The 1984 Volvo 240 is a sturdy and practical car with roots stretching back to the 1970s. Available as a sedan, wagon, and a less common coupe, the 240 series was produced from 1980 through 1993. Key trims often included the base 240, the GL, and the DL. Its popularity stemmed from its legendary durability, spacious interior, and distinctive, boxy European design. It represented a commitment to safety and longevity, a hallmark of Volvo.
The Good
The 1984 Volvo 240 excels in reliability, with its robust engineering promising years of service. Its comfortable and spacious interior caters to practical needs, while its iconic, no-nonsense design appeals to those who value timeless style. Performance is steady, and for many, its enduring value makes it an emotionally satisfying, trustworthy companion.
The Bad
When considering a 1984 Volvo 240, watch out for potential rust, especially around wheel arches and the rocker panels. Electrical gremlins, particularly with aging wiring harnesses and components, can arise. The automatic transmission can sometimes be a weak point, and engine performance, while adequate, is not exhilarating. Regular maintenance is key to mitigating these issues.
1984 Volvo 240: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1984 Volvo 240 primarily came with a 2.3-liter inline-four engine. This was typically the B23F, a fuel-injected variant. In some markets, carbureted versions (like the B230A) might have been available, though less common for 1984.
- Horsepower: The fuel-injected B23F engine generally produced around 114 horsepower. Earlier or carbureted versions might have had slightly lower figures.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for the 1984 Volvo 240 was respectable for its era, typically ranging from 18-22 miles per gallon in combined city/highway driving. This could vary based on driving style, transmission (manual generally better), and specific engine tune.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was not a strong suit of the Volvo 240. 0-60 mph times were generally in the 10-12 second range, depending on the transmission and driver.
- Towing Capacity: The Volvo 240 was not designed with significant towing capacity in mind. While it could technically tow light trailers, dedicated towing specifications were not a prominent feature or recommendation.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base 240: Offered essential features, including manual windows, basic cloth upholstery, and a standard heating system.
- DL Trim: Often included power windows, power door locks, a more upgraded interior fabric, and sometimes power steering (though also available on base).
- GL Trim: Represented the higher end, often featuring leatherette or full leather upholstery, alloy wheels, cruise control, air conditioning, and a premium sound system.
- Wagon Variants: All trims, especially in wagon form, benefited from a spacious cargo area, rear-facing third-row jump seats (in some configurations), and durable interior materials.
1984 Volvo 240 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1984 |
| Make | Volvo |
| Model | 240 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Sweden |
| Manufacturing City | HALIFAX |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.4-L V-6 Diesel |
| Engine Size | 2.4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1984 Volvo 240 Have?
The 1984 Volvo 240 is renowned for its overall long-term reliability, a testament to its robust build. However, like any aging vehicle, it has common areas that owners should monitor. One of the most frequently reported issues revolves around electrical systems. This can manifest as intermittent problems with headlights, power windows, door locks, or the instrument cluster. The wiring harnesses, due to age and heat, can become brittle and prone to failure. Specifically, issues with the fuse box and relays are not uncommon.
Rust is another significant concern, particularly in climates with heavy road salt use. Areas prone to corrosion include the lower door panels, rocker panels, wheel arches, and the battery tray. Thorough inspection of these areas is crucial when buying a used 240. The cooling system can also require attention; radiator leaks, worn hoses, and failing water pumps are typical maintenance items that can lead to overheating if neglected.
The fuel injection system, while generally reliable, can develop issues with fuel pumps, injectors, and the airflow meter over time. Symptoms might include rough idling, hesitation, or poor fuel economy. The automatic transmission, while often durable, can eventually experience wear, leading to slipping or delayed shifts. Manual transmissions are generally more robust.
Recalls for the 1984 model year are less frequent than for some other manufacturers, reflecting Volvo's focus on safety and durability. However, any recalls that were issued would have addressed specific safety concerns related to braking, emissions, or other critical systems. It's advisable to check with Volvo or a reputable dealer for any outstanding recall information for a specific VIN. Overall, while individual components can fail due to age, the fundamental mechanical structure of the Volvo 240 is exceptionally sound and can be kept running with consistent maintenance. There are no widespread, model-year-specific catastrophic failures commonly reported, rather a series of age-related wear-and-tear issues.
Rust is another significant concern, particularly in climates with heavy road salt use. Areas prone to corrosion include the lower door panels, rocker panels, wheel arches, and the battery tray. Thorough inspection of these areas is crucial when buying a used 240. The cooling system can also require attention; radiator leaks, worn hoses, and failing water pumps are typical maintenance items that can lead to overheating if neglected.
The fuel injection system, while generally reliable, can develop issues with fuel pumps, injectors, and the airflow meter over time. Symptoms might include rough idling, hesitation, or poor fuel economy. The automatic transmission, while often durable, can eventually experience wear, leading to slipping or delayed shifts. Manual transmissions are generally more robust.
Recalls for the 1984 model year are less frequent than for some other manufacturers, reflecting Volvo's focus on safety and durability. However, any recalls that were issued would have addressed specific safety concerns related to braking, emissions, or other critical systems. It's advisable to check with Volvo or a reputable dealer for any outstanding recall information for a specific VIN. Overall, while individual components can fail due to age, the fundamental mechanical structure of the Volvo 240 is exceptionally sound and can be kept running with consistent maintenance. There are no widespread, model-year-specific catastrophic failures commonly reported, rather a series of age-related wear-and-tear issues.
How long will the 1984 Volvo 240 last?
The 1984 Volvo 240 is legendary for its longevity. It's not uncommon for these vehicles, with diligent maintenance, to reach 200,000 to 300,000 miles, and even surpass 400,000 miles in some instances. The core of the car's durability lies in its robust drivetrain, solid unibody construction, and relatively simple mechanicals. Weaknesses that emerge over time are typically wear-and-tear items rather than fundamental design flaws. For example, the fuel injection system, while complex for its era, is generally serviceable. The primary determinant of its lifespan is the owner's commitment to regular oil changes, coolant flushes, and addressing minor issues before they become major problems. The biggest enemies over time are rust and neglect. With proper care, a 1984 Volvo 240 can provide reliable service for decades.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1984 Volvo 240, by modern standards, is quite basic in terms of technology. Its focus was on core functionality and safety, rather than cutting-edge electronics.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an analog AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. Some higher trims might have featured a slightly more advanced stereo system with more speakers. Power windows and locks were often optional or standard on higher trims (DL, GL), but manual crank windows were common on base models. Air conditioning was a popular option, as was cruise control. The dashboard featured traditional analog gauges for speed, tachometer (on some models), fuel level, and engine temperature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were non-existent. The focus was on predictable handling and driver control. Features like anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not standard or widely available on the 1984 240. Power steering was common, making maneuvering easier, and most models came with rear-wheel drive.
Safety Features: This is where the Volvo 240 truly shone. Volvo was a pioneer in automotive safety, and the 240 was a prime example. Standard safety features included a very strong, reinforced steel unibody construction, designed to create a protective safety cage. It also featured a collapsible steering column, three-point seatbelts (a rarity in the US for rear passengers in earlier years, but standard by the mid-80s), reinforced side-impact beams in the doors, and a robust braking system. Head restraints for all occupants were also a key safety feature. While formal crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS in their current detailed format were not as prevalent for the 1984 model year as they are today, the Volvo 240 consistently performed well in independent and internal Volvo safety tests of the era, often cited for its structural integrity and occupant protection compared to its contemporaries. Volvo's own "concept of safety" was heavily integrated into the 240's design, making it one of the safest cars available when new.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an analog AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. Some higher trims might have featured a slightly more advanced stereo system with more speakers. Power windows and locks were often optional or standard on higher trims (DL, GL), but manual crank windows were common on base models. Air conditioning was a popular option, as was cruise control. The dashboard featured traditional analog gauges for speed, tachometer (on some models), fuel level, and engine temperature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were non-existent. The focus was on predictable handling and driver control. Features like anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not standard or widely available on the 1984 240. Power steering was common, making maneuvering easier, and most models came with rear-wheel drive.
Safety Features: This is where the Volvo 240 truly shone. Volvo was a pioneer in automotive safety, and the 240 was a prime example. Standard safety features included a very strong, reinforced steel unibody construction, designed to create a protective safety cage. It also featured a collapsible steering column, three-point seatbelts (a rarity in the US for rear passengers in earlier years, but standard by the mid-80s), reinforced side-impact beams in the doors, and a robust braking system. Head restraints for all occupants were also a key safety feature. While formal crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS in their current detailed format were not as prevalent for the 1984 model year as they are today, the Volvo 240 consistently performed well in independent and internal Volvo safety tests of the era, often cited for its structural integrity and occupant protection compared to its contemporaries. Volvo's own "concept of safety" was heavily integrated into the 240's design, making it one of the safest cars available when new.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1984 Volvo 240 Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1984 Volvo 240 typically ranged from approximately $10,000 to $15,000 depending on the body style (sedan, wagon) and trim level (DL, GL). Wagons generally commanded a higher price.
In the current used market, prices for a 1984 Volvo 240 vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and maintenance history. You can find well-maintained examples in good condition for $3,000 to $7,000. Projects or cars with higher mileage might be available for under $2,000. Enthusiast-maintained or exceptionally preserved low-mileage examples could fetch upwards of $8,000.
Depreciation on the Volvo 240 was relatively moderate compared to many other cars of its era, due to its reputation for durability. Resale value is primarily influenced by rust, the condition of the engine and transmission, and overall cosmetic appearance. A car free of rust and with comprehensive maintenance records will always command a higher price. They are considered a value proposition for buyers seeking reliable, no-frills transportation.
In the current used market, prices for a 1984 Volvo 240 vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and maintenance history. You can find well-maintained examples in good condition for $3,000 to $7,000. Projects or cars with higher mileage might be available for under $2,000. Enthusiast-maintained or exceptionally preserved low-mileage examples could fetch upwards of $8,000.
Depreciation on the Volvo 240 was relatively moderate compared to many other cars of its era, due to its reputation for durability. Resale value is primarily influenced by rust, the condition of the engine and transmission, and overall cosmetic appearance. A car free of rust and with comprehensive maintenance records will always command a higher price. They are considered a value proposition for buyers seeking reliable, no-frills transportation.
1984 Volvo 240 Cost of Ownership
The 1984 Volvo 240 is generally an economical vehicle to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and safety features, though classic car insurance can be an option. Fuel costs are moderate, with fuel economy in the 18-22 MPG range. Maintenance is relatively straightforward and affordable, with many parts readily available. Standard maintenance like oil changes and tune-ups are inexpensive. Repair costs can be low for common issues, as mechanics are familiar with the platform, and parts are abundant. However, specialized repairs or rust remediation can increase costs. Overall, the 240 is a cost-effective car for long-term ownership, provided it is maintained consistently.
1984 Volvo 240 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1984 Volvo 240 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1984 Volvo 240 Insurance
Insurance for a 1984 Volvo 240 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1984 Volvo 240 Compare to Other Sedan?
The 1984 Volvo 240 competed in a segment of sturdy, practical sedans and wagons. Key rivals included cars like the Mercedes-Benz W123 (and its successor, the W124), the BMW 3 Series (E30), and American offerings such as the Ford LTD Country Squire (wagon) or Chevrolet Celebrity.
Performance: In this comparison, the Volvo 240 was never the performance leader. The BMW 3 Series (E30) offered significantly more dynamic handling and punchier engines. Mercedes-Benz also provided more refined performance. The Volvo's engine was focused on durability rather than speed, with 0-60 mph times languishing in the double digits.
Features: Feature sets varied. Luxury rivals like Mercedes-Benz and BMW often offered more advanced comfort and convenience features, and more sophisticated interior materials. American offerings sometimes boasted more creature comforts for the price, though often at the expense of build quality. The Volvo 240 was functional and safe, with features like optional air conditioning and power accessories, but lacked the technological frills of some competitors.
Reliability: This is where the Volvo 240 truly excelled and stood out. While Mercedes-Benz cars were also known for durability, the Volvo 240 was often seen as more accessible and less expensive to maintain over the long haul. Its mechanical simplicity and robust construction meant that, with regular care, it could outlast many of its contemporaries. Many E30 BMWs and even some Mercedes models require more specialized and costly maintenance. American cars of this era generally lagged far behind the European stalwarts in long-term mechanical reliability.
Price: The Volvo 240 was generally priced competitively, often sitting between the more affordable American options and the premium European brands like BMW and Mercedes-Benz. It offered a strong value proposition for its blend of durability and safety.
Alternatives:
* Similar: For those prioritizing robust build and straightforward functionality, a well-maintained Mercedes-Benz W123 (if available and affordable) is a strong contender, though likely more expensive. A later model year Volvo 740/940 offers a similar ethos with more refined styling.
* Better (for performance/driving dynamics): If driving engagement is key, a BMW 3 Series (E30) is superior, but expect higher maintenance costs and potential reliability issues.
* Better (for modern tech): For contemporary features and potentially better fuel efficiency, one would look at much newer vehicles, but they would sacrifice the inherent simplicity and legendary durability of the 240.
Performance: In this comparison, the Volvo 240 was never the performance leader. The BMW 3 Series (E30) offered significantly more dynamic handling and punchier engines. Mercedes-Benz also provided more refined performance. The Volvo's engine was focused on durability rather than speed, with 0-60 mph times languishing in the double digits.
Features: Feature sets varied. Luxury rivals like Mercedes-Benz and BMW often offered more advanced comfort and convenience features, and more sophisticated interior materials. American offerings sometimes boasted more creature comforts for the price, though often at the expense of build quality. The Volvo 240 was functional and safe, with features like optional air conditioning and power accessories, but lacked the technological frills of some competitors.
Reliability: This is where the Volvo 240 truly excelled and stood out. While Mercedes-Benz cars were also known for durability, the Volvo 240 was often seen as more accessible and less expensive to maintain over the long haul. Its mechanical simplicity and robust construction meant that, with regular care, it could outlast many of its contemporaries. Many E30 BMWs and even some Mercedes models require more specialized and costly maintenance. American cars of this era generally lagged far behind the European stalwarts in long-term mechanical reliability.
Price: The Volvo 240 was generally priced competitively, often sitting between the more affordable American options and the premium European brands like BMW and Mercedes-Benz. It offered a strong value proposition for its blend of durability and safety.
Alternatives:
* Similar: For those prioritizing robust build and straightforward functionality, a well-maintained Mercedes-Benz W123 (if available and affordable) is a strong contender, though likely more expensive. A later model year Volvo 740/940 offers a similar ethos with more refined styling.
* Better (for performance/driving dynamics): If driving engagement is key, a BMW 3 Series (E30) is superior, but expect higher maintenance costs and potential reliability issues.
* Better (for modern tech): For contemporary features and potentially better fuel efficiency, one would look at much newer vehicles, but they would sacrifice the inherent simplicity and legendary durability of the 240.
Final Verdict: Is the 1984 Volvo 240 a Good Sedan?
The 1984 Volvo 240 is ideal for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing durability, safety, and practicality over performance or cutting-edge technology. It's an excellent choice for new drivers, small families, or anyone seeking a dependable workhorse that's relatively inexpensive to maintain and insure.
It is absolutely worth buying, especially on the used market, provided it has been reasonably well-maintained. Look for examples with minimal rust and a documented service history. Avoid cars with significant electrical issues or transmission problems, as these can become costly. The wagon version is particularly versatile. While never sold new in 1984, its spirit lives on in the used market as a fantastic value for those who appreciate its no-nonsense engineering and enduring appeal. A 1984 model offers a solid entry into the classic Volvo experience.
It is absolutely worth buying, especially on the used market, provided it has been reasonably well-maintained. Look for examples with minimal rust and a documented service history. Avoid cars with significant electrical issues or transmission problems, as these can become costly. The wagon version is particularly versatile. While never sold new in 1984, its spirit lives on in the used market as a fantastic value for those who appreciate its no-nonsense engineering and enduring appeal. A 1984 model offers a solid entry into the classic Volvo experience.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.