The 1996 Ford Escort, part of the fifth generation (1991-1996), was a popular compact car known for its affordability and practicality. Available as a sedan, wagon, and hatchback, key trims included the LX, SE, and the sportier GT. Its widespread availability and value proposition made it a common sight and a favored choice for budget-conscious buyers seeking reliable transportation.
The Good
The 1996 Escort offered commendable fuel efficiency and a surprisingly smooth ride for its class. Its straightforward design appealed to those seeking simplicity, while its low purchase price and reasonable running costs made it a financially sound choice for many. It provided a sense of dependable, no-frills mobility.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of common issues such as transmission problems, particularly with automatic transmissions. Rust can be a significant concern, especially in the rocker panels and wheel wells. Electrical gremlins and interior wear and tear are also areas to inspect carefully.
1996 Ford Escort: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1996 Ford Escort primarily featured two engine options. The base engine was typically a 1.9-liter inline-four, while a more powerful 2.0-liter inline-four was available, especially in sportier trims.
- Horsepower: The 1.9-liter engine generally produced around 88 horsepower, while the 2.0-liter engine, often found in the GT model, offered approximately 118 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy was a strong suit for the Escort. Expect figures in the range of 25-30 MPG in the city and 30-35 MPG on the highway, depending on the engine and transmission combination.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was modest. With the base engine, 0-60 mph times were generally in the 11-13 second range. The GT model could achieve this in closer to 9-10 seconds.
- Towing Capacity: The Ford Escort was not designed for towing. It did not have a factory-specified towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
- LX: The base trim, offering essential features like power steering, intermittent wipers, and a basic AM/FM stereo. Air conditioning was often optional.
- SE: Added a few more amenities over the LX, potentially including upgraded interior fabrics, a tachometer, and power windows/locks on some models.
- GT: Positioned as the sportier option, the GT typically came with the more powerful 2.0-liter engine, sport-tuned suspension, alloy wheels, fog lights, and distinctive interior accents.
1996 Ford Escort Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1996 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Escort |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Mexico |
| Manufacturing City | HERMOSILLO |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2539 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 52.50 inches |
| Overall Length | 170.00 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.70 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 98.40 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.8L I4 |
| Engine Size | 1.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,205 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1996 Ford Escort Have?
The 1996 Ford Escort, like many vehicles of its era, had its share of common issues that owners reported over time. A prevalent concern was with the automatic transmission, which could exhibit erratic shifting, slippage, or complete failure, especially at higher mileage. Manual transmissions were generally more robust but could still experience clutch wear.
Another significant concern for the 1996 model year, and indeed for many Escorts of this generation, was susceptibility to rust. Areas like the rocker panels, wheel wells, and rear quarter panels were particularly prone to corrosion, especially in regions with harsh winters or high humidity. This could compromise structural integrity and lead to costly repairs.
Electrical issues were also not uncommon. Owners sometimes reported problems with the power windows, power locks, and interior lighting. The instrument cluster could also develop faults. The cooling system, including radiators and water pumps, sometimes required attention. Engine performance could be affected by issues with the ignition system, such as spark plugs, coils, or distributor components.
While there weren't any widespread, major recalls that defined the 1996 model year as particularly problematic, individual vehicles could suffer from specific component failures. Long-term reliability varied greatly depending on maintenance. Vehicles that received regular oil changes, fluid checks, and timely repairs tended to fare better than those neglected. However, even well-maintained examples could still be susceptible to the inherent weaknesses of the design, particularly regarding transmission longevity and rust.
Another significant concern for the 1996 model year, and indeed for many Escorts of this generation, was susceptibility to rust. Areas like the rocker panels, wheel wells, and rear quarter panels were particularly prone to corrosion, especially in regions with harsh winters or high humidity. This could compromise structural integrity and lead to costly repairs.
Electrical issues were also not uncommon. Owners sometimes reported problems with the power windows, power locks, and interior lighting. The instrument cluster could also develop faults. The cooling system, including radiators and water pumps, sometimes required attention. Engine performance could be affected by issues with the ignition system, such as spark plugs, coils, or distributor components.
While there weren't any widespread, major recalls that defined the 1996 model year as particularly problematic, individual vehicles could suffer from specific component failures. Long-term reliability varied greatly depending on maintenance. Vehicles that received regular oil changes, fluid checks, and timely repairs tended to fare better than those neglected. However, even well-maintained examples could still be susceptible to the inherent weaknesses of the design, particularly regarding transmission longevity and rust.
How long will the 1996 Ford Escort last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance, a well-maintained 1996 Ford Escort could reasonably be expected to reach between 150,000 and 200,000 miles. Some diligent owners have reported even higher mileage, exceeding 250,000 miles. However, this longevity is heavily contingent on consistent and proactive maintenance. The primary weaknesses that tend to limit long-term durability are the automatic transmission and the vehicle's susceptibility to rust. Without regular fluid changes and addressing any early signs of transmission issues, failure is more likely. Similarly, failure to address rust prevention and treatment can significantly shorten the vehicle's lifespan, particularly in corrosive environments. Over time, minor electrical components can also become more prone to failure.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1996 Ford Escort offered a relatively basic suite of technology and safety features, consistent with its entry-level compact car positioning.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have included a cassette player or, in some cases, a CD player, though these were less common. Speaker quality was generally adequate for the time but not high-fidelity.
Driver-Assistance Features: In 1996, advanced driver-assistance systems as we know them today were virtually non-existent. Features like cruise control were available on some higher trims and were considered a significant convenience. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were also an optional, but increasingly popular, safety feature, particularly beneficial for enhanced braking control in slippery conditions.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included seat belts and airbags for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact door beams were also incorporated for occupant protection. The availability of ABS significantly enhanced the vehicle's safety profile.
Crash-Test Ratings: In terms of crash-test performance, the 1996 Ford Escort received mixed results from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For side impacts, it generally performed acceptably, often earning three out of five stars. Frontal impact ratings were also typically in the three-star range for the driver and front passenger. It's important to note that crash-testing methodologies and standards have evolved significantly since 1996, so these ratings should be viewed within the context of their time.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have included a cassette player or, in some cases, a CD player, though these were less common. Speaker quality was generally adequate for the time but not high-fidelity.
Driver-Assistance Features: In 1996, advanced driver-assistance systems as we know them today were virtually non-existent. Features like cruise control were available on some higher trims and were considered a significant convenience. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were also an optional, but increasingly popular, safety feature, particularly beneficial for enhanced braking control in slippery conditions.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included seat belts and airbags for the driver and front passenger. Side-impact door beams were also incorporated for occupant protection. The availability of ABS significantly enhanced the vehicle's safety profile.
Crash-Test Ratings: In terms of crash-test performance, the 1996 Ford Escort received mixed results from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For side impacts, it generally performed acceptably, often earning three out of five stars. Frontal impact ratings were also typically in the three-star range for the driver and front passenger. It's important to note that crash-testing methodologies and standards have evolved significantly since 1996, so these ratings should be viewed within the context of their time.
What Colors Options are Available?
1996 Ford Escort Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1996 Ford Escort typically had a base price ranging from approximately $11,000 to $13,000 for sedan and hatchback models, with the wagon and GT trims commanding slightly higher prices, potentially up to $15,000.
Currently, on the used market, the 1996 Ford Escort can be found for very affordable prices, often ranging from $1,000 to $3,000, with exceptionally well-maintained or low-mileage examples fetching slightly more. The vehicle has undergone significant depreciation, as is typical for mass-market compact cars from that era. Factors affecting resale value include its overall condition, mileage, the presence of rust, and whether maintenance records are available. A clean title and good mechanical health are paramount for maximizing its limited resale value.
Currently, on the used market, the 1996 Ford Escort can be found for very affordable prices, often ranging from $1,000 to $3,000, with exceptionally well-maintained or low-mileage examples fetching slightly more. The vehicle has undergone significant depreciation, as is typical for mass-market compact cars from that era. Factors affecting resale value include its overall condition, mileage, the presence of rust, and whether maintenance records are available. A clean title and good mechanical health are paramount for maximizing its limited resale value.
1996 Ford Escort Cost of Ownership
The 1996 Ford Escort is generally an economical vehicle to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and low market value. Fuel consumption is also a strong point, making it inexpensive to run daily. Maintenance and repair costs are generally modest, as parts are widely available and labor is often affordable for common issues. However, major repairs, such as transmission replacement or significant rust repair, could quickly outweigh the initial purchase price. Overall, for routine use and diligent maintenance, it remains a cost-effective transportation solution.
1996 Ford Escort Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
13.20 gallons
City Mileage
23 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
29 miles/gallon
1996 Ford Escort Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1996 Ford Escort Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1996 Ford Escort Insurance
Insurance for a 1996 Ford Escort is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1996 Ford Escort Compare to Other Hatchback?
The 1996 Ford Escort competed directly with other popular compact cars of its era, such as the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Nissan Sentra, and Chevrolet Cavalier.
Performance: Compared to rivals like the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, the Escort's performance, especially with the base engine, was often considered less refined and less peppy. The GT trim offered a more engaging driving experience but still lagged behind sportier trims of some competitors.
Features: In terms of features, the Escort was generally on par with its contemporaries. Basic amenities like power steering and airbags were common across the segment. However, Japanese competitors like the Civic and Corolla often offered slightly better build quality and a more comprehensive list of standard or optional features on higher trims.
Reliability: This is where the Escort often faltered compared to its Japanese rivals. The Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla had, and continue to have, a sterling reputation for long-term reliability and durability. While the Escort could be reliable with good maintenance, it was more prone to issues, particularly with its automatic transmission and rust, than its Japanese counterparts. The Chevrolet Cavalier was a more direct American competitor and offered similar levels of reliability and potential issues.
Price: The Escort's primary advantage was its price. It was often one of the most affordable options in its class when new, and this trend continues on the used market, making it a budget-friendly choice.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing reliability and refinement, the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla from the same era are often considered superior choices, though they may command higher used prices. If a similar price point is the main concern, the Chevrolet Cavalier or Pontiac Sunfire are comparable American alternatives, though they share some similar reliability concerns. The Nissan Sentra also falls into this category, offering a decent balance of price and features.
Performance: Compared to rivals like the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, the Escort's performance, especially with the base engine, was often considered less refined and less peppy. The GT trim offered a more engaging driving experience but still lagged behind sportier trims of some competitors.
Features: In terms of features, the Escort was generally on par with its contemporaries. Basic amenities like power steering and airbags were common across the segment. However, Japanese competitors like the Civic and Corolla often offered slightly better build quality and a more comprehensive list of standard or optional features on higher trims.
Reliability: This is where the Escort often faltered compared to its Japanese rivals. The Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla had, and continue to have, a sterling reputation for long-term reliability and durability. While the Escort could be reliable with good maintenance, it was more prone to issues, particularly with its automatic transmission and rust, than its Japanese counterparts. The Chevrolet Cavalier was a more direct American competitor and offered similar levels of reliability and potential issues.
Price: The Escort's primary advantage was its price. It was often one of the most affordable options in its class when new, and this trend continues on the used market, making it a budget-friendly choice.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing reliability and refinement, the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla from the same era are often considered superior choices, though they may command higher used prices. If a similar price point is the main concern, the Chevrolet Cavalier or Pontiac Sunfire are comparable American alternatives, though they share some similar reliability concerns. The Nissan Sentra also falls into this category, offering a decent balance of price and features.
Final Verdict: Is the 1996 Ford Escort a Good Hatchback?
The 1996 Ford Escort is ideal for budget-conscious buyers who need basic, economical transportation and are comfortable with potentially performing or sourcing their own maintenance. It is worth buying if found in good condition with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history, especially for someone seeking a first car or a utilitarian vehicle for short commutes.
It is best purchased used, as finding a new one is impossible. The GT trim offers a more engaging driving experience for those who can find one. However, buyers prioritizing long-term reliability and minimal repair headaches might be better served by looking at Japanese competitors from the same era like the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla, even if they come at a slightly higher cost. The Escort is a utilitarian choice where affordability is the primary driver.
It is best purchased used, as finding a new one is impossible. The GT trim offers a more engaging driving experience for those who can find one. However, buyers prioritizing long-term reliability and minimal repair headaches might be better served by looking at Japanese competitors from the same era like the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla, even if they come at a slightly higher cost. The Escort is a utilitarian choice where affordability is the primary driver.