The Good
The 2012 Ford Escape offers a practical, go-anywhere appeal with available AWD and good cargo space. Its compact dimensions make it easy to maneuver in urban settings, satisfying practical buyers. The optional V6 provides strong performance, while the Hybrid offers impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to both those seeking power and economy. It delivers solid value as an affordable used SUV, known for its generally reliable 4-cylinder powertrain.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 2012 Ford Escape include an aging interior design that feels outdated compared to rivals, a relatively noisy cabin, and a somewhat unrefined ride quality. Owners should also watch out for potential rust issues, particularly on rear wheel wells and tailgate, and some reported transmission concerns, especially with the V6 engine.
2012 Ford Escape: Quick Overview
The 2012 Ford Escape was offered with several powertrain options and trim levels:
- Engine Options:
- 2.5-liter DOHC I4 (gasoline)
- 3.0-liter DOHC V6 (gasoline)
- 2.5-liter Atkinson-cycle I4 Hybrid system
- Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: 171 hp
- 3.0L V6: 240 hp
- Hybrid: 177 hp (net system output)
- Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, city/highway MPG):
- 2.5L I4 FWD: 20/27 MPG
- 2.5L I4 AWD: 19/25 MPG
- 3.0L V6 FWD: 18/25 MPG
- 3.0L V6 AWD: 17/23 MPG
- Hybrid FWD: 34/31 MPG
- Hybrid AWD: 30/27 MPG
- 0-60 mph Times (approximate):
- 2.5L I4: 9.5-10 seconds
- 3.0L V6: 7.8-8.5 seconds
- Hybrid: around 9 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Up to 3,500 lbs when equipped with the V6 engine and a factory towing package.
- Key Trim-Level Features:
- XLS: The base model, typically equipped with 16-inch steel wheels, power accessories (windows, locks, mirrors), air conditioning, a CD player, and an auxiliary audio input.
- XLT: Adds to the XLS with 16-inch alloy wheels, automatic headlights, an upgraded stereo with satellite radio capability, cruise control, a power driver's seat, and a keyless entry keypad.
- Limited: The premium trim level, including leather upholstery, heated front seats, automatic climate control, a universal garage door opener, ambient interior lighting, and the SYNC voice-activated infotainment system.
- Hybrid: Focused on fuel efficiency, its features largely mirrored the XLT and Limited trims, offering various options from comfort to technology, including navigation.
2012 Ford Escape Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2012 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Escape |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | KANSAS CITY |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3669 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4680 pounds |
| Overall Height | 67.70 inches |
| Overall Length | 174.70 inches |
| Overall Width | 71.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 103.10 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5-L |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | Continuously Variable |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $33,080 |
| Invoice Price | $30,692 |
| Delivery Charges | $825 |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2012 Ford Escape Have?
Transmission issues are also a notable concern, particularly with the 3.0-liter V6 engine, where owners have reported hesitation, hard shifts, or even complete failure. While less common, the 2.5-liter four-cylinder's transmission can also develop problems. Regular transmission fluid changes are crucial for longevity.
Another common complaint revolves around the power steering pump, which can fail, leading to noisy operation or stiff steering. The air conditioning system can also be problematic, with issues like compressor failure, refrigerant leaks, or blend door actuators needing attention.
Minor but annoying issues include faulty door ajar switches, which can cause interior lights to stay on or the chime to sound while driving. Some owners have also reported premature wear of brake components or issues with the ABS module.
In terms of recalls, the 2012 Ford Escape has been subject to several important ones. One significant recall involved the throttle body, which could cause the engine to lose power suddenly. Another recall pertained to a potential issue where the steering wheel could detach, though this was for specific production dates. Owners should always check their VIN with Ford or NHTSA to confirm if their specific vehicle is affected by any outstanding recalls.
How long will the 2012 Ford Escape last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Built-in Tech and Entertainment:
Standard across all trims was an AM/FM radio with a single CD player and an auxiliary input jack, providing basic audio connectivity. Higher trims and optional packages introduced the Ford SYNC voice-activated communications and entertainment system. SYNC enabled Bluetooth phone connectivity, USB integration for media devices, and voice control for various functions. A navigation system was an available upgrade, typically paired with a larger touchscreen display. Premium audio systems, often including SiriusXM satellite radio, were also optional.
Driver-Assistance Features:
In 2012, driver-assistance technology was not as prevalent as it is today. The Escape offered very limited active safety features. The most notable driver aid available was an optional rear parking sensor system, which helped with maneuvering in tight spots. A rearview camera was also available as an option, integrated either into the navigation screen or a smaller display in the rearview mirror.
Safety Features:
Ford equipped the 2012 Escape with a comprehensive set of passive and active safety features. Standard safety equipment included: dual-stage front airbags, front seat-mounted side airbags, and side curtain airbags for both rows of seats. Active safety systems included an Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) with Brake Assist, Electronic Stability Control (ESC) with Roll Stability Control (RSC) to help prevent rollovers, and a Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS).
Crash-Test Ratings:
The 2012 Ford Escape received mixed, but generally good, crash-test ratings for its time:
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA):
- Overall Frontal Crash: 3 out of 5 stars (driver side: 3 stars, passenger side: 4 stars)
- Side Barrier Crash: 5 out of 5 stars (front seat: 5 stars, rear seat: 5 stars)
- Rollover Resistance: 3 out of 5 stars
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS):
- Moderate Overlap Front: Good
- Side Impact: Good
- Roof Strength: Good
- Head Restraints & Seats: Good
What Colors Options are Available?
2012 Ford Escape Prices and Market Value
2012 Ford Escape Cost of Ownership
2012 Ford Escape Fuel Efficiency
2012 Ford Escape Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2012 Ford Escape Recalls & Defects
Suspension:front:wheel Bearing
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump
2012 Ford Escape Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
2012 Ford Escape Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2012 Ford Escape Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
Performance: The Escape offered competitive performance, with its optional 3.0L V6 providing stronger acceleration than most rivals' non-turbo engines. The 2.5L I4 was adequate. However, its ride quality and handling felt less refined compared to the more car-like CR-V and RAV4, which often provided a smoother, quieter experience. The Equinox also offered a V6 and generally good highway cruising.
Features: While the Escape's available SYNC system was a highlight for its voice control and connectivity, its overall interior design and material quality felt dated against more modern offerings from Hyundai, Kia, and even the CR-V. Rivals often presented a more contemporary cabin aesthetic and user-friendly layouts.
Reliability: This is where the Escape often lagged behind class leaders. While the 2.5L I4 engine is generally robust, the V6 had more reported transmission concerns. More critically, rust on body panels became a significant long-term reliability and appearance issue. The Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V consistently led the segment in long-term reliability and fewer reported major issues. The Chevrolet Equinox of this era also had some reported engine oil consumption issues, while Hyundai and Kia models were steadily improving their reliability.
Price: On the used market today, the 2012 Escape often presents a more affordable entry point than comparable CR-Vs or RAV4s, largely due to its perceived lower long-term reliability and less refined driving dynamics.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Better Alternatives (for reliability and refinement): The 2012 Honda CR-V and 2012 Toyota RAV4 are generally superior choices for buyers prioritizing bulletproof reliability, better fuel economy (especially for the RAV4's I4), and a more refined driving experience.
- Similar Alternatives (for value and features): The 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, Hyundai Tucson, and Kia Sportage offer compelling alternatives. The Equinox provides a comfortable ride and decent V6 power, while the Korean twins often packed more features for the money and had more modern styling.