The Good
The 2002 Chrysler Voyager's advantages include its affordability and spaciousness, appealing to practical buyers. It offered decent comfort for its price point, making family trips easier. Emotionally, it provided a sense of security and utility for active families. While not a performance vehicle, its adequate power suited daily driving needs. It presented good value for families on a budget.
The Bad
Weaknesses of the 2002 Chrysler Voyager include potential transmission issues, especially with higher mileage. Owners should watch for oil leaks and electrical problems. The interior materials were often criticized for being low-quality and prone to wear. Rust can also be a concern, especially in areas with harsh winters. Reliability wasn't its strongest suit compared to some competitors.
2002 Chrysler Voyager: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.4L Inline-4: Offered in the base model.
- 3.3L V6: Available as an upgrade and standard on higher trims.
- Horsepower:
- 2.4L Inline-4: Approximately 150 horsepower.
- 3.3L V6: Approximately 180 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy (estimated):
- 2.4L Inline-4: 20 MPG city / 26 MPG highway.
- 3.3L V6: 18 MPG city / 24 MPG highway.
- 0-60 Times:
- Generally, the 2.4L was slower, in the 12-13 second range.
- The 3.3L V6 was quicker, around 10-11 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- Around 2,000 lbs when properly equipped.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Standard features included air conditioning, basic audio system, and cloth upholstery.
- LX: Added features like power windows and locks, upgraded audio, and sometimes keyless entry.
- Higher trims (Limited or similar, depending on the year) often included leather seats, premium audio systems, alloy wheels, and enhanced comfort features. Dual zone climate control was usually available as an option.
- Rear climate control was optional on most trims.
- Power sliding doors were often available on higher trims or as an optional extra.
2002 Chrysler Voyager Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 2002 |
Make | Chrysler |
Model | Voyager |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Van |
Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | United States |
Manufacturing City | FENTON |
Dimensions
Doors | - |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6000 pounds |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 3.3 L 6-Cyl. |
Engine Size | 3.3L |
Engine Cylinders | 6 |
Transmission | - |
Transmission Type | - |
Transmission Speeds | - |
Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | - |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2002 Chrysler Voyager Have?
Recalls for the 2002 Voyager often involved safety-related concerns such as airbag malfunctions or issues with the anti-lock braking system (ABS). It's crucial to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) to verify if all applicable recalls have been addressed.
Long-term reliability was a general concern. The Voyager's build quality and materials weren't as robust as some competitors, leading to quicker wear and tear on interior components. Rust could be a problem, especially in regions with road salt. The 2001-2003 model years, being part of the same generation, generally shared similar reliability patterns. Engine misfires and cooling system problems were also reported with some frequency. Maintenance records are vital when considering purchasing this vehicle.
How long will the 2002 Chrysler Voyager last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Driver-assistance features were limited. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, and some models had traction control. Power windows, locks, and mirrors were common on LX and higher trims. Cruise control was also frequently available.
Safety features included front airbags and side airbags were optional. Child safety seat anchors (LATCH system) were present, but earlier versions may not have been as advanced as current systems. Crash-test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) varied, but generally, the Voyager received decent scores for frontal crash protection. Side-impact protection was typically lower. It's essential to review specific crash test data for the 2002 model year.
Optional features varied depending on the trim level and packages chosen. These could include power sliding doors, a premium audio system, leather seats, and alloy wheels. Overall, the 2002 Voyager prioritized basic functionality and affordability over advanced technology.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2002 Chrysler Voyager Prices and Market Value
2002 Chrysler Voyager Cost of Ownership
2002 Chrysler Voyager Fuel Efficiency
2002 Chrysler Voyager Safety Rating
NHTSA
2002 Chrysler Voyager Recalls & Defects
Child Seat
Equipment:electrical:radio/Tape Deck/Cd Etc.
Steering:hydraulic Power Assist:hose, Piping, and Connections
Equipment
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Fuel System, Gasoline
Equipment
2002 Chrysler Voyager Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2002 Chrysler Voyager Compare to Other Van?
Price was where the Voyager held an edge, typically being more affordable than the Honda or Toyota. The Dodge Caravan, being a closely related vehicle, offered similar performance and features at a comparable price point. However, the Caravan also shared the same reliability concerns.
If reliability is a priority, the Honda Odyssey or Toyota Sienna would be better alternatives, despite costing more. If budget is the primary concern and you're willing to accept potential repairs, the Dodge Caravan might be a similar alternative. Overall, the Voyager was a budget-friendly choice, but the trade-off was lower reliability compared to its Japanese rivals. Consider a well-maintained Caravan if seeking a similar vehicle.
Ranks #18 Truck
1 | 2023 Toyota Tundra | (5.0★) |
2 | 2022 Honda Ridgeline | (5.0★) |
3 | 2023 Ford E-Transit Chassis | (0.0★) |
4 | 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cab Chassis | (0.0★) |
5 | 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | (0.0★) |
6 | 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz | (5.0★) |
7 | 2023 Nissan Frontier | (5.0★) |
8 | 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD | (0.0★) |
9 | 2023 Ram 4500 | (0.0★) |
10 | 2022 Jeep Gladiator | (5.0★) |
11 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
12 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | (5.0★) |
18 | 2002 Chrysler Voyager | (0.0★) |