The 1996 Ford Contour, a compact sedan/wagon, was part of Ford's global Mondeo platform, produced from 1995 to 2000. Key trims included the GL, SE, and the sportier SVT. New, it ranged from approximately $15,000 to $21,000. Its standout feature was its European-derived chassis, offering sharper handling than many American contemporaries, appealing to those seeking a more engaging driving experience.
The Good
The 1996 Ford Contour boasted responsive handling and available potent V6 power, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Its European-inspired design offered a sleek look, while decent fuel economy provided practicality. For value-conscious buyers, its competitive pricing and comfortable interior made it a sensible choice.
The Bad
Owners should watch out for potential transmission issues, particularly with automatic transmissions. Rear suspension components, like bushings and struts, can wear out. Electrical gremlins and cooling system problems are also reported. Interior plastic quality can degrade over time.
1996 Ford Contour: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.0L DOHC I4 (Zetec)
- 2.5L DOHC V6 (Duratec)
- Horsepower:
- 2.0L I4: 125 hp
- 2.5L V6: 170 hp
- 2.5L V6 (SVT): 195 hp
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates - Varies by transmission and configuration):
- 2.0L I4 (Manual): approx. 22 MPG City / 30 MPG Highway
- 2.5L V6 (Automatic): approx. 19 MPG City / 26 MPG Highway
- 2.5L V6 (Manual): approx. 18 MPG City / 25 MPG Highway
- 0-60 Times (Approximate):
- 2.0L I4: 9.5 - 10.5 seconds
- 2.5L V6: 7.5 - 8.5 seconds
- 2.5L V6 (SVT): 6.5 - 7.5 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Not applicable for this vehicle.
- Key Trim-Level Features:
- GL: Base model, often with manual windows, cloth seats, basic stereo system.
- SE: Added features like power windows, power locks, cruise control, upgraded interior trim, and often a better audio system.
- SVT (Special Vehicle Team): Performance-oriented trim with the 2.5L V6 engine, sport-tuned suspension, unique body kit, Recaro seats, larger wheels, and upgraded brakes.
1996 Ford Contour Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1996 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Contour |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Speed |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Mexico |
| Manufacturing City | CUAUTITLAN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2813 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 54.50 inches |
| Overall Length | 183.90 inches |
| Overall Width | 69.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 106.50 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5L V6 |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | other |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,925 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1996 Ford Contour Have?
The 1996 Ford Contour, while praised for its driving dynamics, is not without its reported issues that can affect long-term reliability. A significant concern for many owners revolves around the automatic transmission. Failures, particularly with the AX4S and AX4N transmissions, have been frequently reported, often manifesting as slipping, hard shifting, or complete failure. While some of these issues may have been addressed in later model years, it remains a common point of concern for 1996 models.
Cooling system problems are another recurring theme. Radiator leaks, thermostat issues, and hose failures can lead to overheating, which can exacerbate other engine-related problems. The plastic components in the cooling system are particularly prone to degradation over time.
Front suspension components, especially bushings and control arm mounts, are known to wear out, leading to clunking noises and degraded handling. Rear strut mounts and bushings can also develop issues, impacting ride quality and stability.
Electrical gremlins, while not specific to any single component, can be a source of frustration. This can include issues with the instrument cluster, power windows, door locks, and interior lighting. Some owners have also reported problems with the alternator and starter motor.
While there weren't widespread recalls impacting the core powertrain in 1996, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding safety recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the Contour can offer an enjoyable driving experience, potential buyers should be aware of these common mechanical and electrical issues and factor in potential repair costs when considering a purchase.
Cooling system problems are another recurring theme. Radiator leaks, thermostat issues, and hose failures can lead to overheating, which can exacerbate other engine-related problems. The plastic components in the cooling system are particularly prone to degradation over time.
Front suspension components, especially bushings and control arm mounts, are known to wear out, leading to clunking noises and degraded handling. Rear strut mounts and bushings can also develop issues, impacting ride quality and stability.
Electrical gremlins, while not specific to any single component, can be a source of frustration. This can include issues with the instrument cluster, power windows, door locks, and interior lighting. Some owners have also reported problems with the alternator and starter motor.
While there weren't widespread recalls impacting the core powertrain in 1996, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding safety recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the Contour can offer an enjoyable driving experience, potential buyers should be aware of these common mechanical and electrical issues and factor in potential repair costs when considering a purchase.
How long will the 1996 Ford Contour last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1996 Ford Contour can realistically reach 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more. However, its long-term durability is significantly impacted by the issues mentioned previously, particularly the automatic transmission and cooling system. Cars that have had regular fluid changes for the transmission and coolant, along with prompt attention to any leaks or strange noises, are far more likely to achieve higher mileage. Conversely, neglected vehicles, especially those with automatic transmissions, may face premature failure. The chassis and body generally hold up well against rust in drier climates, but the interior components, like dashboard plastics and seat fabric, can show significant wear over time. The engine, particularly the V6, is generally robust if properly maintained.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1996 Ford Contour's technology and safety features were fairly standard for its era, with a focus on essential functionality rather than cutting-edge innovation. Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Optional upgrades could bring a CD player and a premium audio system with more speakers, offering a more immersive listening experience for the time. Air conditioning was standard on most trims, with automatic climate control being a rare, optional luxury.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 1996 Contour was quite basic. Features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, and often standard on higher trims or as an option on lower trims, providing improved stopping power in emergency situations. Cruise control was also a common convenience option.
Safety was a priority, though advanced features were limited. Standard safety equipment included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelt pretensioners were also standard, designed to tighten the belts during a collision to reduce occupant movement. Some models might have offered optional side-impact airbags, but these were not commonplace.
Crash-test ratings for the 1996 Ford Contour were somewhat mixed. In NHTSA frontal crash tests, it generally received good marks, often four out of five stars for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact tests, however, could be less impressive, particularly for the rear passenger, sometimes receiving three or fewer stars, reflecting the limitations of safety technology in that period. It's important to note that specific ratings can vary slightly based on the exact configuration and testing protocols of the time. For those seeking a vehicle with contemporary tech and advanced safety, the 1996 Contour would be considered very basic by today's standards.
In terms of driver-assistance features, the 1996 Contour was quite basic. Features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, and often standard on higher trims or as an option on lower trims, providing improved stopping power in emergency situations. Cruise control was also a common convenience option.
Safety was a priority, though advanced features were limited. Standard safety equipment included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelt pretensioners were also standard, designed to tighten the belts during a collision to reduce occupant movement. Some models might have offered optional side-impact airbags, but these were not commonplace.
Crash-test ratings for the 1996 Ford Contour were somewhat mixed. In NHTSA frontal crash tests, it generally received good marks, often four out of five stars for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact tests, however, could be less impressive, particularly for the rear passenger, sometimes receiving three or fewer stars, reflecting the limitations of safety technology in that period. It's important to note that specific ratings can vary slightly based on the exact configuration and testing protocols of the time. For those seeking a vehicle with contemporary tech and advanced safety, the 1996 Contour would be considered very basic by today's standards.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1996 Ford Contour Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1996 Ford Contour had an MSRP ranging from approximately $15,000 for base models to just over $21,000 for the SVT trim. Like most vehicles of its age, the Contour experienced significant depreciation in its early years. Today, the used market prices for a 1996 Ford Contour are generally quite low, typically ranging from $1,000 to $4,000, depending heavily on condition, mileage, and trim level. Well-maintained SVT models in excellent condition can command slightly higher prices, but still remain affordable. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the presence of maintenance records, the absence of major mechanical issues (especially transmission problems), overall cosmetic condition, and a clean vehicle history report. Vehicles with fewer miles and original components tend to hold their value better, though depreciation has largely plateaued for this model.
1996 Ford Contour Cost of Ownership
The 1996 Ford Contour is generally economical to own, especially considering its low used purchase price. Insurance premiums are typically low due to its age and market value. Fuel costs can be moderate; the 2.0L engine offers respectable MPG, while the V6 will consume more. Maintenance costs are relatively standard for an older domestic sedan, with oil changes and routine checks being affordable. However, long-term ownership costs can be significantly impacted by potential repairs, particularly concerning the automatic transmission and cooling system. If these components require replacement, repair bills can become substantial, potentially outweighing the initial low cost of the vehicle. Despite this, with careful buying and proactive maintenance, it remains an economical choice.
1996 Ford Contour Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
14.50 gallons
City Mileage
23 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
32 miles/gallon
1996 Ford Contour Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1996 Ford Contour Recalls & Defects
Fuel System, Other:storage
Recall date
1997-11-17
Recall no.
97v203000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Bi-Fuel Vehicles Modified TO RUN ON Either Gasoline or Compressed Natural GAS (Cng). THE Natural GAS Fuel Tanks Have A Solenoid Shut-Off Valve That Stops Fuel Flow From THE Fuel Tank IN THE Event OF Certain Moderate TO Severe Collisions. IF THE Vehicle IS IN A Collision and THE Natural GAS Fuel Line IS Damaged, THE System Could Leak Natural Gas.
Consequence
Fuel Leakage IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source Could Result IN A Fire.
Remedy
Ford HAS Requested Owners OF These Vehicles TO Have THE CNG Fuel System Disabled Under A Previous Recall Campaign and TO Only USE Gasoline Fuel Until A Permanent Corrective Action IS Developed. Owners ARE Being Alerted TO This Solenoid Valve Concern AT This Time. THE Timing OF Corrective Actions IS Being Delayed TO Allow Both Conditions TO BE Remedied AT ONE Time. IN THE Meantime, There IS NOT Risk AS Long AS THE Natural GAS System HAS Been Disabled and THE Vheicle IS Only Operated ON Gasoline.
Notes
Owner Notification Began February 9, 1998.owners Will BE Notified When Service Kits ARE Available.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Vehicle Speed Control:cables
Recall date
1997-12-08
Recall no.
97v225000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped With THE Traction Control Option. THE Throttle Cables Were Damaged During Vehicle Assembly Leading TO Fraying or Separation OF THE Throttle Cable.
Consequence
This Condition Could Prevent THE Engine From Returning TO Idle.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Throttle Cable With A Revised Design That IS Less Susceptible TO Bending or Kinking During Installation.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin January 13, 1998. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Power Train:automatic Transmission:lever and Linkage:floor Shift
Recall date
1998-09-18
Recall no.
98v233000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles. THE Floor Shift Automatic Transmission Control CAN BE Damaged IF Subjected TO Certain Interior Cleaning Products. THE Gear Position Indicator CAN Deteriorate and NOT Correctly Indicate THE Actual Gear Position.
Consequence
This Condition CAN Result IN Incorrect Gear Selection.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Automatic Transmission Floor Shift Control.
Notes
Owner Notification Began November 20, 1998.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Exterior Lighting:headlights:switch
Recall date
1999-05-05
Recall no.
99v103000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles. THE Terminals AT THE Headlight Switch and Wiring Harness Connector CAN Experience Heat Damage AS A Result OF Overheating.
Consequence
THE Damage Could Result IN Distortion OF THE Terminal Causing AN Open Circuit IN THE Instrument Panel Illumination, Parking Lamp, and Tail Lamp Circuits.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Headlamp Switch Wiring Connector Containing Bronze Terminals and AN Inspection, and Replacement IF Necessary, OF THE Headlamp Switch.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 16, 1999. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe and CAP
Recall date
1999-09-13
Recall no.
99v247000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles. THE Fuel Filler Pipe Vent Hose MAY Have Less Than THE Intended Level OF Ozone Resistance, Which Could Result IN THE Hose Becoming Brittle and Cracking.
Consequence
A Cracked Hose Could Result IN Fuel Leakage When THE Vehicle IS Being Fueled.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Fuel Filler Vent Hose Contacting THE Appropriate Blend OF PVC and Nitrile Rubber.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 99s24. Owner Notification Began October 11, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components
Recall date
2000-03-09
Recall no.
00v075000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles NOT Equipped With THE Anti-Lock Braking System (Abs). A Pressure Conscious Reducing Valve (Pcrv) IN THE Rear Brakes MAY BE Subject TO Corrosion and Result IN Malfunction, When Operated IN Areas That USE Salt Compounds ON THE Roadway FOR De-Icing or Dust Control.
Consequence
IF Both Pcrv's Malfunction, Vehicle Handling Could BE Adversely Affected During Braking AS A Result OF THE Rear Wheels Locking, Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install Improved Pcrv's IN THE Rear Brake System. This Recall WAS Expanded IN September 2000 TO Include 1999 and 2000 Ford Contour, Mercury Mystique and Cougar Vehicles.
Notes
Owner Notification Began April 3, 2000 FOR THE 1996-1998 Model Vehicles and ON October 11, 2000, FOR THE 1999-2000 Model Vehicles.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Engine and Engine Cooling
Recall date
2000-11-06
Recall no.
00v367000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: 1995 Passenger Vehicles Equipped With THE 2.0l and 2.5l Engines, and 1996 Vehicles Equipped With 2.5l Engines. Tightening OF THE Engine Cooling FAN Motor Bearings, UP TO and Including Motor Stall, CAN Result IN Increased Motor Torque and Higher Than Normal Motor Current and Accompanying High Motor Temperatures.
Consequence
Overheating OF THE Cooling FAN Motor DUE TO Excessive Current CAN Result IN Smoke and Odors From Bearing Grease, Insulation and Other Internal Motor Components. IF Electrical Current Continues TO BE Applied TO THE Motor, Internal Motor Components Could Ignite Possibly Igniting Other Engine Compartment Components.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Positive Temperature Coefficient Device In-Line With Each FAN Motor. Ford Will Also Extend THE Warranty ON THE Engine Cooling FAN Assembly TO A Total OF 8 Years OF Service or 100,000 Miles From THE Warranty Start Date, Whichever Occurs First. IF THE Vehicle Already HAS More Than 100,000 Miles, This Coverage Will Last Until July 31, 2001.
Notes
Owner Notification Began February 5, 2001. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Visibility:defroster/Defogger/Hvac System:windshield:electrical Heating Element
Recall date
2001-07-09
Recall no.
01i009000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Vehicle Description: 1995-1997 Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique Vehicles. THE Heater Blower Resistor Could Overheat Causing THE Attached Electrical Connector TO Melt.
Consequence
This Could Create THE Potential FOR A Fire.
Remedy
Ford Will Provide Additional Warranty Coverage FOR THE Heater Blower Switch FOR 10 Years From Original Date OF Sale OF THE Vehicle or 150,000 Miles, Whichever Comes First. Dealers Will Install A NEW Heater Blower Resistor and A NEW Wire Jumper Harness Free OF Charge.
Notes
Ford HAS Decided TO Conduct AN Extended Coverage Program TO Extend THE Warranty Coverage FOR Potential Heather Blower Resistor Problems. Owners CAN Contact Ford At1-866-436-7332, Concerning This Program.
Electrical System
Recall date
2001-07-09
Recall no.
01v230000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain MY 1996-1998 Passenger Vehicles Built AT THE Kansas City, Cuautitlan Assembly Plants or ON MY 1999 Passenger Vehcles Built AT THE Automotive Alliance International Assembly Plants, THE Rough Surface OF THE Heater Blower Resistor's Stainless Steel Blades CAN Damage THE Copper Surface OF THE Wiring Harness Connector. THE Damage Could, Over Time, Cause Increased Resistance IN THE Connector And, DUE TO Subsequent Terminal Relaxation, Result IN AN Open Circuit Condition.
Consequence
THE Open Circuit Could Lead TO Electrical Arcing That Could Melt THE Connector Housing Material Creasing THE Potential FOR A Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A NEW Heater Blower Resistor and A NEW Wire Jumper Harness. Owner Notification Began August 29, 2001. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.
Notes
Ford Recall No.01s22.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Recall date
2006-03-13
Recall no.
06e022000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Aftermarket Brake Hydraulic Master Cylinders Sold AS Replacement Brake Cylinders FOR Certain Ford, Daimlerchrysler, and Jeep Passenger Vehicles. These Brake Cylinders Were Sold Under THE Brand Names OF Napa, Raybestos, Aimco, AC Delco, Carquest, Bendix, and Wagner. Only Products That Were Manufactured From July 27, 2005 Through January 17, 2006 (Date Codes 0529 Through 0602) ARE Subject TO This Recall. When Subject TO Very Cold Temperatures, AN Internal Seal IN THE Master Cylinder Could Lose Flexibility and MAY Cause Brake Fluid TO Leak.
Consequence
Loss OF Brake Fluid CAN Lead TO A Decrease IN Brake Line Pressure and AN Increase IN Stopping Distance, Which CAN Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Affinia (Brake Parts, Inc.) Will Replace THE Subject Brake Hydraulic Master Cylinders Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON March 20, 2006. Owners CAN Contact Affina Group Customer Service AT 1-800-323-0354.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Napa, Raybestos, AC Delco, Aimco, Carquest, and Bendix Brake Hydraulic Master Cylinders and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Daimlerchrysler or Ford Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Suspension
Recall date
2008-04-14
Recall no.
08e033000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Federal Mogul IS Recalling 6,903 Aftermarket Ball Joint Assemblies Shipped Between November 9, 2007 and March 26, 2008, Which MAY Have Been Packaged With Incorrect Nuts. THE Part Numbers Packaged With Incorrect Nuts Are: K7147, K7329, K8683, and 104353. These Parts Were Made FOR USE ON THE Various Vehicles Listed Above.
Consequence
THE Nuts Included IN THE Packaging FOR These Ball Joint Assemblies ARE Missing THE Intended Prevailing Torque (Self-Locking) Feature. IF THE Incorrect NUT WAS TO Become Loose, THE Joining Members MAY Loosen Leading TO A Separation OF THE Ball Joint. This MAY Result IN Loss OF Vehicle Control, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Federal Mogul Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Parts Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON MAY 22, 2008. Owners CAN Contact Federal Mogul AT 877-489-6659.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Ball Joint Assemblies and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Manufactured BY THE Vehicle Manufacturers.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1996 Ford Contour Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1996 Ford Contour Insurance
Insurance for a 1996 Ford Contour is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1996 Ford Contour Compare to Other Sedan?
In 1996, the Ford Contour competed in the compact sedan segment against rivals like the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Nissan Sentra, and its American counterparts such as the Chevrolet Cavalier and Pontiac Sunfire. In terms of performance, the Contour, especially with the V6 engine and the SVT variant, offered a superior driving experience with sharper handling and more power than most of its Japanese and American competitors. The European-derived chassis gave it a more sophisticated feel.
Features-wise, the Contour was competitive for its time. While base models were spartan, higher trims like the SE offered amenities like power accessories and cruise control, aligning with what rivals offered. The SVT trim was a standout, offering sport-focused features like Recaro seats and a body kit that few competitors could match at that price point.
Reliability is where the Contour often fell short compared to its Japanese rivals. While the engines were generally decent with proper care, the notorious issues with its automatic transmissions and cooling systems gave it a less stellar reputation than the bulletproof reliability of the Corolla or Civic. American rivals like the Cavalier also had their share of reliability concerns, but perhaps not as consistently reported for specific major components as the Contour's transmissions.
Price was a strong point for the Contour, often offering more performance and a more European driving feel for a comparable or slightly lower price than similarly equipped Japanese models. However, the potential for higher repair costs due to reliability issues could offset some of the initial value.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing bulletproof reliability and lower long-term running costs, the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla remain excellent, though less engaging to drive, alternatives. For a similar blend of driving dynamics and practicality with potentially better reliability, later model year contours might be slightly better, or one could consider the Mazda Protege, which also offered good handling for its class. If outright performance is the goal and budget is tight, the SVT Contour remains a unique proposition, but requires careful inspection for known issues.
Features-wise, the Contour was competitive for its time. While base models were spartan, higher trims like the SE offered amenities like power accessories and cruise control, aligning with what rivals offered. The SVT trim was a standout, offering sport-focused features like Recaro seats and a body kit that few competitors could match at that price point.
Reliability is where the Contour often fell short compared to its Japanese rivals. While the engines were generally decent with proper care, the notorious issues with its automatic transmissions and cooling systems gave it a less stellar reputation than the bulletproof reliability of the Corolla or Civic. American rivals like the Cavalier also had their share of reliability concerns, but perhaps not as consistently reported for specific major components as the Contour's transmissions.
Price was a strong point for the Contour, often offering more performance and a more European driving feel for a comparable or slightly lower price than similarly equipped Japanese models. However, the potential for higher repair costs due to reliability issues could offset some of the initial value.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing bulletproof reliability and lower long-term running costs, the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla remain excellent, though less engaging to drive, alternatives. For a similar blend of driving dynamics and practicality with potentially better reliability, later model year contours might be slightly better, or one could consider the Mazda Protege, which also offered good handling for its class. If outright performance is the goal and budget is tight, the SVT Contour remains a unique proposition, but requires careful inspection for known issues.
Final Verdict: Is the 1996 Ford Contour a Good Sedan?
The 1996 Ford Contour is ideal for the budget-conscious enthusiast who values sharp handling and a European driving feel over absolute long-term reliability. It is worth buying if found in excellent condition with a thorough maintenance history, particularly if it's a manual transmission SVT model. For those seeking daily commuting without potential headaches, it's probably not the best choice. Buying used is the only option. Focus on models with documented maintenance, minimal transmission issues, and a clean chassis. Avoid cars with signs of neglect. It's a car for someone who enjoys driving and is willing to accept the potential for higher repair costs in exchange for its engaging dynamics and low purchase price.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma