The 1986 Chevrolet Astro, part of a model run from 1985 to 2005, is a compact/minivan that offered a blend of cargo and passenger utility. Available primarily as a passenger van or cargo van, key trims included the base model, LS, and CL. Its popularity stemmed from its robust, truck-like chassis, rear-wheel-drive platform, and a cavernous interior for its size, making it a versatile workhorse and family hauler.
The Good
The 1986 Astro boasted a strong, reliable V6 powertrain, offering confident performance. Its durable construction and spacious interior provided practical utility, while its commanding driving position and adaptable layout appealed to those seeking both functionality and a sense of capability.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1986 Astro include rust, particularly on the undercarriage and wheel wells. Older models may also experience issues with the transmission, fuel pump, and electrical components due to age and wear. Interior plastics can become brittle.
1986 Chevrolet Astro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1986 Chevrolet Astro primarily offered two engine options:
- 4.3L V6 (VIN Z)
- 2.5L 4-Cylinder (VIN 1) - Less common and often underpowered for the vehicle's size.
- Horsepower:
- 4.3L V6: Approximately 150-165 horsepower, depending on specific configuration.
- 2.5L 4-Cylinder: Around 98 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy was not a strong suit for the Astro, especially with the V6 engine. Expect figures in the range of 15-17 MPG city and 18-21 MPG highway for the V6, with the 4-cylinder offering slightly better, though still modest, results.
- 0-60 Times: Due to its van-like nature and focus on utility, acceleration figures were not a primary design consideration. 0-60 MPH times for the V6 models would likely be in the 10-12 second range, while the 4-cylinder would be considerably slower.
- Towing Capacity: The 1986 Chevrolet Astro, particularly when equipped with the V6 and the appropriate towing package, could tow significant loads. Towing capacity typically ranged from 5,000 to 7,000 pounds, making it a capable vehicle for light to medium-duty towing of trailers or recreational equipment.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Model: Typically came with essential features, manual windows and locks, basic seating, and AM/FM radio.
- CL Trim: Added more creature comforts such as power windows and locks, upgraded interior fabrics, and possibly a cassette player.
- LS Trim: Represented the higher end, often including air conditioning, cruise control, a more premium audio system, and enhanced interior trim.
- Passenger Van Specifics: These trims often came with multiple rows of seating, adjustable seatbelts, and provisions for child seats.
- Cargo Van Specifics: Focused on utility with durable flooring, tie-down points, and minimal interior appointments.
1986 Chevrolet Astro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1986 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Astro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Sport Van |
| Type | Minivan |
| Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | BALTIMORE |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1986 Chevrolet Astro Have?
The 1986 Chevrolet Astro, being one of the earlier models of its generation, shares some common issues with other vehicles of its era, amplified by its utilitarian design and intended usage. One of the most prevalent concerns for any vehicle of this age, including the Astro, is rust. The undercarriage, rocker panels, wheel wells, and door bottoms are particularly susceptible. Early model years, while not specifically singled out for unique catastrophic failures, can still exhibit age-related wear and tear across various systems.
Mechanical issues that tend to surface with higher mileage and age include transmission problems. The automatic transmissions, while generally robust, can eventually develop issues with shifting, slipping, or complete failure if not maintained. The fuel pump is another component that can become a point of failure. Issues with the ignition system, such as coil packs or distributor components, can lead to rough running or no-start conditions.
Electrical gremlins are also common in older vehicles. This can manifest as malfunctioning gauges, power window motors failing, or issues with the interior lighting. The air conditioning system, if equipped, may require significant work to be fully functional.
While there were recalls issued throughout the Astro's long production run, specific major recalls for the 1986 model year that stand out are less common. However, any recall notices for specific components should be investigated. Long-term reliability heavily depends on the vehicle's maintenance history. A well-maintained 1986 Astro can still be a reliable vehicle for its intended purpose, but owners should be prepared for potential repairs related to its age and mileage. The truck-based platform contributes to its durability, but it's not immune to the effects of time and use.
Mechanical issues that tend to surface with higher mileage and age include transmission problems. The automatic transmissions, while generally robust, can eventually develop issues with shifting, slipping, or complete failure if not maintained. The fuel pump is another component that can become a point of failure. Issues with the ignition system, such as coil packs or distributor components, can lead to rough running or no-start conditions.
Electrical gremlins are also common in older vehicles. This can manifest as malfunctioning gauges, power window motors failing, or issues with the interior lighting. The air conditioning system, if equipped, may require significant work to be fully functional.
While there were recalls issued throughout the Astro's long production run, specific major recalls for the 1986 model year that stand out are less common. However, any recall notices for specific components should be investigated. Long-term reliability heavily depends on the vehicle's maintenance history. A well-maintained 1986 Astro can still be a reliable vehicle for its intended purpose, but owners should be prepared for potential repairs related to its age and mileage. The truck-based platform contributes to its durability, but it's not immune to the effects of time and use.
How long will the 1986 Chevrolet Astro last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits for vehicles of this era, a 1986 Chevrolet Astro, when well-cared for, can realistically achieve 150,000 to 250,000 miles or more. The robust, truck-like chassis and the stout V6 engine are key contributors to its long-term durability. However, weaknesses emerge with time, primarily concerning rust, which can compromise structural integrity. Transmission and fuel system components also require attention as the vehicle ages. Consistent fluid changes, addressing minor issues promptly, and protection against the elements significantly extend its service life, turning it into a dependable, albeit aging, workhorse or people mover.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1986 Chevrolet Astro, as a vehicle from the mid-1980s, was not equipped with the advanced technology, driver-assistance, or extensive safety features found in modern vehicles. Its built-in tech and entertainment were basic by today's standards.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Optional upgrades often included a cassette player, which was considered a significant feature at the time. Higher trim levels might have offered a more robust speaker system, but advanced features like CD players or digital displays were not available.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent in the 1986 Astro. Systems like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were just beginning to appear on higher-end luxury vehicles and were not a standard or widely available option on a van like the Astro. Cruise control was often an optional feature, particularly on the LS trim.
Safety Features: Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment included seat belts for all occupants. Some models might have offered optional rear seat shoulder belts. Crumple zones and advanced airbag systems were not part of the design. The vehicle's construction was more about passive safety through its metal frame and body.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles from 1986 are often not readily available in the same format as modern tests. However, given the era's safety standards, the Astro would likely perform adequately for its time but would fall far short of current safety benchmarks. Its heavier, truck-based construction provided some inherent protection, but the lack of modern safety technologies meant a higher risk in severe collisions compared to contemporary vehicles.
Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Optional upgrades often included a cassette player, which was considered a significant feature at the time. Higher trim levels might have offered a more robust speaker system, but advanced features like CD players or digital displays were not available.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent in the 1986 Astro. Systems like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were just beginning to appear on higher-end luxury vehicles and were not a standard or widely available option on a van like the Astro. Cruise control was often an optional feature, particularly on the LS trim.
Safety Features: Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment included seat belts for all occupants. Some models might have offered optional rear seat shoulder belts. Crumple zones and advanced airbag systems were not part of the design. The vehicle's construction was more about passive safety through its metal frame and body.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles from 1986 are often not readily available in the same format as modern tests. However, given the era's safety standards, the Astro would likely perform adequately for its time but would fall far short of current safety benchmarks. Its heavier, truck-based construction provided some inherent protection, but the lack of modern safety technologies meant a higher risk in severe collisions compared to contemporary vehicles.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1986 Chevrolet Astro Prices and Market Value
When new in 1986, the Chevrolet Astro's price typically ranged from approximately $10,000 for a base cargo van to upwards of $18,000-$20,000 for a well-equipped passenger van, depending on trim and options. As a used vehicle today, the 1986 Astro's resale value is generally low, reflecting its age and the availability of newer, more efficient, and safer alternatives. Prices can vary significantly, often from under $2,000 for project vehicles to $5,000-$8,000 for well-maintained examples, especially desirable cargo or specific passenger configurations. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, mileage, rust prevalence, mechanical soundness, and historical maintenance records. Depreciation has been steep, as expected for a vehicle of its vintage.
1986 Chevrolet Astro Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1986 Chevrolet Astro can be economical in terms of initial purchase price and some maintenance costs, especially if you are handy with repairs. Insurance premiums are typically low due to its age and lower replacement value. However, fuel costs can be a significant factor, particularly with the V6 engine, as its fuel economy is modest. Maintenance costs can be moderate; while many parts are readily available and affordable, potential repairs to aging components like the transmission or fuel pump can add up. Overall, while not prohibitively expensive, it's not a particularly economical vehicle to own due to fuel consumption and the potential for age-related repairs.
1986 Chevrolet Astro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1986 Chevrolet Astro Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1986 Chevrolet Astro Insurance
Insurance for a 1986 Chevrolet Astro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Minivan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1986 Chevrolet Astro Compare to Other Minivan?
The 1986 Chevrolet Astro competed in the compact/minivan segment against rivals such as the Ford Aerostar and the Chrysler minivans (Dodge Caravan/Plymouth Voyager).
Performance: The Astro, with its V6 engine and rear-wheel-drive platform, often offered more robust towing and hauling capability compared to the front-wheel-drive Chrysler minivans. The Ford Aerostar also offered a V6, making performance comparable, though the Astro's truck-derived chassis provided a distinct feel.
Features: In 1986, feature content was relatively basic across the board. The Chrysler minivans often led in terms of innovative interior packaging and family-friendly options. The Aerostar was a strong contender with a good balance of features. The Astro, while functional, lagged in interior refinement and cutting-edge technology compared to its competitors, especially the Chrysler offerings.
Reliability: Reliability can be a mixed bag for all these vehicles due to their age. The Astro's mechanical simplicity and robust build contributed to a reputation for durability, particularly in its powertrain. However, like any vehicle of this vintage, rust and age-related wear are significant concerns. Chrysler minivans from this era sometimes faced issues with their transmissions and electrical systems. The Aerostar was generally seen as a reliable option, but perhaps not as bulletproof as the Astro's core mechanicals.
Price: New, the Astro was competitively priced, offering a solid value proposition for its utility. Used prices for a 1986 model are generally quite low across all these competitors, making them affordable entry points. However, the condition and maintenance history become the paramount factors.
Alternatives: For similar utility and a more modern driving experience, one might consider slightly newer models of the Astro itself or its sibling, the GMC Safari, which offered a similar package. For those prioritizing family features and a smoother ride, a 1986-1990 Chrysler minivan could be considered, though at the potential cost of some mechanical durability. The Ford Aerostar is another strong contender offering a blend of performance and features. If pure ruggedness and utility are the priority and modern amenities are secondary, the 1986 Astro remains a viable, albeit aging, choice.
Performance: The Astro, with its V6 engine and rear-wheel-drive platform, often offered more robust towing and hauling capability compared to the front-wheel-drive Chrysler minivans. The Ford Aerostar also offered a V6, making performance comparable, though the Astro's truck-derived chassis provided a distinct feel.
Features: In 1986, feature content was relatively basic across the board. The Chrysler minivans often led in terms of innovative interior packaging and family-friendly options. The Aerostar was a strong contender with a good balance of features. The Astro, while functional, lagged in interior refinement and cutting-edge technology compared to its competitors, especially the Chrysler offerings.
Reliability: Reliability can be a mixed bag for all these vehicles due to their age. The Astro's mechanical simplicity and robust build contributed to a reputation for durability, particularly in its powertrain. However, like any vehicle of this vintage, rust and age-related wear are significant concerns. Chrysler minivans from this era sometimes faced issues with their transmissions and electrical systems. The Aerostar was generally seen as a reliable option, but perhaps not as bulletproof as the Astro's core mechanicals.
Price: New, the Astro was competitively priced, offering a solid value proposition for its utility. Used prices for a 1986 model are generally quite low across all these competitors, making them affordable entry points. However, the condition and maintenance history become the paramount factors.
Alternatives: For similar utility and a more modern driving experience, one might consider slightly newer models of the Astro itself or its sibling, the GMC Safari, which offered a similar package. For those prioritizing family features and a smoother ride, a 1986-1990 Chrysler minivan could be considered, though at the potential cost of some mechanical durability. The Ford Aerostar is another strong contender offering a blend of performance and features. If pure ruggedness and utility are the priority and modern amenities are secondary, the 1986 Astro remains a viable, albeit aging, choice.
Final Verdict: Is the 1986 Chevrolet Astro a Good Minivan?
The 1986 Chevrolet Astro is ideal for DIY mechanics, tradespeople, or individuals seeking a no-frills, highly utilitarian vehicle for hauling equipment or passengers where cargo space and ruggedness are prioritized over modern comfort and technology. It's worth buying cautiously as a used vehicle, primarily if found in good mechanical condition with minimal rust. New, it is obviously not an option. Focus on well-maintained examples, ideally with the V6 engine for adequate performance. It is best suited for those who understand the limitations of an older vehicle and are prepared for potential maintenance. For daily commuting or long road trips requiring comfort and advanced features, better alternatives exist, but for sheer utility on a budget, it can still serve its purpose.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.