The Good
The 2010 Land Rover LR2 provides a blend of practicality and emotional appeal. Its off-road capability, a Land Rover hallmark, is a key advantage, appealing to adventurous buyers. Comfortable seating and a well-designed interior offer a pleasant driving experience. For practical buyers, it offers reasonable cargo space and a relatively affordable price point compared to other luxury SUVs. Good performance for its class with decent power.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses of the 2010 Land Rover LR2 include its reliability record, which is not as strong as some competitors. Owners should watch out for potential issues with the electrical system, including the infotainment system and various sensors. Also, the fuel economy isn't great, and repairs can be expensive due to the Land Rover brand and potential need for specialized service.
2010 Land Rover LR2: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: 3.2-liter inline-6 cylinder
- Horsepower: 230 hp @ 6300 rpm
- Fuel Economy: 15 mpg city / 22 mpg highway (EPA estimated)
- 0-60 Times: Approximately 8.4 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Up to 3,500 lbs (when properly equipped)
- Trim-Level Features:
S:- Cloth upholstery
- Single-zone manual climate control
- Power windows and locks
- CD player with auxiliary input
- 17-inch alloy wheels
- Hill Descent Control
SE (adds to S):- Leather upholstery
- Dual-zone automatic climate control
- Power-adjustable front seats
- Sunroof
- Rain-sensing wipers
- Rear parking sensors
HSE (adds to SE):- Premium leather upholstery
- Heated front seats
- Upgraded sound system
- Xenon headlights
- 18-inch alloy wheels
- Navigation system (optional)
2010 Land Rover LR2 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2010 |
| Make | Land Rover |
| Model | LR2 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturing City | HALEWOOD |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4255 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 5520 pounds |
| Overall Height | 68.50 inches |
| Overall Length | 177.10 inches |
| Overall Width | 75.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 104.70 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3.2-L L-6 DOHC 24V |
| Engine Size | 3.2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $35,500 |
| Invoice Price | $32,305 |
| Delivery Charges | $850 |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2010 Land Rover LR2 Have?
Regarding recalls, it's essential to check the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) website for any outstanding recalls related to the specific VIN of the vehicle in question. Long-term reliability can be a concern, particularly as the vehicle ages. Proper maintenance, including regular fluid changes and addressing issues promptly, is crucial to extending the lifespan of the LR2. Suspension components and drivetrain parts may require attention as the vehicle accumulates mileage. Rust can also be an issue in regions with harsh winters and road salt.
How long will the 2010 Land Rover LR2 last?
Long-term durability weaknesses often involve the electrical system, as previously mentioned. Suspension components may wear out over time, requiring replacement. The transmission is generally reliable if properly maintained with fluid changes, but it can become a significant expense if neglected. Rust can also become a problem, especially in colder climates. The engine itself is generally robust but requires regular servicing.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
In terms of safety, the LR2 came standard with antilock brakes, stability control, traction control, and a full complement of airbags (front, side, and curtain). Hill Descent Control was also standard, aiding in off-road driving. Rear parking sensors were available on the SE and HSE trims.
Driver-assistance features were limited compared to modern vehicles. There was no adaptive cruise control or lane departure warning systems offered. Crash-test ratings from the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) and NHTSA should be consulted for a more detailed assessment of the vehicle's safety performance. Generally, the LR2 performed reasonably well in crash tests for its era. It's important to remember that safety technology has advanced significantly since 2010.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2010 Land Rover LR2 Prices and Market Value
The LR2 has experienced significant depreciation due to its age, reliability concerns, and higher maintenance costs compared to some competitors. Factors affecting resale value include the vehicle's condition (especially mechanical and electrical), mileage, service history, and geographical location (demand for SUVs in certain areas). A well-maintained LR2 with a clean title will command a higher price.
2010 Land Rover LR2 Cost of Ownership
2010 Land Rover LR2 Fuel Efficiency
2010 Land Rover LR2 Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2010 Land Rover LR2 Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
2010 Land Rover LR2 Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2010 Land Rover LR2 Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
Feature-wise, the LR2 offers a decent array of amenities for its time, especially in the higher trims. However, it might lack some of the advanced technology found in rivals like the Acura RDX.
Reliability is where the LR2 falls short. The Acura RDX and Lexus RX (though slightly larger) are significantly more reliable. The BMW X3 and Audi Q5 also tend to have better reliability ratings. The Volvo XC60 offers a similar level of luxury and safety features but may also have comparable reliability concerns.
Price-wise, the LR2 is generally more affordable on the used market than the BMW X3 or Audi Q5, but its higher potential maintenance costs can offset that advantage. Alternatives to the LR2 include the Acura RDX (for reliability and features), the Volvo XC60 (for safety and a similar driving experience), and potentially a slightly older Lexus RX (for bulletproof reliability). For someone prioritizing off-road capability in a small package, the LR2 holds its own; otherwise, there are generally better choices.
Ranks #1590 SUV
| 1 | 2023 Toyota 4Runner | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Lexus GX | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2024 Mazda CX-90 PHEV | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2024 Subaru Crosstrek | (5.0★) |
| 6 | 2024 BMW iX | (0.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Ford Bronco Sport | (3.0★) |
| 8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2024 Chevrolet Trax | (5.0★) |
| 10 | 2023 Audi A4 allroad | (0.0★) |
| 11 | 2023 Hyundai Kona N | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2023 Nissan ARIYA | (5.0★) |
| 1590 | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | (0.0★) |