The Good
The 1992 Ford Taurus offered compelling advantages. Its smooth ride and spacious interior provided excellent comfort for families. The aerodynamic design was both modern and contributed to respectable fuel efficiency for its era. Practical buyers appreciated its relative reliability and the widespread availability of parts, making maintenance relatively easy. Emotionally, the Taurus presented a stylish, forward-thinking image, making ownership feel modern and progressive. It offered good value for money, combining comfort, decent performance, and practicality in one package.
The Bad
Potential buyers of the 1992 Ford Taurus should watch out for several known weaknesses. Common issues include transmission problems, particularly with the AXOD-E automatic, which can fail prematurely. Electrical glitches, such as power window failures and dash illumination issues, are also frequently reported. Rust can be a concern, especially in northern climates, affecting subframes and body panels. Worn suspension components and steering rack leaks are also fairly common, requiring attention for safety and ride quality.
1992 Ford Taurus: Quick Overview
The 1992 Ford Taurus offered a range of engine options and features across its trim levels:
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L "HSC" Inline-4: Available in the base GL model.
- 3.0L "Vulcan" OHV V6: Standard on GL/LX trims, known for reliability.
- 3.8L "Essex" OHV V6: Optional on LX, offering more torque.
- 3.0L "SHO" DOHC V6: Exclusive to the Taurus SHO model, a high-performance Yamaha-designed engine.
- Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 95 hp.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 140 hp.
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 140 hp (similar to 3.0L but with more torque).
- 3.0L SHO V6: Approximately 220 hp.
- Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, city/highway):
- 2.5L I4: Around 20/28 MPG.
- 3.0L V6: Around 18/26 MPG.
- 3.8L V6: Around 17/25 MPG.
- 3.0L SHO V6: Around 17/24 MPG.
- 0-60 MPH Times:
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 12-13 seconds.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 9-10 seconds.
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 9-10 seconds.
- 3.0L SHO V6: Approximately 6.6-7.0 seconds, making it a "sleeper" sports sedan.
- Towing Capacity:
- Generally, up to 1,000 lbs standard, with some V6 models rated up to 2,000 lbs with an optional towing package. The SHO was not intended for towing.
- Trim-Level Features:
- GL: Base model, offering essential power features, AM/FM stereo, cloth seats, and a comfortable ride. Often came with the I4 or 3.0L V6.
- LX: Mid-range trim, adding more comfort and convenience. Features typically included power windows/locks/mirrors, cruise control, air conditioning, upgraded cloth interior, optional power driver's seat, alloy wheels, and a premium sound system. The 3.8L V6 was an option here.
- SHO (Super High Output): Performance-oriented trim. Distinctive exterior styling (unique front and rear fascias, side skirts), sport-tuned suspension, larger brakes, sport seats, tachometer, and the powerful Yamaha-designed DOHC V6 engine. Available with a 5-speed manual or 4-speed automatic transmission.
1992 Ford Taurus Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1992 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Taurus |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Mid-Size Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ATLANTA |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3117 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3.0 6 |
| Engine Size | 3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1992 Ford Taurus Have?
The 1992 Ford Taurus, while popular, had its share of frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns, many of which are common across the second generation (1992-1995).
Transmission Issues: By far the most common and significant problem was with the AXOD-E automatic transmission, especially on V6 models. This transmission was notorious for premature failure, often manifesting as slipping, harsh shifts, or complete loss of gears. Rebuilds or replacements were common and costly. Later model years within the generation saw minor improvements, but the fundamental design remained a weak point. The manual transmission in the SHO models was generally more robust.
Electrical Problems: Owners frequently reported a range of electrical gremlins. These included malfunctioning power windows, often due to faulty motors or regulators. Dashboard lights and gauges could fail intermittently. Issues with the blend door actuator for the HVAC system were also common, leading to problems with air distribution and temperature control. Headlight switches and turn signal stalks could also wear out.
Cooling System: The cooling system was another area of concern. Radiator leaks, water pump failures, and deteriorating coolant hoses were common, potentially leading to overheating if not addressed promptly. The 3.8L "Essex" V6, while offering more torque, was particularly susceptible to head gasket failures if not properly maintained, especially with cooling system issues.
Suspension and Steering: Over time, components like tie rod ends, control arm bushings, and strut mounts would wear out, leading to clunking noises, loose steering, and poor ride quality. Power steering pump leaks and steering rack failures were also not uncommon, necessitating expensive repairs.
Recalls: While specific recalls for the 1992 model year primarily centered on minor issues like seat belt anchor bolts or fuel tank straps, the cumulative effect of these reliability concerns meant that long-term ownership required diligent maintenance and potential for significant repairs as the vehicle aged.
How long will the 1992 Ford Taurus last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1992 Ford Taurus offered a practical array of built-in technology, entertainment, and safety features for its era, though it predates many modern driver-assistance systems.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
- Audio Systems: Standard GL models typically included an AM/FM stereo. LX trims and above often featured a more advanced AM/FM cassette stereo with options for a premium sound system, sometimes with a graphic equalizer. CD players were becoming available as aftermarket options but were rare factory installations in this class at the time.
- Climate Control: Manual air conditioning was standard or optional across most trims. The LX offered more sophisticated controls and occasionally automatic temperature control, though not fully digital "climatronic" systems common today.
- Convenience Features: Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common on LX and SHO trims, optional on GL. Cruise control was also a popular option, especially on V6 models. Remote keyless entry was available on higher trims, a luxury feature then.
Driver-Assistance & Safety Features:
- Airbags: A driver-side airbag was standard on all 1992 Ford Taurus models, a significant safety advancement for its time, as passenger airbags were still rare.
- Brakes: Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was an available option on most V6 models, providing enhanced stopping power and control during emergency braking. Front disc and rear drum brakes were standard. The SHO received larger four-wheel disc brakes.
- Seatbelts: Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with lap belts for rear center passengers and three-point belts for outboard rear passengers.
- Steering: Power steering was standard, with some trims offering speed-sensitive variable assist.
Crash-Test Ratings:
The 1992 Ford Taurus generally performed adequately in crash tests for its time. Specific ratings from agencies like the NHTSA for 1992 models indicated it met federal safety standards. While exact frontal offset or side-impact ratings as we know them today weren't standardized, the inclusion of a standard driver's side airbag was a strong selling point and contributed to its perceived safety advantage over many contemporary rivals that still lacked airbags.
What Colors Options are Available?
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1992 Ford Taurus Prices and Market Value
Today, the used market prices for a 1992 Ford Taurus are significantly lower due to age and depreciation. Most examples, if in running condition, might fetch anywhere from $500 to $3,000. Exceptional, low-mileage SHO models in pristine condition can command higher prices, occasionally reaching $5,000 to $10,000 among enthusiasts. Factors affecting resale value include overall condition, mileage, maintenance history (especially transmission health), and the presence of rust. Depreciation has already bottomed out for most models; any value retained is typically due to collector interest for the SHO or simple utility for base models.
1992 Ford Taurus Cost of Ownership
1992 Ford Taurus Fuel Efficiency
1992 Ford Taurus Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1992 Ford Taurus Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1992 Ford Taurus Compare to Other Sedan?
The 1992 Ford Taurus faced stiff competition in the fiercely contested mid-size sedan market. Key rivals included the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Chevrolet Lumina, and Nissan Stanza/Altima. Here's how it stacked up:
- Performance: The standard Taurus (I4, 3.0L/3.8L V6) offered adequate, but not exhilarating, performance, comparable to the Chevrolet Lumina. The Honda Accord and Toyota Camry often felt a bit more refined in their base powertrains. However, the Taurus SHO stood in a class of its own, outperforming almost all direct rivals with its 220 hp Yamaha V6, making it a true "sleeper" sports sedan that could challenge even more expensive European sports sedans.
- Features: The Taurus was well-equipped for its price point, offering standard driver's side airbag, power accessories, and available ABS, matching or sometimes exceeding rivals like the Lumina. The Camry and Accord often had a reputation for slightly higher interior material quality and more seamless fit and finish, though the Taurus's design was considered more avant-garde.
- Reliability: This was a mixed bag for the Taurus. While the 3.0L "Vulcan" V6 engine itself was quite durable, the Achilles' heel was the AXOD-E automatic transmission, which frequently failed. This gave rivals like the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry a significant edge in long-term reliability and fewer expensive repair bills, as their transmissions were generally more robust. The Lumina also had its share of reliability woes, particularly with electrical systems and GM's own automatic transmissions.
- Price: The Taurus was competitively priced, often offering more features for the dollar than its Japanese rivals, especially when comparing V6 models. Its price point was similar to the Lumina.
Recommended Alternatives:
For someone prioritizing ultimate long-term reliability and lower maintenance costs, a 1992-1993 Honda Accord or Toyota Camry would generally be a better alternative, despite possibly higher initial purchase prices for well-preserved examples. If performance is paramount and you are willing to undertake specific maintenance for the transmission, the Taurus SHO remains a unique and thrilling alternative. For basic transportation on a budget, a well-inspected 3.0L V6 Taurus could suffice, but only with a healthy transmission.
Final Verdict: Is the 1992 Ford Taurus a Good Sedan?
Is it worth buying? Yes, but under specific conditions. As a used vehicle, it's crucial to prioritize mechanical inspection, focusing on transmission health, cooling system integrity, and rust. It's not recommended as a "set it and forget it" car due to potential issues. For daily commuting, a standard GL or LX could be a great value if cheap to acquire and in good shape. For weekend fun, a well-preserved SHO is a fantastic proposition. Avoid neglected examples unless you're prepared for significant repair costs.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma