to its growing status as a sought-after, rugged, and collectible Jeep product. Factors influencing resale value include mileage, condition (especially rust), mechanical soundness, engine choice (4.0L is highly preferred), drivetrain (4WD adds value), originality, and trim level. Enthusiast demand plays a significant role in its current market value.
Today, the used market for a 1987 Jeep Comanche varies significantly. Clean, low-mileage examples, especially those with the desirable 4.0L engine and four-wheel drive, can fetch anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 or even more for pristine, collector-quality specimens. Project trucks or those in fair condition might be found for $2,000-$4,000.
Depreciation was moderate during its initial years, typical for trucks. However, its resale value has since stabilized and even appreciated in recent years due to its growing status as a sought-after, rugged, and collectible Jeep product. Factors influencing resale value include mileage, condition (especially rust), mechanical soundness, engine choice (4.0L is highly preferred), drivetrain (4WD adds value), originality, and trim level. Enthusiast demand plays a significant role in its current market value.
1987 Jeep Comanche Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1987 Jeep Comanche can be quite economical, especially if you're mechanically inclined. Insurance costs are generally reasonable for classic vehicles, though this depends on your coverage and location. Fuel economy, particularly with the 4.0L engine, is comparable to other trucks of its era, averaging around 16-20 MPG. Maintenance is straightforward, with parts widely available and many common repairs being DIY-friendly. However, rust repair can become a significant expense. Overall, while repair costs can be low due to its simple mechanics and parts availability, the potential for rust mitigation and age-related component failures means long-term ownership can range from very economical to moderately costly depending on the vehicle's condition and your maintenance approach.
1987 Jeep Comanche Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1987 Jeep Comanche Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1987 Jeep Comanche Insurance
Insurance for a 1987 Jeep Comanche is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1987 Jeep Comanche Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1987 Jeep Comanche competed in the compact pickup truck market against formidable rivals such as the Ford Ranger, Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, and Nissan Hardbody (D21).
Performance: The Comanche's optional 4.0L inline-six engine offered superior horsepower and torque compared to most base engines in the Ranger and S-10, making it feel more powerful, especially for towing or off-roading. The Nissan Hardbody offered a reputation for robust engines and good performance as well.
Features: In 1987, features were generally comparable across the board. All offered basic amenities. The Comanche's standout feature was its Jeep heritage and genuine off-road capability, particularly with its available 4WD system and solid axles (on some early models, later models used IFS). The Ranger and S-10 also offered capable 4WD and a variety of cab and bed configurations. The Nissan Hardbody was known for its strong build quality and dependable nature.
Reliability: The 4.0L Jeep engine is famously durable. However, the Comanche is more susceptible to rust than some competitors like the Nissan Hardbody, which often fared better in corrosive environments. Ford Ranger and Chevy S-10 reliability was generally good, though less remarkable than the 4.0L Jeep engine. Electrical gremlins could be an issue for all.
Price: The Comanche was competitively priced, offering good value for its capability. New prices were in line with competitors. On the used market today, well-maintained Comanches, especially with the 4.0L, often command higher prices than comparable Rangers or S-10s due to their collectible status and unique Jeep appeal.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Comanche's optional 4.0L inline-six engine offered superior horsepower and torque compared to most base engines in the Ranger and S-10, making it feel more powerful, especially for towing or off-roading. The Nissan Hardbody offered a reputation for robust engines and good performance as well.
Features: In 1987, features were generally comparable across the board. All offered basic amenities. The Comanche's standout feature was its Jeep heritage and genuine off-road capability, particularly with its available 4WD system and solid axles (on some early models, later models used IFS). The Ranger and S-10 also offered capable 4WD and a variety of cab and bed configurations. The Nissan Hardbody was known for its strong build quality and dependable nature.
Reliability: The 4.0L Jeep engine is famously durable. However, the Comanche is more susceptible to rust than some competitors like the Nissan Hardbody, which often fared better in corrosive environments. Ford Ranger and Chevy S-10 reliability was generally good, though less remarkable than the 4.0L Jeep engine. Electrical gremlins could be an issue for all.
Price: The Comanche was competitively priced, offering good value for its capability. New prices were in line with competitors. On the used market today, well-maintained Comanches, especially with the 4.0L, often command higher prices than comparable Rangers or S-10s due to their collectible status and unique Jeep appeal.
Alternatives:
- Similar: 1987 Ford Ranger, Chevrolet S-10, Nissan Hardbody. These offer similar utility and practicality. The Nissan Hardbody might be a better choice if rust is a major concern.
- Better (for specific needs): If raw off-road capability is the absolute priority and you can find one in good condition, the Comanche is hard to beat. If a more modern feel, better fuel economy, or a wider range of comfort features are desired, then looking at slightly newer trucks might be beneficial, but they lose some of the classic charm. For pure reliability and ease of maintenance, a well-kept Toyota pickup from the same era is also a strong contender.
Final Verdict: Is the 1987 Jeep Comanche a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1987 Jeep Comanche is ideal for off-road enthusiasts, DIY mechanics, and those seeking a rugged, utilitarian pickup with classic Jeep charm. It's a vehicle that rewards owners who are willing to perform regular maintenance and address potential rust issues.
It is absolutely worth buying for the right person. However, condition is paramount. Look for models with minimal rust, particularly in the unibody structure. The 4.0L inline-six engine is highly recommended for its power and durability, especially when paired with a manual transmission or a well-maintained automatic and 4WD.
Buying used is the only option, and prioritizing a mechanically sound vehicle with a solid body over cosmetic perfection is wise. While it demands more attention than a modern vehicle, its simplicity, capability, and iconic status make it a rewarding purchase for the dedicated enthusiast.
It is absolutely worth buying for the right person. However, condition is paramount. Look for models with minimal rust, particularly in the unibody structure. The 4.0L inline-six engine is highly recommended for its power and durability, especially when paired with a manual transmission or a well-maintained automatic and 4WD.
Buying used is the only option, and prioritizing a mechanically sound vehicle with a solid body over cosmetic perfection is wise. While it demands more attention than a modern vehicle, its simplicity, capability, and iconic status make it a rewarding purchase for the dedicated enthusiast.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.