The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty is a highly versatile and popular commercial truck, part of Freightliner's M2 series introduced in the early 2000s. Its cab-over-engine design offers excellent maneuverability, making it ideal for various vocations from box trucks and utility vehicles to dump trucks and refuse haulers. Known for its robust construction and customizable chassis, the M2 106 stands out due to its adaptability, reliability, and relatively comfortable driver environment for a medium-duty workhorse, appealing to businesses seeking a dependable platform.
The Good
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 boasts exceptional versatility and reliability, making it a practical choice for various industries. Its robust chassis and dependable powertrains ensure longevity and minimize downtime, appealing to pragmatic buyers focused on operational efficiency. Emotionally, owners appreciate its reputation for durability, enhanced driver comfort compared to predecessors, and the confidence that comes from owning a trusted workhorse. It offers strong value through its enduring service life.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 include common issues associated with aging commercial vehicles, such as electrical system glitches, wear on suspension components and brakes, and potential for cab corrosion in harsh climates. Specific engine problems can arise with high mileage, and while comfort is improved, it remains a commercial truck, not a luxury vehicle. Owners should scrutinize maintenance records for neglect.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty: Quick Overview
Here's a summary of key specifications for the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty:
- Engine Options: The 2005 M2 106 offered a range of robust diesel engines to suit various applications. Common choices included the Caterpillar C7 (often 7.2L displacement), the Mercedes-Benz MBE 900 series (available in 6.4L and 7.2L displacements), and the Cummins ISB (5.9L or 6.7L) and ISC (8.3L) engines. These engines were selected for their durability and torque output.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings varied significantly based on the specific engine and its tuning, typically ranging from approximately 190 horsepower for lighter applications up to around 330 horsepower for more demanding tasks. Torque figures were substantial, critical for hauling and vocational use.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy is highly dependent on the vehicle's configuration, load, driving style, and application. For a medium-duty truck of this class and era, typical fuel efficiency could range from 6 to 10 miles per gallon (MPG). Dedicated city driving with frequent stops or heavy loads would yield lower figures, while highway driving would be more efficient.
- 0-60 Times: "0-60 mph" acceleration times are not a relevant performance metric for commercial medium-duty trucks like the M2 106. These vehicles are designed for hauling heavy loads and consistent power delivery, not rapid acceleration.
- Towing/Hauling Capacity: The M2 106 is rated by Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) and Gross Combined Weight Rating (GCWR). GVWR typically ranged from 19,500 lbs to 33,000 lbs, depending on the axle configuration and spring capacities. GCWR, when configured for trailer towing, could extend up to 60,000 lbs or more, making it suitable for a wide range of towing and hauling duties.
- Trim-Level Features: The M2 106 is primarily a chassis-cab platform, and "trims" are less about luxury and more about vocational utility.
- Chassis Features: Standard features include air brakes, power steering, various wheelbase options, single or tandem rear axles, and manual or automatic transmission choices (e.g., Eaton Fuller manual, Allison 2500/3000 series automatic). PTO (Power Take-Off) options were common for specialized equipment.
- Cab Configurations: Available as a day cab, extended cab, or full crew cab.
- Interior Features: Basic instrumentation, AM/FM radio, heater/air conditioning, air-ride driver's seat (optional for enhanced comfort), cruise control (optional), and robust, easy-to-clean materials designed for commercial use. Power windows and locks were often optional upgrades rather than standard.
- Chassis Features: Standard features include air brakes, power steering, various wheelbase options, single or tandem rear axles, and manual or automatic transmission choices (e.g., Eaton Fuller manual, Allison 2500/3000 series automatic). PTO (Power Take-Off) options were common for specialized equipment.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2005 |
| Make | Freightliner |
| Model | M2 106 Medium Duty |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | MT. HOLLY |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 6.4L L6 DIESEL |
| Engine Size | 6.4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Have?
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106, while generally robust, is not without its frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns, typical for a commercial vehicle of its age and usage.
One of the most common categories of issues revolves around the electrical system. Owners often report problems with wiring harnesses, sensor failures (affecting everything from engine performance to ABS), and instrument cluster malfunctions. Aging wiring can become brittle or corroded, leading to intermittent issues that are challenging to diagnose.
Engine-specific problems are also prevalent, depending on the installed powerplant. For vehicles equipped with the Caterpillar C7 engine, issues with fuel injectors and the HEUI (Hydraulically Actuated Electronic Unit Injector) pump are known, along with potential exhaust manifold leaks. Mercedes-Benz MBE 900 engines can experience problems with fuel system components and oil leaks, though EGR-related issues became more prominent in later emissions-compliant models. Cummins engines, particularly the ISB/ISC, might see turbocharger failures or exhaust manifold cracking over time, especially under heavy usage.
Brake and suspension components are subject to significant wear. Air brake system leaks, worn air dryers, and issues with suspension bushings and kingpins are frequently reported. Steering components, such as power steering pump leaks and steering gearbox wear, also arise with high mileage.
Cab and body integrity can be a concern, particularly in regions exposed to salt and harsh weather. Rust is commonly found around wheel wells, cab corners, and battery boxes. Door hinge wear and window regulator failures are also noted.
Several recalls were issued for vehicles from this era that could affect the 2005 M2 106. Notable recalls include:
Long-term reliability hinges heavily on consistent and thorough maintenance. Neglecting preventative maintenance will accelerate wear and tear on all critical systems.
One of the most common categories of issues revolves around the electrical system. Owners often report problems with wiring harnesses, sensor failures (affecting everything from engine performance to ABS), and instrument cluster malfunctions. Aging wiring can become brittle or corroded, leading to intermittent issues that are challenging to diagnose.
Engine-specific problems are also prevalent, depending on the installed powerplant. For vehicles equipped with the Caterpillar C7 engine, issues with fuel injectors and the HEUI (Hydraulically Actuated Electronic Unit Injector) pump are known, along with potential exhaust manifold leaks. Mercedes-Benz MBE 900 engines can experience problems with fuel system components and oil leaks, though EGR-related issues became more prominent in later emissions-compliant models. Cummins engines, particularly the ISB/ISC, might see turbocharger failures or exhaust manifold cracking over time, especially under heavy usage.
Brake and suspension components are subject to significant wear. Air brake system leaks, worn air dryers, and issues with suspension bushings and kingpins are frequently reported. Steering components, such as power steering pump leaks and steering gearbox wear, also arise with high mileage.
Cab and body integrity can be a concern, particularly in regions exposed to salt and harsh weather. Rust is commonly found around wheel wells, cab corners, and battery boxes. Door hinge wear and window regulator failures are also noted.
Several recalls were issued for vehicles from this era that could affect the 2005 M2 106. Notable recalls include:
- NHTSA Campaign Number: 05V539000 (November 2005) – Addressed a potential failure of the brake light switch, which could cause brake lights not to illuminate, increasing collision risk.
- NHTSA Campaign Number: 05V554000 (December 2005) – Related to front spring suspension bolts that might not have been properly tightened, potentially leading to spring detachment.
- NHTSA Campaign Number: 05V028000 (February 2005) – Concerned with air disc brake rotors that could crack, reducing braking efficiency.
Long-term reliability hinges heavily on consistent and thorough maintenance. Neglecting preventative maintenance will accelerate wear and tear on all critical systems.
How long will the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty last?
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty, when properly maintained, is known for its exceptional long-term durability and can easily achieve substantial mileage. It's common for these trucks to see 500,000 to 750,000 miles, and many well-cared-for units surpass 1,000,000 miles in service. This translates to an average service life of 15 to 20 years, or even more, for fleets that diligently follow maintenance schedules.
Over time, the inherent robustness of the chassis, engine blocks, and major drivetrain components stands out. However, long-term weaknesses often emerge in the electrical system, where wiring and sensors can degrade, leading to intermittent faults. Corrosion can become a significant issue, particularly in the cab and frame components, if not proactively addressed. Auxiliary components like alternators, starters, and air conditioning systems are also prone to wear. Suspension bushings, kingpins, and steering components will eventually require replacement due to continuous stress, underscoring that while the core is strong, peripherals and wear items demand attention.
Over time, the inherent robustness of the chassis, engine blocks, and major drivetrain components stands out. However, long-term weaknesses often emerge in the electrical system, where wiring and sensors can degrade, leading to intermittent faults. Corrosion can become a significant issue, particularly in the cab and frame components, if not proactively addressed. Auxiliary components like alternators, starters, and air conditioning systems are also prone to wear. Suspension bushings, kingpins, and steering components will eventually require replacement due to continuous stress, underscoring that while the core is strong, peripherals and wear items demand attention.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty, as a commercial work vehicle, featured built-in technology, entertainment, and safety features that were functional and practical for its era, rather than luxurious or cutting-edge.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: The "tech" primarily revolved around essential operational systems. The dashboard featured analog gauges for critical information like speed, RPM, oil pressure, and air pressure, with some digital displays for odometer and trip information. Entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio, with optional upgrades to include a cassette or single-CD player. Bluetooth connectivity, navigation, or advanced infotainment systems were not standard or generally available in 2005.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technologies were rudimentary compared to modern vehicles. The primary assistance features included standard cruise control for highway driving, air brakes (common in commercial vehicles for superior stopping power), and Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was becoming standard on most commercial trucks by this time, preventing wheel lock-up during hard braking. Advanced systems like lane departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, or automatic emergency braking were not present.
Safety Features: Core safety features focused on passive restraint and active braking. These included:
Optional Features: Owners could opt for features enhancing comfort and utility, such as air-ride driver's seats to reduce fatigue, power windows and door locks for convenience, and specialized vocational controls like PTO (Power Take-Off) engagement switches. Enhanced lighting packages for specific work environments were also common.
Crash-Test Ratings: It is important to note that commercial medium-duty trucks like the Freightliner M2 106 are not subjected to the consumer-oriented crash-test ratings (e.g., NHTSA 5-Star or IIHS Top Safety Pick) that passenger cars and light trucks receive. Their safety is assessed through adherence to commercial vehicle safety standards and design for robust operation and driver protection.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: The "tech" primarily revolved around essential operational systems. The dashboard featured analog gauges for critical information like speed, RPM, oil pressure, and air pressure, with some digital displays for odometer and trip information. Entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio, with optional upgrades to include a cassette or single-CD player. Bluetooth connectivity, navigation, or advanced infotainment systems were not standard or generally available in 2005.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technologies were rudimentary compared to modern vehicles. The primary assistance features included standard cruise control for highway driving, air brakes (common in commercial vehicles for superior stopping power), and Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was becoming standard on most commercial trucks by this time, preventing wheel lock-up during hard braking. Advanced systems like lane departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, or automatic emergency braking were not present.
Safety Features: Core safety features focused on passive restraint and active braking. These included:
- Air Brakes with ABS: Essential for reliable stopping power, especially with heavy loads.
- Seat Belts: Three-point seat belts were standard for primary occupants.
- Robust Cab Structure: While not subjected to consumer crash tests, the cab was designed to provide a degree of protection in commercial vehicle accidents.
- Excellent Visibility: The cab-over-engine design generally provides superior forward and downward visibility compared to conventional hood-style trucks, aiding in maneuverability and hazard perception.
Optional Features: Owners could opt for features enhancing comfort and utility, such as air-ride driver's seats to reduce fatigue, power windows and door locks for convenience, and specialized vocational controls like PTO (Power Take-Off) engagement switches. Enhanced lighting packages for specific work environments were also common.
Crash-Test Ratings: It is important to note that commercial medium-duty trucks like the Freightliner M2 106 are not subjected to the consumer-oriented crash-test ratings (e.g., NHTSA 5-Star or IIHS Top Safety Pick) that passenger cars and light trucks receive. Their safety is assessed through adherence to commercial vehicle safety standards and design for robust operation and driver protection.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Prices and Market Value
When new in 2005, the Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty had a wide pricing spectrum due to its highly customizable nature. A base chassis-cab could start from approximately $50,000 to $70,000, but with a specific vocational body (e.g., box, dump, refuse) and various options, prices could easily exceed $100,000, often reaching $150,000 or more for well-equipped units.
Today, current used market prices for a 2005 M2 106 vary dramatically, ranging from as low as $10,000 for high-mileage units in fair condition to over $40,000 for well-maintained examples with desirable bodies and lower hours/mileage.
Depreciation on commercial trucks like the M2 106 follows a pattern of significant initial drops, then a slower, more linear decline. They tend to hold a steady residual value for many years due to their utility and long operational life. Factors heavily affecting resale value include the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition, total mileage/engine hours, the specific engine installed (Cummins typically commands good value), the type and condition of the vocational body, and the availability of comprehensive maintenance records. A well-documented service history is paramount for maximizing resale.
Today, current used market prices for a 2005 M2 106 vary dramatically, ranging from as low as $10,000 for high-mileage units in fair condition to over $40,000 for well-maintained examples with desirable bodies and lower hours/mileage.
Depreciation on commercial trucks like the M2 106 follows a pattern of significant initial drops, then a slower, more linear decline. They tend to hold a steady residual value for many years due to their utility and long operational life. Factors heavily affecting resale value include the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition, total mileage/engine hours, the specific engine installed (Cummins typically commands good value), the type and condition of the vocational body, and the availability of comprehensive maintenance records. A well-documented service history is paramount for maximizing resale.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty entails significant long-term costs, classifying it as costly compared to passenger vehicles, but potentially economical relative to its commercial utility. Insurance premiums are high, reflecting its commercial use, GVWR, and operational risks. Fuel expenses are substantial due to its diesel appetite and lower MPG, making it a primary operating cost.
Maintenance is crucial and involves specialized commercial services, meaning higher labor rates and parts costs for routine tasks like oil changes, brake services, and air system upkeep. Repairs, especially for major engine or transmission components, can be very expensive. While durable, aging components will fail. The true economic factor often lies in minimizing downtime; a well-maintained M2 106 can be highly profitable, but neglect leads to costly breakdowns. Its economy is in its ability to generate income over its long service life.
Maintenance is crucial and involves specialized commercial services, meaning higher labor rates and parts costs for routine tasks like oil changes, brake services, and air system upkeep. Repairs, especially for major engine or transmission components, can be very expensive. While durable, aging components will fail. The true economic factor often lies in minimizing downtime; a well-maintained M2 106 can be highly profitable, but neglect leads to costly breakdowns. Its economy is in its ability to generate income over its long service life.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Insurance
Insurance for a 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Compare to Other Truck?
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty operates in a highly competitive segment, stacked against several robust rivals, primarily the International 4300/4400 series, Kenworth T300, and Peterbilt 330/335, as well as the Ford F-650/F-750 commercial chassis and Hino 268/338.
In terms of performance, the M2 106 is highly competitive, offering a similar range of proven diesel engines (Caterpillar, Cummins, MBE) and transmission options (manuals, Allison automatics) to its International and Kenworth counterparts. Its maneuverability, courtesy of the cab-over design, is often lauded, matching or exceeding similar configurations from rivals. Ford's offerings typically provided different engine packages but aimed for the same hauling capabilities.
Regarding features, all medium-duty trucks of this vintage were utilitarian workhorses. The M2 106 offered good visibility and a functional, relatively comfortable cab for its class, on par with International and generally a step above the older generation Ford commercial chassis. Kenworth and Peterbilt often provided slightly more refined interiors and customizable options, though at a higher initial cost.
Reliability is a strong suit for the M2 106. It's widely considered a durable and dependable platform, holding its own against the International series, which sometimes faced more reported electrical gremlins. Kenworth and Peterbilt products are traditionally viewed as premium in reliability and build quality, often reflected in their price. Hino trucks, while potentially offering less heavy-duty customization than the M2, are also renowned for their reliability, particularly in lighter applications.
For price, new, the M2 106 was competitively priced against International, often offering a strong value proposition. Kenworth and Peterbilt typically commanded a premium. In the used market, the M2 106 generally offers excellent value due to its widespread availability, ease of parts sourcing, and proven longevity.
Similar Alternatives: The International 4300/4400 is perhaps the most direct and comparable rival, offering similar versatility and powertrain options. The Kenworth T300 and Peterbilt 330/335 are excellent alternatives if a slightly higher initial or used price is acceptable for their perceived premium build and refinement. The Hino 268/338 is a strong choice for applications where ultimate heavy-duty capacity isn't the primary concern, offering renowned Japanese reliability.
In terms of performance, the M2 106 is highly competitive, offering a similar range of proven diesel engines (Caterpillar, Cummins, MBE) and transmission options (manuals, Allison automatics) to its International and Kenworth counterparts. Its maneuverability, courtesy of the cab-over design, is often lauded, matching or exceeding similar configurations from rivals. Ford's offerings typically provided different engine packages but aimed for the same hauling capabilities.
Regarding features, all medium-duty trucks of this vintage were utilitarian workhorses. The M2 106 offered good visibility and a functional, relatively comfortable cab for its class, on par with International and generally a step above the older generation Ford commercial chassis. Kenworth and Peterbilt often provided slightly more refined interiors and customizable options, though at a higher initial cost.
Reliability is a strong suit for the M2 106. It's widely considered a durable and dependable platform, holding its own against the International series, which sometimes faced more reported electrical gremlins. Kenworth and Peterbilt products are traditionally viewed as premium in reliability and build quality, often reflected in their price. Hino trucks, while potentially offering less heavy-duty customization than the M2, are also renowned for their reliability, particularly in lighter applications.
For price, new, the M2 106 was competitively priced against International, often offering a strong value proposition. Kenworth and Peterbilt typically commanded a premium. In the used market, the M2 106 generally offers excellent value due to its widespread availability, ease of parts sourcing, and proven longevity.
Similar Alternatives: The International 4300/4400 is perhaps the most direct and comparable rival, offering similar versatility and powertrain options. The Kenworth T300 and Peterbilt 330/335 are excellent alternatives if a slightly higher initial or used price is acceptable for their perceived premium build and refinement. The Hino 268/338 is a strong choice for applications where ultimate heavy-duty capacity isn't the primary concern, offering renowned Japanese reliability.
Final Verdict: Is the 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty a Good Truck?
The 2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty is an excellent choice for businesses and owner-operators seeking a highly versatile, dependable, and customizable work truck. It's ideal for a wide array of vocational applications, from local delivery and refuse collection to utility work and construction, where its robust chassis and maneuverability shine.
It is absolutely worth buying in the used market, provided the right conditions are met. As a 2005 model, only used options exist. Key considerations include prioritizing units with comprehensive maintenance records, ideally from a single owner or well-managed fleet, and conducting a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a reputable commercial truck mechanic. The specific engine option (e.g., Cummins ISB/ISC) can influence long-term parts availability and perceived reliability. Buyers should also ensure the attached vocational body is in good working order and suits their intended purpose. While initial acquisition costs are low, anticipate and budget for ongoing commercial maintenance and potential repairs, as it's an aging heavy-duty asset. Under these conditions, a well-chosen M2 106 offers tremendous value and a long, productive service life.
It is absolutely worth buying in the used market, provided the right conditions are met. As a 2005 model, only used options exist. Key considerations include prioritizing units with comprehensive maintenance records, ideally from a single owner or well-managed fleet, and conducting a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a reputable commercial truck mechanic. The specific engine option (e.g., Cummins ISB/ISC) can influence long-term parts availability and perceived reliability. Buyers should also ensure the attached vocational body is in good working order and suits their intended purpose. While initial acquisition costs are low, anticipate and budget for ongoing commercial maintenance and potential repairs, as it's an aging heavy-duty asset. Under these conditions, a well-chosen M2 106 offers tremendous value and a long, productive service life.
2005 Freightliner M2 106 Medium Duty Owner Reviews
0.00
Consumer Rating,
Based on 0 Consumer Reviews
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma