The 1999 Chevrolet Metro, a subcompact car, originated from a collaboration with Suzuki. Produced from 1989 to 2001, it was available as a two-door or four-door hatchback. Key trims included the base, LSi, and XFi. Known for its exceptional fuel economy and affordable price, the Metro was a popular choice for budget-conscious buyers and urban commuters seeking an economical and nimble vehicle. Its compact size made parking a breeze.
The Good
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro shines in its astonishing fuel efficiency, making it incredibly practical and wallet-friendly. Its small footprint ensures easy maneuverability and parking, while its surprisingly low purchase price offers exceptional value. For the eco-conscious and budget-minded, it's a smart, sensible choice that evokes a sense of responsible ownership.
The Bad
Owners should be aware of the 1999 Chevrolet Metro's modest power, which can struggle on inclines or during overtaking. Interior materials can feel basic, and road noise is noticeable. Some older models may exhibit rust issues, particularly in colder climates, and acceleration is not its strong suit.
1999 Chevrolet Metro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1999 Chevrolet Metro primarily featured a 1.0-liter, three-cylinder engine and a 1.3-liter, four-cylinder engine.
- Horsepower: The 1.0L engine typically produced around 53 horsepower, while the 1.3L engine offered approximately 70-75 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: This is a major strong point. Expect fuel economy figures in the range of 35-45 MPG in the city and 40-50 MPG on the highway, varying slightly between engine and transmission configurations.
- 0-60 Times: Due to its small engines, acceleration was not a strong suit. 0-60 mph times were generally in the 12-16 second range, depending on the engine and whether it was a manual or automatic transmission.
- Towing Capacity: The Chevrolet Metro was not designed for towing. It does not have a specified towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trim: Typically included essential features like manual windows, manual door locks, a basic AM/FM radio, and 13-inch steel wheels. Air conditioning was often an option.
- LSi Trim: This was a more popular and well-equipped option. It usually added power steering, air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, a tachometer, body-colored mirrors and door handles, and sometimes upgraded interior trim. A stereo system with more speakers was also common.
- XFi Trim: This was an economy-focused trim, often emphasizing the best possible fuel efficiency. It might have featured lighter-weight components and fewer comfort features to reduce weight and improve mileage.
1999 Chevrolet Metro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1999 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Metro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | - |
| Category | - |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | - |
| Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | - |
| Engine Size | - |
| Engine Cylinders | - |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Chevrolet Metro Have?
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro, like many vehicles of its era, had some reported issues. One of the most common concerns revolved around the transmission, particularly with automatic transmissions experiencing a lack of responsiveness or premature failure in some cases. Manual transmissions were generally more robust.
Engine-related problems, while not widespread, could include issues with the ignition system, such as spark plug or coil pack failures, leading to misfires and rough running. The cooling system was another area where owners sometimes reported leaks or premature wear of hoses and the radiator.
Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in areas that use road salt during winter. The unibody construction, particularly around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and subframes, could succumb to corrosion if not properly treated or maintained.
Electrical gremlins could also pop up, affecting components like power windows, door locks, or the radio. These were often minor but could be frustrating to diagnose and repair.
While specific recalls for the 1999 model year aren't overwhelmingly numerous, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any outstanding recalls related to safety defects. Generally, the Metro's smaller engine and simpler design meant fewer complex systems to fail compared to larger vehicles. However, maintenance is key. Neglecting regular oil changes and fluid checks can exacerbate potential issues. The long-term reliability is heavily dependent on how well the vehicle has been cared for, especially regarding rust prevention and consistent mechanical upkeep.
Engine-related problems, while not widespread, could include issues with the ignition system, such as spark plug or coil pack failures, leading to misfires and rough running. The cooling system was another area where owners sometimes reported leaks or premature wear of hoses and the radiator.
Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in areas that use road salt during winter. The unibody construction, particularly around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and subframes, could succumb to corrosion if not properly treated or maintained.
Electrical gremlins could also pop up, affecting components like power windows, door locks, or the radio. These were often minor but could be frustrating to diagnose and repair.
While specific recalls for the 1999 model year aren't overwhelmingly numerous, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any outstanding recalls related to safety defects. Generally, the Metro's smaller engine and simpler design meant fewer complex systems to fail compared to larger vehicles. However, maintenance is key. Neglecting regular oil changes and fluid checks can exacerbate potential issues. The long-term reliability is heavily dependent on how well the vehicle has been cared for, especially regarding rust prevention and consistent mechanical upkeep.
How long will the 1999 Chevrolet Metro last?
Based on owner data and common maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1999 Chevrolet Metro can realistically achieve between 150,000 to 200,000 miles. Some owners have reported even higher mileages, often exceeding 250,000 miles, particularly those who meticulously followed maintenance schedules and addressed minor issues promptly. The long-term durability is significantly influenced by rust prevention, as corrosion is its primary nemesis. The engine and transmission, if properly serviced, can be quite resilient. However, expect wear and tear on suspension components, seals, and interior plastics over time. Early attention to minor leaks or unusual noises can prevent more significant and costly repairs down the road.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro was a budget-oriented subcompact, so its technology, entertainment, and driver-assistance features were quite basic, reflecting its era and price point.
Technology & Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio, often with a single-disc CD player as an upgrade. Higher trims might have offered a more robust speaker system. Power windows and door locks were often optional or part of higher trim levels. Remote keyless entry was a rare but possible optional feature on LSi models. The instrument cluster was straightforward, featuring essential gauges like speedometer, fuel level, and engine temperature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the 1999 Metro. Power steering was available on higher trims, making it easier to maneuver at low speeds. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were typically optional, and often only on the rear wheels if equipped. No advanced systems like cruise control were standard.
Safety Features: Standard safety features included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelts were three-point at the front and rear. Crumple zones were incorporated into the design to absorb impact energy.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1999 Chevrolet Metro are not readily available or are from an era when testing protocols were less stringent. However, based on the vehicle's small size and basic safety structure, it would likely not perform as well in severe impact scenarios compared to modern vehicles. Side airbags were not offered. The vehicle's primary safety advantage lay in its maneuverability, which could help drivers avoid accidents in the first place.
Technology & Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio, often with a single-disc CD player as an upgrade. Higher trims might have offered a more robust speaker system. Power windows and door locks were often optional or part of higher trim levels. Remote keyless entry was a rare but possible optional feature on LSi models. The instrument cluster was straightforward, featuring essential gauges like speedometer, fuel level, and engine temperature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were virtually nonexistent in the 1999 Metro. Power steering was available on higher trims, making it easier to maneuver at low speeds. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were typically optional, and often only on the rear wheels if equipped. No advanced systems like cruise control were standard.
Safety Features: Standard safety features included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seatbelts were three-point at the front and rear. Crumple zones were incorporated into the design to absorb impact energy.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1999 Chevrolet Metro are not readily available or are from an era when testing protocols were less stringent. However, based on the vehicle's small size and basic safety structure, it would likely not perform as well in severe impact scenarios compared to modern vehicles. Side airbags were not offered. The vehicle's primary safety advantage lay in its maneuverability, which could help drivers avoid accidents in the first place.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1999 Chevrolet Metro Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1999 Chevrolet Metro had an MSRP that typically ranged from around $9,000 to $13,000, depending on the trim level and options. Its value proposition was its affordability.
Currently, used market prices for a 1999 Chevrolet Metro are very low, generally ranging from $1,000 to $3,000. This price is heavily influenced by the vehicle's condition, mileage, and presence of rust.
Depreciation was rapid in its early years, as is typical for most economy cars. Its resale value is now minimal, making it a very inexpensive used car option. Factors affecting its already low resale value include rust damage, mechanical condition, the number of previous owners, and overall cosmetic appeal. Finding one in excellent, rust-free condition can command a slightly higher price, but these are rare.
Currently, used market prices for a 1999 Chevrolet Metro are very low, generally ranging from $1,000 to $3,000. This price is heavily influenced by the vehicle's condition, mileage, and presence of rust.
Depreciation was rapid in its early years, as is typical for most economy cars. Its resale value is now minimal, making it a very inexpensive used car option. Factors affecting its already low resale value include rust damage, mechanical condition, the number of previous owners, and overall cosmetic appeal. Finding one in excellent, rust-free condition can command a slightly higher price, but these are rare.
1999 Chevrolet Metro Cost of Ownership
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro is exceptionally economical to own. Insurance premiums are typically very low due to its low value and inherent safety features. Fuel costs are minimal thanks to its outstanding MPG. Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and filter replacements, is inexpensive. Repair costs are generally modest, as parts are readily available and the car's simple design makes them easier to fix. However, significant repairs like transmission issues or extensive rust remediation can increase costs. Overall, it is one of the most economical vehicles to own and operate.
1999 Chevrolet Metro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
-
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1999 Chevrolet Metro Insurance
Insurance for a 1999 Chevrolet Metro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Chevrolet Metro Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro competed in the fiercely contested subcompact segment against rivals like the Honda Civic, Toyota Echo/Starlet, Nissan Sentra, and Ford Focus.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Metro lagged significantly behind most of its competitors. Its small engines prioritized fuel economy over power, resulting in sluggish acceleration and difficulty maintaining speed on highways or inclines, especially when compared to the more robust engines found in the Civic or Focus.
Features: The Metro was spartan in its feature offerings. While rivals like the Civic and Focus started offering more creature comforts, power accessories, and even early forms of infotainment, the Metro typically made do with basic necessities. Optional features like power steering and air conditioning were highlights.
Reliability: Reliability was a mixed bag. While the Metro's simple mechanicals meant fewer complex parts to fail, issues like rust and occasional transmission problems could be drawbacks. Competitors like the Honda Civic and Toyota Echo generally had a stronger reputation for long-term reliability and build quality.
Price: This is where the Metro truly shone. It was consistently one of the most affordable vehicles in its class, both when new and on the used market. This made it attractive to buyers with extremely tight budgets.
Alternatives: For those seeking better performance and features while maintaining good fuel economy and strong reliability, a used **Honda Civic** (late 90s/early 2000s) or **Toyota Echo/Corolla** would be superior choices, though likely more expensive to acquire. If sheer affordability is the absolute top priority and performance/features are secondary, the Metro remains a contender. A **Ford Focus** from this era could offer a slightly better balance of performance and features but might have its own set of reliability concerns.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Metro lagged significantly behind most of its competitors. Its small engines prioritized fuel economy over power, resulting in sluggish acceleration and difficulty maintaining speed on highways or inclines, especially when compared to the more robust engines found in the Civic or Focus.
Features: The Metro was spartan in its feature offerings. While rivals like the Civic and Focus started offering more creature comforts, power accessories, and even early forms of infotainment, the Metro typically made do with basic necessities. Optional features like power steering and air conditioning were highlights.
Reliability: Reliability was a mixed bag. While the Metro's simple mechanicals meant fewer complex parts to fail, issues like rust and occasional transmission problems could be drawbacks. Competitors like the Honda Civic and Toyota Echo generally had a stronger reputation for long-term reliability and build quality.
Price: This is where the Metro truly shone. It was consistently one of the most affordable vehicles in its class, both when new and on the used market. This made it attractive to buyers with extremely tight budgets.
Alternatives: For those seeking better performance and features while maintaining good fuel economy and strong reliability, a used **Honda Civic** (late 90s/early 2000s) or **Toyota Echo/Corolla** would be superior choices, though likely more expensive to acquire. If sheer affordability is the absolute top priority and performance/features are secondary, the Metro remains a contender. A **Ford Focus** from this era could offer a slightly better balance of performance and features but might have its own set of reliability concerns.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Chevrolet Metro a Good Vehicle?
The 1999 Chevrolet Metro is ideal for the ultra-budget-conscious buyer who prioritizes absolute fuel economy and low purchase price above all else. It's a perfect second car for short urban commutes or for a first-time driver needing an economical way to get around.
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on its condition. Given its age and minimal current market value, it is exclusively a used car purchase. Look for examples with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. Prioritize manual transmissions for better longevity and drivability. While not a car for long highway journeys or those seeking driving excitement, for its intended purpose of cheap, efficient transportation, it can still be a viable option if found in decent shape.
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on its condition. Given its age and minimal current market value, it is exclusively a used car purchase. Look for examples with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. Prioritize manual transmissions for better longevity and drivability. While not a car for long highway journeys or those seeking driving excitement, for its intended purpose of cheap, efficient transportation, it can still be a viable option if found in decent shape.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma