The 2002 Peterbilt 357 is a robust vocational truck known for its distinctive classic styling and exceptional durability. Primarily produced as a heavy-duty conventional tractor, its model years span many decades, with the 2002 model representing a well-established iteration. While specific trims are less defined than consumer vehicles, configurations often revolved around engine and axle choices. Its popularity stems from its iconic Peterbilt heritage, reliable performance in demanding applications, and a strong resale value, making it a favorite for owner-operators and fleets alike.
The Good
The 2002 Peterbilt 357 excels in raw power and unwavering reliability, appealing to practical needs. Its iconic, bold design evokes pride for emotional buyers, while its robust construction promises long-term value and enduring service life, a win for both.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 2002 Peterbilt 357 include aging electrical systems which can develop gremlins, and some older models might exhibit rust in high-humidity areas. Wear and tear on components due to heavy use is also a consideration for any truck of this age.
2002 Peterbilt 357: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2002 Peterbilt 357 was typically offered with a range of powerful diesel engines, predominantly from Caterpillar (CAT) and Cummins. Common options included the Caterpillar C-15 and various Cummins ISX or N14 engines. These engines were renowned for their torque and durability in heavy-duty applications.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings varied significantly based on the specific engine chosen and its configuration. Expect a wide range, typically from around 370 horsepower up to well over 600 horsepower for high-performance applications. Many configurations fell within the 400-500 horsepower range, suitable for long-haul and heavy hauling.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for a vehicle of this class is highly dependent on the engine, transmission, gearing, load, and driving conditions. It is not comparable to a passenger vehicle. Typical figures might range from 4 to 7 miles per gallon (MPG). Aerodynamics and load are the biggest factors.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph acceleration times are generally not a relevant metric for heavy-duty trucks like the Peterbilt 357. These vehicles are built for sustained hauling and power, not rapid acceleration. When unloaded, they could accelerate reasonably well, but loaded times would be significantly longer and dependent on the gross vehicle weight (GVW).
- Towing Capacity: The towing capacity is a primary function of the Peterbilt 357. It is designed for heavy-duty towing and hauling. Configurations could handle Gross Combination Weights (GCW) ranging from 80,000 pounds for standard operations up to 120,000 pounds or more for specialized heavy haul applications, depending on the axle configurations, frame strength, and drivetrain.
- Trim-Level Features: Peterbilt trucks, especially in this era, didn't have traditional consumer-oriented 'trim levels' in the same way. Features were highly customizable and optioned by the buyer or fleet. However, common distinctions could be made based on:
- Cab Configurations: Day cabs (for local/shorter routes) and various sleeper cab configurations (for long-haul).
- Axle Configurations: Tandem or tridem rear axles for increased load-carrying capacity.
- Suspension Systems: Different types of air or mechanical suspensions to suit load requirements and ride comfort.
- Interior Appointments: While generally utilitarian, options could include upgraded seating materials, premium sound systems, and additional driver amenities in the sleeper.
- Exterior Styling: Chromed accents, custom paint, and specific wheel types could be optioned for aesthetic appeal.
2002 Peterbilt 357 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2002 |
| Make | Peterbilt |
| Model | 357 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | MADISON |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 104520 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 14.6L I6 |
| Engine Size | 14.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | 6x4 |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2002 Peterbilt 357 Have?
The 2002 Peterbilt 357, being a well-built vocational truck, generally boasts high long-term reliability. However, as with any vehicle of this age and intended use, certain issues can arise, often related to wear and tear or evolving technology.
Electrical System Issues: One of the more frequently reported areas of concern on trucks from this era, including the 2002 Peterbilt 357, can be the electrical system. Over time, wiring harnesses can become brittle, connectors can corrode, and grounding points can weaken, leading to intermittent faults, warning lights, or complete system failures. This is particularly true for components exposed to the elements or subjected to vibration. Diagnosing and repairing these can be complex and time-consuming.
Engine and Drivetrain Wear: While the underlying engines (like CAT C-15 or Cummins N14/ISX) are known for their longevity, components within them and the drivetrain can wear out with high mileage and heavy use. This can include issues with turbochargers, fuel injectors, clutch wear, transmission synchros, or differential problems. Regular and diligent maintenance is paramount to mitigating these risks.
Suspension and Chassis Components: The heavy-duty nature of the 357 means its suspension and chassis components are constantly under stress. Bushings can wear out, air suspension bags can leak, and leaf springs can fatigue. Frame cracks, while rare, can occur in severely overloaded or accident-damaged vehicles.
HVAC System: The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system can be a source of frustration. Compressor failures, leaks in the refrigerant lines, or issues with the blower motor are not uncommon as the vehicle ages and accumulates hours of operation.
Recalls: Specific recalls for the 2002 model year Peterbilt 357 would need to be researched through official channels like the NHTSA database, as they are often tied to specific component manufacturers or production batches. However, for trucks of this age, recalls are less common than for newer vehicles unless a significant safety defect is identified. Most issues are typically addressed through proactive maintenance and component replacement as needed.
Long-Term Reliability Concerns: The primary long-term concern is the overall age of the vehicle. Components made from rubber, plastic, and certain metals degrade over time, regardless of mileage. Therefore, a well-maintained 2002 Peterbilt 357 can still offer many years of reliable service, but potential buyers should be prepared for the possibility of age-related repairs.
Electrical System Issues: One of the more frequently reported areas of concern on trucks from this era, including the 2002 Peterbilt 357, can be the electrical system. Over time, wiring harnesses can become brittle, connectors can corrode, and grounding points can weaken, leading to intermittent faults, warning lights, or complete system failures. This is particularly true for components exposed to the elements or subjected to vibration. Diagnosing and repairing these can be complex and time-consuming.
Engine and Drivetrain Wear: While the underlying engines (like CAT C-15 or Cummins N14/ISX) are known for their longevity, components within them and the drivetrain can wear out with high mileage and heavy use. This can include issues with turbochargers, fuel injectors, clutch wear, transmission synchros, or differential problems. Regular and diligent maintenance is paramount to mitigating these risks.
Suspension and Chassis Components: The heavy-duty nature of the 357 means its suspension and chassis components are constantly under stress. Bushings can wear out, air suspension bags can leak, and leaf springs can fatigue. Frame cracks, while rare, can occur in severely overloaded or accident-damaged vehicles.
HVAC System: The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system can be a source of frustration. Compressor failures, leaks in the refrigerant lines, or issues with the blower motor are not uncommon as the vehicle ages and accumulates hours of operation.
Recalls: Specific recalls for the 2002 model year Peterbilt 357 would need to be researched through official channels like the NHTSA database, as they are often tied to specific component manufacturers or production batches. However, for trucks of this age, recalls are less common than for newer vehicles unless a significant safety defect is identified. Most issues are typically addressed through proactive maintenance and component replacement as needed.
Long-Term Reliability Concerns: The primary long-term concern is the overall age of the vehicle. Components made from rubber, plastic, and certain metals degrade over time, regardless of mileage. Therefore, a well-maintained 2002 Peterbilt 357 can still offer many years of reliable service, but potential buyers should be prepared for the possibility of age-related repairs.
How long will the 2002 Peterbilt 357 last?
The 2002 Peterbilt 357 is renowned for its exceptional long-term durability. With proper and consistent maintenance, these trucks can easily achieve well over 1 million miles. Owner data and industry experience suggest that well-cared-for units can remain in active service for 15 to 20 years or more. The core chassis and driveline components are built to withstand immense stress and mileage. Weaknesses over time tend to manifest in ancillary systems such as electrical components, HVAC, and suspension wear items, rather than fundamental structural or powertrain failures. This inherent toughness is a significant factor in their enduring appeal and strong resale value.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2002 Peterbilt 357, by its nature as a vocational heavy-duty truck from the early 2000s, prioritizes function, durability, and raw capability over advanced technology, entertainment, or driver-assistance features commonly found in modern passenger vehicles.
Built-in Tech: The technology is primarily focused on operational efficiency and diagnostics. This would typically include a robust instrument cluster with analog gauges for essential information like engine RPM, speed, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and air brake system status. Diagnostic ports for engine and system monitoring would be standard. Advanced in-dash navigation or infotainment systems were not common factory options.
Entertainment: Entertainment features were generally limited to an aftermarket-capable radio unit. This could be a basic AM/FM stereo, potentially with a CD player, or a CB radio for communication on the road. Upgraded sound systems were typically owner-installed modifications rather than factory options.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features in the traditional sense were virtually non-existent. There would be no lane departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on the driver's direct control and awareness. Features like power steering, air brakes, and potentially cruise control would be the extent of driver aids. Some models might have offered features like engine brakes (Jake Brake) for controlled deceleration.
Safety Features: Safety in the 2002 Peterbilt 357 is primarily derived from its robust construction and the driver's responsibility. Standard safety features include the strong steel frame, reinforced cab structure, seat belts for the driver and any passengers, and the reliable air brake system. Visibility is generally good due to the conventional hood design and large windshield.
Optional Features: Optional features were extensive but focused on utility and driver comfort for long hours. These could include:
Crash-Test Ratings: Commercial trucks like the Peterbilt 357 are not typically subjected to the same type of crash-testing regimens as passenger cars by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Their design inherently focuses on occupant protection through structural integrity and the sheer mass of the vehicle. The emphasis is on survivability in severe conditions rather than achieving specific star ratings. Manufacturers conduct their own internal testing and engineering to meet stringent Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) applicable to heavy trucks.
Built-in Tech: The technology is primarily focused on operational efficiency and diagnostics. This would typically include a robust instrument cluster with analog gauges for essential information like engine RPM, speed, oil pressure, coolant temperature, and air brake system status. Diagnostic ports for engine and system monitoring would be standard. Advanced in-dash navigation or infotainment systems were not common factory options.
Entertainment: Entertainment features were generally limited to an aftermarket-capable radio unit. This could be a basic AM/FM stereo, potentially with a CD player, or a CB radio for communication on the road. Upgraded sound systems were typically owner-installed modifications rather than factory options.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features in the traditional sense were virtually non-existent. There would be no lane departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on the driver's direct control and awareness. Features like power steering, air brakes, and potentially cruise control would be the extent of driver aids. Some models might have offered features like engine brakes (Jake Brake) for controlled deceleration.
Safety Features: Safety in the 2002 Peterbilt 357 is primarily derived from its robust construction and the driver's responsibility. Standard safety features include the strong steel frame, reinforced cab structure, seat belts for the driver and any passengers, and the reliable air brake system. Visibility is generally good due to the conventional hood design and large windshield.
Optional Features: Optional features were extensive but focused on utility and driver comfort for long hours. These could include:
- Various sleeper cab configurations, offering beds, storage, and sometimes small amenities.
- Heated mirrors for improved visibility in cold weather.
- Additional lighting packages for enhanced nighttime operation.
- Air-ride suspension for improved ride comfort.
- Custom interior packages for enhanced driver ergonomics.
Crash-Test Ratings: Commercial trucks like the Peterbilt 357 are not typically subjected to the same type of crash-testing regimens as passenger cars by organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS. Their design inherently focuses on occupant protection through structural integrity and the sheer mass of the vehicle. The emphasis is on survivability in severe conditions rather than achieving specific star ratings. Manufacturers conduct their own internal testing and engineering to meet stringent Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) applicable to heavy trucks.
What Colors Options are Available?
2002 Peterbilt 357 Prices and Market Value
New, a 2002 Peterbilt 357 would have a base price in the range of $80,000 to $120,000, with fully optioned configurations, especially with powerful engines and custom sleepers, potentially exceeding $150,000. The used market for a 2002 Peterbilt 357 shows remarkable resilience. Current prices typically range from $30,000 to $70,000, heavily influenced by mileage, engine condition, maintenance history, and overall appearance. Peterbilts, including the 357, exhibit slower depreciation compared to many commercial vehicles due to their legendary durability and desirability. Factors affecting resale value include engine type (Cummins and CAT are highly sought after), transmission, axle configuration, frame condition, tire wear, and whether it's a day cab or has a desirable sleeper configuration.
2002 Peterbilt 357 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2002 Peterbilt 357 is generally considered costly, though its value proposition lies in its earning potential and longevity. Insurance premiums will be substantial, reflecting its commercial use and value. Fuel costs are significant due to its powerful diesel engine and typical operating environment (6-7 MPG is common). Maintenance is critical and ongoing; expect regular oil changes, filter replacements, and potential repairs to wear items. Repair costs can be high, especially for specialized diesel components. Long-term ownership is economical only if the truck is actively used for income generation, offsetting its considerable operating expenses through hauling revenue.
2002 Peterbilt 357 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2002 Peterbilt 357 Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Air:controls:hand Control/Valve
Recall date
2002-09-10
Recall no.
02v241001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Vehicles Equipped With Bendix Tc-7 Trailer Control Hand-Operated Valve With Push-to-connect Fittings. THE Delivery Port IN THE Valve Body MAY BE Partially Blocked DUE TO A Problem During THE Molding Process.
Consequence
Such Blockage MAY Slow THE Delivery and Exhaust OF AIR TO and From THE Trailer Brakes When They ARE Operated BY This Hand-Operated Trailer Control Valve.
Remedy
Paccar Will Notify ITS Customers and Inspect and Replace, IF Necessary, THE Hand Valve Free OF Charge. Owner Notification Began October 18, 2002. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Peterbilt AT 940-591-4201.
Notes
Also, Customers CAN Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Suspension:front:hub
Recall date
2003-04-01
Recall no.
03v125000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Trucks Equipped With Truck HUB Units Manufactured BY SKF Exclusively FOR USE ON Arvinmeritor's Ff98x Series Non-Drive Steer Axles, THE HUB Unit Bearings CAN Wear Prematurely.
Consequence
Seizure OF THE Bearings CAN Cause Wheel Separation or Wheel END Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace All Front Axle Hubs. Notification Began July 16, 2003. THE Manufacturer HAS Advised US That Parts Will NOT BE Available Until September 2003. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy With A Reasonable Time Should Contact Peterbilt AT 940-591-4201 or Kenworth 425-828-5440.
Notes
Kenworth Recall NO. 03kw2 and Peterbilt Recall NO. 303-A.customers CAN Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
2002 Peterbilt 357 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2002 Peterbilt 357 Insurance
Insurance for a 2002 Peterbilt 357 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2002 Peterbilt 357 Compare to Other Truck?
The 2002 Peterbilt 357 competed in the heavy-duty vocational and long-haul truck market against formidable rivals such as Kenworth (e.g., W900B, T800), Freightliner (e.g., FLD, Classic XL), Volvo (e.g., VN series), and International (e.g., 9000i series).
Performance: The Peterbilt 357, often powered by robust Caterpillar or Cummins engines, typically offered comparable or superior torque and horsepower to many rivals, especially in its class. Its reputation for pulling power and ability to handle heavy loads was a strong suit. Kenworth trucks were often seen as direct competitors in terms of raw performance and ruggedness.
Features: Feature-wise, the 2002 Peterbilt 357 was, like its contemporaries, highly customizable. Peterbilt traditionally offered a more premium, driver-focused interior and exterior aesthetic than some utilitarian rivals. Kenworth also excelled in this regard, offering similar levels of driver comfort and customization. Freightliner and Volvo often presented more modern (for the era) cab designs and potentially slightly better aerodynamics or integrated technology, though Peterbilt and Kenworth often held the edge in perceived build quality and driver appeal. International trucks, while capable, sometimes lagged in terms of perceived prestige and long-term interior durability compared to Peterbilt or Kenworth.
Reliability: Peterbilt has a long-standing reputation for exceptional reliability and durability, a trait shared closely with Kenworth. Both brands are known for their robust chassis, quality components, and longevity. While all trucks require maintenance, Peterbilt and Kenworth models from this era are often cited for their ability to withstand demanding conditions and high mileage with fewer major issues compared to some other brands that might have had more widespread electrical or structural concerns over time.
Price: When new, the 2002 Peterbilt 357 was generally positioned at the higher end of the price spectrum, competing with Kenworth. Freightliner and International often offered slightly more budget-friendly options. In the used market today, the strong reputation of Peterbilt and Kenworth translates to higher resale values, meaning they might command more upfront but potentially offer better long-term value and lower depreciation.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Peterbilt 357, often powered by robust Caterpillar or Cummins engines, typically offered comparable or superior torque and horsepower to many rivals, especially in its class. Its reputation for pulling power and ability to handle heavy loads was a strong suit. Kenworth trucks were often seen as direct competitors in terms of raw performance and ruggedness.
Features: Feature-wise, the 2002 Peterbilt 357 was, like its contemporaries, highly customizable. Peterbilt traditionally offered a more premium, driver-focused interior and exterior aesthetic than some utilitarian rivals. Kenworth also excelled in this regard, offering similar levels of driver comfort and customization. Freightliner and Volvo often presented more modern (for the era) cab designs and potentially slightly better aerodynamics or integrated technology, though Peterbilt and Kenworth often held the edge in perceived build quality and driver appeal. International trucks, while capable, sometimes lagged in terms of perceived prestige and long-term interior durability compared to Peterbilt or Kenworth.
Reliability: Peterbilt has a long-standing reputation for exceptional reliability and durability, a trait shared closely with Kenworth. Both brands are known for their robust chassis, quality components, and longevity. While all trucks require maintenance, Peterbilt and Kenworth models from this era are often cited for their ability to withstand demanding conditions and high mileage with fewer major issues compared to some other brands that might have had more widespread electrical or structural concerns over time.
Price: When new, the 2002 Peterbilt 357 was generally positioned at the higher end of the price spectrum, competing with Kenworth. Freightliner and International often offered slightly more budget-friendly options. In the used market today, the strong reputation of Peterbilt and Kenworth translates to higher resale values, meaning they might command more upfront but potentially offer better long-term value and lower depreciation.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternatives: A 2002 Kenworth W900B or T800 would be the most direct competitor, offering very similar performance, reliability, and build quality, often with a comparable price point.
- Potentially Better Alternatives (depending on needs): If extreme modern technology or slightly better fuel efficiency were paramount, a 2002 Volvo VN series might offer advancements in cab ergonomics or engine management. However, for sheer ruggedness and classic appeal, the Peterbilt 357 and Kenworth W900B/T800 remain hard to beat. For a more budget-conscious purchase with good capability, a well-maintained 2002 Freightliner FLD Classic could be considered, though it might not match the perceived prestige or long-term durability of the Peterbilt.
Final Verdict: Is the 2002 Peterbilt 357 a Good Truck?
The 2002 Peterbilt 357 is ideal for owner-operators and small fleets prioritizing raw capability, legendary durability, and classic styling over cutting-edge technology. It's an excellent choice for heavy hauling, construction, or specialized vocational applications where reliability and power are paramount.
It is absolutely worth buying, especially on the used market, provided it has been well-maintained. Given its age, buying a 2002 model requires a thorough inspection by a qualified heavy-duty mechanic. Look for trucks with strong service records, particularly those powered by well-regarded Caterpillar or Cummins engines. Day cabs are simpler and often more affordable, while sleeper cabs offer crucial amenities for long-haul drivers. This truck represents enduring value for those who understand and appreciate its robust, no-nonsense engineering.
It is absolutely worth buying, especially on the used market, provided it has been well-maintained. Given its age, buying a 2002 model requires a thorough inspection by a qualified heavy-duty mechanic. Look for trucks with strong service records, particularly those powered by well-regarded Caterpillar or Cummins engines. Day cabs are simpler and often more affordable, while sleeper cabs offer crucial amenities for long-haul drivers. This truck represents enduring value for those who understand and appreciate its robust, no-nonsense engineering.