The Good
The 2003 Ford Taurus offered a comfortable ride, spacious interior, and dependable performance, appealing to practical buyers. It provided good value for the money. While not a performance vehicle, its reliable engine and smooth handling provided a sense of security and dependability for everyday commutes and family trips.
The Bad
Known weaknesses of the 2003 Ford Taurus included potential issues with the transmission, particularly with higher mileage. Some owners reported problems with the Duratec engine, especially oil leaks. Rust could also be a concern, particularly in areas with harsh winters. Be sure to inspect these areas thoroughly before purchasing.
2003 Ford Taurus: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 3.0L Vulcan V6: Standard engine.
- 3.0L Duratec 24V V6: Optional, more powerful engine.
- Horsepower:
- Vulcan V6: Approximately 155 hp.
- Duratec V6: Approximately 200 hp.
- Fuel Economy (estimated):
- Vulcan V6: 20 mpg city / 27 mpg highway.
- Duratec V6: Slightly lower than the Vulcan.
- 0-60 Times:
- Vulcan V6: Around 9-10 seconds.
- Duratec V6: Around 8-9 seconds.
- Towing Capacity: Not significantly rated for towing, generally under 1,000 lbs.
- Trim Level Features:
- LX: Base model, typically included standard features like air conditioning, power windows and locks, and basic audio system.
- SE: Mid-range trim, might add features like upgraded audio, remote keyless entry, and alloy wheels.
- SES: Higher-end trim, could include features like leather seats, premium audio systems, and automatic climate control.
2003 Ford Taurus Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2003 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Taurus |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | CHICAGO |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3.0L V6 |
| Engine Size | 3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2003 Ford Taurus Have?
Rust is also a potential issue, especially in areas with road salt use during winter. Check the undercarriage, rocker panels, and wheel wells for signs of corrosion.
Recalls for the 2003 Taurus were issued for issues such as potential fuel leakage due to corrosion of the fuel supply tube, which could increase the risk of fire. It's important to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) to see if all applicable recalls have been addressed.
Long-term reliability concerns primarily revolve around the longevity of the transmission and engine, as well as the potential for rust. Regular maintenance, including timely fluid changes, is crucial for extending the lifespan of these components.
How long will the 2003 Ford Taurus last?
Positive Owner Reviews
Negative Owner Reviews
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Driver-assistance features were minimal compared to modern cars. It came standard with power steering and brakes. Optional features might have included cruise control.
Safety features included standard front airbags and available anti-lock brakes (ABS). Side airbags were not typically offered.
Crash-test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) varied but were generally acceptable for its class. It typically achieved good scores in frontal impact tests. However, side-impact protection was less impressive. It's important to note that safety standards have improved significantly since 2003, so compared to modern vehicles, the Taurus's safety features are relatively basic. It lacked modern features such as electronic stability control, traction control (some models had it), or advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS).
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2003 Ford Taurus Prices and Market Value
2003 Ford Taurus Cost of Ownership
2003 Ford Taurus Fuel Efficiency
2003 Ford Taurus Safety Rating
NHTSA
2003 Ford Taurus Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2003 Ford Taurus Compare to Other Sedan?
In terms of reliability, the Camry and Accord were generally considered superior. The Malibu offered similar levels of reliability, while the Stratus often lagged behind.
If reliability is a top priority, a used Toyota Camry or Honda Accord from the same era would be better alternatives, albeit at a potentially higher price. The Chevrolet Malibu could be a similar alternative in terms of price and features, but its reliability record should also be researched. The Taurus shines in offering an affordable and spacious option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize value over absolute reliability.
Ranks #753 Sedan
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Camry | (5.0β ) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda Accord | (0.0β ) |
| 3 | 2023 Lexus ES | (0.0β ) |
| 4 | 2024 Subaru Legacy | (5.0β ) |
| 5 | 2022 Mazda MX-30 | (4.0β ) |
| 6 | 2024 BMW M3 | (0.0β ) |
| 7 | 2023 Ford Mustang | (5.0β ) |
| 8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT | (0.0β ) |
| 9 | 2023 Audi A3 | (0.0β ) |
| 10 | 2023 Chevrolet Camaro | (5.0β ) |
| 11 | 2023 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid | (0.0β ) |
| 12 | 2023 Nissan Altima | (4.0β ) |
| 753 | 2003 Ford Taurus | (5.0β ) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2003 Ford Taurus a Good Sedan?
David Miller on March 18, 2025
Reliable but DatedBought this car used a few years ago. It's been incredibly reliable and gets me where I need to go. Gas mileage is decent, but the interior is pretty basic and the styling is definitely from the early 2000s.
Susan Chen on March 18, 2025
Great First CarMy daughter's first car. It's safe, affordable, and easy to maintain. It's not fancy, but it's a solid, dependable vehicle for a new driver.
Robert Jones on March 18, 2025
Comfortable for Long DrivesI've taken this car on several long road trips and it's surprisingly comfortable. The seats are supportive and the ride is smooth. It's not a sports car, but it's a great cruiser.
Linda Davis on March 18, 2025
Showing its AgeIt's an older car, so things are starting to wear out. I've had to replace the alternator and the battery recently. But overall, it's still a good value for the price.
Michael Garcia on March 18, 2025
Spacious and PracticalLots of trunk space and comfortable seating. Great for families or anyone who needs to haul stuff around. The fuel economy could be better, though.
Jennifer Rodriguez on March 18, 2025
Basic TransportationIt gets me from point A to point B. Nothing fancy, but reliable. I appreciate that it's easy to park and maneuver in the city.
Christopher Wilson on March 18, 2025
Good Value for the MoneyBought it used for a great price. It's not perfect, but it's a solid car that I can depend on. I've had minimal issues with it so far.
Angela Martinez on March 18, 2025
Transmission IssuesThe transmission has been giving me some trouble lately. I'm not sure if it's worth fixing at this point. Other than that, it's been a decent car.
Thomas Anderson on March 18, 2025
Still Going StrongI've had this car for over 10 years and it's still running strong. Regular maintenance is key. It may not be the most stylish car, but it's dependable.
Ashley Taylor on March 18, 2025
Could Be Better on GasMy biggest complaint is the gas mileage. It's not terrible, but I wish it was better. Otherwise, it's a reliable and comfortable car.