The 2010 Suzuki Equator is a mid-size pickup truck resulting from a collaboration with Nissan. It's essentially a rebadged Nissan Frontier. Available as a regular cab or extended cab, it was produced from 2009-2012. Key trims included the base model, Premium, and RMZ-4. New, the Equator ranged from approximately $17,000 to $27,000. Its appeal stems from its value proposition, offering Nissan reliability at a potentially lower price point.
The Good
The 2010 Suzuki Equator boasts Nissan-sourced reliability and capable performance, especially with the V6 engine. It's a practical truck for hauling and light off-roading. Emotionally, it offers a sense of ruggedness and capability without the hefty price tag of some competitors. Value is a major selling point.
The Bad
Weaknesses of the 2010 Suzuki Equator include its dated interior, potentially lower resale value compared to its Nissan counterpart, and limited Suzuki dealer network for parts and service. Watch out for potential rust issues, especially in areas with road salt, and ensure proper maintenance records exist due to Suzuki's departure from the US market.
2010 Suzuki Equator: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L Inline-4: This engine produces around 152 horsepower and 171 lb-ft of torque.
- 4.0L V6: This engine generates approximately 261 horsepower and 281 lb-ft of torque.
- Horsepower: As mentioned above, 152 hp (I4) and 261 hp (V6).
- Fuel Economy:
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 17 mpg city / 23 mpg highway.
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway (these numbers can vary).
- 0-60 Times: The 0-60 mph time for the I4 engine is estimated to be around 10 seconds, while the V6 shaves that down to around 7.5 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- 2.5L I4: Around 3,500 lbs.
- 4.0L V6: Up to 6,500 lbs (depending on configuration).
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Typically includes basic features like cloth seats, manual windows/locks, and a basic audio system.
- Premium: Adds features such as air conditioning, power windows/locks, cruise control, and upgraded audio.
- RMZ-4: Focused on off-road capability, potentially including features like Bilstein shocks, skid plates, and electronic locking rear differential. May also include unique styling elements.
2010 Suzuki Equator Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2010 |
| Make | Suzuki |
| Model | Equator |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Extended Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SMYRNA |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3801 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4690 pounds |
| Overall Height | 68.70 inches |
| Overall Length | 206.60 inches |
| Overall Width | 72.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 125.90 inches |
| Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5-L L-4 DOHC 16V |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $17,520 |
| Invoice Price | $16,819 |
| Delivery Charges | $795 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2010 Suzuki Equator Have?
Frequently reported problems for the 2010 Suzuki Equator, mirroring issues found in the Nissan Frontier, often involve the fuel level sending unit, which can lead to inaccurate fuel gauge readings. Rust, especially in areas where road salt is used, is another concern. The frame, in particular, should be inspected thoroughly before purchase. Other potential issues include problems with the automatic transmission, although these are less common. Recalls have been issued for various reasons, including issues with the fuel system and potential problems with the secondary hood latch. Owners should check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA to ensure all applicable recalls have been addressed. Long-term reliability concerns largely depend on maintenance. Because Suzuki no longer operates in the US, sourcing parts might become more challenging and potentially more expensive over time, though Nissan parts generally fit. It is important to consider the availability of parts and qualified mechanics familiar with Nissan/Suzuki trucks for future repairs. Early signs of rust should be addressed promptly to prevent more significant structural issues down the line.
How long will the 2010 Suzuki Equator last?
With proper maintenance, a 2010 Suzuki Equator can realistically provide 200,000 miles or more of service. Based on owner data, well-maintained examples can easily last beyond 15 years. Key to longevity is consistent oil changes, transmission fluid maintenance, and addressing any rust promptly. Long-term weaknesses revolve around potential rust issues, electrical component failures (common in older vehicles), and the aforementioned parts availability challenges. The engine and transmission themselves are generally robust if properly cared for. Regular inspection and preventative maintenance are crucial.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2010 Suzuki Equator's built-in tech and entertainment features are fairly basic by modern standards. Standard features typically included a basic AM/FM radio with a CD player. Higher trims could add features like satellite radio and an auxiliary input jack. There were no advanced driver-assistance systems available.
Safety features included standard front airbags, anti-lock brakes (ABS), and electronic stability control (ESC) on some models. Side-impact airbags were often optional. Crash-test ratings from the IIHS and NHTSA, mirroring the Nissan Frontier, were generally acceptable for the time, but not class-leading. NHTSA gave it four stars in frontal crash tests and five stars in side crash tests. IIHS rated it 'Good' in moderate overlap front crash tests. Optional features could include a Rockford Fosgate audio system upgrade in certain trims, offering enhanced sound quality. Keep in mind that the Equator was designed as a utilitarian truck and lacked many of the tech advancements found in newer vehicles. Its safety features, while standard for the era, are less comprehensive than those in contemporary trucks. The technology and driver assistance options were limited, and it lacks modern features like touchscreen infotainment systems or advanced safety aids like blind-spot monitoring or lane departure warning. Therefore, prospective buyers should prioritize its mechanical capabilities and value proposition over cutting-edge technology.
Safety features included standard front airbags, anti-lock brakes (ABS), and electronic stability control (ESC) on some models. Side-impact airbags were often optional. Crash-test ratings from the IIHS and NHTSA, mirroring the Nissan Frontier, were generally acceptable for the time, but not class-leading. NHTSA gave it four stars in frontal crash tests and five stars in side crash tests. IIHS rated it 'Good' in moderate overlap front crash tests. Optional features could include a Rockford Fosgate audio system upgrade in certain trims, offering enhanced sound quality. Keep in mind that the Equator was designed as a utilitarian truck and lacked many of the tech advancements found in newer vehicles. Its safety features, while standard for the era, are less comprehensive than those in contemporary trucks. The technology and driver assistance options were limited, and it lacks modern features like touchscreen infotainment systems or advanced safety aids like blind-spot monitoring or lane departure warning. Therefore, prospective buyers should prioritize its mechanical capabilities and value proposition over cutting-edge technology.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Arctic White
Metallic Silver
Granite Gray
Super Black
Interior Colors
Sandstone
Graphite
2010 Suzuki Equator Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2010 Suzuki Equator ranged from approximately $17,000 to $27,000, depending on trim and configuration. Current used market prices typically range from $6,000 to $14,000, varying with condition, mileage, and location. Depreciation has been significant due to the truck's age, Suzuki's departure from the US market, and its perception as a rebadged Nissan. Resale value is affected by factors like overall condition, rust presence, mileage, and the demand for used trucks in the specific region. Lower values often reflect the lack of Suzuki dealership support.
2010 Suzuki Equator Cost of Ownership
Insurance costs for the 2010 Suzuki Equator are generally moderate, similar to other mid-size trucks of its age. Fuel costs depend on the engine choice and driving habits. Maintenance and repair costs can be relatively affordable, leveraging the Nissan Frontier's parts availability. However, finding Suzuki-specific parts might be challenging. Overall, the Equator can be an economical truck to own, especially if purchased at a good price and properly maintained. Rust prevention is crucial to minimizing long-term repair expenses.
2010 Suzuki Equator Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
21.10 gallons
City Mileage
19 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
23 miles/gallon
2010 Suzuki Equator Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2010 Suzuki Equator Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
84 months / 100,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
36 months / unlimited miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
2010 Suzuki Equator Insurance
Insurance for a 2010 Suzuki Equator is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2010 Suzuki Equator Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 2010 Suzuki Equator's key rivals include the Nissan Frontier (its direct twin), Toyota Tacoma, Ford Ranger, and Chevrolet Colorado. In terms of performance, the Equator (Frontier) and Tacoma offer comparable engine options and towing capabilities. Feature-wise, the Tacoma generally offered more available features and a slightly more modern interior. Reliability is a strong point for both the Equator/Frontier and the Tacoma. Price is where the Equator could potentially stand out, often being slightly cheaper than the comparable Frontier due to the Suzuki badge. The Ford Ranger and Chevy Colorado from that era are generally considered less reliable.
Alternatives to the Equator include: 1) The Nissan Frontier: If you can find a Frontier at a similar price, it might be a better choice for easier parts availability and potentially better resale value. 2) Toyota Tacoma: If reliability and resale value are paramount, the Tacoma is a strong contender, but expect to pay a premium. 3) Honda Ridgeline: Offers a more comfortable ride and unique features, but may not be as capable for off-roading or heavy towing. The Equator is a decent choice for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing reliability and basic truck capabilities, but the Frontier is generally a safer bet due to the stronger dealer network and brand recognition.
Alternatives to the Equator include: 1) The Nissan Frontier: If you can find a Frontier at a similar price, it might be a better choice for easier parts availability and potentially better resale value. 2) Toyota Tacoma: If reliability and resale value are paramount, the Tacoma is a strong contender, but expect to pay a premium. 3) Honda Ridgeline: Offers a more comfortable ride and unique features, but may not be as capable for off-roading or heavy towing. The Equator is a decent choice for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing reliability and basic truck capabilities, but the Frontier is generally a safer bet due to the stronger dealer network and brand recognition.
Ranks #404 Truck
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Tundra | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2022 Honda Ridgeline | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Ford E-Transit Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cab Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | (0.0★) |
| 6 | 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz | (5.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Nissan Frontier | (5.0★) |
| 8 | 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Ram 4500 | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2022 Jeep Gladiator | (5.0★) |
| 11 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | (5.0★) |
| 404 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2010 Suzuki Equator a Good Pickup Truck?
The 2010 Suzuki Equator is ideal for budget-minded buyers seeking a reliable and capable mid-size truck without the premium price of a Toyota Tacoma. It's worth buying *used*, provided it has been well-maintained and rust-free. Look for the V6 engine for better performance. Avoid if you need the latest technology or prioritize high resale value. A key consideration is the availability of parts and service due to Suzuki's departure from the US. Under these conditions, a well-maintained Equator can be a smart purchase.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma