The 1989 Chevrolet S-10 represents the robust and versatile compact pickup truck from GM's second generation, initially launched in 1982. This model year, part of the first-generation S-10 (1982-1993), was available in various body styles including regular cab, extended cab, and a choice of short or long beds. Key trims typically ranged from the base S-10 to more equipped Tahoe, Baja, and Sport variants. Known for its practical size and affordability, the S-10 stood out as a reliable workhorse, popular among those needing a capable utility vehicle without the bulk of a full-size truck. Pricing for a new 1989 S-10 generally fell between $8,000 and $13,000 depending on configuration and options.
The Good
The 1989 Chevrolet S-10 offered a compelling package of advantages. Its performance, especially with the optional V6 engine, provided adequate power for daily driving and light hauling. Reliability was a strong point, with many S-10s proving durable with basic maintenance. The compact design made it maneuverable in urban settings, appealing to practical buyers, while its rugged, no-nonsense aesthetic resonated with emotional buyers looking for an authentic truck experience. Good fuel efficiency for its class and a low initial purchase price contributed to its excellent overall value, making it an affordable and dependable choice.
The Bad
While robust, the 1989 Chevrolet S-10 had its weaknesses. Owners frequently reported issues with rust, especially on the body and frame, which could significantly impact longevity. The base 2.5L "Iron Duke" engine was often underpowered, leading to frustrating performance. Interior comfort was basic, lacking modern amenities and offering limited legroom, particularly in regular cab models. Electrical gremlins, worn suspension components, and brake issues were also common, requiring diligent attention during maintenance and inspections.
1989 Chevrolet S-10: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1989 Chevrolet S-10 offered a few engine choices to suit various needs. The standard engine was the 2.5-liter "Iron Duke" inline-4, a reliable but somewhat underpowered unit. An optional, more desirable engine was the 2.8-liter V6, providing a significant boost in power. Later in the first generation, the 4.3-liter V6 became available, though it was not standard across all 1989 configurations.
- Horsepower: The 2.5L I4 typically produced around 92 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque. The 2.8L V6 improved this to approximately 125 horsepower and 160 lb-ft of torque, offering much better acceleration and towing capability. The 4.3L V6, if equipped, would push output closer to 160 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied based on engine and transmission. The 2.5L I4 with a manual transmission could achieve around 20-22 MPG combined. The 2.8L V6 generally saw figures closer to 17-19 MPG combined. Automatic transmissions typically yielded slightly lower numbers.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration was not a strong suit for the S-10, especially with the base engine. The 2.5L I4 models typically took 14-16 seconds to reach 60 mph. The 2.8L V6 improved this significantly, often achieving 0-60 mph in the 10-12 second range, making it more competitive for daily driving.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was a key selling point for a compact truck. With the 2.5L engine, towing was limited to about 2,000 lbs. However, with the 2.8L V6 and proper equipment, the 1989 S-10 could tow anywhere from 3,500 lbs to 5,000 lbs, making it suitable for small boats or utility trailers.
- Trim-Level Features: Trims included the base S-10, offering utilitarian features like vinyl seating, manual windows, and basic instrumentation. The Tahoe trim added comfort features such as cloth upholstery, carpeting, and some chrome accents. The Sport trim featured body-color grilles, sport wheels, and enhanced styling. Optional features across trims included air conditioning, power windows and locks, cruise control, tilt steering, an AM/FM stereo, and various wheel upgrades, allowing buyers to customize their trucks from basic work vehicles to more comfortable daily drivers. Extended cab models offered additional interior storage behind the front seats.
1989 Chevrolet S-10 Specifications
No records to be displayed
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1989 Chevrolet S-10 Have?
The 1989 Chevrolet S-10, while generally reliable, did have its share of frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. A pervasive issue across many first-generation S-10s, including the 1989 model, was rust. Body panels, especially fenders, rocker panels, cab corners, and bed sides, were highly susceptible to corrosion, particularly in regions with harsh winters and road salt. The frame also showed signs of rust, which could compromise structural integrity over time.
Another common complaint involved electrical system issues. Owners often reported problems with dashboard gauges, lighting (both interior and exterior), faulty wiring harnesses, and starter motor failures. Window regulators, especially for power windows, were known to fail, leading to stuck or inoperable windows.
Engine-specific problems included oil leaks from the 2.5L "Iron Duke" engine, often around the rear main seal or valve cover. The 2.8L V6 could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and premature timing chain wear. Owners also reported issues with fuel delivery systems, including failing fuel pumps and clogged fuel injectors, leading to rough idling or stalling.
Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and shock absorbers, tended to wear out prematurely, particularly under heavy use or poor road conditions, resulting in loose steering and a rough ride. Brake system issues, including worn calipers, rotors, and master cylinder problems, were also common, often leading to spongy pedals or reduced braking effectiveness.
Recalls for the 1989 S-10 specifically related to fuel tank straps and potential fuel leaks were documented, which could pose a fire hazard. There were also recalls concerning steering column components that could lead to a loss of steering control. Prospective buyers should always check a vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls. Overall, while many issues were maintenance-related, the S-10's longevity often depended heavily on consistent preventative care and addressing rust promptly.
Another common complaint involved electrical system issues. Owners often reported problems with dashboard gauges, lighting (both interior and exterior), faulty wiring harnesses, and starter motor failures. Window regulators, especially for power windows, were known to fail, leading to stuck or inoperable windows.
Engine-specific problems included oil leaks from the 2.5L "Iron Duke" engine, often around the rear main seal or valve cover. The 2.8L V6 could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and premature timing chain wear. Owners also reported issues with fuel delivery systems, including failing fuel pumps and clogged fuel injectors, leading to rough idling or stalling.
Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and shock absorbers, tended to wear out prematurely, particularly under heavy use or poor road conditions, resulting in loose steering and a rough ride. Brake system issues, including worn calipers, rotors, and master cylinder problems, were also common, often leading to spongy pedals or reduced braking effectiveness.
Recalls for the 1989 S-10 specifically related to fuel tank straps and potential fuel leaks were documented, which could pose a fire hazard. There were also recalls concerning steering column components that could lead to a loss of steering control. Prospective buyers should always check a vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls. Overall, while many issues were maintenance-related, the S-10's longevity often depended heavily on consistent preventative care and addressing rust promptly.
How long will the 1989 Chevrolet S-10 last?
The 1989 Chevrolet S-10, given proper maintenance, often achieved impressive mileage and years of service. Based on owner data, it was not uncommon for these trucks to surpass 150,000 to 200,000 miles, with many well-maintained examples reaching even 250,000 miles or more. The "Iron Duke" 2.5L I4 and the 2.8L V6 engines, while not immensely powerful, were generally robust. Long-term durability was a hallmark, provided routine oil changes, tune-ups, and fluid checks were performed. However, weaknesses over time often manifested as significant rust on the body and frame, which could eventually become a structural concern. Electrical gremlins, worn suspension components, and persistent fluid leaks were also common age-related issues that required attention to keep the truck running reliably into its later years.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
As a compact pickup from 1989, the Chevrolet S-10's built-in technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features were quite basic by modern standards. The focus was primarily on functionality rather than luxury or advanced electronics.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
Driver-Assistance & Safety Features:
Driver-assistance features as we know them today (e.g., ABS, traction control, stability control) were non-existent in the 1989 S-10.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS in the manner they are conducted today were not available for vehicles from 1989. Safety standards were significantly less stringent. Therefore, specific numerical crash-test ratings for the 1989 S-10 are not available. It can be assumed that its safety performance would be considerably below modern vehicles due to the absence of airbags, advanced crumple zones, and reinforced structures. Buyers interested in a classic S-10 should be aware of these inherent safety limitations.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
- Radio: Standard entertainment was typically a simple AM radio. Optional upgrades included an AM/FM stereo, and sometimes an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player. These units were usually single-DIN sized and offered basic sound quality with two speakers.
- Instrumentation: The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, fuel level, coolant temperature, and oil pressure. A tachometer was an optional extra on some trims.
- Air Conditioning: Air conditioning was an optional, highly desirable feature, especially for comfort in warmer climates.
- Power Options: Power windows and power door locks were optional conveniences, not standard on most base models. Cruise control was also an available option, primarily found on higher trim levels or specific option packages.
Driver-Assistance & Safety Features:
Driver-assistance features as we know them today (e.g., ABS, traction control, stability control) were non-existent in the 1989 S-10.
- Brakes: The S-10 came standard with power-assisted front disc brakes and rear drum brakes. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were not standard, and if available at all, it would have been a rudimentary rear-wheel-only ABS system, typically found on later models or specific option groups.
- Seatbelts: Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants. Rear passengers in extended cab models (if equipped with jump seats) would have had lap belts.
- Airbags: Airbags were not offered in the 1989 S-10; they became standard in compact trucks much later.
- Visibility: Large windows provided decent outward visibility, aiding in maneuvering and parking.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS in the manner they are conducted today were not available for vehicles from 1989. Safety standards were significantly less stringent. Therefore, specific numerical crash-test ratings for the 1989 S-10 are not available. It can be assumed that its safety performance would be considerably below modern vehicles due to the absence of airbags, advanced crumple zones, and reinforced structures. Buyers interested in a classic S-10 should be aware of these inherent safety limitations.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Chevrolet S-10 Prices and Market Value
When new in 1989, the Chevrolet S-10 had a broad pricing range, typically starting from approximately $8,000 for a base regular cab model with the 2.5L engine and manual transmission, and extending up to around $13,000 to $15,000 for extended cab models with the V6 engine, automatic transmission, and popular options like air conditioning and power accessories.
Today, the used market prices for a 1989 Chevrolet S-10 vary significantly based on condition, mileage, engine, and geographical location. Well-preserved, low-mileage examples or those that have undergone restoration can fetch anywhere from $7,000 to $15,000+, especially for rare trims like the Baja or Sport. More commonly, a decent running S-10 in fair to good condition will range from $2,500 to $6,000. Trucks needing significant work or with heavy rust might go for under $1,500.
Depreciation was substantial in its initial years, like most vehicles. However, at this age, depreciation has largely bottomed out. Instead, prices are now driven by condition and collector interest. Factors affecting resale value include rust (the biggest detractor), engine health (especially V6 models being more desirable), transmission condition, functional accessories (AC, power windows), and overall originality. A clean title and maintenance history also add value.
Today, the used market prices for a 1989 Chevrolet S-10 vary significantly based on condition, mileage, engine, and geographical location. Well-preserved, low-mileage examples or those that have undergone restoration can fetch anywhere from $7,000 to $15,000+, especially for rare trims like the Baja or Sport. More commonly, a decent running S-10 in fair to good condition will range from $2,500 to $6,000. Trucks needing significant work or with heavy rust might go for under $1,500.
Depreciation was substantial in its initial years, like most vehicles. However, at this age, depreciation has largely bottomed out. Instead, prices are now driven by condition and collector interest. Factors affecting resale value include rust (the biggest detractor), engine health (especially V6 models being more desirable), transmission condition, functional accessories (AC, power windows), and overall originality. A clean title and maintenance history also add value.
1989 Chevrolet S-10 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1989 Chevrolet S-10 generally falls into the category of economical, provided the truck is in decent shape to begin with.
Long-term ownership costs are mainly tied to preventative maintenance and addressing age-related wear, primarily rust and worn suspension components. It's an affordable vehicle to keep running, making it a good choice for budget-conscious owners or as a second utility vehicle.
- Insurance: Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age and modest value. Collector car insurance might be an option for pristine examples.
- Fuel: Fuel economy is respectable for its era (17-22 MPG), making it relatively inexpensive to fuel compared to larger trucks.
- Maintenance: Maintenance is straightforward. Parts are widely available and often inexpensive, and many repairs can be performed by a DIY enthusiast.
- Repair: Repair costs are generally low due to simple mechanicals. Common issues like rust repair or electrical fixes can add up, but engine and transmission overhauls are less frequent and, when needed, parts are still accessible.
Long-term ownership costs are mainly tied to preventative maintenance and addressing age-related wear, primarily rust and worn suspension components. It's an affordable vehicle to keep running, making it a good choice for budget-conscious owners or as a second utility vehicle.
1989 Chevrolet S-10 Fuel Efficiency
No records to be displayed
1989 Chevrolet S-10 Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Chevrolet S-10 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Chevrolet S-10 Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1989 Chevrolet S-10 competed in a fiercely contested compact pickup truck market. Its primary rivals offered similar utility and features, making for a tough choice for buyers.
Compared to these rivals, the S-10 held its own with a good balance of utility, affordability, and repairability. While the Japanese rivals often had an edge in long-term mechanical reliability, the S-10 benefitted from cheaper parts and easier access to repair knowledge in North America. For buyers prioritizing a V6 engine option and parts availability, the S-10 was a solid choice.
- Ford Ranger: The Ford Ranger was the S-10's most direct and formidable competitor. In 1989, the Ranger offered a comparable range of engines (2.3L I4, 2.9L V6, later 4.0L V6), similar body styles, and competitive towing capacities.
- Performance: Similar to the S-10, with the V6 Ranger often feeling slightly more refined.
- Features: Basic, similar optional amenities as the S-10.
- Reliability: Generally on par, though some argue the Ranger had slightly better rust resistance in certain areas.
- Price: Very competitive, often cross-shopped directly with the S-10.
- Recommendation: A very similar alternative; choice often came down to brand loyalty or minor preferences.
- Toyota Pickup (Hilux in other markets): Known for its legendary reliability and bulletproof engines. The 1989 Toyota Pickup offered 2.4L I4 (22R-E) and 3.0L V6 (3VZE) engines.
- Performance: The Toyota's 22R-E I4 was highly respected for its durability, if not its power. The V6 was comparable to GM's.
- Features: Less variety in trims than American counterparts, but known for build quality.
- Reliability: Often considered superior in terms of long-term mechanical reliability, particularly the 22R-E engine. Less prone to major electrical issues.
- Price: Typically commanded a slightly higher price new and retains more value on the used market due to its reputation for reliability.
- Recommendation: A better alternative if absolute reliability and minimal fuss are top priorities, willing to pay a premium.
- Nissan Hardbody (D21): Another strong Japanese contender, offering solid performance and reliability. Engine options included a 2.4L I4 and a 3.0L V6.
- Performance: Competitive with the S-10, especially with the V6.
- Features: Offered similar basic and optional features.
- Reliability: Very good, often praised for its durable drivetrain. Some rust issues but generally solid.
- Price: Competitive with the S-10 and Ranger.
- Recommendation: A similar and very strong alternative to the S-10, offering comparable value and robustness.
Compared to these rivals, the S-10 held its own with a good balance of utility, affordability, and repairability. While the Japanese rivals often had an edge in long-term mechanical reliability, the S-10 benefitted from cheaper parts and easier access to repair knowledge in North America. For buyers prioritizing a V6 engine option and parts availability, the S-10 was a solid choice.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Chevrolet S-10 a Good Vehicle?
The 1989 Chevrolet S-10 is an ideal vehicle for budget-conscious buyers seeking a practical, no-frills compact pickup truck. It's perfect for those who need a light-duty work vehicle, a reliable commuter, or a weekend project hauler without the expense and bulk of a full-size truck. It's worth buying for individuals who value simple mechanicals, readily available and affordable parts, and are prepared for basic maintenance. This truck excels as a used purchase, specifically for those comfortable with DIY repairs or who have access to an affordable mechanic. Look for models with the 2.8L V6 for better performance. It is less suited for buyers expecting modern comforts, advanced safety features, or powerful acceleration. However, for a utilitarian classic that offers excellent long-term value and character, the 1989 S-10 remains a commendable choice, especially if a rust-free example can be found.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.