The Peugeot 505 was produced from 1979 to 1992, thus a 2012 model year does not exist. The original 505 was a large family car, offered as a four-door sedan and a five-door station wagon. Key trims included GL, GR, SR, STI, GTi, and Turbo models. It was renowned for its exceptional ride comfort, robust build quality, and elegant Pininfarina design, making it a popular choice, especially in markets valuing durability and practicality. Its appeal was its blend of French comfort with sturdy engineering.
The Good
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. For the actual Peugeot 505 (1979-1992), key advantages include its legendary ride comfort and spacious interior, appealing to practical buyers. Its elegant Pininfarina design and engaging, balanced handling offered emotional appeal. The robust mechanicals, especially diesel engines, ensured long-term reliability and value, making it a durable workhorse in many parts of the world.
The Bad
As a 2012 Peugeot 505 was not produced, these weaknesses pertain to the 1979-1992 models. Owners should watch out for pervasive rust issues, particularly on sills and wheel arches. Electrical gremlins can be common due to aging wiring. Parts availability for specific components can be challenging, and older petrol engines can be quite thirsty, leading to higher fuel costs compared to modern vehicles.
2012 Peugeot 505: Quick Overview
It is important to note that a 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist, as production ceased in 1992. The following specifications apply to the actual Peugeot 505 models produced between 1979 and 1992, which varied significantly by market and model year:
- Engine Options: The 505 offered a wide array of engines. Petrol options included 1.8L (carbureted), 2.0L (carbureted and later fuel-injected), 2.2L (fuel-injected, including a Turbo Injection variant), and a 2.8L V6 (PRV engine). Diesel options were a 2.3L naturally aspirated, a 2.5L naturally aspirated, and a 2.5L turbodiesel.
- Horsepower: Horsepower figures ranged considerably. Base 1.8L petrol engines produced around 79 hp. Mid-range 2.0L engines offered approximately 96-110 hp. The more potent 2.2L Turbo Injection could achieve around 150-160 hp, and the 2.8L V6 delivered about 150-170 hp. Diesel engines typically ranged from 70 hp (2.3L NA) to 110 hp (2.5L Turbodiesel).
- Fuel Economy: Given the older engine technology, fuel economy was not a strong suit for petrol models, typically ranging from 20-28 MPG (US, combined) depending on the engine and driving conditions. Diesel variants were notably more economical, often achieving 30-40 MPG or more.
- 0-60 Times: Performance varied greatly. Base models would take 12-15 seconds to reach 60 mph. Sportier variants like the 2.2L Turbo Injection or V6 could achieve 0-60 mph in a respectable 8-10 seconds for their era.
- Towing Capacity: The Peugeot 505, particularly the wagon versions and diesel models, often had decent towing capacities, generally in the range of 1,200 to 1,500 kg (approximately 2,600 to 3,300 lbs), depending on the engine and specific market regulations.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trims (e.g., GL): Offered essentials like manual windows, basic cloth upholstery, and minimal instrumentation. Air conditioning was typically an option, as was power steering on earlier models.
- Mid-Range Trims (e.g., GR, SR): Added features such as power windows (front), central locking, better interior materials, and optional air conditioning and sunroofs.
- Luxury/Sport Trims (e.g., STI, GTi, Turbo): These top-tier models often included more powerful engines, alloy wheels, upgraded suspension, full power accessories (windows, mirrors, central locking), air conditioning as standard, premium audio systems, leather upholstery options, and sometimes features like a trip computer or power sunroof.
2012 Peugeot 505 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2012 |
| Make | Peugeot |
| Model | 505 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | - |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | - |
| Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.9 L 4-Cyl. |
| Engine Size | 1.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2012 Peugeot 505 Have?
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. Discussing frequently reported problems, recalls, or long-term reliability concerns for the actual Peugeot 505 (1979-1992) requires acknowledging its age and the context of vehicles from that era.
One of the most significant and frequently reported problems is rust. The 505 was susceptible to rust, particularly in areas like the sills, wheel arches, floor pans, and around the front and rear screens. This was a common issue for many vehicles of its time, exacerbated by climate and lack of diligent rustproofing.
Electrical gremlins are another common complaint. As the wiring harnesses aged, issues could arise with power windows, central locking, dashboard gauges (speedometer, fuel gauge), and lighting. These problems often required tracing complex, aged wiring to identify and resolve.
For earlier carbureted models, issues with the fuel system, such as carburetor tuning, vacuum leaks, and fuel pump failures, were not uncommon. Later fuel-injected models generally offered more consistent performance but could suffer from issues with fuel injectors or the Bosch K-Jetronic system if not properly maintained.
The cooling system is another area requiring attention. Radiator leaks, thermostat failures, and water pump issues are common due to age, leading to potential overheating if neglected.
Suspension components like bushings, ball joints, and shock absorbers naturally wear out over decades, contributing to less precise handling and a degradation of the renowned ride comfort. Finding exact replacement parts for some suspension items can be challenging.
Brake system components, such as seized calipers, worn master cylinders, or deteriorating brake lines, are also typical long-term concerns for any vehicle of this age.
Regarding recalls, information for a vehicle that went out of production over 30 years ago is extremely difficult to ascertain from official modern databases. Historically, recalls might have addressed specific manufacturing defects during its production run, but these records are not readily accessible. Generally, owners acquiring a 505 today should focus on a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic familiar with classic European cars, rather than relying on recall data.
One of the most significant and frequently reported problems is rust. The 505 was susceptible to rust, particularly in areas like the sills, wheel arches, floor pans, and around the front and rear screens. This was a common issue for many vehicles of its time, exacerbated by climate and lack of diligent rustproofing.
Electrical gremlins are another common complaint. As the wiring harnesses aged, issues could arise with power windows, central locking, dashboard gauges (speedometer, fuel gauge), and lighting. These problems often required tracing complex, aged wiring to identify and resolve.
For earlier carbureted models, issues with the fuel system, such as carburetor tuning, vacuum leaks, and fuel pump failures, were not uncommon. Later fuel-injected models generally offered more consistent performance but could suffer from issues with fuel injectors or the Bosch K-Jetronic system if not properly maintained.
The cooling system is another area requiring attention. Radiator leaks, thermostat failures, and water pump issues are common due to age, leading to potential overheating if neglected.
Suspension components like bushings, ball joints, and shock absorbers naturally wear out over decades, contributing to less precise handling and a degradation of the renowned ride comfort. Finding exact replacement parts for some suspension items can be challenging.
Brake system components, such as seized calipers, worn master cylinders, or deteriorating brake lines, are also typical long-term concerns for any vehicle of this age.
Regarding recalls, information for a vehicle that went out of production over 30 years ago is extremely difficult to ascertain from official modern databases. Historically, recalls might have addressed specific manufacturing defects during its production run, but these records are not readily accessible. Generally, owners acquiring a 505 today should focus on a thorough pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic familiar with classic European cars, rather than relying on recall data.
How long will the 2012 Peugeot 505 last?
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. For the actual Peugeot 505 (1979-1992), its long-term durability was a significant selling point. Many examples, especially the diesel variants, were known to accumulate well over 300,000 to 400,000 kilometers (180,000 to 250,000+ miles) with diligent maintenance. It was common for them to remain in active service for 15-20 years or more, particularly in regions where robust, repairable vehicles were valued.
The key to this longevity was simple, sturdy engineering. However, over time, the primary weakness became body rust, which could compromise structural integrity. Electrical systems also degraded, leading to persistent minor issues. Interior plastics and fabrics, exposed to decades of sun and use, would often become brittle or worn. Despite these age-related weaknesses, the core mechanical components, particularly engines and transmissions, were remarkably resilient, underscoring its reputation as a "tank" when properly cared for.
The key to this longevity was simple, sturdy engineering. However, over time, the primary weakness became body rust, which could compromise structural integrity. Electrical systems also degraded, leading to persistent minor issues. Interior plastics and fabrics, exposed to decades of sun and use, would often become brittle or worn. Despite these age-related weaknesses, the core mechanical components, particularly engines and transmissions, were remarkably resilient, underscoring its reputation as a "tank" when properly cared for.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. This review pertains to the actual Peugeot 505 models produced between 1979 and 1992, which were developed long before modern automotive technology.
Built-in Tech: The 505 was a product of its time, offering very basic "tech" by today's standards. The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel, and temperature. Climate control was manual, with sliders for temperature and fan speed; air conditioning was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or later models. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or advanced electronic interfaces. Simplicity and mechanical robustness were the focus.
Entertainment: Entertainment systems were rudimentary. Early models came with an AM/FM radio, often with a manual tuner and two speakers. As the 1980s progressed, cassette players became common, and higher trims might have offered a four-speaker setup. Features like CD players, Bluetooth connectivity, USB ports, or satellite radio were entirely non-existent.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, or automatic emergency braking were decades away from being conceived or implemented in vehicles like the 505. Driver assistance was limited to fundamental aids: power steering (often optional on base models, standard on higher trims) and power-assisted brakes. There were no electronic stability control (ESC) or traction control systems.
Safety Features: Safety for the 505 was based on the standards of the 1980s. Key features included a robust chassis with designed crumple zones, and three-point seatbelts for front occupants (rear seatbelts were often two-point lap belts or optional three-point for outer seats, especially in earlier models). A laminated windshield was standard. There were no airbags (driver or passenger), no anti-lock braking systems (ABS) as standard (ABS was a very rare, high-cost option on some very late, top-tier models, but not widespread), and certainly no side-impact protection systems or child seat anchors (ISOFIX) as known today.
Optional Features: Common options included metallic paint, alloy wheels, a sunroof (manual or electric), power windows (often front only on lower trims, all four on higher trims), central locking, and leather upholstery.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern independent crash-test ratings (like Euro NCAP or NHTSA) did not exist during the 505's production run. Therefore, there are no formal contemporary crash-test ratings available for the Peugeot 505. Its safety performance would have been assessed against governmental standards prevalent in the 1980s, which were far less stringent than today's criteria.
Built-in Tech: The 505 was a product of its time, offering very basic "tech" by today's standards. The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, RPM, fuel, and temperature. Climate control was manual, with sliders for temperature and fan speed; air conditioning was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or later models. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or advanced electronic interfaces. Simplicity and mechanical robustness were the focus.
Entertainment: Entertainment systems were rudimentary. Early models came with an AM/FM radio, often with a manual tuner and two speakers. As the 1980s progressed, cassette players became common, and higher trims might have offered a four-speaker setup. Features like CD players, Bluetooth connectivity, USB ports, or satellite radio were entirely non-existent.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, or automatic emergency braking were decades away from being conceived or implemented in vehicles like the 505. Driver assistance was limited to fundamental aids: power steering (often optional on base models, standard on higher trims) and power-assisted brakes. There were no electronic stability control (ESC) or traction control systems.
Safety Features: Safety for the 505 was based on the standards of the 1980s. Key features included a robust chassis with designed crumple zones, and three-point seatbelts for front occupants (rear seatbelts were often two-point lap belts or optional three-point for outer seats, especially in earlier models). A laminated windshield was standard. There were no airbags (driver or passenger), no anti-lock braking systems (ABS) as standard (ABS was a very rare, high-cost option on some very late, top-tier models, but not widespread), and certainly no side-impact protection systems or child seat anchors (ISOFIX) as known today.
Optional Features: Common options included metallic paint, alloy wheels, a sunroof (manual or electric), power windows (often front only on lower trims, all four on higher trims), central locking, and leather upholstery.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern independent crash-test ratings (like Euro NCAP or NHTSA) did not exist during the 505's production run. Therefore, there are no formal contemporary crash-test ratings available for the Peugeot 505. Its safety performance would have been assessed against governmental standards prevalent in the 1980s, which were far less stringent than today's criteria.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2012 Peugeot 505 Prices and Market Value
A 2012 Peugeot 505 was not produced. For the actual 505 (1979-1992), prices when new varied significantly by market and trim. In the mid-1980s, a new Peugeot 505 could range from approximately £8,000 to over £15,000 in the UK, or roughly $10,000 to $20,000+ in the US, positioning it as a competitive European family car.
Currently, used market prices are very low for most examples, typically ranging from under $2,000 for a running but well-worn car to around $5,000 for a decent driver. Exceptionally well-preserved, low-mileage, or rare performance models (e.g., GTi, Turbo, V6) can command higher prices, potentially $8,000 to $15,000 or more from collectors. Depreciation insights show that the 505 has long since bottomed out in value, having fully depreciated decades ago. Its current value is driven almost entirely by rarity, condition, originality, and enthusiast demand, rather than utility. Factors affecting resale value are primarily condition (especially rust-free bodywork), engine type (diesels, performance variants are sought after), and a documented history of maintenance and care.
Currently, used market prices are very low for most examples, typically ranging from under $2,000 for a running but well-worn car to around $5,000 for a decent driver. Exceptionally well-preserved, low-mileage, or rare performance models (e.g., GTi, Turbo, V6) can command higher prices, potentially $8,000 to $15,000 or more from collectors. Depreciation insights show that the 505 has long since bottomed out in value, having fully depreciated decades ago. Its current value is driven almost entirely by rarity, condition, originality, and enthusiast demand, rather than utility. Factors affecting resale value are primarily condition (especially rust-free bodywork), engine type (diesels, performance variants are sought after), and a documented history of maintenance and care.
2012 Peugeot 505 Cost of Ownership
As a 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist, these insights apply to the 1979-1992 models. Insurance costs are generally low, often qualifying for classic car insurance. Fuel costs can be high for petrol models due to older engine technology and lower efficiency; diesels are more economical. Maintenance and repair can be costly due to parts scarcity for specific components, requiring specialist knowledge and potentially imported parts. While routine maintenance is straightforward, unexpected breakdowns can lead to significant expenses. Long-term ownership is generally not economical for daily driving compared to modern vehicles. It's a costly commitment for a classic car enthusiast due to parts, specialist labor, and potential restoration, rather than a practical, cheap-to-run option.
2012 Peugeot 505 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
-
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2012 Peugeot 505 Insurance
Insurance for a 2012 Peugeot 505 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2012 Peugeot 505 Compare to Other Vehicle?
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. Stacking the actual 1979-1992 Peugeot 505 against its contemporary rivals, such as the Mercedes-Benz W123/W124, BMW E28/E34, Volvo 240/740, Ford Granada/Scorpio, and Audi 100/200, reveals its unique position.
In terms of performance, the 505 was competitive but rarely class-leading. While its GTi, Turbo, and V6 models offered brisk acceleration for the era, it generally couldn't match the sportiness of a BMW E28 or E34. However, its balanced chassis provided a surprisingly engaging drive for a large family car.
Features were good for its class, offering power windows, central locking, and air conditioning on higher trims, comparable to mid-range German rivals, but typically not as technologically advanced as top-tier Mercedes or BMW models of the late 80s (e.g., in terms of early ABS or electronic amenities). It often offered a more complete package than contemporary Ford or Opel models.
Reliability was a strong suit, particularly for the robust diesel engines, which gained a reputation for immense longevity. It was often considered more durable than some Italian or French competitors. While perhaps not quite as "bulletproof" as a Volvo 240 or Mercedes W123, its mechanical simplicity contributed to its hardiness. However, electrical issues were a more common long-term concern compared to its more stoic rivals.
Price new, the 505 typically undercut the premium German marques like Mercedes and BMW, offering a compelling blend of comfort and quality at a more accessible price point. It was positioned above more mainstream offerings like Ford or Opel.
Similar Alternatives: For sheer robustness and long-term reliability, the Volvo 240/740 or Mercedes-Benz W123 are excellent, arguably superior, choices for a classic. If driving dynamics are paramount, a BMW E28 (5-series) from the same era would be a better alternative. The 505 stands out for its unique blend of ride comfort, elegant Pininfarina styling, and the distinctive 'French car' feel that many enthusiasts adore.
In terms of performance, the 505 was competitive but rarely class-leading. While its GTi, Turbo, and V6 models offered brisk acceleration for the era, it generally couldn't match the sportiness of a BMW E28 or E34. However, its balanced chassis provided a surprisingly engaging drive for a large family car.
Features were good for its class, offering power windows, central locking, and air conditioning on higher trims, comparable to mid-range German rivals, but typically not as technologically advanced as top-tier Mercedes or BMW models of the late 80s (e.g., in terms of early ABS or electronic amenities). It often offered a more complete package than contemporary Ford or Opel models.
Reliability was a strong suit, particularly for the robust diesel engines, which gained a reputation for immense longevity. It was often considered more durable than some Italian or French competitors. While perhaps not quite as "bulletproof" as a Volvo 240 or Mercedes W123, its mechanical simplicity contributed to its hardiness. However, electrical issues were a more common long-term concern compared to its more stoic rivals.
Price new, the 505 typically undercut the premium German marques like Mercedes and BMW, offering a compelling blend of comfort and quality at a more accessible price point. It was positioned above more mainstream offerings like Ford or Opel.
Similar Alternatives: For sheer robustness and long-term reliability, the Volvo 240/740 or Mercedes-Benz W123 are excellent, arguably superior, choices for a classic. If driving dynamics are paramount, a BMW E28 (5-series) from the same era would be a better alternative. The 505 stands out for its unique blend of ride comfort, elegant Pininfarina styling, and the distinctive 'French car' feel that many enthusiasts adore.
Final Verdict: Is the 2012 Peugeot 505 a Good Vehicle?
A 2012 Peugeot 505 does not exist. For the actual Peugeot 505 (1979-1992), this vehicle is ideal for classic car enthusiasts who appreciate its legendary ride comfort, robust engineering, and elegant Pininfarina design. It appeals to those seeking a distinctive European classic that offers a unique driving experience compared to its German rivals, or those looking for a rewarding project car.
It is generally not worth buying as a primary daily driver in the modern era due to its age, lack of contemporary safety features, relatively poor fuel economy (for petrol models), and the increasing challenge of parts sourcing and specialized maintenance. However, it is absolutely worth buying for a dedicated enthusiast as a used classic vehicle. Buyers should focus on finding well-maintained, rust-free examples, preferably later fuel-injected models (GTi, Turbo) or the famously durable diesels. A comprehensive service history is paramount. Prepare for a commitment in time and resources for maintenance and potential restoration, as it's a labor of love rather than a purely practical investment.
It is generally not worth buying as a primary daily driver in the modern era due to its age, lack of contemporary safety features, relatively poor fuel economy (for petrol models), and the increasing challenge of parts sourcing and specialized maintenance. However, it is absolutely worth buying for a dedicated enthusiast as a used classic vehicle. Buyers should focus on finding well-maintained, rust-free examples, preferably later fuel-injected models (GTi, Turbo) or the famously durable diesels. A comprehensive service history is paramount. Prepare for a commitment in time and resources for maintenance and potential restoration, as it's a labor of love rather than a purely practical investment.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma