The 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van is a versatile minivan known for its rear-wheel-drive platform and robust capabilities. Produced from 1985 to 2005, the Astro offered a practical blend of passenger and cargo hauling. Key trims included the base model, LS, and LT. Its popularity stemmed from its truck-like durability and ability to tow, making it a favorite for families and small businesses. Expect a used pricing range of approximately $2,000 to $8,000, depending on condition and mileage.
The Good
The 2003 Astro Van boasts reliable performance with its strong V6 engine, appealing to practical buyers. Its spacious interior provides comfort for passengers and cargo. Emotionally, owners appreciate its nostalgic design and ruggedness. It's a value-driven choice offering a balance of utility and affordability, even with its moderate fuel efficiency.
The Bad
The 2003 Astro Van's weaknesses include lower fuel economy compared to front-wheel-drive minivans. Watch out for rust, especially in areas with road salt. Common issues involve the automatic transmission and electrical components. Suspension wear and tear is also something to inspect due to its age.
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van: Quick Overview
Key specs for the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van:
- Engine Options: Primarily a 4.3L V6
- Horsepower: Around 190 horsepower
- Fuel Economy: Approximately 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway (RWD) - Fuel economy can vary depending on driving conditions and maintenance.
- 0-60 Times: Roughly 10-11 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Up to 5,500 lbs with proper equipment
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Basic features including cloth seats, AM/FM radio, and standard safety equipment.
- LS: Adds features like upgraded upholstery, power windows and locks, and optional rear air conditioning. Can have options like alloy wheels and upgraded audio systems.
- LT: Top-of-the-line trim with features like leather seats, premium audio system, alloy wheels, and sometimes included captain's chairs in the second row. More comfort and convenience features were standard on this trim.
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2003 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Astro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Cargo Van All-Wheel Drive |
| Type | Van |
| Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | BALTIMORE/LANSING (CRAFT CENTER) |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4184 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 5850 pounds |
| Overall Height | 75.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 189.80 inches |
| Overall Width | 77.50 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 111.20 inches |
| Standard Seating | 2 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | All-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $24,450 |
| Invoice Price | $22,127 |
| Delivery Charges | $705 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Have?
Frequently reported problems for the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van include issues with the automatic transmission, particularly slipping or harsh shifting. Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in areas with salted roads; body panels, frame, and brake lines are susceptible. Electrical issues, such as malfunctioning power windows and door locks, are also common.
Specific to the 2003 model year, some owners have reported problems with the fuel pump and fuel injectors. ABS sensor failures are also noted. Recalls have been issued for certain years of the Astro Van related to issues such as faulty fuel tanks or brake light switches, so checking the vehicle's VIN for outstanding recalls is crucial.
Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the longevity of the 4.3L V6 engine, although it is generally considered reliable if properly maintained. Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rod ends, tend to wear out over time, requiring replacement. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes and inspections, is vital to mitigating these issues and extending the van's lifespan. The body-on-frame construction is generally durable, but corrosion can weaken it over time if not addressed.
Specific to the 2003 model year, some owners have reported problems with the fuel pump and fuel injectors. ABS sensor failures are also noted. Recalls have been issued for certain years of the Astro Van related to issues such as faulty fuel tanks or brake light switches, so checking the vehicle's VIN for outstanding recalls is crucial.
Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the longevity of the 4.3L V6 engine, although it is generally considered reliable if properly maintained. Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rod ends, tend to wear out over time, requiring replacement. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes and inspections, is vital to mitigating these issues and extending the van's lifespan. The body-on-frame construction is generally durable, but corrosion can weaken it over time if not addressed.
How long will the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van last?
With proper maintenance, a 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van can easily reach 200,000 to 300,000 miles or provide 15-20 years of service. Long-term durability hinges on regular maintenance, including oil changes, transmission fluid flushes, and addressing rust promptly. Weaknesses over time include potential transmission issues, suspension wear, and rust corrosion. Well-maintained examples demonstrate impressive longevity, while neglected vans suffer from accelerated degradation. Regular inspections and proactive repairs are key to maximizing the Astro's lifespan. Owner data shows a direct correlation between consistent maintenance and extended vehicle life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van's built-in tech and entertainment features were relatively basic for its time. Standard features included an AM/FM radio and, depending on the trim, a cassette or CD player. Driver-assistance features were limited; ABS was available, and some models included cruise control. Safety features consisted of standard front airbags.
Optional features included rear air conditioning, power windows and locks, and upgraded audio systems. Higher trims like the LT offered features like leather seats and premium sound. There were no advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like lane departure warning or blind-spot monitoring available.
Crash-test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for the 2003 Astro Van vary depending on the specific test and configuration. Some ratings indicate a 4-star rating for frontal impact for the driver and passenger. Side-impact ratings are generally lower. These ratings should be considered in the context of the vehicle's age and the safety standards of the time. Keep in mind that modern vehicles generally offer significantly improved safety features and crash protection. Electronic stability control was not a standard feature on the 2003 Astro Van.
Optional features included rear air conditioning, power windows and locks, and upgraded audio systems. Higher trims like the LT offered features like leather seats and premium sound. There were no advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like lane departure warning or blind-spot monitoring available.
Crash-test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for the 2003 Astro Van vary depending on the specific test and configuration. Some ratings indicate a 4-star rating for frontal impact for the driver and passenger. Side-impact ratings are generally lower. These ratings should be considered in the context of the vehicle's age and the safety standards of the time. Keep in mind that modern vehicles generally offer significantly improved safety features and crash protection. Electronic stability control was not a standard feature on the 2003 Astro Van.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Summit White
Dark Blue Metallic
Silver Metallic
Light Autumnwood Metallic
Black
Medium Pewter Metallic
Dark Cherry Red Metallic
Interior Colors
Neutral
Dark Charcoal
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van had an MSRP ranging from approximately $20,000 to $28,000, depending on the trim level and options. Currently, used market prices typically range from $2,000 to $8,000, but this can vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and location. Depreciation has been substantial due to the vehicle's age. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, rust presence, mechanical soundness, and documented maintenance history. Well-maintained examples with lower mileage command higher prices, while those with significant rust or mechanical issues have minimal resale value. The rear-wheel-drive configuration also contributes to its continued desirability among certain buyers.
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Cost of Ownership
Insurance costs for a 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van are generally moderate due to its age. Fuel costs are relatively high given its average fuel economy. Maintenance can be moderate if addressed proactively, but unexpected repairs can increase expenses. Long-term ownership costs depend heavily on maintenance habits; neglected vans become costly. Overall, the Astro Van isn't exceptionally economical, but it can be affordable if well-maintained. Budget for potential repairs typical of an older vehicle.
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
27.00 gallons
City Mileage
15 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
19 miles/gallon
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Recalls & Defects
Suspension:front:control Arm:lower Ball Joint
Recall date
2003-09-12
Recall no.
03v328000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Minivans Have AN Interference Condition Between THE Lower Ball Joint Rubber Boot and THE Steering Knuckle (Both Left/Right Sides), Which Could Result IN Cutting OF THE Boot That IS Intended TO Seal THE Ball Joint. IF THE Lower Ball Joint Boot Were Cut, Contamination From THE Road (Salt, Dirt, Water, Etc.) Could Enter THE Ball Socket Area OF THE Ball Joint Causing THE Joint TO Wear OUT TOO Quickly.
Consequence
THE Steering Knuckle Could Separate From THE Lower Control Arm, Dropping Down THE Affected Corner OF THE Vehicle. THE Coil Spring Would Push THE Control ARM Down Into Contact With THE Ground, Creating A Drag That Would Slow THE Vehicle. THE Driver Could Have Difficulty IN Maintaining THE Directional Control OF THE Vehicle. IN Addition, THE Affected Wheel Assembly Could Separate From THE Vehicle IF Forces Resulting From THE Wheel's Dragging Action Were Sufficient TO Fracture THE TIE ROD END and Upper Ball Joint Connections. Separation OF THE Wheel Assembly Would Also Sever That Wheel's Hydraulic Brake Hose, Resulting IN Lost Braking Performance From THE Front Brake System. Vehicle Stopping Distance Would Increase, Which Could Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Steering Knuckles. Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin ON April 8, 2004. Owners Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-630-2438 or GMC AT 1-866-996-9463.
Notes
GM Recall NO. 03044.customers CAN Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
72 months / 100,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Insurance
Insurance for a 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Van with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van Compare to Other Van?
The 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van competed with minivans like the Dodge Caravan/Chrysler Town & Country, Ford Windstar, and Honda Odyssey. In terms of performance, the Astro's V6 engine offered comparable power but lower fuel economy than its rivals. Features were generally less advanced compared to the Honda Odyssey, which offered more innovative options. Reliability is a mixed bag; the Astro's engine is durable, but other components can be problematic. Price-wise, the Astro was often more affordable than the Honda Odyssey and similar to the Dodge Caravan.
A similar alternative is the GMC Safari, which is essentially the same vehicle as the Astro. The Ford Windstar is another alternative, but it had its own reliability issues. A better alternative for those prioritizing reliability and features would be the Honda Odyssey, though it's more expensive. For those needing towing capability, the Astro holds an advantage due to its rear-wheel-drive platform, something many of its competitors lacked. The Astro's body-on-frame construction provides a more truck-like feel, which is appreciated by some but detracts from ride comfort compared to the unibody construction of competitors.
A similar alternative is the GMC Safari, which is essentially the same vehicle as the Astro. The Ford Windstar is another alternative, but it had its own reliability issues. A better alternative for those prioritizing reliability and features would be the Honda Odyssey, though it's more expensive. For those needing towing capability, the Astro holds an advantage due to its rear-wheel-drive platform, something many of its competitors lacked. The Astro's body-on-frame construction provides a more truck-like feel, which is appreciated by some but detracts from ride comfort compared to the unibody construction of competitors.
Ranks #75 Van
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Sienna | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda Odyssey | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2001 Mazda MPV | (4.0★) |
| 4 | 2024 Ford E-Series Cutaway | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz Metris Passenger Van | (0.0★) |
| 6 | 2023 Chevrolet Express Passenger | (0.0★) |
| 7 | 2021 Nissan NV200 | (3.0★) |
| 8 | 2023 GMC Savana | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Ram ProMaster | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2021 Rolls-Royce Dawn | (0.0★) |
| 11 | 2013 Volkswagen Routan | (4.0★) |
| 12 | 2007 Buick Terraza | (0.0★) |
| 75 | 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van | (0.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van a Good Van?
The 2003 Chevrolet Astro Van is ideal for buyers needing a robust, affordable van with towing capabilities and aren't overly concerned with fuel economy or the latest features. It's worth buying under specific conditions: if it's well-maintained, rust-free, and priced appropriately. It’s best as a used purchase, given its age. The LT trim offers the most features, but even a well-cared-for base or LS model can be a good value. It appeals to those who value simplicity and utility over modern amenities and are prepared to address potential maintenance issues. It's a practical choice for small businesses or families needing a workhorse vehicle.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma