
The Good
The 2002 SLK-Class offers a blend of sporty performance, especially with the Kompressor engine, and iconic Mercedes-Benz styling. Its retractable hardtop provides coupe comfort and open-air thrills. While not the most efficient, it offers reasonable fuel economy. It appeals to emotional buyers seeking a stylish roadster and practical buyers wanting a reliable, well-built vehicle.
The Bad
Common issues with the 2002 SLK-Class include potential problems with the retractable hardtop mechanism, which can be costly to repair. Oil leaks, particularly around the valve cover gasket, are also common. The mass airflow sensor and the supercharger (on the SLK230) are also potential areas of concern. Rust can also be an issue in certain climates, so inspect thoroughly.
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- SLK230 Kompressor: 2.3L Supercharged Inline-4
- SLK320: 3.2L V6
- Horsepower:
- SLK230 Kompressor: 192 hp
- SLK320: 215 hp
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimated):
- SLK230 Kompressor: 21 mpg city / 29 mpg highway (automatic)
- SLK320: 18 mpg city / 25 mpg highway (automatic)
- 0-60 mph Times:
- SLK230 Kompressor: Approximately 7.2 - 7.6 seconds
- SLK320: Approximately 6.5 - 7.0 seconds
- Towing Capacity: Not applicable - the SLK-Class is not designed for towing.
- Trim-Level Features:
- SLK230 Kompressor: Standard features include leather upholstery, power windows and locks, keyless entry, cruise control, air conditioning, AM/FM stereo with CD player, alloy wheels, and the retractable hardtop.
- SLK320: Adds or upgrades to the SLK230's features, often including upgraded audio systems, wood trim, and sometimes optional features like heated seats.
- Optional Features (Both Trims): Many SLKs were equipped with optional features such as heated seats, premium audio systems (Bose), upgraded leather, integrated cell phone, and various appearance packages. The Sport package was also popular, adding sportier suspension and styling cues.
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 2002 |
Make | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | SLK-Class |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Convertible |
Category | Sports Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Germany |
Manufacturing City | BRERNEN |
Dimensions
Doors | 2-Door |
Curb Weight | 3110 pounds |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 3627 pounds |
Overall Height | 50.40 inches |
Overall Length | 157.90 inches |
Overall Width | 67.50 inches |
Wheelbase Length | 94.50 inches |
Standard Seating | 2 |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 2.3-L L-4 DOHC 16V SUPERCHARGER |
Engine Size | 2.3L |
Engine Cylinders | 4 |
Transmission | 6-Speed Manual |
Transmission Type | Manual |
Transmission Speeds | 6-Speed |
Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $39,400 |
Invoice Price | $36,642 |
Delivery Charges | $665 |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Have?
Rust can be an issue, especially in areas with salted roads. Check around the wheel wells, rocker panels, and underbody. Electrical issues, such as faulty window regulators or problems with the central locking system, are also reported. The crank position sensor is another potential failure point.
While the 2002 model year doesn't have a significantly different list of problems compared to other years in the R170 generation, it's important to address any issues promptly to prevent further damage. Regularly scheduled maintenance, including oil changes and inspections, is crucial for long-term reliability. Recalls for this model year are relatively infrequent, but it's always advisable to check the NHTSA website for any outstanding safety recalls.
How long will the 2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Safety features included dual front airbags and side airbags. Optional features included a cellular phone (integrated, a luxury at the time), heated seats, and various appearance packages.
Crash-test ratings from the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) and NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for the 2002 SLK-Class are somewhat limited. NHTSA gave it 4 stars for driver and passenger in the frontal crash test. Keep in mind that crash-test standards have significantly evolved since 2002. The SLK's safety features were adequate for its era, but modern vehicles offer considerably more advanced safety technology. It's worth noting that the SLK was designed as a sporty roadster, not primarily focused on achieving the highest crash-test scores.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Prices and Market Value
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Cost of Ownership
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Fuel Efficiency
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Compare to Other Convertible?
Features-wise, the SLK's retractable hardtop was a significant advantage, offering better security and weather protection than the soft tops of its rivals. Reliability is comparable across these models, with each having its own set of common issues. However, Mercedes-Benz parts and labor can sometimes be more expensive. In terms of price, the SLK typically falls in the middle of the pack.
Alternatives to the SLK include the BMW Z4 (later model years for improved reliability), the Mazda MX-5 Miata (for pure driving fun and reliability, though less luxurious), and the Porsche Boxster (if performance is a top priority and maintenance costs aren't a major concern). The SLK is a good choice for those who prioritize the retractable hardtop and Mercedes-Benz prestige.
Ranks #770 Sedan
1 | 2023 Toyota Camry | (5.0★) |
2 | 2023 Honda Accord | (0.0★) |
3 | 2023 Lexus ES | (0.0★) |
4 | 2024 Subaru Legacy | (5.0★) |
5 | 2022 Mazda MX-30 | (4.0★) |
6 | 2024 BMW M3 | (0.0★) |
7 | 2023 Ford Mustang | (5.0★) |
8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT | (0.0★) |
9 | 2023 Audi A3 | (0.0★) |
10 | 2023 Chevrolet Camaro | (5.0★) |
11 | 2023 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid | (0.0★) |
12 | 2023 Nissan Altima | (4.0★) |
770 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class | (4.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class a Good Convertible?
JCM on November 25, 2018
Most enjoyable car I have owned.I bought the car for the purpose of relaxing after work on winding roads near our home. It has been one of the best auto purchases I have made. It is fun to drive, is very responsive, with a strong and reliable V 6 engine. It has been garaged since new, and I was careful to avoid driving it on salt treated roads. The paint and finish are pristine, the interior very good. Leather seats have no cracks or splits.
John on November 11, 2018
Small aggressive and fastThe car is awesome- Small, fast, fun- Loved the way the roof folds into the trunk and still had room for a couple overnight bags.
A retired "kid" on October 19, 2018
Very pleased!I love the way it handles and drives. A LOT of fun! Driving this vehicle is thereputic for me. Extremely glad that I decided to purchase it.
Rafactor on October 10, 2018
Fun little second car!The interior of this car is small. It makes getting in and out a little challenging sometimes. The 6 speed manual transmission is fun to drive and still has lots of power. We love this car, but it is not a winter car.
erich760 on June 16, 2018
Fun Fun FunA real head turner - lots of fun around town - your neighbors will all want a ride - just dont buy too many groceries as there is not lots of room -
OldGuy on November 4, 2017
Most fun car I've owned. Wreaks performanceThis car is great and primarily driven by my wife. She loves the hardtop/convertible feature and the auto/manual transmission is fun. The AMG part of this car begs you to drive it as its designed, quick and fast but stylish.
SLKlover on July 2, 2017
Best car I've ever ownedI own and drive daily a manual transmission 2002 SLK 230 Kompressor . I have 170,000 miles on the car and the only expenses have been new tires, regular service and replacement of faulty ignition lock. The car still has the original clutch. I bought the car new and intentional bought it with the fewest options possible. Simpler is better. Love it! Its simple, good looking, sporty to drive and the retractable hard top is great. The large trunk easily holds a full set of golf clubs and folding cart. Once a year the local Mercedes dealer calls and asks if I want to upgrade. The answer is always no. I figure this car is good for another 100,000 miles.
RichD on June 28, 2013
SLK 230 or 320?Have always loved the look of the SLK 230. Now that some of the early models were in may price range I started my quest in ernest. I 've always driven stick shift cars but found such Mercedes very difficult to find. I test drove at least six SLK Kompressors , all w/ auto trans. All had sporty ride / handling, but felt sluggish from dead start. I hoped a manual trans w/ 4 cyl. might be the answer but never found one. Instead I located an SLK 320 w/ 6spd manual and loved that combo! Felt like a rocket!.Unfortunately, that car needed a clutch so that made it too costly. Frustrated, my research led me to a Chrysler Crossfire, built on same assembly line as SLK. I found an '04 w/ 66K miles for $4000 less then a SLK & bought it. Very similar ride / handling, lots of features but w/ a hot rod look of 19" rear tires & sweeping hatch back styling that is unique. I love it!
former S2k owner on March 6, 2012
just a carafter owning Honda's, this was a poor decision. maintenance is expensive, and the slk230 that I purchased was poorly maintained. lots of little things needing to be fixed. after getting the bulk of the repairs done, i just have a compact car that looks looks good. the S2000 was exciting, the SLK230 is not. It's just a comfortable compact car. The hardtop retracts, big whoop. the only strong point is that it feels appreciatively safer in rainy conditions.
mr benze on August 12, 2011
easy on the eyesI have owned many mercedes i will keep it simple if u are going to invest in a slk take ur time and look for a v6 and make sure u have a 2nd car to drive every day