The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer is a mid-size luxury SUV that served as a more upscale sibling to the Ford Explorer. Produced from 1997 to 2010, key trims for 2002 included the well-equipped Luxury and the more rugged Premier. It appealed to buyers seeking a comfortable, spacious, and capable vehicle with a touch of premium flair. Its popularity stemmed from its blend of family-friendly utility and a refined driving experience, especially for its era.
The Good
The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer offers a comfortable and smooth ride, ample interior space for families and cargo, and a capable powertrain for its class. Its luxurious touches appealed to emotional desires for refinement, while its practical utility and solid build provided peace of mind for practical buyers.
The Bad
Common issues for the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer include potential transmission problems, particularly with earlier models, and occasional electrical gremlins. Rust on the undercarriage and body panels can also be a concern, especially in harsher climates. Buyers should also be aware of potential catalytic converter failures.
2002 Mercury Mountaineer: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer was primarily offered with two engine choices:
- 4.0L V6 SOHC (Single Overhead Cam) engine.
- 4.6L V8 SOHC (Single Overhead Cam) engine.
- Horsepower:
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 210 horsepower.
- 4.6L V8: Approximately 232 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates):
- 4.0L V6 (4WD): Around 14 MPG city / 18 MPG highway.
- 4.6L V8 (4WD): Around 13 MPG city / 17 MPG highway.
- Note: Fuel economy figures can vary significantly based on driving conditions, maintenance, and specific drivetrain (2WD or 4WD).
- 0-60 Times:
- Estimates for the 4.0L V6 typically ranged from 9.5 to 10.5 seconds.
- Estimates for the 4.6L V8 were generally around 8.5 to 9.5 seconds.
- These are approximate figures and can vary.
- Towing Capacity:
- The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer generally offered a towing capacity of up to 7,300 pounds when properly equipped with the V8 engine and towing package.
- The V6 models typically had a lower towing capacity, around 5,200 pounds.
- Trim-Level Features (Luxury and Premier):
- Luxury Trim: Standard features often included leather seating, power-adjustable front seats, automatic climate control, a premium sound system, fog lights, and a roof rack. It offered a comfortable and well-appointed interior.
- Premier Trim: This trim typically added even more upscale amenities such as a power sunroof, a rear-seat entertainment system (optional), heated front seats, and often unique badging or exterior accents. It aimed for a higher level of refinement and convenience.
- Both trims typically came with standard safety features like anti-lock brakes and airbags.
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2002 |
| Make | Mercury |
| Model | Mountaineer |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2WD |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | HAZELWOOD |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4226 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 5276 pounds |
| Overall Height | 69.60 inches |
| Overall Length | 190.70 inches |
| Overall Width | 72.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 113.70 inches |
| Standard Seating | 7 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.6-L V-8 SOHC 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $28,950 |
| Invoice Price | $26,386 |
| Delivery Charges | $625 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Have?
The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer, like many vehicles of its era, has a few recurring issues that owners and mechanics have noted. One of the more significant concerns revolves around the transmission, particularly the 4R55E and 5R55E units. Reports of rough shifting, delayed engagement, and outright failure have been documented, especially as mileage accumulates. While not always specific to the 2002 model year, these transmission issues are a common thread in earlier generations of the Mountaineer and its Ford Explorer cousins. Regular fluid changes and proper maintenance can mitigate some risks, but it remains a point of concern for potential buyers.
Another area to watch out for is the potential for cooling system leaks, specifically with the intake manifold gaskets and radiator. Over time, these components can degrade, leading to coolant loss and potential engine overheating. Related to this, some owners have reported issues with the mass airflow sensor (MAF sensor), which can lead to rough idling, poor acceleration, and check engine lights.
Rust is also a perennial concern for SUVs of this vintage, and the Mountaineer is no exception. Areas prone to corrosion include the frame rails, rocker panels, and wheel wells, especially in regions where roads are salted during winter. Thorough inspection for rust is crucial when considering a used model. Some electrical gremlins have also been reported, though these are often less critical and can include issues with power windows, door locks, or dashboard warning lights.
While the 2002 model year itself doesn't stand out with an unusual number of specific recalls compared to other vehicles, it's always prudent to check for any outstanding safety campaigns with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) using the vehicle's VIN. Long-term reliability can be decent if well-maintained, but the aforementioned transmission and cooling system concerns are the most frequently cited weaknesses that can impact long-term ownership satisfaction and cost.
Another area to watch out for is the potential for cooling system leaks, specifically with the intake manifold gaskets and radiator. Over time, these components can degrade, leading to coolant loss and potential engine overheating. Related to this, some owners have reported issues with the mass airflow sensor (MAF sensor), which can lead to rough idling, poor acceleration, and check engine lights.
Rust is also a perennial concern for SUVs of this vintage, and the Mountaineer is no exception. Areas prone to corrosion include the frame rails, rocker panels, and wheel wells, especially in regions where roads are salted during winter. Thorough inspection for rust is crucial when considering a used model. Some electrical gremlins have also been reported, though these are often less critical and can include issues with power windows, door locks, or dashboard warning lights.
While the 2002 model year itself doesn't stand out with an unusual number of specific recalls compared to other vehicles, it's always prudent to check for any outstanding safety campaigns with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) using the vehicle's VIN. Long-term reliability can be decent if well-maintained, but the aforementioned transmission and cooling system concerns are the most frequently cited weaknesses that can impact long-term ownership satisfaction and cost.
How long will the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a well-maintained 2002 Mercury Mountaineer can reasonably be expected to reach 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more. Its overall durability is considered average for its class and era. The primary factors influencing its longevity are consistent maintenance, particularly concerning the transmission fluid and cooling system. Neglecting these areas can lead to premature failure of critical components, significantly shortening its service life. However, with diligent care, including regular oil changes, fluid flushes, and addressing any minor issues promptly, the Mountaineer can continue to serve as a reliable vehicle for many years and miles, demonstrating decent long-term resilience.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer offered a respectable array of technology and safety features for its time, aiming to provide a comfortable and secure experience. Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM stereo with a CD player, and an optional premium sound system from Audiophile provided enhanced audio quality. Power windows, power door locks, and cruise control were standard, adding to the convenience. Optional features could include a power sunroof, adding an open-air feel to the cabin, and for higher trims like the Premier, a rear-seat entertainment system was available, a significant luxury for families on longer journeys.
In terms of safety, the 2002 Mountaineer was equipped with standard anti-lock brakes (ABS) for improved stopping power, particularly in emergency situations. Dual front airbags were also standard, providing crucial frontal impact protection. Side-impact airbags were not typically standard for this model year, a common limitation for vehicles of this era. Traction control was often available, particularly on higher trims or as part of option packages, aiding in slippery conditions. The vehicle's robust body-on-frame construction also contributed to its inherent safety in a collision.
Crash-test ratings for the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer are available through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For frontal driver and passenger impacts, it generally received good ratings, often scoring 4 out of 5 stars. Side-impact ratings could vary, but were generally considered acceptable for the time. It's important to note that modern safety standards and technologies have evolved considerably since 2002, so while it was competitive then, its safety suite is less advanced by today's benchmarks. Advanced driver-assistance systems like lane departure warnings or adaptive cruise control were not available on this model.
In terms of safety, the 2002 Mountaineer was equipped with standard anti-lock brakes (ABS) for improved stopping power, particularly in emergency situations. Dual front airbags were also standard, providing crucial frontal impact protection. Side-impact airbags were not typically standard for this model year, a common limitation for vehicles of this era. Traction control was often available, particularly on higher trims or as part of option packages, aiding in slippery conditions. The vehicle's robust body-on-frame construction also contributed to its inherent safety in a collision.
Crash-test ratings for the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer are available through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For frontal driver and passenger impacts, it generally received good ratings, often scoring 4 out of 5 stars. Side-impact ratings could vary, but were generally considered acceptable for the time. It's important to note that modern safety standards and technologies have evolved considerably since 2002, so while it was competitive then, its safety suite is less advanced by today's benchmarks. Advanced driver-assistance systems like lane departure warnings or adaptive cruise control were not available on this model.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer had an original MSRP that typically ranged from approximately $30,000 to $40,000, depending on the trim level (Luxury, Premier) and chosen options. As a luxury-oriented SUV from that era, it commanded a higher price than its Ford Explorer counterpart. The current used market prices for a 2002 Mercury Mountaineer vary significantly, generally falling between $2,000 and $6,000, with condition, mileage, and maintenance history being the primary determinants. Depreciation for this vehicle has been substantial, as is typical for SUVs over two decades old. Factors affecting its resale value include the prevalence of rust, the condition of the transmission and powertrain, overall cosmetic appeal, and whether it has desirable features like the V8 engine or a well-documented maintenance record. Lower mileage and well-preserved examples will command higher prices.
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2002 Mercury Mountaineer can be moderately costly. Insurance premiums will likely be lower than for a brand-new SUV but can still be higher than for a compact car. Fuel costs are a significant factor due to its V6 or V8 engines and less efficient nature compared to modern vehicles; expect fuel economy in the mid-to-high teens MPG. Maintenance costs are average for its class, but potential repairs for known issues like transmission problems or cooling system leaks can be substantial. Routine maintenance like oil changes, tire rotations, and brake services are standard. Overall, it's not an extremely economical vehicle to own, particularly regarding fuel consumption and potential repair expenses, but can be manageable with careful shopping for parts and service.
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Flex-Fuel
Fuel Capacity
22.50 gallons
City Mileage
14 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
19 miles/gallon
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
60 months / unlimited miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
2002 Mercury Mountaineer Insurance
Insurance for a 2002 Mercury Mountaineer is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer competed in the mid-size luxury SUV segment against formidable rivals like the Ford Explorer (its mechanical twin, but less luxurious), the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Toyota 4Runner, and the Chevrolet TrailBlazer/GMC Envoy. In terms of performance, the Mountaineer's V8 option offered competitive power for its time, comparable to the Grand Cherokee and TrailBlazer. Its ride comfort, particularly with its independent front suspension, was generally smoother and more car-like than the more rugged 4Runner. Feature-wise, the Mountaineer aimed for a more premium feel with available leather, upgraded audio, and optional rear-seat entertainment, aiming to surpass the standard offerings of the Explorer and base models of its competitors.
Reliability is where the Mountaineer, and by extension the Explorer platform, often faced criticism compared to the segment leaders. While the 4Runner typically excelled in long-term dependability, the Mountaineer's reported issues with transmissions and potential cooling system leaks could present challenges. The Grand Cherokee also had its share of reliability concerns, particularly with electronics. Price-wise, the Mountaineer was positioned above the Explorer, offering a premium badge for a premium price, often similar to or slightly less than a similarly equipped Grand Cherokee or 4Runner.
**Similar Alternatives:**
Given its age, if long-term reliability is the absolute top priority, a well-maintained Toyota 4Runner or Lexus RX (from a similar era) might be a more prudent choice. However, if you prioritize a comfortable ride and a touch of luxury at a potentially lower used price, the Mountaineer, despite its potential pitfalls, remains a viable option if thoroughly inspected.
Reliability is where the Mountaineer, and by extension the Explorer platform, often faced criticism compared to the segment leaders. While the 4Runner typically excelled in long-term dependability, the Mountaineer's reported issues with transmissions and potential cooling system leaks could present challenges. The Grand Cherokee also had its share of reliability concerns, particularly with electronics. Price-wise, the Mountaineer was positioned above the Explorer, offering a premium badge for a premium price, often similar to or slightly less than a similarly equipped Grand Cherokee or 4Runner.
**Similar Alternatives:**
- Ford Explorer (2002-2005): Mechanically identical but with a less luxurious interior and fewer premium options. Often found at a lower price point.
- Jeep Grand Cherokee (2002-2004): Offered more off-road capability, especially with the legendary inline-six engine, but could also have its share of complex repairs.
- Chevrolet TrailBlazer/GMC Envoy (2002-2005): Offered powerful inline-six and V8 engines and a more modern design for the time. Reliability was generally decent.
- Toyota 4Runner (2002-2009): Renowned for exceptional long-term reliability and robust build quality, though often pricier and less focused on luxury appointments.
Given its age, if long-term reliability is the absolute top priority, a well-maintained Toyota 4Runner or Lexus RX (from a similar era) might be a more prudent choice. However, if you prioritize a comfortable ride and a touch of luxury at a potentially lower used price, the Mountaineer, despite its potential pitfalls, remains a viable option if thoroughly inspected.
Final Verdict: Is the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 2002 Mercury Mountaineer is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a comfortable, spacious, and capable mid-size SUV for family hauling or light towing, who prioritize a smoother ride over rugged off-road prowess. It's worth buying cautiously as a used vehicle, provided it has a documented maintenance history and passes a thorough pre-purchase inspection, especially focusing on the transmission and cooling system. Buying new is obviously not an option. Specific trims like the Luxury or Premier are preferable for their enhanced features, but their value is primarily in their original luxury, not current market desirability. For those willing to accept the potential for age-related repairs and average fuel economy, it can offer a decent amount of utility and comfort for the money. However, prioritizing reliability might lead buyers to consider more dependable alternatives from Toyota or Lexus of the same era.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma