The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer emerged as a more upscale, refined sibling to the popular Ford Explorer, sharing its robust body-on-frame SUV architecture. Positioned as a mid-size SUV, it typically offered a more luxurious interior and distinctive exterior styling than its Ford counterpart. It was part of the second-generation Mountaineer, which ran from 1998 to 2001. Key trims usually included a well-appointed base model, often featuring leather options. New, its pricing ranged roughly from $28,000 to $33,000. It stood out for blending rugged capability with a touch of sophistication, appealing to those who desired SUV utility without sacrificing comfort.
The Good
The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer offered a compelling blend of advantages. Its robust V8 engine provided confident performance and strong towing capabilities, appealing to practical buyers needing utility. Comfortable seating and a relatively smooth ride, especially compared to some rivals, catered to emotional desires for a pleasant driving experience. The distinctive, somewhat upscale design gave it a unique identity. While not exceptionally efficient, its sturdy build promised decent reliability, and as a used vehicle, it offered good value for a full-frame SUV.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer include potential issues with the automatic transmission, particularly after high mileage. Rust on the chassis and body panels can be a concern, especially in salt-belt regions. Interior trim pieces may degrade or rattle over time, and suspension components, like ball joints and bushings, often require replacement. Fuel economy is also a significant drawback for many prospective owners.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer primarily offered one main engine option, a robust V8.
- 5.0L "Windsor" V8 engine.
- Horsepower:
- 5.0L V8: Approximately 215 hp at 4200 rpm.
- Fuel Economy (Estimated EPA):
- 5.0L V8 (2WD/4WD): Around 13-14 MPG city / 18-19 MPG highway.
- Note: Real-world figures can vary based on driving conditions and maintenance.
- 0-60 Times (Estimated):
- With the 5.0L V8, 0-60 mph times were typically in the 8.5-9.5 second range, which was competitive for an SUV of its size and era.
- Towing Capacity:
- With the 5.0L V8 and proper equipment, the Mountaineer could tow approximately 5,000 to 6,700 lbs, depending on the configuration (2WD/4WD) and specific options. This made it a capable hauler for boats, trailers, or RVs.
- Trim-Level Features: The 1999 Mountaineer was generally offered in a single, well-equipped trim level with various optional packages.
- Standard Features: Included power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, air conditioning, cruise control, a tilt steering wheel, and a premium AM/FM stereo with a CD player.
- Interior Appointments: Often came standard with cloth upholstery, but leather seating surfaces were a very popular option, often bundled with power-adjustable front seats.
- Exterior Features: Standard alloy wheels, roof rack, fog lights, and a unique grille design that differentiated it from the Ford Explorer.
- Convenience Options: Keyless entry, automatic climate control, a power moonroof, and an upgraded audio system with a cassette player were commonly available.
- Drivetrain: Available in both two-wheel drive (2WD) and ControlTrac four-wheel drive (4WD) systems. The 4WD system offered auto, 4-high, and 4-low settings.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1999 |
| Make | Mercury |
| Model | Mountaineer |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2WD 5-Speed Automatic |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | WIXOM |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3942 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6000 pounds |
| Overall Height | 70.50 inches |
| Overall Length | 190.10 inches |
| Overall Width | 70.20 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 111.60 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5.0-L V-8 OHV 16V |
| Engine Size | 5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $27,255 |
| Invoice Price | $24,620 |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer Have?
The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer, while generally robust, did have its share of frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. A common and significant issue revolves around the automatic transmission, specifically the 5R55E or 4R70W (depending on the engine, though the 5.0L typically used the 4R70W). Owners often reported delayed shifts, harsh shifts, or complete failure, particularly as mileage accumulated. Solenoid pack failures and worn bands were common culprits, leading to expensive repairs or replacements.
Another widespread concern for these vehicles, especially in regions exposed to road salt, is frame and body rust. The rear leaf spring mounts, shock mounts, and underbody cross members are particularly susceptible. Extensive rust can compromise structural integrity and make maintenance difficult.
Suspension components are also frequent points of failure. Ball joints, tie rod ends, control arm bushings, and sway bar links tend to wear out, leading to clunking noises, poor handling, and uneven tire wear. Owners should also inspect the steering gearbox for leaks or excessive play.
The 5.0L V8 engine itself is generally reliable, but accessories and sensors can fail. Common engine-related complaints include issues with the idle air control (IAC) valve, mass airflow (MAF) sensor, and oxygen sensors, which can cause rough idling, stalling, or poor fuel economy. The plastic intake manifold (particularly on later 5.0L models, though less common on the '99 Mountaineer compared to other Ford V8s) can also crack, leading to coolant leaks.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon, ranging from power window failures and malfunctioning door locks to instrument cluster issues and intermittent lighting problems. The blend door actuator for the HVAC system is also known to fail, resulting in improper temperature control.
Regarding recalls for the 1999 model year, there were several. One notable recall involved the speed control deactivation switch, which could potentially overheat and cause a fire. This issue affected a wide range of Ford/Mercury vehicles from this era. Another recall pertained to the parking brake cable, which could fray or break, reducing braking effectiveness. It is crucial for potential buyers to check if these, and any other relevant recalls, have been addressed by reviewing the vehicle's VIN with a dealership or online database.
Another widespread concern for these vehicles, especially in regions exposed to road salt, is frame and body rust. The rear leaf spring mounts, shock mounts, and underbody cross members are particularly susceptible. Extensive rust can compromise structural integrity and make maintenance difficult.
Suspension components are also frequent points of failure. Ball joints, tie rod ends, control arm bushings, and sway bar links tend to wear out, leading to clunking noises, poor handling, and uneven tire wear. Owners should also inspect the steering gearbox for leaks or excessive play.
The 5.0L V8 engine itself is generally reliable, but accessories and sensors can fail. Common engine-related complaints include issues with the idle air control (IAC) valve, mass airflow (MAF) sensor, and oxygen sensors, which can cause rough idling, stalling, or poor fuel economy. The plastic intake manifold (particularly on later 5.0L models, though less common on the '99 Mountaineer compared to other Ford V8s) can also crack, leading to coolant leaks.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon, ranging from power window failures and malfunctioning door locks to instrument cluster issues and intermittent lighting problems. The blend door actuator for the HVAC system is also known to fail, resulting in improper temperature control.
Regarding recalls for the 1999 model year, there were several. One notable recall involved the speed control deactivation switch, which could potentially overheat and cause a fire. This issue affected a wide range of Ford/Mercury vehicles from this era. Another recall pertained to the parking brake cable, which could fray or break, reducing braking effectiveness. It is crucial for potential buyers to check if these, and any other relevant recalls, have been addressed by reviewing the vehicle's VIN with a dealership or online database.
How long will the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer last?
Based on owner data and maintenance habits, a 1999 Mercury Mountaineer, if well-maintained, can typically achieve an average mileage of 150,000 to 200,000 miles, with many examples exceeding 250,000 miles. Years of service can easily extend beyond 15-20 years for a cared-for vehicle. Its long-term durability is largely tied to its robust body-on-frame construction and the generally reliable 5.0L V8 engine. However, this durability is often challenged by specific weaknesses that emerge over time. The automatic transmission is a prime candidate for failure in the higher mileage ranges, often requiring a rebuild or replacement. Rust, particularly on the frame and suspension components, becomes a major concern, diminishing its structural integrity and safety. Electrical issues, degraded interior plastics, and worn-out suspension components are also common long-term weaknesses that owners frequently address to keep these vehicles on the road. Consistent preventative maintenance, especially fluid changes and rust mitigation, is key to maximizing its lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer, being a product of its era, featured technology and safety systems that were relatively standard for mid-size SUVs of the late 1990s, offering a comfortable and reasonably safe package without many advanced "driver-assistance" features by today's standards.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
For the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer (and its Ford Explorer twin), crash test ratings from organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) were generally available.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
- Audio System: Standard was an AM/FM stereo with a CD player. Optional upgrades included a premium sound system, often with an integrated cassette player, and sometimes a multi-CD changer in the console or trunk.
- Climate Control: Manual air conditioning was standard, with an optional automatic climate control system providing more precise temperature regulation. Rear seat auxiliary climate controls were also a common option.
- Convenience Features: Power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, and cruise control were standard. Keyless entry with a remote fob was a highly sought-after option, as were a power moonroof and a universal garage door opener.
- Airbags: Dual front airbags (for driver and front passenger) were standard. Side airbags were not typically offered for this model year.
- Brakes: Four-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS) were standard, providing improved stopping performance and control, especially on slippery surfaces.
- Traction & Stability Control: Advanced electronic stability control systems were not available for the 1999 model year. However, the available ControlTrac 4WD system offered enhanced traction in various conditions.
- Seatbelts: Three-point seatbelts were provided for all outboard seating positions, with a lap belt for the center rear passenger.
- Child Safety: Rear child safety seat anchors (LATCH system) were beginning to be introduced around this time, but the Mountaineer would primarily rely on seatbelt-based attachment. Rear door child safety locks were standard.
- Headlights: Automatic on/off headlights were sometimes an optional convenience feature.
For the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer (and its Ford Explorer twin), crash test ratings from organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) were generally available.
- NHTSA Frontal Crash Test: Typically received 4 out of 5 stars for both driver and passenger in frontal impact tests.
- NHTSA Side Impact Test: Ratings usually ranged from 3 to 4 out of 5 stars for front and rear occupants.
- Rollover Rating: Due to its SUV body style and higher center of gravity, rollover ratings were often 3 out of 5 stars.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer typically had a Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) ranging from approximately $28,000 to $33,000, depending on trim and optional features, making it a moderately priced mid-size SUV. Today, its current used market prices are significantly lower, reflecting substantial depreciation over more than two decades. Expect to find examples ranging from a few hundred dollars for "parts" vehicles to $3,000-$6,000 for well-maintained, lower-mileage examples, with exceptional, pristine models possibly fetching slightly more from enthusiasts. Factors severely affecting resale value include high mileage, known mechanical issues (especially transmission problems), significant rust, and overall cosmetic condition. As an older vehicle, its value is now largely driven by condition, the cost of potential repairs, and its utility rather than its original MSRP, making depreciation a non-factor in its current market state.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Cost of Ownership
The long-term ownership costs for a 1999 Mercury Mountaineer can be a mixed bag. Insurance costs are generally low due to its age and modest replacement value, making it economical in this regard. However, fuel costs are a significant factor; with its 5.0L V8 and typical real-world fuel economy in the 13-16 MPG range, it is decidedly *not* economical at the pump. Maintenance and repair costs can vary. Routine maintenance for parts like oil filters, spark plugs, and brake components is relatively affordable due to the shared Ford Explorer platform and widespread availability of parts. However, major repairs, particularly for common issues like transmission failure or extensive rust remediation, can be quite costly, often exceeding the vehicle's market value. Therefore, while basic upkeep can be cheap, it can quickly become an expensive vehicle to own if significant mechanical issues arise, making it potentially costly in the long run, especially for those unable to perform DIY repairs.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
21.00 gallons
City Mileage
14 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
19 miles/gallon
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Electrical System:wiring:fuses and Circuit Breakers
Recall date
2000-03-07
Recall no.
00v072000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Vehicles Equipped With 4.0l Engines and All-Time 4-wheel Drive (A4wd) Powertrains. THE Generic Electronic Module (Gem) Could Experience A Condition Referred TO AS "lock-up" IN Which THE GEM Controlled Electronic Functions (e.g., Front Windshield Wipers, Interior Lights, 4X4 System, Etc.) Could NOT BE Turned ON OR, IN Some Cases IF THE Function IS ON, Could NOT BE Turned Off.
Consequence
AN Inoperative Windshield Wiper System Could Affect Driver Visibility, Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Resistor IN THE GEM Circuit.
Notes
Owner Notification Began April 15, 2000. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1999-05-18
Recall no.
99v123000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Sport Utility Vehicles. THE Right Front Brake Line TO THE Hydraulic Control Unit (Hcu) Connection Could Separate Causing THE Line TO Leak When THE Brake Pedal IS Applied.
Consequence
This Could Result IN A Loss OF Brake Pressure TO THE Front Wheels, Increasing THE Stopping Distance.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Flare NUT ON THE Brake Line.
Notes
Owner Notification Began MAY 17, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Latches/Locks/Linkages:hood:latch
Recall date
1999-06-29
Recall no.
99v164000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Sport Utility Vehicles. THE Secondary Hood Latch MAY Corrode AT THE Latch Pivot and Stick IN THE Open Position.
Consequence
IF This Occurs and THE Primary Hood Latch IS Either NOT Engaged or IS Released, A Hood Fly-Up Could Occur.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Secondary Hood Latch With Components That ARE Coated Prior TO Assembly FOR Improved Latch Pivot Corrosion Protection.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 14, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1999-03-30
Recall no.
99v062001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Certain 1997-1999 RHD Explorer Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/Sohc Engines and Cruise Control Built From MAY 29, 1996 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Explorer/Mountaineers Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/sohc or 5.0l Engines or 1998-1999 Rangers Equipped With 2.5l, 3.0l Ffv/efi or 4.0l Engines and Cruise Control Built From January 5, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Mustangs Equipped With 3.8l, 4.6l 2-valve or 4-valve Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1999 F250/f350/f450/f550 (Over 8,500 Lbs.) Trucks Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; and 1999 F-53 Stripped Chassis Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999. A Cruise Control Cable CAN Interfere With THE Speed Control Servo Pulley and NOT Allow THE Throttle TO Return TO Idle When Disengaging THE Cruise Control.
Consequence
IF THE Cruise Control IS Used and This Condition IS Present, A Stuck Throttle Could Result, Which Could Potentially Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Cruise Control Cables. AT THE Present Time, THE Replacement Cables ARE NOT Available. Customers ARE Being Advised NOT TO USE THE Cruise Control System Until A Replacement CAN BE Made.
Notes
A Pre-Release Warning Letter That Identified AN Interim FIX Until THE Parts FOR THE Permanent FIX Became Available WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning March 27, 1999.a Second Owner Notification, Identifying THE Permanent FIX WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning MAY 24, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-06-13
Recall no.
06e056000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Aftermarket Fuel Filters Sold Under THE Purolator Brand Name, P/N F65277, Shipped From January 16 Through June 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Passenger Vehicles. DUE TO Incorrect Design, THE Quick Connectors MAY NOT Fully Seat With THE Tube Interface, Even Though THE Person Making THE Connection MAY Believe That THE Quick Connector IS Fully Attached.
Consequence
Failure OF This Connection Could Lead TO Fuel Spillage And, IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
UFI Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON August 4, 2006. Owners MAY Contact UFI Filters USA AT 800-230-5876.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO UFI Filters USA (Purolator) Aftermarket Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Vehicle Speed Control:cables
Recall date
2003-08-05
Recall no.
03v280000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Sport Utility Vehicles Equipped With Speed Control and 4.0l Sohc Engines, IF THE Strand Cover ON THE Speed Control Cable Becomes Flared AT THE End, THE Speed Control Cable MAY Bind When THE Speed Control IS Activated.
Consequence
THE Throttle Return Spring Force MAY NOT BE Sufficient TO Overcome THE Binding Condition When THE Speed Control IS Disengaged. Braking Function Would BE Maintained Though Stopping Distances MAY BE Increased.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect THE Speed Control Cable And, IF Necessary, Replace IT. Owner Notification Began August 29, 2003. Owners Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 03s03.customers CAN Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Seats:front Assembly:recliner
Recall date
2003-08-05
Recall no.
03v281000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Sport Utility Vehicles Equipped With High Back Seats, THE Upper Bolt ON THE Driver's Side High Back Seat, That Attaches THE Seat Recliner Mechanism TO THE Seat Back Frame, Could Fracture. IF THE Bolt Fractures and Does NOT JAM IN THE Seat Back Frame, THE Seat Back MAY Recline Until IT Makes Contact With AN Object Behind THE Seat, Such AS THE Second ROW Seat Cushion.
Consequence
THE Driver Could Potentially Lose Contact With THE Steering Wheel or Foot Pedals During Such AN Event, Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Driver Seat Upper Bolt With A Metal Spacer and Bolt. IN Addition, Seats With Tubular Back Frames Will Have THE Fully Threaded Lower Recliner Bolt Replaced With A Partially Threaded Bolt. Owner Notification Began ON August 29, 2003. Owners Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 03s04.customers CAN Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2007-08-03
Recall no.
07v336000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Pickup Trucks, Passenger Vehicles, Sport Utility Vehicles, and Motor Homes Chassis, THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch May, Under Certain Conditions, Leak Internally and Then Overheat, Smoke, or Burn.
Consequence
This Could Result IN AN Underhood Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Fused Wiring Harness. Owners OF THE Passenger Cars Included IN This Campaign Will BE Instructed TO Return Their Vehicles TO Their Dealers TO Have THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch Disconnected AS AN Interim Repair. AS Soon AS Repair Parts ARE Available (Expected October 2007), Owners Will BE Instructed TO Return TO THE Dealers FOR Installation OF A Fused Wiring Harness. THE Recall Began ON August 13, 2007, and Mailing Completed BY September 19, 2007. Owners MAY Contact Ford AT 1-888-222-2751.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 05s28.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;s Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
60 months / unlimited miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
1999 Mercury Mountaineer Insurance
Insurance for a 1999 Mercury Mountaineer is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
When stacking the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer against its key rivals in the mid-size SUV class of its era, it presents a compelling, albeit flawed, picture. Its primary competitors included the Chevrolet Blazer/GMC Jimmy, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Toyota 4Runner, and Nissan Pathfinder.
Performance: The Mountaineer's standard 5.0L V8 gave it a distinct advantage in performance over most base engine rivals like the Blazer's 4.3L V6 or even the Grand Cherokee's inline-six. Its acceleration and towing capacity were strong points. However, the Grand Cherokee offered a more potent 5.9L V8 option, and the 4Runner/Pathfinder typically had smoother, albeit less powerful, V6 engines.
Features: The Mountaineer generally offered a slightly more upscale interior and more standard comfort features than a comparably equipped Ford Explorer. It was competitive with the Grand Cherokee in terms of luxury options (leather, automatic climate control) but often surpassed the Blazer/Jimmy. The Japanese rivals, while well-appointed, sometimes lagged in V8 power options.
Reliability: This is where the Mountaineer, like its Explorer sibling, faced significant challenges. Its automatic transmission issues and propensity for rust (especially the frame) often put it at a disadvantage compared to the more robust and famously reliable Toyota 4Runner and Nissan Pathfinder. The Jeep Grand Cherokee also had its share of electrical gremlins and cooling system issues, while the Blazer/Jimmy suffered from various engine and transmission problems as well. The Mountaineer's 5.0L V8 engine itself was generally strong, but supporting components could falter.
Price: New, the Mountaineer was priced competitively, often a bit higher than a comparable Explorer but generally in line with the Grand Cherokee and less than top-trim 4Runners. On the used market today, due to its depreciation and reliability concerns, it is often among the more affordable V8-powered SUVs from its class and era, sometimes cheaper than a comparable Grand Cherokee and significantly less than a 4Runner.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Mountaineer's standard 5.0L V8 gave it a distinct advantage in performance over most base engine rivals like the Blazer's 4.3L V6 or even the Grand Cherokee's inline-six. Its acceleration and towing capacity were strong points. However, the Grand Cherokee offered a more potent 5.9L V8 option, and the 4Runner/Pathfinder typically had smoother, albeit less powerful, V6 engines.
Features: The Mountaineer generally offered a slightly more upscale interior and more standard comfort features than a comparably equipped Ford Explorer. It was competitive with the Grand Cherokee in terms of luxury options (leather, automatic climate control) but often surpassed the Blazer/Jimmy. The Japanese rivals, while well-appointed, sometimes lagged in V8 power options.
Reliability: This is where the Mountaineer, like its Explorer sibling, faced significant challenges. Its automatic transmission issues and propensity for rust (especially the frame) often put it at a disadvantage compared to the more robust and famously reliable Toyota 4Runner and Nissan Pathfinder. The Jeep Grand Cherokee also had its share of electrical gremlins and cooling system issues, while the Blazer/Jimmy suffered from various engine and transmission problems as well. The Mountaineer's 5.0L V8 engine itself was generally strong, but supporting components could falter.
Price: New, the Mountaineer was priced competitively, often a bit higher than a comparable Explorer but generally in line with the Grand Cherokee and less than top-trim 4Runners. On the used market today, due to its depreciation and reliability concerns, it is often among the more affordable V8-powered SUVs from its class and era, sometimes cheaper than a comparable Grand Cherokee and significantly less than a 4Runner.
Alternatives:
- For better reliability: The Toyota 4Runner (3rd Gen) is a superior alternative, known for legendary reliability, strong resale value, and robust off-road capability, though it will typically cost more on the used market.
- For similar V8 power and capability with potential luxury: The Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ/WJ generations) offers comparable V8 power (especially the 5.9L Limited) and luxury features, often at a similar price point on the used market, but also comes with its own set of potential reliability issues.
- For a more basic, rugged experience: The Ford Explorer (its sibling) offers almost identical mechanics but often at a lower price point, especially if luxury isn't a priority.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Mercury Mountaineer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1999 Mercury Mountaineer presents a balanced verdict for specific buyers. It is ideal for individuals or families seeking a relatively inexpensive, V8-powered, body-on-frame SUV with decent towing capacity and a slightly upscale feel compared to its Ford Explorer sibling. It's a good fit for those who need a utilitarian vehicle for occasional hauling, mild off-roading, or winter driving, and who appreciate the comfort and features that were considered premium in its day.
Is it worth buying today? Yes, but under strict conditions. It's worth buying if you find a well-documented example with a solid maintenance history, especially one where the transmission has either been recently serviced or replaced, and rust is minimal. It's an excellent choice for a DIY mechanic willing to tackle common issues, or for someone needing an affordable secondary vehicle. Avoid neglected examples or those with significant rust or transmission problems unless you&re getting it for parts. Consider it a budget-friendly workhorse, not a worry-free daily driver, unless it has received substantial care.
Is it worth buying today? Yes, but under strict conditions. It's worth buying if you find a well-documented example with a solid maintenance history, especially one where the transmission has either been recently serviced or replaced, and rust is minimal. It's an excellent choice for a DIY mechanic willing to tackle common issues, or for someone needing an affordable secondary vehicle. Avoid neglected examples or those with significant rust or transmission problems unless you&re getting it for parts. Consider it a budget-friendly workhorse, not a worry-free daily driver, unless it has received substantial care.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.