The 1998 Chevrolet Metro, a subcompact car, was part of a lineage known for its exceptional fuel economy. Produced from 1989 to 2001, it was available as a two-door or four-door hatchback. Key trims included the base model and the LS. Its popularity stemmed from its incredibly low price point and outstanding MPG, making it an ideal urban commuter and a budget-friendly choice for many.
The Good
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro shines in efficiency, offering unparalleled fuel economy that appeals to the practical buyer. Its nimble size makes city driving a breeze. Emotionally, its affordability and simplicity resonate with those seeking a no-nonsense, reliable transportation solution.
The Bad
Potential buyers of the 1998 Chevrolet Metro should be aware of its modest power, which can make highway driving or steep inclines challenging. Interior noise levels can also be high, and build quality might feel less substantial compared to larger vehicles.
1998 Chevrolet Metro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1998 Chevrolet Metro primarily featured a 1.0L 3-cylinder engine. Later in its production run, a 1.3L 4-cylinder engine became available, especially in certain trims or markets.
- Horsepower: The 1.0L engine typically produced around 53 horsepower. The optional 1.3L engine offered a slight increase, often in the range of 60-70 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: This is where the Metro truly excelled. Expect figures in the range of 40-50 MPG in the city and potentially higher on the highway, depending on engine and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: Due to its small engines, acceleration was not a strong suit. 0-60 mph times were generally in the 14-18 second range, sometimes exceeding 20 seconds for the base models.
- Towing Capacity: The Chevrolet Metro was not designed or equipped for towing. Towing capacity is effectively zero.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Model: Typically offered minimal features, focusing on essential transportation. This included basic upholstery, manual windows and locks, and a simple AM/FM radio.
- LS Trim: The LS trim often added a few creature comforts. These could include power steering, air conditioning (though sometimes optional), upgraded interior trim, a tachometer, and potentially a more robust sound system. Body-colored mirrors and a rear wiper might also be present.
- Body Styles: Available as a 2-door hatchback and a 4-door hatchback.
- Standard Features (across most trims): Front-wheel drive, independent front suspension, and a solid rear axle were standard. Safety features like front airbags and optional anti-lock brakes (ABS) were also available.
1998 Chevrolet Metro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1998 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Metro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | INGERSOLL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.0 L 3-Cyl. |
| Engine Size | 1L |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Chevrolet Metro Have?
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro, while generally simple mechanically, has some common areas of concern for owners. One frequently reported issue revolves around the **clutch**, especially in manual transmission models, which can wear out prematurely if subjected to heavy city driving or aggressive use. The **transmission** itself, particularly automatic units, can also develop issues over time, sometimes leading to slipping or rough shifting.
**Engine-related problems** can include oil leaks, often from the valve cover gasket or oil pan. Some owners have reported issues with the **starter motor** failing. Due to the Metro's lightweight construction and tendency to be driven in urban environments, **suspension components** such as ball joints, tie rods, and struts can wear out more quickly than on larger vehicles.
**Electrical gremlins** are not uncommon in older vehicles, and the Metro is no exception. This can manifest as issues with the **power windows**, **door locks**, or **dashboard warning lights** that may illuminate intermittently. The **radiator** and cooling system can also be a source of problems, with leaks and eventual failure being a concern, especially in warmer climates.
While specific major recalls for the 1998 model year are not as extensive as some other vehicles, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding recalls with the NHTSA. In terms of long-term reliability, the Metro's simplicity is a double-edged sword. It means fewer complex systems to fail, but the inherent trade-offs in build materials and design for cost-effectiveness mean that components can wear out faster if not maintained diligently. Rust can also be a significant concern in areas with harsh winters, particularly around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and undercarriage. By model year, while the 1998 is representative, minor refinements might have occurred in earlier or later iterations, but the core mechanicals and common issues tend to persist.
**Engine-related problems** can include oil leaks, often from the valve cover gasket or oil pan. Some owners have reported issues with the **starter motor** failing. Due to the Metro's lightweight construction and tendency to be driven in urban environments, **suspension components** such as ball joints, tie rods, and struts can wear out more quickly than on larger vehicles.
**Electrical gremlins** are not uncommon in older vehicles, and the Metro is no exception. This can manifest as issues with the **power windows**, **door locks**, or **dashboard warning lights** that may illuminate intermittently. The **radiator** and cooling system can also be a source of problems, with leaks and eventual failure being a concern, especially in warmer climates.
While specific major recalls for the 1998 model year are not as extensive as some other vehicles, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding recalls with the NHTSA. In terms of long-term reliability, the Metro's simplicity is a double-edged sword. It means fewer complex systems to fail, but the inherent trade-offs in build materials and design for cost-effectiveness mean that components can wear out faster if not maintained diligently. Rust can also be a significant concern in areas with harsh winters, particularly around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and undercarriage. By model year, while the 1998 is representative, minor refinements might have occurred in earlier or later iterations, but the core mechanicals and common issues tend to persist.
How long will the 1998 Chevrolet Metro last?
With diligent maintenance, the 1998 Chevrolet Metro can reasonably achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles, or even more. Many owners report using these cars for 10 to 15 years of service. The long-term durability hinges significantly on consistent oil changes, transmission fluid flushes, and addressing minor issues promptly. Its small, simple engine is generally robust if treated well. However, weaknesses emerge over time, primarily related to wear-and-tear on suspension components, exhaust systems, and the occasional electrical quirk. Rust is a major enemy of long-term survival, especially in rust-prone climates, often dictating the vehicle's ultimate lifespan more than mechanical wear.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro is a study in simplicity when it comes to technology and features, reflecting its budget-friendly positioning.
Technology and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio with two speakers. An optional upgrade might have included a cassette player or even a CD player, though these were less common. Air conditioning was often an optional extra, a significant consideration for buyers in warmer climates. Power windows and power door locks were also typically optional, even on the higher LS trims. Features like cruise control were generally absent or very rarely specified.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we understand them today were virtually non-existent in the 1998 Metro. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were available as an option, typically on the front wheels, but were not standard across all trims. Power steering was also an option, making the steering feel quite heavy at low speeds without it.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included front dual airbags for the driver and front passenger. Seatbelts were, of course, standard. Side-impact airbags were not offered. The overall structure of the vehicle is designed for its class, and as with most small, lightweight cars of this era, its performance in severe impacts would be less than that of larger, heavier vehicles. Crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS from this period for vehicles like the Metro often showed mixed results, with its small size being a significant factor in frontal and side impact protection. Specific detailed crash-test data for the 1998 model year might be available through historical NHTSA archives but generally indicate a basic level of protection. The focus was on providing essential safety rather than advanced systems.
Technology and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of a basic AM/FM radio with two speakers. An optional upgrade might have included a cassette player or even a CD player, though these were less common. Air conditioning was often an optional extra, a significant consideration for buyers in warmer climates. Power windows and power door locks were also typically optional, even on the higher LS trims. Features like cruise control were generally absent or very rarely specified.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we understand them today were virtually non-existent in the 1998 Metro. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were available as an option, typically on the front wheels, but were not standard across all trims. Power steering was also an option, making the steering feel quite heavy at low speeds without it.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included front dual airbags for the driver and front passenger. Seatbelts were, of course, standard. Side-impact airbags were not offered. The overall structure of the vehicle is designed for its class, and as with most small, lightweight cars of this era, its performance in severe impacts would be less than that of larger, heavier vehicles. Crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS from this period for vehicles like the Metro often showed mixed results, with its small size being a significant factor in frontal and side impact protection. Specific detailed crash-test data for the 1998 model year might be available through historical NHTSA archives but generally indicate a basic level of protection. The focus was on providing essential safety rather than advanced systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1998 Chevrolet Metro Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1998 Chevrolet Metro was exceptionally affordable, with base models typically retailing in the $9,000 to $12,000 range, while higher trims might have pushed closer to $14,000. Its depreciation curve was steep initially, as is common with economy cars. However, a well-maintained Metro can hold its value surprisingly well in the current used market, often selling for $2,000 to $4,000, depending heavily on mileage, condition, and location. Factors affecting resale value include the absence of rust, an intact interior, and documented maintenance history. Rarity of well-preserved examples also contributes to its value for those seeking an economical commuter.
1998 Chevrolet Metro Cost of Ownership
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro is remarkably economical to own. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its low value and simple safety features. Fuel expenses are minimal, thanks to its outstanding MPG. Routine maintenance is inexpensive, with parts readily available and labor costs generally lower than for larger vehicles. Repair costs are also usually modest, as most common issues involve simpler mechanicals. While some components may require replacement sooner due to its age and design, the overall long-term ownership cost is exceptionally low, making it one of the most budget-friendly cars to maintain and operate.
1998 Chevrolet Metro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Electric
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1998 Chevrolet Metro Insurance
Insurance for a 1998 Chevrolet Metro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Chevrolet Metro Compare to Other Hatchback?
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro competed in the subcompact segment against rivals like the Honda Civic, Toyota Echo (later Yaris), Ford Aspire, and Hyundai Accent.
Performance: In performance, the Metro was consistently outclassed by most rivals. Its small engines offered meager horsepower and leisurely acceleration, making highway merging and overtaking a deliberate affair. The Honda Civic and Toyota Echo, while not performance kings, offered more responsive engines and better handling. The Ford Aspire and Hyundai Accent also generally provided slightly more pep.
Features: Feature-wise, the Metro was typically sparse. While rivals might have offered more standard amenities or more advanced optional features like power accessories, better sound systems, or even ABS as standard on higher trims, the Metro often kept things basic to maintain its low price. The Civic and Echo, in particular, tended to offer a more refined interior and a better-feature set.
Reliability: The Metro's mechanical simplicity contributed to a certain level of reliability, especially for basic operation. However, compared to the legendary reliability of the Honda Civic and Toyota Echo, the Metro often lagged. While the Metro could be dependable if well-maintained, its build quality and component longevity weren't on par with Japanese competitors. The Ford Aspire and Hyundai Accent had more varied reliability reputations.
Price: This is where the Metro truly shone. It was almost always the most affordable option when new, and this trend often continues into the used market. Its primary appeal was its rock-bottom purchase price and incredibly low running costs.
Recommendations: If budget is the absolute paramount concern, the 1998 Chevrolet Metro remains a contender. However, for a better all-around experience, consider a 1998 Honda Civic or Toyota Echo. They offer superior performance, a more refined interior, better long-term reliability, and are still relatively affordable on the used market. The Hyundai Accent of the same era is another option that might offer a slightly better balance of features and performance for a similar price, though reliability can be more variable. If extreme fuel efficiency is the only goal and driving dynamics are secondary, the Metro is a logical choice.
Performance: In performance, the Metro was consistently outclassed by most rivals. Its small engines offered meager horsepower and leisurely acceleration, making highway merging and overtaking a deliberate affair. The Honda Civic and Toyota Echo, while not performance kings, offered more responsive engines and better handling. The Ford Aspire and Hyundai Accent also generally provided slightly more pep.
Features: Feature-wise, the Metro was typically sparse. While rivals might have offered more standard amenities or more advanced optional features like power accessories, better sound systems, or even ABS as standard on higher trims, the Metro often kept things basic to maintain its low price. The Civic and Echo, in particular, tended to offer a more refined interior and a better-feature set.
Reliability: The Metro's mechanical simplicity contributed to a certain level of reliability, especially for basic operation. However, compared to the legendary reliability of the Honda Civic and Toyota Echo, the Metro often lagged. While the Metro could be dependable if well-maintained, its build quality and component longevity weren't on par with Japanese competitors. The Ford Aspire and Hyundai Accent had more varied reliability reputations.
Price: This is where the Metro truly shone. It was almost always the most affordable option when new, and this trend often continues into the used market. Its primary appeal was its rock-bottom purchase price and incredibly low running costs.
Recommendations: If budget is the absolute paramount concern, the 1998 Chevrolet Metro remains a contender. However, for a better all-around experience, consider a 1998 Honda Civic or Toyota Echo. They offer superior performance, a more refined interior, better long-term reliability, and are still relatively affordable on the used market. The Hyundai Accent of the same era is another option that might offer a slightly better balance of features and performance for a similar price, though reliability can be more variable. If extreme fuel efficiency is the only goal and driving dynamics are secondary, the Metro is a logical choice.
Final Verdict: Is the 1998 Chevrolet Metro a Good Hatchback?
The 1998 Chevrolet Metro is ideal for the ultra-budget-conscious buyer seeking the absolute cheapest way to get from point A to point B. Students, first-time car buyers with extremely limited funds, or those needing a dedicated second vehicle for short city commutes would find it appealing. It is worth buying only if acquired at a very low price and in good mechanical condition, with minimal rust. New examples are obviously no longer available; the focus is entirely on the used market. Any trim level is acceptable, but the LS might offer a few more comfort features. It is essential to thoroughly inspect any Metro for rust and check its maintenance history, as its longevity heavily depends on how it was cared for. For anyone prioritizing comfort, performance, or modern features, this vehicle is not recommended.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma