The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 is a compact pickup truck that entered production in 1982 as Chevrolet's first domestically produced pickup truck smaller than a full-size. Available in regular and extended cab configurations, popular trims included the base, Sport, and the off-road-oriented S-10 Tahoe. Its popularity stemmed from its smaller, more maneuverable size compared to full-size trucks, offering a good balance of utility and everyday drivability for its era. The pricing range in 1986 typically fell between $7,000 and $13,000.
The Good
The 1986 S-10 offered nimble handling and decent fuel economy for its time, appealing to practical buyers. Its straightforward design and robust construction contributed to its reliability, while a surprisingly comfortable ride for a truck of its era pleased both practical and emotional buyers seeking a versatile companion.
The Bad
Common weaknesses for the 1986 S-10 include potential rust issues, particularly around the wheel wells and rocker panels. Electrical gremlins can surface, and some older models may exhibit worn-out suspension components and interior wear. Engine performance can be modest with the base engine.
1986 Chevrolet S-10: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 offered a few engine choices. The standard engine was typically a 2.5-liter inline-four cylinder, known for its fuel efficiency. For those seeking more power, a 4.3-liter V6 engine was also available, providing a significant boost in performance.
- Horsepower: The 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine generally produced around 92-105 horsepower. The optional 4.3-liter V6 engine offered considerably more power, with figures around 150-165 horsepower, depending on the specific configuration and emission controls for that year.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied depending on the engine and transmission. With the four-cylinder engine and manual transmission, drivers could expect EPA estimates in the range of 20-25 MPG combined. The V6 engine would yield lower figures, likely in the 15-20 MPG combined range.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times were not a primary focus for the S-10, especially with the base engine. For the 2.5L, expect times in the 12-15 second range. The 4.3L V6 could achieve 0-60 mph in approximately 9-11 seconds, offering more spirited acceleration.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity for the 1986 S-10 was respectable for a compact truck of its size. Properly equipped models, especially those with the V6 engine and the towing package, could typically tow between 3,500 to 5,000 pounds, making it suitable for light to moderate hauling needs.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trim: Offered essential features like vinyl seats, a basic radio, and a functional dashboard.
- Sport Trim: Added some cosmetic enhancements and potentially a few comfort features like upgraded upholstery and carpeting.
- S-10 Tahoe: This trim often included more premium features such as better seating, distinctive exterior badging, and sometimes a more robust suspension setup for improved off-road capability or a sportier feel. Optional features across trims could include air conditioning, power steering, power brakes, and various interior comfort upgrades.
1986 Chevrolet S-10 Specifications
No records to be displayed
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1986 Chevrolet S-10 Have?
The 1986 Chevrolet S-10, like many vehicles of its era, is susceptible to certain recurring issues that owners should be aware of. One of the most common concerns is rust. The body panels, particularly around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and the bed of the truck, are prone to corrosion. This is often exacerbated by exposure to salt and moisture in colder climates. Frame rust can also be a significant structural concern that requires careful inspection.
Another area that can present problems is the electrical system. Older S-10s may experience issues with wiring harnesses, sensors, and control modules, leading to intermittent problems or complete failures of various components. Headlight switch failures and issues with the gauge cluster are not uncommon. The ignition system, including the distributor and coil, can also require attention over time.
The powertrain, while generally robust, is not immune to age-related wear. The 2.5L four-cylinder engine, while economical, can develop issues like oil leaks and may require valve adjustments. The 4.3L V6, a popular choice, is known for its torque but can also suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and potential head gasket issues, especially if not properly maintained. Transmission problems, both manual and automatic, can occur, including worn synchronizers in manual transmissions and failing clutch packs or torque converter issues in automatics.
While specific recalls for the 1986 model year might be limited and often related to safety components like braking systems or seatbelts, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any relevant campaigns. Long-term reliability concerns often center on the wear and tear of components due to age and mileage, rather than inherent design flaws, provided the truck has been reasonably maintained. Suspension components, such as ball joints and bushings, will eventually wear out and require replacement. Exhaust systems are also prone to rust and leaks.
Another area that can present problems is the electrical system. Older S-10s may experience issues with wiring harnesses, sensors, and control modules, leading to intermittent problems or complete failures of various components. Headlight switch failures and issues with the gauge cluster are not uncommon. The ignition system, including the distributor and coil, can also require attention over time.
The powertrain, while generally robust, is not immune to age-related wear. The 2.5L four-cylinder engine, while economical, can develop issues like oil leaks and may require valve adjustments. The 4.3L V6, a popular choice, is known for its torque but can also suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and potential head gasket issues, especially if not properly maintained. Transmission problems, both manual and automatic, can occur, including worn synchronizers in manual transmissions and failing clutch packs or torque converter issues in automatics.
While specific recalls for the 1986 model year might be limited and often related to safety components like braking systems or seatbelts, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any relevant campaigns. Long-term reliability concerns often center on the wear and tear of components due to age and mileage, rather than inherent design flaws, provided the truck has been reasonably maintained. Suspension components, such as ball joints and bushings, will eventually wear out and require replacement. Exhaust systems are also prone to rust and leaks.
How long will the 1986 Chevrolet S-10 last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1986 Chevrolet S-10 can reasonably be expected to last for 200,000 to 300,000 miles or more. The long-term durability of the S-10 is generally considered good, especially for the V6 engine, which is known for its robustness. However, its longevity is heavily dependent on consistent maintenance, rust prevention, and addressing mechanical issues promptly. Weaknesses over time tend to be age-related, primarily corrosion on the body and frame, and wear on suspension and drivetrain components. Regular fluid changes, rust-proofing, and addressing minor repairs before they escalate are crucial for maximizing its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 was a product of its time, meaning its technology, entertainment, and safety features were relatively basic compared to modern vehicles.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. An upgraded stereo system with cassette tape player was often an optional feature, offering a bit more listening variety. Air conditioning was also an option, a welcome addition for comfort in warmer climates. Power windows and power door locks were not standard across all trims and were considered premium options, usually found on higher trim levels or as part of an option package.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we know them today (like lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or blind-spot monitoring) were virtually non-existent in the 1986 S-10. The focus was on fundamental driving mechanics. Features like power steering and power brakes were available to make driving easier and safer, reducing driver fatigue, particularly during maneuvers and braking.
Safety Features: Safety in the 1986 S-10 was limited by the standards of the mid-1980s. Seatbelts were standard, though often lap and shoulder belts in the front. Crumple zones were incorporated into the vehicle's structure to absorb impact energy, and the chassis was designed to provide a degree of protection. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not commonly available or were very rudimentary if offered as an option on higher-end models. There were no airbags offered in the 1986 S-10.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS for vehicles from 1986 are often not readily available or may not be directly comparable to modern testing protocols. However, as a body-on-frame truck from that era, its safety performance would be considered significantly lower than contemporary vehicles designed with more advanced safety structures and supplemental restraint systems.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. An upgraded stereo system with cassette tape player was often an optional feature, offering a bit more listening variety. Air conditioning was also an option, a welcome addition for comfort in warmer climates. Power windows and power door locks were not standard across all trims and were considered premium options, usually found on higher trim levels or as part of an option package.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features as we know them today (like lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or blind-spot monitoring) were virtually non-existent in the 1986 S-10. The focus was on fundamental driving mechanics. Features like power steering and power brakes were available to make driving easier and safer, reducing driver fatigue, particularly during maneuvers and braking.
Safety Features: Safety in the 1986 S-10 was limited by the standards of the mid-1980s. Seatbelts were standard, though often lap and shoulder belts in the front. Crumple zones were incorporated into the vehicle's structure to absorb impact energy, and the chassis was designed to provide a degree of protection. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not commonly available or were very rudimentary if offered as an option on higher-end models. There were no airbags offered in the 1986 S-10.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS for vehicles from 1986 are often not readily available or may not be directly comparable to modern testing protocols. However, as a body-on-frame truck from that era, its safety performance would be considered significantly lower than contemporary vehicles designed with more advanced safety structures and supplemental restraint systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
1986 Chevrolet S-10 Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1986 Chevrolet S-10 had a starting Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) that typically ranged from around $7,000 for a base model to upwards of $13,000 for a more equipped extended cab version. In the current used market, prices for a 1986 S-10 can vary significantly based on condition, mileage, trim level, and originality. Expect prices to range from $1,500 for project vehicles to $5,000 or more for well-maintained examples. Depreciation has been substantial, as is typical for trucks of this age. Factors affecting resale value include the presence of rust, the condition of the powertrain and interior, originality of parts, and the presence of desirable options or trim levels like the S-10 Tahoe. Collector interest in clean, unmodified examples can sometimes boost value.
1986 Chevrolet S-10 Cost of Ownership
The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and lower market value. Fuel costs depend heavily on the engine choice; the 2.5L four-cylinder offers good MPG, while the 4.3L V6 is less efficient. Maintenance and repair costs are also usually reasonable, with parts being widely available and affordable. Routine maintenance like oil changes, filter replacements, and brake jobs are straightforward. While it can be economical, owners should budget for potential rust repair and age-related mechanical issues. Overall, it's a cost-effective vehicle to keep running.
1986 Chevrolet S-10 Fuel Efficiency
No records to be displayed
1986 Chevrolet S-10 Insurance
Insurance for a 1986 Chevrolet S-10 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1986 Chevrolet S-10 Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 competed in the compact pickup truck segment against strong rivals such as the Ford Ranger, Nissan Hardbody (D21), Toyota Pickup (later Hilux), and the Mitsubishi Mighty Max.
Performance: The S-10's available 4.3L V6 engine offered competitive power for its class, often outperforming the base engines of rivals like the Nissan Hardbody or Mitsubishi Mighty Max. However, the base 2.5L four-cylinder was less potent. The Ford Ranger often offered a good balance of performance with its own inline-four and V6 options.
Features: In 1986, features were relatively basic across the board. The S-10 offered standard amenities, with optional upgrades like power steering, A/C, and better stereos. The Toyota Pickup was renowned for its rugged simplicity, while the Nissan Hardbody was praised for its sturdy build. Options like four-wheel drive were available on most models, including the S-10.
Reliability: Reliability is a mixed bag for this era. Toyota and Nissan pickups from this period often held a reputation for exceptional longevity and durability, potentially surpassing the S-10 in long-term, trouble-free operation, especially concerning rust resistance. The S-10's reliability is more dependent on maintenance and can be affected by rust issues more readily than its Japanese counterparts. Ford Ranger reliability was generally considered good, comparable to the S-10.
Price: The S-10 was competitively priced when new, slotting into the market similarly to the Ranger and often slightly more affordable than the Toyota or Nissan. Used prices today reflect their condition, with clean S-10s often being more budget-friendly than comparable Toyotas or Nissans, though rust can significantly impact value for all.
Recommendations: If exceptional long-term reliability and minimal rust concerns are paramount, the Toyota Pickup (Hilux) or Nissan Hardbody are often considered superior alternatives for durability. The Ford Ranger is a very similar competitor offering comparable performance and reliability, often with a slightly different feel. If you prioritize strong V6 power and American-market parts availability at a potentially lower used price point, the 1986 S-10 remains a solid contender, especially if rust is not a significant issue.
Performance: The S-10's available 4.3L V6 engine offered competitive power for its class, often outperforming the base engines of rivals like the Nissan Hardbody or Mitsubishi Mighty Max. However, the base 2.5L four-cylinder was less potent. The Ford Ranger often offered a good balance of performance with its own inline-four and V6 options.
Features: In 1986, features were relatively basic across the board. The S-10 offered standard amenities, with optional upgrades like power steering, A/C, and better stereos. The Toyota Pickup was renowned for its rugged simplicity, while the Nissan Hardbody was praised for its sturdy build. Options like four-wheel drive were available on most models, including the S-10.
Reliability: Reliability is a mixed bag for this era. Toyota and Nissan pickups from this period often held a reputation for exceptional longevity and durability, potentially surpassing the S-10 in long-term, trouble-free operation, especially concerning rust resistance. The S-10's reliability is more dependent on maintenance and can be affected by rust issues more readily than its Japanese counterparts. Ford Ranger reliability was generally considered good, comparable to the S-10.
Price: The S-10 was competitively priced when new, slotting into the market similarly to the Ranger and often slightly more affordable than the Toyota or Nissan. Used prices today reflect their condition, with clean S-10s often being more budget-friendly than comparable Toyotas or Nissans, though rust can significantly impact value for all.
Recommendations: If exceptional long-term reliability and minimal rust concerns are paramount, the Toyota Pickup (Hilux) or Nissan Hardbody are often considered superior alternatives for durability. The Ford Ranger is a very similar competitor offering comparable performance and reliability, often with a slightly different feel. If you prioritize strong V6 power and American-market parts availability at a potentially lower used price point, the 1986 S-10 remains a solid contender, especially if rust is not a significant issue.
Final Verdict: Is the 1986 Chevrolet S-10 a Good Vehicle?
The 1986 Chevrolet S-10 is ideal for budget-conscious individuals seeking a compact, versatile pickup truck for light-duty hauling, DIY projects, or as a dependable second vehicle. It's particularly suited for those who appreciate classic truck styling and don't require cutting-edge technology or advanced safety features. It is worth buying if found in good mechanical condition with minimal rust. Buying used is the only option. Focus on examples with the 4.3L V6 engine for better performance. Thoroughly inspect for rust, especially on the frame and body panels. Well-maintained S-10s can offer excellent value and years of service for those willing to perform basic upkeep. Avoid vehicles with significant rust damage.