The 1985 Ford Bronco II introduced itself as Ford's answer to the burgeoning compact SUV market, serving as a smaller counterpart to the full-size Bronco. This two-door SUV, produced from 1984 to 1990, offered trims like the XL, XLT, and the more upscale Eddie Bauer edition. Priced new in the range of approximately $11,000-$15,000, it stood out for its compact size, maneuverability, and genuine 4x4 capability, making it popular among buyers seeking a more efficient and nimble off-road vehicle than traditional large SUVs.
The Good
The 1985 Ford Bronco II offered a rugged, classic compact SUV design, appealing to emotional buyers seeking adventure and a nostalgic aesthetic. Practically, its smaller footprint made it nimble for urban driving and trail exploration. It provided reasonable efficiency for its class and, as a used vehicle, presents an affordable entry into 4x4 ownership, offering a relatively simple mechanical setup for DIY maintenance and decent value for its utility.
The Bad
A primary weakness of the 1985 Ford Bronco II is its well-documented rollover propensity, attributed to its narrow track and high center of gravity. Other concerns include the somewhat underpowered 2.8L V6 engine, susceptibility to rust on body panels and frame, and basic interior materials that tend to show wear quickly. Overall safety features are minimal compared to modern standards.
1985 Ford Bronco II: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
For 1985, the primary engine was a 2.8-liter "Cologne" V6. An extremely rare 2.3-liter four-cylinder diesel engine, sourced from Mitsubishi, was also theoretically available but seldom seen. The 2.8L V6 was mated to either a 4-speed manual, 5-speed manual, or a 3-speed automatic transmission. - Horsepower:
The 2.8L V6 engine typically produced around 115 horsepower at 4,600 rpm and 150 lb-ft of torque at 2,600 rpm. This provided adequate, but not exhilarating, performance for the compact SUV. - Fuel Economy:
Fuel economy estimates for the 1985 Bronco II with the 2.8L V6 varied, but generally fell in the range of 18-20 MPG combined, with highway figures potentially reaching into the low 20s. This was relatively efficient for an SUV of its era. - 0-60 Times:
Acceleration from 0-60 mph was leisurely, typically taking around 12-14 seconds, depending on the transmission, drivetrain (2WD or 4WD), and specific conditions. It was not built for speed but for utility. - Towing Capacity:
When properly equipped, the 1985 Ford Bronco II had a respectable towing capacity for its size, generally rated between 2,000 to 2,500 pounds. This made it suitable for towing small trailers, boats, or recreational equipment. - Trim-Level Features:
- XL: This was the base model, offering essential features. Standard items included vinyl or cloth bench seats, manual windows and door locks, an AM radio, and basic instrumentation. Steel wheels were standard.
- XLT: Stepping up to the XLT trim added more comfort and convenience. Features could include upgraded cloth upholstery, carpeting, a full-length headliner, power steering, power brakes, a tilt steering column, a tachometer, and an AM/FM stereo. Exterior enhancements often included brighter trim, styled steel wheels, and more extensive badging. Optional power windows and locks became available here.
- Eddie Bauer: The top-tier Eddie Bauer trim package emphasized luxury and outdoor appeal. It featured unique two-tone paint schemes, special exterior graphics, higher-quality cloth or optional leather upholstery with Eddie Bauer badging, plush carpeting, full power accessories (windows, locks, mirrors), air conditioning, cruise control, and often included a premium sound system. It was designed to offer a more upscale and comfortable experience.
1985 Ford Bronco II Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1985 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Bronco II |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Wagon |
| Category | Minivan Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.8-L V-6 |
| Engine Size | 2.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1985 Ford Bronco II Have?
The 1985 Ford Bronco II, like its other model years, is unfortunately most infamous for its stability issues and high propensity for rollovers. Due to a narrow track width, short wheelbase, and relatively high center of gravity, the vehicle was prone to rolling over in certain maneuvers, leading to numerous lawsuits and a tarnished reputation. This was a consistent design flaw across all model years of the Bronco II. While not a direct recall for the rollover tendency itself, Ford did issue service bulletins and modify later models slightly to improve stability, though the fundamental design remained.
Beyond the critical safety concern, other frequently reported problems include powertrain issues. The 2.8L "Cologne" V6 engine, specific to the 1984-1985 models, was known for head gasket failures and valve guide wear if not meticulously maintained. It was eventually replaced by the more robust 2.9L V6 in 1986, which, while an improvement, still had its own share of head gasket and valve train concerns. Transmission problems are also common with age, including issues with the automatic transmission's shifting solenoids or fluid leaks, and clutch wear or linkage problems in manual versions.
Electrical gremlins are typical for vehicles of this vintage, with dashboard lights flickering, power accessory failures (especially for optional power windows and locks), and wiring harness degradation being common. Rust is another significant long-term reliability concern, particularly in regions exposed to salt. Critical areas include rocker panels, wheel arches, floorboards, and the frame rails. The front suspension components, such as ball joints and control arm bushings, wear out over time, leading to sloppy steering and poor handling. Owners should also watch out for steering column play and brake system deterioration. While many parts are still available, extensive restoration can be costly due to labor and bodywork associated with rust.
Beyond the critical safety concern, other frequently reported problems include powertrain issues. The 2.8L "Cologne" V6 engine, specific to the 1984-1985 models, was known for head gasket failures and valve guide wear if not meticulously maintained. It was eventually replaced by the more robust 2.9L V6 in 1986, which, while an improvement, still had its own share of head gasket and valve train concerns. Transmission problems are also common with age, including issues with the automatic transmission's shifting solenoids or fluid leaks, and clutch wear or linkage problems in manual versions.
Electrical gremlins are typical for vehicles of this vintage, with dashboard lights flickering, power accessory failures (especially for optional power windows and locks), and wiring harness degradation being common. Rust is another significant long-term reliability concern, particularly in regions exposed to salt. Critical areas include rocker panels, wheel arches, floorboards, and the frame rails. The front suspension components, such as ball joints and control arm bushings, wear out over time, leading to sloppy steering and poor handling. Owners should also watch out for steering column play and brake system deterioration. While many parts are still available, extensive restoration can be costly due to labor and bodywork associated with rust.
How long will the 1985 Ford Bronco II last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1985 Ford Bronco II could realistically see 150,000 to 200,000 miles, and some well-cared-for examples have surpassed this. However, many did not reach such high mileage due to several long-term weaknesses. Rust is the most significant long-term durability killer; neglected body and frame corrosion often rendered vehicles unsafe or uneconomical to repair, especially in salt-belt states. Engine issues, particularly head gasket failures on the 2.8L V6 if not addressed, could also shorten its lifespan. Over time, electrical components tend to degrade, leading to intermittent failures. While the basic frame and drivetrain components are generally robust if maintained, the cumulative effect of wear, rust, and the inherent safety concerns often meant they didn't remain in service as long as some competitors. Therefore, years of service varied greatly, but 10-15 years was a typical active lifespan for many before major issues arose.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1985 Ford Bronco II, being a product of its era, featured technology, entertainment, and safety systems that are rudimentary by today's standards. Built-in technology was essentially limited to the vehicle's mechanical and electrical operation. Power steering and power brakes were common and provided the primary "driver assistance" to reduce effort. There were no advanced electronic driver-assistance features like ABS, traction control, stability control, or airbags; these technologies were either nonexistent or in their infancy and not implemented in mass-market compact SUVs.
For entertainment, the standard offering was typically an AM radio. Optional upgrades included an AM/FM stereo, and higher trims or option packages might have offered an AM/FM cassette player. Sound quality was basic, delivered through a few speakers strategically placed in the cabin. Comfort features, beyond the basic seats, included optional air conditioning, which was a highly sought-after extra. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were also available on higher trims (XLT, Eddie Bauer), representing the pinnacle of convenience tech for this vehicle.
Safety features were minimal. The primary passive safety systems included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. The dashboard was padded, and the steering column was designed to be collapsible in a severe front impact. There were no crumple zones or side-impact beams as understood in modern vehicles. Crash-test ratings as we know them today from organizations like NHTSA or IIHS did not exist for vehicles like the 1985 Bronco II. Even if they did, its design, particularly its known rollover tendency, would likely result in very poor ratings by contemporary safety standards. Buyers of this vehicle today must be acutely aware that it lacks virtually all modern safety features and offers substantially less occupant protection than current vehicles.
For entertainment, the standard offering was typically an AM radio. Optional upgrades included an AM/FM stereo, and higher trims or option packages might have offered an AM/FM cassette player. Sound quality was basic, delivered through a few speakers strategically placed in the cabin. Comfort features, beyond the basic seats, included optional air conditioning, which was a highly sought-after extra. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were also available on higher trims (XLT, Eddie Bauer), representing the pinnacle of convenience tech for this vehicle.
Safety features were minimal. The primary passive safety systems included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. The dashboard was padded, and the steering column was designed to be collapsible in a severe front impact. There were no crumple zones or side-impact beams as understood in modern vehicles. Crash-test ratings as we know them today from organizations like NHTSA or IIHS did not exist for vehicles like the 1985 Bronco II. Even if they did, its design, particularly its known rollover tendency, would likely result in very poor ratings by contemporary safety standards. Buyers of this vehicle today must be acutely aware that it lacks virtually all modern safety features and offers substantially less occupant protection than current vehicles.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1985 Ford Bronco II Prices and Market Value
When new in 1985, the Ford Bronco II had a base Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) ranging from approximately $11,000 for a basic XL 2WD model to around $15,000 or more for a fully optioned Eddie Bauer 4WD. This price point made it an accessible compact SUV at the time. Like most mass-produced vehicles, it experienced significant depreciation over its first decade, quickly falling to a fraction of its original cost as newer, safer, and more advanced SUVs entered the market.
Currently, used market prices for the 1985 Ford Bronco II are highly variable. Project vehicles or those in poor condition can be found for a few hundred to a couple of thousand dollars. Well-maintained, rust-free examples, especially 4WD XLT or Eddie Bauer trims, can command prices ranging from $3,000 to $8,000, with exceptionally preserved or restored models occasionally exceeding this. Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (rust is a major detractor), mileage, whether it's 2WD or 4WD (4WD is more desirable), the presence of desirable options like air conditioning and power accessories, and documented maintenance history. While most depreciation has already occurred, significant appreciation is only seen in rare, pristine examples for collectors.
Currently, used market prices for the 1985 Ford Bronco II are highly variable. Project vehicles or those in poor condition can be found for a few hundred to a couple of thousand dollars. Well-maintained, rust-free examples, especially 4WD XLT or Eddie Bauer trims, can command prices ranging from $3,000 to $8,000, with exceptionally preserved or restored models occasionally exceeding this. Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (rust is a major detractor), mileage, whether it's 2WD or 4WD (4WD is more desirable), the presence of desirable options like air conditioning and power accessories, and documented maintenance history. While most depreciation has already occurred, significant appreciation is only seen in rare, pristine examples for collectors.
1985 Ford Bronco II Cost of Ownership
Insurance for a 1985 Ford Bronco II is generally economical due to its age and low current value, though some insurers might factor in its rollover reputation. Fuel costs are moderate; it uses regular unleaded, but its 18-20 MPG combined isn't stellar for its size. Maintenance and repair can be relatively inexpensive for basic items, as parts are often available and many components are simple enough for DIY mechanics. However, major repairs like engine or transmission rebuilds, or extensive rust remediation, can quickly become costly, exceeding the vehicle's market value. Long-term ownership is economical if you can handle minor repairs yourself and avoid major structural issues like rust. If a shop is needed for every repair, or if rust is severe, it becomes a costly endeavor. Overall, it can be an economical vehicle to own for a handy enthusiast, but potentially costly for others.
1985 Ford Bronco II Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1985 Ford Bronco II Insurance
Insurance for a 1985 Ford Bronco II is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Wagon with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1985 Ford Bronco II Compare to Other Wagon?
The 1985 Ford Bronco II competed in a burgeoning compact SUV segment against notable rivals such as the Chevrolet S-10 Blazer, the Jeep Cherokee (XJ generation), and to a lesser extent, the Nissan Pathfinder and Suzuki Samurai.
In terms of performance, the Bronco II's 2.8L V6 offered comparable power to the early 2.8L V6 in the S-10 Blazer. Both were generally considered adequate for everyday driving but not powerful. The Jeep Cherokee XJ, especially with its optional 4.0L inline-six engine introduced later in its generation, significantly outperformed the Bronco II. The Suzuki Samurai was lighter and more nimble off-road but extremely underpowered for highway use. Features were largely similar across the board for these early compact SUVs: basic interiors, manual controls for windows and locks standard, and optional amenities like air conditioning and power accessories. The XLT and Eddie Bauer Bronco II trims offered a decent array of comfort features for the time, comparable to higher trims of the S-10 Blazer. The Jeep Cherokee often had a more refined interior feel in its higher trims.
Reliability is where the Bronco II faces its greatest challenge. While mechanically robust in many aspects (if maintained), its infamous rollover risk due to stability issues severely impacted its reputation and real-world safety perception. The Chevrolet S-10 Blazer had its own set of common issues, but not the same fundamental safety concern. The Jeep Cherokee (XJ) developed a reputation for extreme durability and reliability, especially with the 4.0L engine, making it a benchmark in the segment. Price-wise, all these vehicles were competitively priced when new, targeting a similar budget-conscious SUV buyer.
For alternatives, the Jeep Cherokee (XJ), particularly models from 1987 onwards with the 4.0L engine, is a significantly better alternative if reliability, greater off-road capability, and a more robust design are priorities. It offers superior performance and a much better long-term reliability record, without the same critical safety concerns. The Chevrolet S-10 Blazer is a very similar alternative if one is drawn to the '80s compact SUV aesthetic, offering a comparable driving experience and utility, but without the Bronco II's major stability issues. For a truly unique and hardcore off-road experience, the Suzuki Samurai, though much smaller, offered exceptional capability for its size, albeit with significant compromises in on-road comfort and power.
In terms of performance, the Bronco II's 2.8L V6 offered comparable power to the early 2.8L V6 in the S-10 Blazer. Both were generally considered adequate for everyday driving but not powerful. The Jeep Cherokee XJ, especially with its optional 4.0L inline-six engine introduced later in its generation, significantly outperformed the Bronco II. The Suzuki Samurai was lighter and more nimble off-road but extremely underpowered for highway use. Features were largely similar across the board for these early compact SUVs: basic interiors, manual controls for windows and locks standard, and optional amenities like air conditioning and power accessories. The XLT and Eddie Bauer Bronco II trims offered a decent array of comfort features for the time, comparable to higher trims of the S-10 Blazer. The Jeep Cherokee often had a more refined interior feel in its higher trims.
Reliability is where the Bronco II faces its greatest challenge. While mechanically robust in many aspects (if maintained), its infamous rollover risk due to stability issues severely impacted its reputation and real-world safety perception. The Chevrolet S-10 Blazer had its own set of common issues, but not the same fundamental safety concern. The Jeep Cherokee (XJ) developed a reputation for extreme durability and reliability, especially with the 4.0L engine, making it a benchmark in the segment. Price-wise, all these vehicles were competitively priced when new, targeting a similar budget-conscious SUV buyer.
For alternatives, the Jeep Cherokee (XJ), particularly models from 1987 onwards with the 4.0L engine, is a significantly better alternative if reliability, greater off-road capability, and a more robust design are priorities. It offers superior performance and a much better long-term reliability record, without the same critical safety concerns. The Chevrolet S-10 Blazer is a very similar alternative if one is drawn to the '80s compact SUV aesthetic, offering a comparable driving experience and utility, but without the Bronco II's major stability issues. For a truly unique and hardcore off-road experience, the Suzuki Samurai, though much smaller, offered exceptional capability for its size, albeit with significant compromises in on-road comfort and power.
Final Verdict: Is the 1985 Ford Bronco II a Good Wagon?
The 1985 Ford Bronco II is ideal for a niche buyer: primarily enthusiasts of vintage Ford vehicles, collectors of 1980s compact SUVs, or someone seeking a unique, simple, and capable 4x4 for light off-road adventures or as a project vehicle. It's worth buying for these specific groups, but with significant caveats.
It is absolutely not recommended as a primary family vehicle or for anyone prioritizing modern safety standards. If considering a purchase, it must be a used vehicle, as new models are obviously unavailable. Seek out a 4WD XLT or Eddie Bauer trim for the best blend of features and capability. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing on rust, engine health, and suspension components. Crucially, any buyer must be fully aware of the vehicle's well-documented rollover propensity and drive accordingly, exercising extreme caution. For a hands-on individual who appreciates its classic appeal and is prepared for its limitations, the Bronco II offers a unique slice of automotive history and rugged utility at an accessible price point, making it a conditional "yes" for a very specific type of owner.
It is absolutely not recommended as a primary family vehicle or for anyone prioritizing modern safety standards. If considering a purchase, it must be a used vehicle, as new models are obviously unavailable. Seek out a 4WD XLT or Eddie Bauer trim for the best blend of features and capability. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing on rust, engine health, and suspension components. Crucially, any buyer must be fully aware of the vehicle's well-documented rollover propensity and drive accordingly, exercising extreme caution. For a hands-on individual who appreciates its classic appeal and is prepared for its limitations, the Bronco II offers a unique slice of automotive history and rugged utility at an accessible price point, making it a conditional "yes" for a very specific type of owner.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.