New, it ranged from approximately $20,000 to $25,000. Its blend of Swedish safety with a smaller, more affordable package made it a popular choice for families and safety-conscious buyers.
The Good
The 2003 Volvo S40 offers a comfortable ride and a reputation for safety, appealing to practical buyers. Its distinctively Volvo design and available turbocharged engine can evoke an emotional connection. It provides decent fuel efficiency and, as a used car, represents good value for its price, offering a taste of luxury and safety at an affordable cost.
The Bad
The 2003 Volvo S40 can suffer from electrical issues and problems with the climate control system. Suspension components and bushings tend to wear out, leading to a less comfortable ride. Some owners have also reported issues with the automatic transmission. Regular maintenance is crucial to avoid costly repairs.
2003 Volvo S40: Quick Overview
Here's a summary of the key specs for the 2003 Volvo S40:
- Engine Options:
- 2.0L Inline-4 (naturally aspirated)
- 1.9L Inline-4 Turbocharged (T5)
- Horsepower:
- 2.0L: Approximately 160 hp
- 1.9L Turbo: Approximately 170 hp
- Fuel Economy:
- 2.0L: Around 22 mpg city / 31 mpg highway
- 1.9L Turbo: Around 21 mpg city / 29 mpg highway
- 0-60 Times:
- 2.0L: Approximately 8.5 - 9.5 seconds
- 1.9L Turbo: Approximately 7.5 - 8.5 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Not recommended or officially rated for towing.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Standard features included air conditioning, power windows and locks, keyless entry, and a basic audio system. Safety features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) and front airbags were also standard.
- SE: The SE trim often added features like alloy wheels, upgraded upholstery (leatherette or partial leather), a better audio system, and potentially a sunroof.
- T5 (Turbo): In addition to the turbocharged engine, the T5 trim typically included sportier suspension tuning, unique interior and exterior styling elements, and potentially more premium features like leather seats and upgraded audio.
2003 Volvo S40 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2003 |
| Make | Volvo |
| Model | S40 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 1.9-T |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Netherlands |
| Manufacturing City | BORN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2767 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | B4204T3 |
| Engine Size | 1.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $23,900 |
| Invoice Price | $22,466 |
| Delivery Charges | $685 |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2003 Volvo S40 Have?
Long-term reliability concerns center around the automatic transmission, which some owners have reported experiencing slippage or failure after higher mileage. The turbocharged models (T5) may experience issues related to the turbocharger itself, such as oil leaks or premature wear.
While I don't have specific recall information available at this moment, it's essential to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website using the VIN to identify any outstanding recalls for the vehicle. Regular maintenance, particularly fluid changes and addressing issues promptly, is crucial for maximizing the lifespan and reliability of the 2003 Volvo S40. Specific year-related issues aren't widely documented outside of broader concerns for this generation.
How long will the 2003 Volvo S40 last?
Positive Owner Reviews
Negative Owner Reviews
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Driver-assistance features were limited compared to modern cars. It lacked advanced features like lane departure warning or blind-spot monitoring. However, it did include standard features like anti-lock brakes (ABS) and power steering.
Safety was a strong point for the S40. It featured standard front airbags and side-impact airbags. Optional safety features may have included traction control and stability control.
Crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) generally reflected well on the S40's safety performance for its class and era. While specific ratings should be verified with those organizations directly, Volvo's reputation for safety was a key selling point. Keep in mind that safety standards have evolved considerably since 2003, so comparing its safety to a modern vehicle isn't directly comparable.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2003 Volvo S40 Prices and Market Value
Resale value is affected by factors like its overall condition (especially rust), the presence of service records, and the demand for older, fuel-efficient vehicles. Models with lower mileage and a well-documented maintenance history command higher prices. The turbocharged T5 variants might also hold slightly better value due to their performance.
2003 Volvo S40 Cost of Ownership
2003 Volvo S40 Fuel Efficiency
2003 Volvo S40 Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2003 Volvo S40 Recalls & Defects
Equipment:other:labels
Fuel System, Gasoline
2003 Volvo S40 Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2003 Volvo S40 Compare to Other Sedan?
Reliability is a mixed bag; the S40 can be reliable if well-maintained, but is prone to certain electrical and suspension issues, potentially making it less reliable than a Honda or Toyota. Price-wise, on the used market, it can be a good value.
Alternatives to consider include the Acura RSX (for sportier handling and a more engaging driving experience), the Mazda 3 (for a balance of fun and practicality), or a well-maintained Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla (for superior reliability and lower running costs). The Volkswagen Jetta provides a similar European driving experience, but might also share similar maintenance concerns.
Ranks #2028 Sedan
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Camry | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda Accord | (0.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Lexus ES | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2024 Subaru Legacy | (5.0★) |
| 5 | 2022 Mazda MX-30 | (4.0★) |
| 6 | 2024 BMW M3 | (0.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Ford Mustang | (5.0★) |
| 8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Audi A3 | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2023 Chevrolet Camaro | (5.0★) |
| 11 | 2023 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2023 Nissan Altima | (4.0★) |
| 2028 | 2003 Volvo S40 | (4.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2003 Volvo S40 a Good Sedan?
major f on January 8, 2019
better than a golfhad this car for 6 months and its been great , a lot better than a vw golf,which was the car i had before this one,fuel consumption around town is in the low 20 s but on a run its about 45 to 50 to the gallon
Big-D on August 8, 2017
Reliable, fun little car to drive.I have driven a Volvo S40 for almost four years now and have had little to no issues with it. I purchased with over 100k on it, and had to do some maintenance, but nothing more than you'd expect from a car with that many miles.
somedudeinchicago on May 28, 2011
It's got character.Definitely love this car. It's good in the corners, and has a fair amount of power. Transmission is better than previous volvo's. It's got a little charm to it. My parents got this car in 2005 (we have a 2004 model) with 20,000 miles. It was handed to me and now the car now has 163,000 miles and yes, things have had to be replaced (suspension, alternator, bushings, basic wear-items), but the car still runs like new. Overall, very good car. However, if I could have done it differently; I would have bought an S60R. One last thing. This car is driven every day, nearly 100 miles each day, and it's not driven lightly. Definitely reliable in my book.
Whatever! on May 18, 2011
RE:Did not grow up to the VOLVO name,Did not grow up to the VOLVO name, That's probably the reason it was for sale in the first place. Not all VOLVO's Are like that. It was either a bad apple, or the previous owner(s) got into an accident and tried to fix it chep before they sold it.
Volvo lover on June 30, 2010
I love this car!I've had this car for 7 years now and love it just as much today as when I drove it off the lot. It has never had any problems except for a cracked knob on the radio. I'll be the first to admit that I am terrible at keeping up with scheduled maintenance and it still runs great! It's a lot of fun to drive, is easy to park, has great safety features, and gets great gas mileage. It's my first Volvo, but it won't be my last!
Binu on September 22, 2006
Did not grow up to the VOLVO nameToo many mechanical problems. Looks like some one just rushed it through the production. Two inside door handles came off. Too many loose nuts and bolts. Plastic guard underneath the engine fell down within the first year. The liner beneath the front bumper too low and broke off in the first Chicago snow storm. Keeps changing light bulbs every month. Too many problems with the power antenna. I like the handling of the car and the sporty feeling.
Marin on July 19, 2006
I like this car.I really like this car. It's not the most stylish on the road, but it has been a reliable car. I like the turbo and the way it performs on the highway. The ride is a little stiff and it has more cabin noise than some other cars. Steering and handling are very good. Good turning ratio. Comfortable seats and easy to use instruments. Gets good mileage. I would recommend it, and I would buy it again, or replace it with the same but newer model.
major f on January 8, 2019
better than a golfhad this car for 6 months and its been great , a lot better than a vw golf,which was the car i had before this one,fuel consumption around town is in the low 20 s but on a run its about 45 to 50 to the gallon
Big-D on August 8, 2017
Reliable, fun little car to drive.I have driven a Volvo S40 for almost four years now and have had little to no issues with it. I purchased with over 100k on it, and had to do some maintenance, but nothing more than you'd expect from a car with that many miles.
somedudeinchicago on May 28, 2011
It's got character.Definitely love this car. It's good in the corners, and has a fair amount of power. Transmission is better than previous volvo's. It's got a little charm to it. My parents got this car in 2005 (we have a 2004 model) with 20,000 miles. It was handed to me and now the car now has 163,000 miles and yes, things have had to be replaced (suspension, alternator, bushings, basic wear-items), but the car still runs like new. Overall, very good car. However, if I could have done it differently; I would have bought an S60R. One last thing. This car is driven every day, nearly 100 miles each day, and it's not driven lightly. Definitely reliable in my book.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.