The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker, a subcompact SUV, was a popular choice for its affordable pricing and go-anywhere capability. Part of a generation produced from 1989 to 2004, it offered both 2-door convertible and 4-door hardtop body styles. Key trims included the base model and the more equipped LS. It stood out for its rugged, truck-like charm and off-road prowess, making it a fun and versatile vehicle for adventurous drivers.
The Good
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker offered accessible 4x4 capability, a nimble and fun-to-drive experience, and impressive fuel efficiency for its class. Its compact size made it easy to maneuver, while its affordable price point delivered excellent value, appealing to both budget-conscious and adventure-seeking buyers.
The Bad
Owners should be aware of potential issues such as rust, particularly on the frame and body panels, and transmission problems. Engine performance can be sluggish, and the interior comfort is basic. Braking performance is also often cited as a weakness.
1998 Chevrolet Tracker: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker was primarily offered with a 1.6-liter inline 4-cylinder engine. Some later models or specific markets might have had access to a 2.0-liter inline 4-cylinder engine.
- Horsepower: For the 1.6-liter engine, horsepower typically ranged around 95 hp. The optional 2.0-liter engine offered a more robust 127 hp.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied depending on the engine, drivetrain (2WD or 4WD), and transmission. For the 1.6L engine with 4WD, expect figures in the range of 20-23 MPG city and 23-26 MPG highway.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was not a strong suit for the Tracker. 0-60 mph times were generally in the 12-15 second range for the 1.6L engine, and slightly quicker for the 2.0L.
- Towing Capacity: The towing capacity for the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker was modest, typically around 1,000 to 1,500 lbs when properly equipped, suitable for small trailers or personal watercraft.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trim: Typically included essential features like power steering, intermittent wipers, and basic cloth seating. Air conditioning and an AM/FM stereo were often standard or optional.
- LS Trim: The LS trim added comfort and convenience features such as air conditioning, upgraded cloth upholstery, power windows and door locks, cruise control, a rear window defroster, and sometimes a CD player. Alloy wheels were also common on the LS.
- Base Trim: Typically included essential features like power steering, intermittent wipers, and basic cloth seating. Air conditioning and an AM/FM stereo were often standard or optional.
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1998 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tracker |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door 2WD 5-Speed Manual |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | INGERSOLL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2339 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4000 pounds |
| Overall Height | 65.70 inches |
| Overall Length | 158.70 inches |
| Overall Width | 64.40 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 97.60 inches |
| Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.6-L L-4 SOHC 16V |
| Engine Size | 1.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $14,860 |
| Invoice Price | $14,147 |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker Have?
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker, while generally considered a relatively simple vehicle, is not without its common issues. One of the most frequently reported problems is related to rust. Due to its body-on-frame construction and the tendency for these vehicles to be used in areas with salt on the roads, frame rust can become a serious concern, potentially compromising structural integrity. Body panels, particularly around wheel wells and rocker panels, are also susceptible.
Another area that can cause headaches is the transmission. Both automatic and manual transmissions have been known to develop issues, sometimes leading to slippage or complete failure. Regular fluid changes and proper maintenance are crucial, but even then, transmission problems can arise, especially on higher-mileage examples.
The engine, while generally robust in its 1.6-liter form, can suffer from oil leaks, particularly from the valve cover gasket. Overheating can also be an issue if the cooling system is not maintained. Some owners have reported problems with the clutch in manual transmission models.
Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rods, can wear out over time, leading to clunking noises and steering issues. The brakes are also often noted as being somewhat weak, requiring more frequent maintenance and replacement of pads and rotors.
While specific recalls for the 1998 model year are not extensively documented, it's always advisable to check with the NHTSA for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply. Long-term reliability concerns often center around the aforementioned rust and drivetrain components. With diligent maintenance, many Trackers can soldier on, but buyers should be prepared for potential repairs related to these common weak points.
Another area that can cause headaches is the transmission. Both automatic and manual transmissions have been known to develop issues, sometimes leading to slippage or complete failure. Regular fluid changes and proper maintenance are crucial, but even then, transmission problems can arise, especially on higher-mileage examples.
The engine, while generally robust in its 1.6-liter form, can suffer from oil leaks, particularly from the valve cover gasket. Overheating can also be an issue if the cooling system is not maintained. Some owners have reported problems with the clutch in manual transmission models.
Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rods, can wear out over time, leading to clunking noises and steering issues. The brakes are also often noted as being somewhat weak, requiring more frequent maintenance and replacement of pads and rotors.
While specific recalls for the 1998 model year are not extensively documented, it's always advisable to check with the NHTSA for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply. Long-term reliability concerns often center around the aforementioned rust and drivetrain components. With diligent maintenance, many Trackers can soldier on, but buyers should be prepared for potential repairs related to these common weak points.
How long will the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker last?
With regular and diligent maintenance, a 1998 Chevrolet Tracker can realistically achieve between 150,000 to 200,000 miles. Some well-cared-for examples have even surpassed 250,000 miles. The long-term durability is significantly influenced by how the vehicle has been treated, especially concerning rust prevention and drivetrain servicing. Weaknesses that emerge over time include increased susceptibility to frame rust in corrosive environments and potential wear on transmission components. Early attention to minor oil leaks and cooling system maintenance can prevent more significant, costly repairs down the road. Vehicles that have been driven primarily in dry climates and consistently maintained are likely to offer the best longevity.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker was designed with simplicity and affordability in mind, so its built-in technology and entertainment features are quite basic by modern standards.
Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio. A CD player was an available option, often bundled with upgraded sound systems on higher trims like the LS. Speakers were generally modest, focusing on functionality rather than premium audio quality.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technology was virtually nonexistent in the 1998 Tracker. Features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were optional on most 1998 models and became more common on later iterations. Traction control was not a feature offered.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included driver and front passenger airbags. Seatbelts were also standard. Side-impact door beams were incorporated for some measure of protection in side collisions. The vehicle's compact size and body-on-frame construction meant it was not a top performer in crash safety tests compared to larger, more modern vehicles.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker from organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) or NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) are difficult to find or were not conducted with the same rigor as today. However, based on its design era and vehicle type, it would likely not score highly in modern crash tests, particularly in frontal and side-impact scenarios. It's important for potential buyers to understand that this vehicle prioritizes its off-road and utilitarian capabilities over advanced safety or cutting-edge technology.
Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio. A CD player was an available option, often bundled with upgraded sound systems on higher trims like the LS. Speakers were generally modest, focusing on functionality rather than premium audio quality.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technology was virtually nonexistent in the 1998 Tracker. Features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were optional on most 1998 models and became more common on later iterations. Traction control was not a feature offered.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included driver and front passenger airbags. Seatbelts were also standard. Side-impact door beams were incorporated for some measure of protection in side collisions. The vehicle's compact size and body-on-frame construction meant it was not a top performer in crash safety tests compared to larger, more modern vehicles.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker from organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) or NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) are difficult to find or were not conducted with the same rigor as today. However, based on its design era and vehicle type, it would likely not score highly in modern crash tests, particularly in frontal and side-impact scenarios. It's important for potential buyers to understand that this vehicle prioritizes its off-road and utilitarian capabilities over advanced safety or cutting-edge technology.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker had an MSRP that typically ranged from around $15,000 to $20,000, depending on the trim level and drivetrain. As a subcompact SUV from its era, it experienced significant depreciation. Currently, used market prices for a 1998 Chevrolet Tracker can vary widely, generally falling between $1,500 and $5,000. Excellent condition, low mileage examples, especially with the 4WD option, can fetch slightly more. Factors heavily influencing resale value include the presence of rust (a major detractor), mechanical condition, mileage, and whether it has the desirable 4WD system. Well-maintained vehicles with good maintenance records hold their value better than neglected ones.
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Cost of Ownership
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and modest value. Fuel economy is also a strong point, with the 1.6-liter engine offering good MPG for its class. Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and filter replacements, is affordable. However, repair costs can fluctuate. While common parts are readily available and inexpensive, significant repairs like transmission work or frame rust remediation can become costly. Overall, the Tracker is an economical choice, but potential buyers should budget for potential repairs related to its known weaknesses.
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
14.50 gallons
City Mileage
22 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
26 miles/gallon
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1998 Chevrolet Tracker Insurance
Insurance for a 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker competed in the burgeoning subcompact SUV segment. Its primary rivals included vehicles like the Suzuki Sidekick (which it was closely related to), the Toyota RAV4, and the Honda CR-V.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Tracker's 1.6-liter engine was underpowered compared to the more car-like Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, which offered smoother on-road driving dynamics and better acceleration. The Tracker, especially in 4WD configuration, excelled more in off-road capability and ruggedness, albeit at the expense of on-road refinement.
Features: Feature-wise, the Tracker was basic. The RAV4 and CR-V offered more creature comforts, more advanced optional technology, and a more sophisticated interior design. The Tracker's interior was utilitarian and simple, lacking the amenities found in its Japanese competitors.
Reliability: While the Tracker was mechanically simple, its long-term reliability was often hampered by its susceptibility to rust and potential transmission issues. The Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, in contrast, built strong reputations for exceptional reliability and durability, often requiring fewer major repairs over their lifespan.
Price: The Tracker's major advantage was its price. It was typically more affordable when new and continued to be cheaper on the used market compared to the RAV4 and CR-V, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers seeking basic 4x4 functionality.
Alternatives: If seeking a more refined on-road experience and superior reliability, the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V from the same era are generally considered better alternatives, though they will likely be more expensive on the used market and lack the Tracker's extreme off-road bias. For a similar rugged, body-on-frame compact SUV experience, the Suzuki Samurai (earlier models) or other older generation 4x4s might be considered, though they often share similar maintenance needs.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Tracker's 1.6-liter engine was underpowered compared to the more car-like Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, which offered smoother on-road driving dynamics and better acceleration. The Tracker, especially in 4WD configuration, excelled more in off-road capability and ruggedness, albeit at the expense of on-road refinement.
Features: Feature-wise, the Tracker was basic. The RAV4 and CR-V offered more creature comforts, more advanced optional technology, and a more sophisticated interior design. The Tracker's interior was utilitarian and simple, lacking the amenities found in its Japanese competitors.
Reliability: While the Tracker was mechanically simple, its long-term reliability was often hampered by its susceptibility to rust and potential transmission issues. The Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, in contrast, built strong reputations for exceptional reliability and durability, often requiring fewer major repairs over their lifespan.
Price: The Tracker's major advantage was its price. It was typically more affordable when new and continued to be cheaper on the used market compared to the RAV4 and CR-V, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers seeking basic 4x4 functionality.
Alternatives: If seeking a more refined on-road experience and superior reliability, the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V from the same era are generally considered better alternatives, though they will likely be more expensive on the used market and lack the Tracker's extreme off-road bias. For a similar rugged, body-on-frame compact SUV experience, the Suzuki Samurai (earlier models) or other older generation 4x4s might be considered, though they often share similar maintenance needs.
Final Verdict: Is the 1998 Chevrolet Tracker a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a no-frills, compact 4x4 vehicle for light off-roading, trail use, or navigating rough weather. It's a great choice for those who prioritize affordability and capability over luxury and performance. It is worth buying for individuals or small families who understand its limitations and are prepared for potential maintenance. Buying used is the only option, and it's crucial to inspect thoroughly for rust, especially on the frame and body. The 4WD models are generally more desirable. If you find a well-maintained, rust-free example with reasonable mileage, it can offer a fun and capable ownership experience for its price.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.