The 1989 Ford Bronco II is a compact, two-door SUV, representing the penultimate model year of its generation (1984-1990). As a smaller counterpart to the full-size Bronco, it offered rugged utility in a more maneuverable package. Available in trims like XL, XLT, and the upscale Eddie Bauer, new prices ranged from approximately $13,000 to $20,000. It stood out for its classic off-road styling and compact size, making it a popular choice for adventure seekers and a significant precursor to the Ford Explorer.
The Good
For emotional buyers, its rugged, classic SUV design evokes a sense of adventure and nostalgia, offering genuine off-road capability in a compact package. Practically, it provides an affordable entry into vintage 4x4 ownership. Its relatively simple mechanics can be a boon for DIY enthusiasts, while its size ensures maneuverability. Though not luxurious, its utilitarian comfort and decent fuel efficiency for its era appeal to pragmatic owners seeking value.
The Bad
The 1989 Ford Bronco II is infamously known for its rollover propensity due to a narrow track and high center of gravity. Owners should also watch for common issues with the 2.9L V6 engine, including cylinder head cracking and head gasket leaks. Rust, particularly on the frame and body panels, is a significant concern for older models. Transmission reliability, especially with the A4LD automatic, can also be a weakness.
1989 Ford Bronco II: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: For the 1989 model year, the primary engine was the 2.9-liter "Cologne" V6 fuel-injected engine. Earlier model years (1984-1985) also offered a 2.8-liter V6, and a 2.3-liter four-cylinder diesel was briefly available. The 2.9L V6 was a significant upgrade in power and refinement compared to its predecessors.
- Horsepower: The 2.9-liter V6 engine produced approximately 140 horsepower at 4,600 RPM and 170 lb-ft of torque at 2,600 RPM, offering adequate power for its size and intended use, including light off-roading and towing.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for the 2.9L V6 varied significantly with transmission and drivetrain (2WD vs. 4WD), but typically ranged from 15-18 MPG in the city and 18-21 MPG on the highway for 2WD models, with 4WD versions being slightly less efficient.
- 0-60 Times: The 1989 Ford Bronco II, equipped with the 2.9L V6, had estimated 0-60 mph acceleration times in the range of 10-12 seconds, which was respectable for a compact SUV of its era. Performance was not its primary selling point, but it was capable.
- Towing Capacity: Depending on the drivetrain configuration (2WD or 4WD), axle ratio, and transmission, the 1989 Bronco II had a respectable towing capacity generally ranging from 2,000 pounds up to 3,500 pounds when properly equipped with a tow package.
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: This was the base model, offering essential features. It typically came with manual windows and locks, vinyl or basic cloth upholstery, an AM/FM radio, and steel wheels. Air conditioning was often optional.
- XLT: The mid-range trim added more comfort and convenience. Features included upgraded cloth interior, carpeting, chrome exterior trim, power windows and door locks (often optional), a tilt steering wheel, and a cassette player. Air conditioning and cruise control were common options.
- Eddie Bauer: The top-tier trim emphasized luxury and unique styling. It featured premium cloth or optional leather interior, distinct exterior two-tone paint schemes, unique "Eddie Bauer" badging, and more standard features such as air conditioning, power windows/locks, and often a more advanced sound system for the time. This trim aimed for a more upscale recreational vehicle market.
1989 Ford Bronco II Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1989 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Bronco II |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2WD |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Minivan Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 69.90 inches |
| Overall Length | 161.90 inches |
| Overall Width | 68.00 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 94.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.9-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 2.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,362 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1989 Ford Bronco II Have?
The 1989 Ford Bronco II, like many vehicles of its age, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. A primary mechanical issue for the 2.9-liter "Cologne" V6 engine is the tendency for cylinder head cracking, particularly between the valves, leading to coolant leaks and overheating. Head gasket failures are also common. Valve guide wear, causing excessive oil consumption and smoking, is another well-documented engine weakness. The automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD unit, is notorious for its relatively short lifespan and susceptibility to failure if not meticulously maintained, often exhibiting delayed shifts or complete loss of gears. Manual transmissions (M5OD) are generally more robust but can suffer from shifter bushing wear and clutch issues.
The Twin-Traction Beam (TTB) independent front suspension, while offering good articulation off-road, is prone to alignment problems and accelerated tire wear if not regularly serviced. Steering components, such as tie rods and ball joints, also experience typical wear over time. Electrical issues, while generally minor, can include failing power window motors, erratic gauge readings, and problems with dashboard illumination. Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in areas where salt is used on roads. Common rust spots include the frame, rocker panels, wheel arches, and floorboards, which can compromise structural integrity.
Regarding recalls, the Bronco II faced significant scrutiny over its stability. While there weren't widespread mechanical recalls specific to addressing rollover for the 1989 model year in the way modern recalls function, there were numerous warnings and lawsuits regarding its high rollover propensity. Other recalls related to the Bronco II line over its lifespan included issues with the brake system (e.g., master cylinder problems), fuel system components (e.g., fuel tank straps, sending units), and potential fire hazards. Prospective owners should always check the NHTSA database for any applicable recalls and ensure they have been addressed. The overarching long-term reliability depends heavily on prior maintenance, with the engine and transmission being the most critical areas to inspect.
The Twin-Traction Beam (TTB) independent front suspension, while offering good articulation off-road, is prone to alignment problems and accelerated tire wear if not regularly serviced. Steering components, such as tie rods and ball joints, also experience typical wear over time. Electrical issues, while generally minor, can include failing power window motors, erratic gauge readings, and problems with dashboard illumination. Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in areas where salt is used on roads. Common rust spots include the frame, rocker panels, wheel arches, and floorboards, which can compromise structural integrity.
Regarding recalls, the Bronco II faced significant scrutiny over its stability. While there weren't widespread mechanical recalls specific to addressing rollover for the 1989 model year in the way modern recalls function, there were numerous warnings and lawsuits regarding its high rollover propensity. Other recalls related to the Bronco II line over its lifespan included issues with the brake system (e.g., master cylinder problems), fuel system components (e.g., fuel tank straps, sending units), and potential fire hazards. Prospective owners should always check the NHTSA database for any applicable recalls and ensure they have been addressed. The overarching long-term reliability depends heavily on prior maintenance, with the engine and transmission being the most critical areas to inspect.
How long will the 1989 Ford Bronco II last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1989 Ford Bronco II can realistically achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles, providing many years of service—often 10-15+ years as a daily driver or longer as a recreational vehicle. Its body-on-frame construction offers inherent durability, and many components are robust if cared for. However, long-term durability is heavily influenced by how well the known weaknesses are managed. The 2.9L V6 engine's propensity for head issues or the A4LD automatic transmission's reliability can significantly shorten its lifespan without expensive repairs. Rust is perhaps the biggest long-term threat, progressively weakening the chassis and body. Consistent fluid changes, rust prevention, and proactive attention to suspension and brake components are crucial to maximizing its service life. Vehicles with higher mileage often signify that major engine or transmission work has likely already been performed or that the vehicle received exceptional care.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1989 Ford Bronco II, being a vehicle from the late 1980s, offered a very basic suite of built-in technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features by today's standards.
Built-in Tech: Technology was rudimentary. The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, fuel, temperature, and oil pressure. There were no digital displays, onboard computers, or advanced electronic systems. Functionality was purely mechanical or electromechanical.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have offered an AM/FM cassette player. "Premium" sound systems for the era would have involved a few additional speakers but nothing comparable to modern audio setups.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), traction control, stability control, or rearview cameras were entirely absent. Basic power steering and power brakes were common and often standard or optional, greatly assisting in drivability. Cruise control was an optional convenience feature available on XLT and Eddie Bauer trims.
Safety Features: Safety features were limited to essential passive restraints. The Bronco II came equipped with three-point lap and shoulder belts for the front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Airbags were not available in this vehicle; they became more common in the early 1990s. There were no advanced crash protection structures, side-impact beams, or other modern safety enhancements.
Optional Features: Beyond the basic offerings, common optional features included air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, a tilt steering wheel, intermittent windshield wipers, and a rear window defroster.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern standardized crash-test ratings (like those from the IIHS or NHTSA's 5-star rating system) were not conducted for vehicles from this era. The Bronco II's design, with its relatively narrow track width and high center of gravity, was unfortunately associated with a higher propensity for rollovers in certain accident scenarios, which led to significant public and media attention, and later influenced the design of its successor, the Ford Explorer. While no formal "crash test rating" exists in the contemporary sense, its safety profile in rollover incidents was a major concern for consumers and regulators.
Built-in Tech: Technology was rudimentary. The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, fuel, temperature, and oil pressure. There were no digital displays, onboard computers, or advanced electronic systems. Functionality was purely mechanical or electromechanical.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have offered an AM/FM cassette player. "Premium" sound systems for the era would have involved a few additional speakers but nothing comparable to modern audio setups.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), traction control, stability control, or rearview cameras were entirely absent. Basic power steering and power brakes were common and often standard or optional, greatly assisting in drivability. Cruise control was an optional convenience feature available on XLT and Eddie Bauer trims.
Safety Features: Safety features were limited to essential passive restraints. The Bronco II came equipped with three-point lap and shoulder belts for the front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Airbags were not available in this vehicle; they became more common in the early 1990s. There were no advanced crash protection structures, side-impact beams, or other modern safety enhancements.
Optional Features: Beyond the basic offerings, common optional features included air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, a tilt steering wheel, intermittent windshield wipers, and a rear window defroster.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern standardized crash-test ratings (like those from the IIHS or NHTSA's 5-star rating system) were not conducted for vehicles from this era. The Bronco II's design, with its relatively narrow track width and high center of gravity, was unfortunately associated with a higher propensity for rollovers in certain accident scenarios, which led to significant public and media attention, and later influenced the design of its successor, the Ford Explorer. While no formal "crash test rating" exists in the contemporary sense, its safety profile in rollover incidents was a major concern for consumers and regulators.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Ford Bronco II Prices and Market Value
When new in 1989, the Ford Bronco II had a starting MSRP for the base XL model ranging from approximately $13,000 to $15,000. Higher trims like the XLT and Eddie Bauer, especially with options like 4WD, air conditioning, and power accessories, could push the price upwards of $18,000 to $20,000. Like most vehicles, it experienced steep depreciation in its initial years. However, its value has since bottomed out, and now, as a classic or 'youngtimer' SUV, its current used market price is highly condition-dependent. Poor condition or project vehicles can be found for $500-$2,000. Running examples in fair condition typically fetch $2,000-$5,000, while well-maintained, rust-free models in good to excellent shape can command $5,000-$10,000, with exceptionally preserved or restored examples occasionally exceeding that. Factors heavily affecting resale value include the absence of significant rust, documented maintenance history, originality, lower mileage, and the presence of desirable options or the Eddie Bauer trim. Any lingering engine issues or transmission problems severely depress value.
1989 Ford Bronco II Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 1989 Ford Bronco II can be a mixed bag. Insurance costs are generally low due to its age and market value, potentially qualifying for classic car policies. Fuel costs are moderate; with its 15-20 MPG, it's not economical by modern standards but better than full-size SUVs. Maintenance can be reasonably inexpensive if you're DIY-inclined, as many parts are still available and relatively simple to replace. However, major repairs, especially addressing known issues like cylinder head cracks or automatic transmission failures, can be costly. Rust repair can also be a significant expense. If purchased in good condition and diligently maintained, it can be an economical classic. Conversely, a neglected example requiring extensive repairs can become a money pit, making it potentially costly to own in the long run.
1989 Ford Bronco II Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
23.00 gallons
City Mileage
17 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
21 miles/gallon
1989 Ford Bronco II Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1989 Ford Bronco II Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Ford Bronco II is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Ford Bronco II Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1989 Ford Bronco II competed in a burgeoning compact SUV market, directly challenging vehicles like the Jeep Cherokee (XJ), Chevrolet S-10 Blazer/GMC S-15 Jimmy, and the Toyota 4Runner (1st generation).
In terms of Performance, the Bronco II's 2.9L V6 offered comparable power to the S-10 Blazer's 4.3L V6 (though the Blazer's was often more robust) and was generally more powerful than the base engines of the Cherokee. However, the Cherokee's optional 4.0L inline-six, particularly post-1987, often outperformed the Bronco II in both horsepower and torque. The Bronco II's Twin-Traction Beam (TTB) front suspension provided good off-road articulation but could be more complex for alignment than solid axle designs.
Features across all these rivals were quite basic compared to modern standards. The Bronco II, S-10 Blazer, and Cherokee offered similar comfort options like air conditioning, power accessories, and upgraded stereos, largely depending on the trim level. The Cherokee often had a more spacious interior and a more car-like unibody ride, while the Bronco II and Blazer were body-on-frame.
Reliability is where significant distinctions emerge. The Toyota 4Runner of this era is widely regarded as the most reliable, known for its robust engine (22R-E four-cylinder or 3.0L V6) and drivetrain. The Jeep Cherokee (especially with the 4.0L I6) is also considered quite dependable, though it had its own quirks. The Bronco II suffers from the well-documented 2.9L V6 cylinder head issues and often less durable A4LD automatic transmission, placing it below the 4Runner and often the Cherokee in long-term mechanical reliability. The S-10 Blazer/Jimmy had their own common issues, including rust and some electrical gremlins, but often offered more diverse engine options.
Current Price in the used market largely reflects condition and reputation. While all are affordable, well-preserved 1st-gen Toyota 4Runners typically command the highest prices. The Bronco II, S-10 Blazer, and Cherokee are generally more budget-friendly, though rust-free, well-maintained examples of any can fetch a premium.
Recommended Alternatives:
In terms of Performance, the Bronco II's 2.9L V6 offered comparable power to the S-10 Blazer's 4.3L V6 (though the Blazer's was often more robust) and was generally more powerful than the base engines of the Cherokee. However, the Cherokee's optional 4.0L inline-six, particularly post-1987, often outperformed the Bronco II in both horsepower and torque. The Bronco II's Twin-Traction Beam (TTB) front suspension provided good off-road articulation but could be more complex for alignment than solid axle designs.
Features across all these rivals were quite basic compared to modern standards. The Bronco II, S-10 Blazer, and Cherokee offered similar comfort options like air conditioning, power accessories, and upgraded stereos, largely depending on the trim level. The Cherokee often had a more spacious interior and a more car-like unibody ride, while the Bronco II and Blazer were body-on-frame.
Reliability is where significant distinctions emerge. The Toyota 4Runner of this era is widely regarded as the most reliable, known for its robust engine (22R-E four-cylinder or 3.0L V6) and drivetrain. The Jeep Cherokee (especially with the 4.0L I6) is also considered quite dependable, though it had its own quirks. The Bronco II suffers from the well-documented 2.9L V6 cylinder head issues and often less durable A4LD automatic transmission, placing it below the 4Runner and often the Cherokee in long-term mechanical reliability. The S-10 Blazer/Jimmy had their own common issues, including rust and some electrical gremlins, but often offered more diverse engine options.
Current Price in the used market largely reflects condition and reputation. While all are affordable, well-preserved 1st-gen Toyota 4Runners typically command the highest prices. The Bronco II, S-10 Blazer, and Cherokee are generally more budget-friendly, though rust-free, well-maintained examples of any can fetch a premium.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Better (Reliability/Safety): For superior long-term reliability and a more robust build, the Toyota 4Runner (1st Gen) is often the gold standard. For a generally more capable and potentially safer (due to wider stance) alternative with strong engine options, a Jeep Cherokee (XJ), particularly 1987-1996 models with the 4.0L inline-six, would be a strong contender.
- Similar: The Chevrolet S-10 Blazer / GMC S-15 Jimmy offers a very similar compact SUV experience with comparable performance and features, though with its own set of known issues.
- Successor/Safer Alternative: If rollover concerns are paramount, its successor, the Ford Explorer (introduced in 1991), provided a wider, more stable platform and improved safety features, albeit in a slightly larger package.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Ford Bronco II a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1989 Ford Bronco II is ideal for specific niche buyers: classic SUV enthusiasts, budget-conscious individuals seeking a vintage 4x4 for light off-roading or as a secondary vehicle, and those with a strong sense of nostalgia or a penchant for DIY mechanics. It's worth buying, but only under very specific conditions, as it comes with well-documented safety and reliability caveats. It's exclusively available used.
Prospective owners must prioritize finding an example that is as rust-free as possible, has a thoroughly documented maintenance history, and ideally has already addressed or shows no signs of the common 2.9L V6 engine issues. Higher trims like the XLT or Eddie Bauer offer more comfort. Buyers must be aware of its inherent rollover risk and drive accordingly. For those who understand its limitations, are prepared for regular maintenance, and appreciate its rugged charm, the Bronco II can be a rewarding and affordable classic. It is not recommended for anyone seeking a primary, low-maintenance daily driver without significant investment.
Prospective owners must prioritize finding an example that is as rust-free as possible, has a thoroughly documented maintenance history, and ideally has already addressed or shows no signs of the common 2.9L V6 engine issues. Higher trims like the XLT or Eddie Bauer offer more comfort. Buyers must be aware of its inherent rollover risk and drive accordingly. For those who understand its limitations, are prepared for regular maintenance, and appreciate its rugged charm, the Bronco II can be a rewarding and affordable classic. It is not recommended for anyone seeking a primary, low-maintenance daily driver without significant investment.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.