The Good
The 1998 Ford Taurus offered a comfortable and spacious ride, appealing to practical buyers needing a reliable family car. While not a performance machine, its adequate engine options provided sufficient power for everyday driving. It was also relatively fuel-efficient and offered good value for its price, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. The roomy interior could evoke a sense of security and comfort for families.
The Bad
Common weaknesses of the 1998 Ford Taurus included potential transmission issues, particularly with the AX4S automatic transmission. The oval-shaped design wasn't universally loved and became somewhat dated. Rust could also be a concern, especially in areas with harsh winters. Some owners reported issues with the Duratec engine regarding head gasket leaks, so it's important to inspect the car thoroughly before purchase.
1998 Ford Taurus: Quick Overview
Key Specifications of the 1998 Ford Taurus:
- Engine Options:
- 3.0L Vulcan V6: A reliable but less powerful option.
- 3.0L Duratec 24V V6: A more refined and powerful engine.
- Horsepower:
- 3.0L Vulcan V6: Approximately 145-155 hp.
- 3.0L Duratec 24V V6: Approximately 200 hp.
- Fuel Economy:
- 3.0L Vulcan V6: Around 20 mpg city / 29 mpg highway.
- 3.0L Duratec 24V V6: Around 19 mpg city / 27 mpg highway. (Note: Fuel economy varied based on driving conditions and transmission)
- 0-60 Times:
- 3.0L Vulcan V6: Approximately 10-11 seconds.
- 3.0L Duratec 24V V6: Approximately 8-9 seconds.
- Towing Capacity: Generally not recommended for towing. Light utility trailers only if equipped with the correct equipment and within weight limits. Typically, towing capacity would be minimal, around 1000 lbs maximum.
- Trim-Level Features:
- GL: Base model, typically included standard features like power windows, power locks, and air conditioning. Cloth seats and basic audio system.
- LX: Added features like upgraded cloth upholstery, cruise control, and sometimes alloy wheels. Enhanced sound system.
- SE: Sportier trim with features like a rear spoiler, upgraded suspension (in some cases), and unique interior trim. Included most of the features available on LX trim.
- SHO (Super High Output): Not available in 1998 model year. The SHO ended production in 1996, then returned for the 2010 model year.
1998 Ford Taurus Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1998 |
Make | Ford |
Model | Taurus |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Sedan |
Category | Mid-Size Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | United States |
Manufacturing City | ATLANTA |
Dimensions
Doors | 4-Door |
Curb Weight | 3353 pounds |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 3.0 6 |
Engine Size | 3L |
Engine Cylinders | 6 |
Transmission | - |
Transmission Type | Automatic |
Transmission Speeds | - |
Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | - |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Ford Taurus Have?
Recalls were issued for various issues across the Taurus model years, including potential problems with the fuel system and airbags. Owners should check the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) website to verify if their specific vehicle had any outstanding recalls. Long-term reliability concerns often revolved around the aforementioned transmission and engine problems. Suspension components, such as struts and ball joints, also tended to wear out over time, requiring replacement. Regular maintenance, including timely fluid changes, was crucial to mitigating these issues and extending the vehicle's lifespan. Proper cooling system maintenance was also important to prevent head gasket failure on the Duratec engines. While not specific to the 1998 model year, issues with the electronic ignition system were reported across multiple years of the Taurus.
How long will the 1998 Ford Taurus last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Safety features included dual front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were optional on some trims. Side airbags were not available. Crash-test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) generally showed acceptable performance for frontal impacts, but side-impact protection was less impressive by today's standards. Optional features varied by trim level and could include cruise control, power windows and locks, and upgraded audio systems. The lack of advanced safety tech like electronic stability control or traction control underscores its age. It is important to remember that safety standards have evolved drastically since 1998, so its performance in a crash compared to newer vehicles would likely be significantly worse. Built-in tech was limited to basic functions, lacking features like navigation systems or Bluetooth connectivity.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
1998 Ford Taurus Prices and Market Value
1998 Ford Taurus Cost of Ownership
1998 Ford Taurus Fuel Efficiency
1998 Ford Taurus Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1998 Ford Taurus Recalls & Defects
Seat Belts:front:anchorage
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Exterior Lighting
Exterior Lighting
1998 Ford Taurus Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Ford Taurus Compare to Other Sedan?
Price-wise, the Taurus was often more affordable than the Camry or Accord, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. The Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo offered similar pricing and features. Considering long-term reliability and resale value, the Toyota Camry or Honda Accord would generally be better alternatives, despite their higher initial cost. If budget is the primary concern, and the Taurus is in good condition with a solid maintenance history, it can still be a viable option. The Dodge Intrepid offered a more stylish design, but its reliability record was less consistent than the Taurus. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual priorities and the condition of the specific vehicles being considered.