The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer was introduced as a more upscale version of the Ford Explorer. It is a mid-size SUV featuring a traditional body-on-frame construction. The first generation Mountaineer spanned from 1997 to 2001. Key trims included the base model and the premium trim, often equipped with leather and enhanced features. In 1998, the pricing ranged from approximately $28,000 to $35,000. It stood out for its distinct Mercury styling and emphasis on comfort and refinement compared to its Ford counterpart.
The Good
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer offered a strong V8 engine providing ample power for towing and daily driving, appealing to practical needs. Its comfortable ride and available leather interior catered to emotional desires for a refined driving experience. While not the most fuel-efficient, it provided reasonable reliability for its time, making it a valuable option for families.
The Bad
Potential buyers should watch out for rust, especially in areas prone to salt exposure. Transmission issues and electrical problems were fairly common. Suspension components, particularly ball joints and tie rod ends, could wear out prematurely. Fuel economy was not a strong suit, and some interior plastics were prone to cracking and fading.
1998 Mercury Mountaineer: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 5.0L V8
- Horsepower:
- 5.0L V8: 215 hp
- Fuel Economy (estimated):
- 5.0L V8: 14 mpg city / 19 mpg highway (2WD)
- 5.0L V8: 13 mpg city / 17 mpg highway (4WD)
- 0-60 Times (estimated):
- 5.0L V8: Around 9 seconds
- Towing Capacity:
- 5.0L V8: Approximately 6,500 lbs (when properly equipped)
- Trim Level Features:
- Base: Included features such as air conditioning, power windows and locks, cloth upholstery, and an AM/FM radio.
- Premium (Often denoted by leather package): Could include leather upholstery, premium audio system, automatic climate control, power seats, keyless entry, and alloy wheels. Other options included a sunroof, running boards, and a towing package. Electronic shift 4x4 was also available.
- Safety features were standard and included dual front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS).
- Base: Included features such as air conditioning, power windows and locks, cloth upholstery, and an AM/FM radio.
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1998 |
Make | Mercury |
Model | Mountaineer |
Trim | - |
Style | 2WD 5-Speed Automatic |
Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | United States |
Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
Doors | 4-Door |
Curb Weight | 4139 pounds |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | 67.50 inches |
Overall Length | 188.50 inches |
Overall Width | 70.20 inches |
Wheelbase Length | 111.50 inches |
Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 5.0-L V-8 OHV 16V |
Engine Size | 5L |
Engine Cylinders | 8 |
Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
Transmission Type | Automatic |
Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $26,730 |
Invoice Price | $24,163 |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Mercury Mountaineer Have?
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer, being related to the Ford Explorer, shared many of the same common problems. Transmission issues, particularly with the automatic transmission, were frequently reported. Premature wear and tear could lead to slipping or failure. Electrical issues were also common, ranging from malfunctioning power windows and door locks to more significant problems with the engine control system. Rust was a significant concern, especially in areas with harsh winters and salted roads, affecting body panels and undercarriage components. The front suspension, particularly the ball joints and tie rod ends, was prone to wear, requiring regular inspection and replacement. Engine cooling systems could also be problematic, leading to overheating if not properly maintained. Recalls for the 1998 model year were issued for issues such as faulty speed control cables that could potentially cause unintended acceleration. Long-term reliability concerns centered around the longevity of the transmission and the potential for rust. Owners often reported that regular maintenance, including fluid changes and rust prevention measures, was crucial for extending the vehicle's lifespan. Some model years also experienced issues with the rear liftgate hinges.
How long will the 1998 Mercury Mountaineer last?
With proper maintenance, a 1998 Mercury Mountaineer could potentially reach 200,000 miles or more. However, mileage greatly depends on maintenance habits and driving conditions. Neglecting regular servicing, like oil changes and transmission fluid flushes, significantly shortens its lifespan. Rust is a major long-term durability concern, especially in colder climates. Weaknesses include the transmission, which may require rebuilding or replacement, and the suspension components, which are prone to wear. Electrical issues also tend to surface over time.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer featured basic tech for its time. Standard entertainment included an AM/FM radio, with optional upgrades to a cassette player and CD player. There were minimal driver-assistance features; power steering and ABS were the most advanced. Safety features included dual front airbags. Optional features included keyless entry and cruise control.
Crash test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) and IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) can provide insights into its safety performance. As a 1998 vehicle, driver-assistance tech was not common. The emphasis was primarily on fundamental safety features like airbags and ABS. Higher trims offered comfort features such as automatic headlights and climate control. The 1998 Mountaineer represents a generation of vehicles prioritizing a robust and comfortable ride over modern technological advancements. Check NHTSA and IIHS archives for specific crash test data.
Crash test ratings from the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) and IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) can provide insights into its safety performance. As a 1998 vehicle, driver-assistance tech was not common. The emphasis was primarily on fundamental safety features like airbags and ABS. Higher trims offered comfort features such as automatic headlights and climate control. The 1998 Mountaineer represents a generation of vehicles prioritizing a robust and comfortable ride over modern technological advancements. Check NHTSA and IIHS archives for specific crash test data.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Deep Wedgewood Blue Clearcoat Metallic
Chestnut Brown Clearcoat Metallic
Silver Frost Clearcoat Metallic
Toreador Red Clearcoat Metallic
Dark Green Satin Clearcoat Metallic
White Clearcoat
Black Clearcoat
Interior Colors
Medium Graphite
Light Graphite
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Prices and Market Value
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer had a starting MSRP of around $28,000 to $35,000 when new. Today, used market prices typically range from $1,500 to $5,000, depending on condition, mileage, and location. Depreciation has been significant due to age, mileage, and the emergence of newer, more fuel-efficient SUVs. Factors affecting resale value include the vehicle's overall condition, presence of rust, mechanical soundness, and whether it has been well-maintained. Low mileage examples in excellent condition command higher prices, while those with significant issues or rust will have minimal resale value.
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Cost of Ownership
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer is generally considered costly to own compared to modern vehicles. Insurance costs are moderate, but fuel economy is poor. Maintenance and repair costs can be high, especially given the vehicle's age and potential for mechanical issues. Parts availability can be variable. Long-term ownership requires diligent maintenance to mitigate potential problems. The Mountaineer is not an economical choice for those seeking low running costs.
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
21.00 gallons
City Mileage
14 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
19 miles/gallon
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Recalls & Defects
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2000-12-27
Recall no.
00v422000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Sport Utility Vehicles Equipped With 4.0l Sohc Engines and Still Retain THE Original Throttle Body (Part Numbers 97jf-9e926ab or 97jf-9e926-ac). Some OF THE Original Throttle Bodies Installed Allowed A GAP Between THE Plate and Bore TO BE Built TOO Narrow. This Reduced Clearance Allowed THE Engine Deposits Normally Present IN THE Throttle Body TO Contact or Bridge THE Gap. IF THE Engine Deposits Bridged THE GAP Between THE Throttle Plate and Bore and Then Hardened, ON THE Initial Application OF THE Accelerator Pedal After THE Engine HAS Cooled, THE Operator Would Need TO Apply Additional Force TO THE Accelerator Pedal TO Break THE Bridge.
Consequence
This Could Result IN Engine Surge When THE Accelerator Pedal Breaks Free.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Original Throttle Bodies.
Notes
Owner Notification Began March 5, 2001.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Latches/Locks/Linkages:hood:latch
Recall date
1999-06-29
Recall no.
99v164000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Sport Utility Vehicles. THE Secondary Hood Latch MAY Corrode AT THE Latch Pivot and Stick IN THE Open Position.
Consequence
IF This Occurs and THE Primary Hood Latch IS Either NOT Engaged or IS Released, A Hood Fly-Up Could Occur.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Secondary Hood Latch With Components That ARE Coated Prior TO Assembly FOR Improved Latch Pivot Corrosion Protection.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 14, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1999-03-30
Recall no.
99v062001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Certain 1997-1999 RHD Explorer Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/Sohc Engines and Cruise Control Built From MAY 29, 1996 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Explorer/Mountaineers Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/sohc or 5.0l Engines or 1998-1999 Rangers Equipped With 2.5l, 3.0l Ffv/efi or 4.0l Engines and Cruise Control Built From January 5, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Mustangs Equipped With 3.8l, 4.6l 2-valve or 4-valve Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1999 F250/f350/f450/f550 (Over 8,500 Lbs.) Trucks Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; and 1999 F-53 Stripped Chassis Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999. A Cruise Control Cable CAN Interfere With THE Speed Control Servo Pulley and NOT Allow THE Throttle TO Return TO Idle When Disengaging THE Cruise Control.
Consequence
IF THE Cruise Control IS Used and This Condition IS Present, A Stuck Throttle Could Result, Which Could Potentially Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Cruise Control Cables. AT THE Present Time, THE Replacement Cables ARE NOT Available. Customers ARE Being Advised NOT TO USE THE Cruise Control System Until A Replacement CAN BE Made.
Notes
A Pre-Release Warning Letter That Identified AN Interim FIX Until THE Parts FOR THE Permanent FIX Became Available WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning March 27, 1999.a Second Owner Notification, Identifying THE Permanent FIX WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning MAY 24, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1998-03-19
Recall no.
98v060000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Equipped With 4.0l Single Overhead CAM Engines. THE Engine Fuel Lines CAN BE Damaged IF THE Vehicle IS Jump Started and THE Ground Cable IS Attached TO THE Fuel Line Bracket That IS Located Near THE Battery. Since THE Bracket IS NOT Grounded, THE Stainless Steel Fuel Line Braid Could ACT AS A Ground Potentially Overheating THE Ptfe Inner Liner OF THE Fuel Line Resulting IN Damage TO THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
THE Fuel Lines CAN Leak, and IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Potentially Result.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Warning Label ON THE Fuel Line Bracket Advising Owners NOT TO USE IT FOR A Jump Start Ground. Also A Revised Bolt Will BE Installed IN THE Alternator Bracket TO Provide A Convenient Jump Start Ground Location.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin April 20, 1998.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Seats:front Assembly:recliner
Recall date
2003-08-05
Recall no.
03v281000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Sport Utility Vehicles Equipped With High Back Seats, THE Upper Bolt ON THE Driver's Side High Back Seat, That Attaches THE Seat Recliner Mechanism TO THE Seat Back Frame, Could Fracture. IF THE Bolt Fractures and Does NOT JAM IN THE Seat Back Frame, THE Seat Back MAY Recline Until IT Makes Contact With AN Object Behind THE Seat, Such AS THE Second ROW Seat Cushion.
Consequence
THE Driver Could Potentially Lose Contact With THE Steering Wheel or Foot Pedals During Such AN Event, Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Driver Seat Upper Bolt With A Metal Spacer and Bolt. IN Addition, Seats With Tubular Back Frames Will Have THE Fully Threaded Lower Recliner Bolt Replaced With A Partially Threaded Bolt. Owner Notification Began ON August 29, 2003. Owners Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 03s04.customers CAN Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1998 Mercury Mountaineer Insurance
Insurance for a 1998 Mercury Mountaineer is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Mercury Mountaineer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer competed against the Ford Explorer, Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Chevrolet Blazer/GMC Jimmy. In terms of performance, it was comparable to the Explorer, offering similar engine options and towing capacity. The Grand Cherokee offered a slightly more refined driving experience, while the Blazer/Jimmy were generally more affordable. Feature-wise, the Mountaineer aimed for a slightly more upscale feel than the Explorer but lacked the advanced features found in some Grand Cherokee models. Reliability was a mixed bag; all these models had their share of issues. The Mountaineer and Explorer were known for transmission problems, while the Grand Cherokee had electrical quirks. Price-wise, the Mountaineer was positioned slightly above the Explorer when new. Considering its age, potential buyers might find a well-maintained Jeep Grand Cherokee a similar or potentially better alternative due to a slightly stronger reputation for reliability and available four-wheel-drive systems. A comparable Ford Explorer could also be a good alternative, especially if found at a lower price point. Newer SUVs, though more expensive, generally offer improved safety, fuel efficiency, and reliability.
Final Verdict: Is the 1998 Mercury Mountaineer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1998 Mercury Mountaineer is ideal for someone seeking an affordable, classic SUV with a V8 engine and comfortable ride, understanding its age-related limitations. It's only worth buying in well-maintained condition with documented service history and minimal rust. Pre-purchase inspection by a qualified mechanic is crucial. Given its age, buying a used Mountaineer is the only option. Higher trims with leather and additional features offer a more pleasant experience, but reliability is paramount. Consider it as a project vehicle or a temporary transportation solution rather than a long-term reliable daily driver. Newer SUVs offer significantly improved safety, fuel efficiency, and reliability for those prioritizing these aspects.