The 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van is a versatile minivan, part of the second generation (1995-2005) of Astro vans. Known for its truck-like construction and rear-wheel-drive, it offered a blend of utility and passenger capacity. Key trims included the base model, LS, and LT. New pricing ranged approximately from $20,000 to $25,000. Its popularity stemmed from its ability to haul cargo and passengers, and its relatively simple, robust design made it a workhorse.
The Good
The 2002 Astro offers a powerful V6 engine providing decent performance and towing capacity appealing to practical buyers. While not the most fuel-efficient, its solid build and proven reliability can be reassuring. It's spacious interior and customization options provide a sense of comfort and personalization, appealing to those seeking a dependable and versatile vehicle.
The Bad
Rust, especially in areas prone to road salt, is a major concern. The 4L60E transmission is a potential weak point, and regular maintenance is vital. Fuel economy is generally poor compared to front-wheel-drive minivans. Interior plastics can be prone to cracking and wear, and some electrical issues may arise with age.
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: 4.3L Vortec V6 (standard)
- Horsepower: 190 hp
- Fuel Economy: 16 mpg city / 21 mpg highway (RWD)
- 0-60 Times: Approximately 9-10 seconds (varies based on load and drivetrain)
- Towing Capacity: Up to 5,500 lbs (when properly equipped)
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Standard features include cloth upholstery, AM/FM radio, manual windows and locks, and basic safety features like airbags.
- LS: Adds features like power windows and locks, upgraded upholstery, cruise control, and available rear air conditioning.
- LT: Typically includes premium features such as leather upholstery (optional), upgraded audio system, alloy wheels, and more luxurious interior trim. May include captain's chairs in the second row.
- Other Features:
- Available all-wheel drive (AWD)
- Sliding side door(s)
- Rear liftgate or Dutch doors
- Seating for up to 8 passengers
- Optional running boards
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2002 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Astro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Cargo Van All-Wheel Drive |
| Type | Van |
| Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | BALTIMORE/LANSING (CRAFT CENTER) |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4052 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 5850 pounds |
| Overall Height | 75.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 189.80 inches |
| Overall Width | 77.50 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 111.20 inches |
| Standard Seating | 2 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | All-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $23,672 |
| Invoice Price | $21,423 |
| Delivery Charges | $680 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Have?
The 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van, like other years in its generation, is known for a few common problems. Rust is a significant concern, particularly in areas with road salt, affecting body panels, undercarriage, and brake lines. The 4L60E automatic transmission is another potential weak point, with reports of slipping or failure, especially with infrequent fluid changes or heavy towing.
Fuel pump failures are also relatively common, requiring replacement. Some owners have reported issues with the ABS system, including malfunctioning sensors and modules.
Electrical problems, such as faulty wiring or sensor malfunctions, can occur with age. Check engine lights are frequent, often related to emissions system components. While specific recalls may vary depending on the manufacturing date and location, it's crucial to check the NHTSA website for any open recalls related to safety or emissions. Long-term reliability concerns primarily revolve around the transmission, rust prevention, and maintaining the electrical system to prevent age-related issues.
Fuel pump failures are also relatively common, requiring replacement. Some owners have reported issues with the ABS system, including malfunctioning sensors and modules.
Electrical problems, such as faulty wiring or sensor malfunctions, can occur with age. Check engine lights are frequent, often related to emissions system components. While specific recalls may vary depending on the manufacturing date and location, it's crucial to check the NHTSA website for any open recalls related to safety or emissions. Long-term reliability concerns primarily revolve around the transmission, rust prevention, and maintaining the electrical system to prevent age-related issues.
How long will the 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van last?
With good maintenance, a 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van can often reach 200,000 miles or more. Many well-maintained examples are still on the road after 20 years. However, long-term durability depends heavily on maintenance habits. Regular oil changes, transmission fluid flushes, and cooling system maintenance are critical. Weaknesses over time include rust, particularly in colder climates, and potential transmission issues. Neglecting these aspects can significantly shorten the lifespan. The interior may also show wear and tear with age, including cracked plastic and worn upholstery.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van was fairly basic in terms of technology and driver-assistance features by today's standards. Built-in tech consisted primarily of an AM/FM radio, with optional cassette or CD players. Higher trims might have included rear audio controls. Entertainment features were limited compared to modern minivans.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Safety features included standard front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were optional on some trims. Power windows and locks were standard on higher trims but optional on base models.
Crash test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for the 2002 Astro Van are available. While specific scores may vary depending on the type of test, it generally received fairly low ratings, especially in frontal impact tests. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) may also have conducted tests; checking their archives would provide further details. The Astro van lacks modern safety technologies like electronic stability control or side-impact airbags, which are now commonplace.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Safety features included standard front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were optional on some trims. Power windows and locks were standard on higher trims but optional on base models.
Crash test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for the 2002 Astro Van are available. While specific scores may vary depending on the type of test, it generally received fairly low ratings, especially in frontal impact tests. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) may also have conducted tests; checking their archives would provide further details. The Astro van lacks modern safety technologies like electronic stability control or side-impact airbags, which are now commonplace.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Summit White
Onyx Black
Dark Blue Metallic
Light Pewter Metallic
Dark Cherry Red Metallic
Medium Beige Metallic
Interior Colors
Gray Cloth
Neutral Cloth
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van had an MSRP ranging from approximately $20,000 to $25,000, depending on the trim level and options. In the current used market, prices vary widely based on condition, mileage, and location, but typically range from $2,000 to $8,000.
Depreciation has been significant due to age. Resale value is primarily affected by the van's condition, mileage, and history of maintenance. Rust-free examples with well-maintained mechanical components command higher prices. The availability of all-wheel drive (AWD) can also increase resale value in certain regions.
Depreciation has been significant due to age. Resale value is primarily affected by the van's condition, mileage, and history of maintenance. Rust-free examples with well-maintained mechanical components command higher prices. The availability of all-wheel drive (AWD) can also increase resale value in certain regions.
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Cost of Ownership
Insurance costs for a 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van are generally lower than newer vehicles due to its age and relatively low market value. Fuel costs are higher compared to modern minivans due to its less efficient engine. Maintenance and repair costs can be moderate, depending on the van's condition. While parts are generally affordable, potential repairs like transmission work can be costly. Overall, it's not the most economical vehicle to own long-term, but it can be affordable if well-maintained and not requiring major repairs.
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
27.00 gallons
City Mileage
15 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
20 miles/gallon
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Recalls & Defects
Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch
Recall date
2005-03-14
Recall no.
05v099000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Minivans, THE Multifunction Switch MAY Develop AN Open Circuit Condition IN THE Stop Lamp or Hazard Lamp Circuit That Results IN THE Stop Lamps and Hazard Lamps Being Inoperative.
Consequence
THE Loss OF Stop Lamps and Rear Hazard Lamps Could Fail TO Warn A Following Driver That THE Vehicle IS Braking And/Or IS Stopped and Could Lead TO A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Hazard Warning Flasher Switch and Apply Special Grease TO THE Contacts AT THE Time OF Installation OF THE Module Free OF Charge. THE Repair Would BE Used IN Vehicles IN Which THE Hazard Slider Button IS Still Movable. IF A Vehicle HAS A Hazard Slider Button That IS NOT Movable (Frozen), THE Entire Multifunction Switch Will BE Replaced. THE Recall Began ON April 13, 2005. Owners MAY Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-630-2438 or GMC AT 1-866-996-9463.
Notes
GM Recall NO. 05013.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
72 months / 100,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Insurance
Insurance for a 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Van with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van Compare to Other Van?
The 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van competed against minivans like the Dodge Caravan/Chrysler Town & Country, Ford Windstar, and Honda Odyssey. Compared to these rivals, the Astro offered a more truck-like driving experience due to its rear-wheel drive and body-on-frame construction. While its V6 engine provided ample power, fuel economy was worse than the front-wheel-drive competition. In terms of features, it generally lagged behind, especially in safety and convenience technologies.
Reliability can be comparable, but the Astro is more prone to rust issues. The Dodge Caravan/Chrysler Town & Country offered more features and often at a lower price point when new. The Honda Odyssey was known for its reliability and refinement but came at a higher price. The Ford Windstar had a more comfortable ride but also had its own reliability concerns.
Alternatives to the Astro Van would be a newer, more fuel-efficient minivan like a Toyota Sienna or Honda Odyssey if reliability and fuel economy are top priorities. If the need is for a work van with truck-like capabilities, a newer full-size van might be a better option.
Reliability can be comparable, but the Astro is more prone to rust issues. The Dodge Caravan/Chrysler Town & Country offered more features and often at a lower price point when new. The Honda Odyssey was known for its reliability and refinement but came at a higher price. The Ford Windstar had a more comfortable ride but also had its own reliability concerns.
Alternatives to the Astro Van would be a newer, more fuel-efficient minivan like a Toyota Sienna or Honda Odyssey if reliability and fuel economy are top priorities. If the need is for a work van with truck-like capabilities, a newer full-size van might be a better option.
Ranks #77 Van
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Sienna | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda Odyssey | (4.0★) |
| 3 | 2001 Mazda MPV | (4.0★) |
| 4 | 2024 Ford E-Series Cutaway | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz Metris Passenger Van | (0.0★) |
| 6 | 2023 Chevrolet Express Passenger | (0.0★) |
| 7 | 2021 Nissan NV200 | (3.0★) |
| 8 | 2023 GMC Savana | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Ram ProMaster | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2021 Rolls-Royce Dawn | (0.0★) |
| 11 | 2013 Volkswagen Routan | (4.0★) |
| 12 | 2007 Buick Terraza | (0.0★) |
| 77 | 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van | (0.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van a Good Van?
The 2002 Chevrolet Astro Van is ideal for budget-conscious buyers needing a rugged, versatile vehicle for hauling cargo or passengers, and who appreciate its truck-like qualities. It's worth buying if you find a well-maintained example with minimal rust and a recent transmission service. Specific trims aren't as critical as overall condition. It's best suited for those who can perform basic maintenance and repairs themselves. Due to its age and potential maintenance needs, it's not recommended for those seeking a completely trouble-free or highly fuel-efficient vehicle. Thorough inspection for rust and mechanical issues is crucial before purchase. A pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic is highly recommended.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.