The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado marked its second model year after replacing the long-running S-10. This first-generation compact/mid-size pickup truck, produced from 2004 to 2012, was available in Work Truck (WT), LS, Z71, and Z85 trims. Originally priced from approximately $16,000 to $27,000, it stood out for its more modern styling and available inline-five engine, offering a balance of utility and efficiency for its class, making it a popular choice for those needing a practical truck without the bulk of a full-size.
The Good
The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado offers practical advantages like a manageable size for city driving, decent fuel efficiency for a truck, and strong value on the used market. Emotionally, its rugged design and versatile capabilities for light hauling or outdoor adventures appeal to those seeking a capable pickup experience without the full-size commitment.
The Bad
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2005 Chevrolet Colorado: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado offered two gasoline engine choices: a 2.8-liter inline-four (I4) and a 3.5-liter inline-five (I5).
- Horsepower: The 2.8L I4 produced 175 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. The more powerful 3.5L I5 delivered 220 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque.
- Fuel Economy:
• 2.8L I4 2WD (manual): EPA estimated around 18 MPG city / 24 MPG highway.
• 3.5L I5 2WD (automatic): EPA estimated around 17 MPG city / 23 MPG highway.
• 4WD models generally saw slightly lower figures. - 0-60 Times:
• 2.8L I4: Approximately 9.5-10.5 seconds.
• 3.5L I5: Approximately 8.5-9.5 seconds, offering more spirited acceleration for a compact truck. - Towing Capacity: With the proper equipment, the 2005 Colorado equipped with the 3.5L I5 engine could tow up to 4,000 pounds. The 2.8L I4 typically managed around 2,200 pounds.
- Trim-Level Features:
• Work Truck (WT): The most basic trim, featuring vinyl seating, AM/FM radio, manual windows/locks, and steel wheels. Designed for utility and durability.
• LS: Added amenities such as air conditioning, power windows and door locks, power mirrors, a CD player, and cloth upholstery.
• Z71 Off-Road: Geared towards outdoor enthusiasts, this trim included off-road suspension, larger tires, unique exterior badging, and a limited-slip differential for enhanced traction. It was available in both 2WD and 4WD configurations.
• Z85 (Standard/Street): This trim offered a more street-oriented suspension tuning compared to the Z71, often coming with alloy wheels and other aesthetic enhancements, while still providing capable performance. - Body Styles: Available in Regular Cab, Extended Cab (with jump seats), and Crew Cab (with four full doors) configurations.
- Bed Lengths: Regular and Extended cabs typically came with a 6-foot bed, while Crew Cabs had a shorter 5-foot bed.
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2005 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Colorado |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SHREVEPORT |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | L52 |
| Engine Size | 3.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2005 Chevrolet Colorado Have?
The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado, while generally a robust truck, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that prospective owners should be aware of. One of the most significant and well-documented issues, particularly for early 1st generation models (2004-2006) equipped with the 3.5L inline-five engine, involves premature wear of the cylinder head valve guides. This can lead to engine misfires, a "check engine" light, reduced power, and eventually require costly cylinder head replacement or repair. Some owners also report rough idling or surging, which can be linked to dirty throttle bodies or other engine sensor issues.
Beyond engine woes, rust is a pervasive concern, especially in regions that use road salt. Owners frequently report rust on the frame, rocker panels, rear wheel wells, and other body components. The brake system can also present issues, with some owners noting premature wear of brake pads and rotors or illumination of the ABS light due to sensor malfunctions. Electrical problems are not uncommon; these can manifest as failures of the instrument cluster (dead gauges or pixel issues), faulty blower motor resistors leading to fan speed issues, or power window motor failures.
Regarding recalls for the 2005 model year, several were issued by NHTSA. Key recalls included: 04V500000 (October 2004) and 05V293000 (July 2005) both concerning the headlamp switch, which could overheat and fail; 05V028000 (January 2005) and 05V391000 (August 2005) for issues with the steering column shaft; 05V158000 (April 2005) regarding a potential power steering fluid leak from the brake booster; 05V248000 (June 2005) for steering gear mount bolts; and 06V398000 (October 2006) for a faulty fuel pump module. These recalls highlight various potential safety and operational concerns addressed by GM. Long-term reliability is largely dependent on addressing these common issues and consistent maintenance.
Beyond engine woes, rust is a pervasive concern, especially in regions that use road salt. Owners frequently report rust on the frame, rocker panels, rear wheel wells, and other body components. The brake system can also present issues, with some owners noting premature wear of brake pads and rotors or illumination of the ABS light due to sensor malfunctions. Electrical problems are not uncommon; these can manifest as failures of the instrument cluster (dead gauges or pixel issues), faulty blower motor resistors leading to fan speed issues, or power window motor failures.
Regarding recalls for the 2005 model year, several were issued by NHTSA. Key recalls included: 04V500000 (October 2004) and 05V293000 (July 2005) both concerning the headlamp switch, which could overheat and fail; 05V028000 (January 2005) and 05V391000 (August 2005) for issues with the steering column shaft; 05V158000 (April 2005) regarding a potential power steering fluid leak from the brake booster; 05V248000 (June 2005) for steering gear mount bolts; and 06V398000 (October 2006) for a faulty fuel pump module. These recalls highlight various potential safety and operational concerns addressed by GM. Long-term reliability is largely dependent on addressing these common issues and consistent maintenance.
How long will the 2005 Chevrolet Colorado last?
With diligent maintenance, many 2005 Chevrolet Colorado owners report achieving 150,000 to 200,000 miles, and some well-cared-for examples can even exceed 250,000 miles. The truck's frame and major drivetrain components are generally durable. However, long-term weaknesses include the pervasive issue of rust, particularly on the frame and body panels, which can significantly impact structural integrity and appearance over time. Electrical gremlins, such as instrument cluster failures and power window issues, tend to emerge with age. The cylinder head problems on the 3.5L engine, if not addressed early, can lead to substantial repair costs. Proactive rust prevention, regular fluid changes, and addressing minor issues promptly are crucial for maximizing its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado, being a product of its era, featured relatively basic built-in technology and entertainment compared to modern vehicles. Standard entertainment included an AM/FM stereo, with an optional CD player available on higher trims. Buyers could also opt for XM Satellite Radio, providing a wider range of audio content. There were no advanced infotainment screens, navigation systems, or smartphone integration features common today; controls were straightforward and analog. USB ports, Bluetooth connectivity, or other contemporary tech were not offered.
In terms of driver-assistance, features were also minimal. The most prominent driver-aid was the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was standard on most models but optional on some base Work Truck configurations. Advanced systems like blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or parking sensors were not available.
Safety features included standard dual front airbags for the driver and front passenger. Side-curtain airbags were an important optional safety upgrade, offering enhanced head protection in side-impact collisions, and were available on select trims and body styles. Daytime running lights were also standard. Traction control was available on some models, particularly those with the Z71 off-road package or higher trims.
Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 2005 Colorado generally showed respectable results for its class:
In terms of driver-assistance, features were also minimal. The most prominent driver-aid was the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was standard on most models but optional on some base Work Truck configurations. Advanced systems like blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or parking sensors were not available.
Safety features included standard dual front airbags for the driver and front passenger. Side-curtain airbags were an important optional safety upgrade, offering enhanced head protection in side-impact collisions, and were available on select trims and body styles. Daytime running lights were also standard. Traction control was available on some models, particularly those with the Z71 off-road package or higher trims.
Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 2005 Colorado generally showed respectable results for its class:
- Frontal Driver: 4 out of 5 stars
- Frontal Passenger: 4 out of 5 stars
- Side Impact (Front Seat): 5 out of 5 stars (for Regular and Extended Cabs), 4 out of 5 stars (for Crew Cab)
- Side Impact (Rear Seat): Not Rated (for Regular and Extended Cabs), 3 out of 5 stars (for Crew Cab)
- Rollover: 3 out of 5 stars (2WD models), 4 out of 5 stars (4WD models)
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Prices and Market Value
When new in 2005, the Chevrolet Colorado's pricing ranged from approximately $16,000 for a basic Regular Cab 2WD Work Truck to around $27,000 for a fully-equipped Crew Cab 4WD Z71. Today, as a used vehicle, current market prices vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and trim. You can find examples ranging from $3,000 for high-mileage trucks in fair condition, up to $8,000-$12,000 for lower-mileage, well-maintained Z71 4x4 models. Depreciation has been substantial, as expected for a nearly two-decade-old vehicle, with its value largely bottoming out. Factors greatly affecting its current resale value include the extent of rust (especially on the frame), overall mechanical condition, presence of maintenance records, and whether it's a desirable 4x4 or Crew Cab configuration. The known engine issues and common rust spots can significantly diminish perceived value.
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 2005 Chevrolet Colorado can be a mixed bag. Insurance costs are generally affordable due to its age and lower replacement value. Fuel economy is moderate for a pickup, better than full-size trucks but not car-like, with 17-24 MPG depending on configuration. Routine maintenance (oil changes, filters) is inexpensive, as parts are readily available and shared with other GM models. However, repair costs can escalate if common issues like cylinder head problems (for the 3.5L I5) or extensive rust need attention. Proactive maintenance and addressing minor issues prevent larger bills. Overall, it can be an economical truck to own if a well-maintained example is purchased and known weaknesses are managed, but neglect can quickly make it costly.
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
21 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
27 miles/gallon
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Safety Rating
NHTSA
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Recalls & Defects
Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch
Recall date
2006-04-27
Recall no.
06v139000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pickup Trucks MAY Experience THE Permanent Loss OF Brake Lamp Function or Brake Lamps That ARE Illuminated AT All Times. THE Center High-Mounted Stop Lamp (Chmsl) IS Affected IN Both Instances. Also, IF Equipped, THE Cruise Control Will Become Inoperative. ANY Trailer Brake Lamps Which ARE Connected TO THE Vehicle's Brake Lamp Wiring Will Mimic THE Vehicle's Brake Lamps When Either Condition Occurs.
Consequence
A Following Driver MAY NOT Know When THE Brakes Have Been Applied, and A Rear-End Crash Could Occur Without Prior Warning.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Brake Lamp Switch Assembly. THE Recall Began ON December 5, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-630-2438; GMC AT 1-866-996-9463 or Isuzu AT 1-800-255-6727.
Notes
GM Recall NO. 06030.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch
Recall date
2009-07-29
Recall no.
09v310000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
GM IS Recalling 185,903 Model Year 2004-2009 Colorado, GMC Model Year 2009-2004 Canyon, Model Year 2006 I-280, I-350, Model Year 2007-2008 I-290, and I-370, Passenger Vehicles Originally Sold IN or Currently Registered IN THE States OF Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, NEW Mexico, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, U.s. Virgin Islands and Utah. Some OF These Vehicles Have A Brake Lamp Switch That MAY NOT Work AS Designed DUE TO Contamination IN THE Switch.
Consequence
This Condition Could Cause THE Simultaneous Loss OF All Brake Lamps or Cause All OF THE Brake Lamps TO Stay ON Continuously. Both OF These Conditions Could Fail TO Warn Others OF THE Driver's Intentions and Could Lead TO A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect and Replace THE Necessary Components AS Specified IN THE Recall Bulletin Free OF Charge. GM Anticipates That Parts Will BE Available BY June 2010. A Special Coverage FOR Vehicles Registered IN All Other States Will BE Implemented IN THE Same Time Frame. IN THE Interim, Owners WHO Experience THE Failure CAN Obtain A Free Repair, However They Will BE Required TO Return When THE NEW Design Part Becomes Available. Owners MAY Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-630-2438, GMC AT 1-866-996-9463, Isuzu AT 1-800-255-6727 or AT Www.gmownercenter.com.
Notes
GM Recall NO. 09049.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Child Seat
Recall date
2010-11-18
Recall no.
10v575000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
GM IS Recalling Certain Model Year 2004-2011, Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon, Model Year 2006, Isuzu I-280/I-350, and Model Year 2007-2008, I-290/I-370, Regular Cab Vehicles and Extended Cab Vehicles Without A Rear Seat and Equipped With A Front 60/40 Split Bench Seat. These Vehicles Fail TO Comply With THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 225, "child Restraint Anchorage Systems." THE Top Tether Anchor FOR THE Front Center Seat IS NOT Accessible and THE Owner Manual Does NOT Include Instructions Regarding HOW TO USE THE Top Tether.
Consequence
Both Nhtsa and GM Discourage Placement OF A Child IN A Front Seat. Nevertheless, There ARE Individual Circumstances That MAY Require Placement OF A Child IN A Restraint IN THE Front Center Seating Position OF This Vehicle That Does NOT Offer A Rear Seat. Lack OF Access TO THE Top Tether Anchor and A Lack OF Instructions AS TO HOW TO USE IT, MAY Result IN Improper Installation OF A Child Restraint. Improper Installation OF A Child Restraint CAN Result IN A Reduction IN THE Restraint's Performance IN THE Event OF A Crash and AN Increased Risk OF Injury or Death TO THE Child Seated IN THE Restraint.
Remedy
Dealers Will CUT A Hole Into THE Back Panel Trim Cover TO Allow Access TO THE Top Tether Anchor FOR THE Front Center Seat Position and Will Provide Supplemental Information AS TO USE IN THE Owner's Manual. THE Manufacturer HAS NOT YET Provided AN Owner Notification Schedule FOR This Campaign. Owners MAY Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-630-2438, GMC AT 1-866-996-9463, Isuzu AT 1-800-255-6727 or Visit Gm's Website AT Www.gmownercenter.com.
Notes
GM Safety Recall NO. 10367 And/Or 10407.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
2005 Chevrolet Colorado Insurance
Insurance for a 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2005 Chevrolet Colorado Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Truck?
When comparing the 2005 Chevrolet Colorado against its key rivals like the Ford Ranger, Toyota Tacoma, and Nissan Frontier from the same era, its standing is competitive but with distinct trade-offs.
In terms of performance, the Colorado's optional 3.5L inline-five engine, with 220 horsepower, generally offered more power than the typical 4-cylinder or even base V6 options in a Ford Ranger (V6 around 207 hp) or 4-cylinder Toyota Tacoma (164 hp). However, it lagged behind the V6 Toyota Tacoma (245 hp) and the larger V8-optioned Dodge Dakota. The ride quality was decent but often considered less refined than the Tacoma.
Regarding features, the Colorado was on par with its rivals for the era, offering basic amenities like air conditioning, power accessories, and a CD player on mid-to-high trims. None of these trucks offered advanced infotainment or driver-assistance technologies common today. The Tacoma often boasted slightly better interior material quality and ergonomics, while the Ranger and Frontier were similarly utilitarian.
Reliability is where the Colorado often faces its toughest comparison. While generally robust, the known cylinder head issues in the 3.5L I5 engine for early models are a significant concern. The Toyota Tacoma from this generation is legendary for its bulletproof reliability, often surpassing 250,000 miles with minimal major issues, setting a very high bar. The Ford Ranger is also known for its simplistic, enduring mechanicals, though it's less powerful. The Nissan Frontier of this generation had its own set of common issues, particularly with automatic transmission cooler failures (SMOD - "Strawberry Milkshake of Death"), making the Colorado's engine issues comparable in severity.
In terms of price, when new, they were all competitive. On the used market, the Colorado is typically more affordable than a comparable Toyota Tacoma, which commands a premium due to its strong reputation for reliability and resale value. The Ford Ranger is often the cheapest entry point, reflecting its simpler nature.
Recommended Alternatives:
In terms of performance, the Colorado's optional 3.5L inline-five engine, with 220 horsepower, generally offered more power than the typical 4-cylinder or even base V6 options in a Ford Ranger (V6 around 207 hp) or 4-cylinder Toyota Tacoma (164 hp). However, it lagged behind the V6 Toyota Tacoma (245 hp) and the larger V8-optioned Dodge Dakota. The ride quality was decent but often considered less refined than the Tacoma.
Regarding features, the Colorado was on par with its rivals for the era, offering basic amenities like air conditioning, power accessories, and a CD player on mid-to-high trims. None of these trucks offered advanced infotainment or driver-assistance technologies common today. The Tacoma often boasted slightly better interior material quality and ergonomics, while the Ranger and Frontier were similarly utilitarian.
Reliability is where the Colorado often faces its toughest comparison. While generally robust, the known cylinder head issues in the 3.5L I5 engine for early models are a significant concern. The Toyota Tacoma from this generation is legendary for its bulletproof reliability, often surpassing 250,000 miles with minimal major issues, setting a very high bar. The Ford Ranger is also known for its simplistic, enduring mechanicals, though it's less powerful. The Nissan Frontier of this generation had its own set of common issues, particularly with automatic transmission cooler failures (SMOD - "Strawberry Milkshake of Death"), making the Colorado's engine issues comparable in severity.
In terms of price, when new, they were all competitive. On the used market, the Colorado is typically more affordable than a comparable Toyota Tacoma, which commands a premium due to its strong reputation for reliability and resale value. The Ford Ranger is often the cheapest entry point, reflecting its simpler nature.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Toyota Tacoma (2005-2015): Often considered the benchmark for compact trucks, offering superior reliability, higher resale value, and a more refined experience. Expect to pay a premium on the used market.
- Ford Ranger (1998-2011): A highly durable, no-frills workhorse. It's often more affordable to buy and maintain, though it offers less power and refinement than the Colorado. Ideal if simplicity and low cost are top priorities.
- Nissan Frontier (2005-2021): Provides a strong V6 option and good towing capacity, making it a competitive alternative to the Colorado, but research specific model year issues.
Final Verdict: Is the 2005 Chevrolet Colorado a Good Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Truck?
The 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a versatile, compact pickup truck for light hauling, commuting, or occasional off-road adventures. It appeals to those who appreciate a manageable size and the utility of a truck without the bulk and fuel consumption of a full-size model. It's definitely a used purchase, not available new.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but with crucial conditions. A thorough pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic is paramount, focusing specifically on rust (frame, body panels) and the health of the 3.5L inline-five engine's cylinder head, if equipped. Look for examples with comprehensive maintenance records. The Z71 4x4 trims offer good capability and tend to hold their value slightly better. Buyers should be prepared for potential electrical glitches and be proactive about rust prevention. If you find a well-maintained example and are ready to address its known quirks, the 2005 Colorado can be an economical and capable daily driver or work truck, offering significant utility for its modest price.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but with crucial conditions. A thorough pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic is paramount, focusing specifically on rust (frame, body panels) and the health of the 3.5L inline-five engine's cylinder head, if equipped. Look for examples with comprehensive maintenance records. The Z71 4x4 trims offer good capability and tend to hold their value slightly better. Buyers should be prepared for potential electrical glitches and be proactive about rust prevention. If you find a well-maintained example and are ready to address its known quirks, the 2005 Colorado can be an economical and capable daily driver or work truck, offering significant utility for its modest price.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.