The 1999 Subaru Forester is a notable member of the first-generation SF series, introduced in 1998. This compact crossover SUV blended the practicality of a wagon with the higher ground clearance of an SUV, pioneering a popular body style. Produced from 1998-2002, key trims included the "L" and more equipped "S." With new prices starting around $20,000, its standard Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive made it stand out, offering unparalleled all-weather capability and popularity among outdoor enthusiasts.
The Good
The 1999 Subaru Forester offers exceptional all-weather performance thanks to its standard Symmetrical AWD, appealing to adventurous spirits. Practical buyers appreciate its renowned reliability, decent fuel efficiency for an AWD vehicle, and versatile cargo space. Its rugged, go-anywhere design fosters emotional confidence, while its enduring value and relatively comfortable ride make it a sensible choice for long-term ownership.
The Bad
Key weaknesses for the 1999 Subaru Forester include common head gasket failures on the 2.5L engine, which can be costly. Oil leaks from various gaskets are also prevalent. Rust, particularly in regions using road salt, is a significant concern for older models, affecting subframes and body panels. Performance is also modest by modern standards.
1999 Subaru Forester: Quick Overview
The 1999 Subaru Forester, a first-generation SF model, offered a clear and practical set of specifications and features.
- Engine Options: The primary engine for the U.S. market was a single option: a 2.5-liter SOHC (Single Overhead Camshaft) "EJ251" flat-four engine, known for its horizontally opposed "boxer" configuration. This engine was paired with Subaru's renowned Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, available with either a 5-speed manual transmission or a 4-speed automatic.
- Horsepower: This 2.5L engine produced a respectable 165 horsepower at 5,600 RPM and 162 lb-ft of torque at 4,000 RPM. While not a powerhouse, it provided sufficient motivation for daily driving and light off-road excursions.
- Fuel Economy: EPA estimated fuel economy ratings for the 1999 Forester were generally around 20 MPG in the city and 25 MPG on the highway for the manual transmission, and slightly less for the automatic, typically 19 MPG city/24 MPG highway. Combined ratings often fell into the 20-22 MPG range, considered decent for a permanent AWD vehicle of its era.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration from 0-60 mph typically ranged between 9.0 to 10.0 seconds, depending on the transmission and specific test conditions. This placed it competitively among its compact SUV rivals at the time.
- Towing Capacity: The 1999 Forester had a modest but useful towing capacity, generally rated at up to 2,000 pounds when properly equipped. This was suitable for small utility trailers, jet skis, or lightweight campers.
- Trim-Level Features: The 1999 Forester was offered in two main trim levels:
- Forester L: The base model, which still came well-equipped. Standard features included Subaru's Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, power windows, power door locks, power side mirrors, air conditioning, an AM/FM stereo with cassette player (sometimes with a CD player as an option), dual front airbags, roof rails, and 15-inch steel wheels.
- Forester S: The uplevel trim added a range of desirable features. These included 16-inch alloy wheels, larger tires for improved grip, rear disc brakes (the L trim had rear drums), a limited-slip rear differential for enhanced traction, heated front seats, heated exterior mirrors, a heated windshield wiper de-icer for cold climates, cruise control, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and an upgraded stereo system, often with a CD player standard.
1999 Subaru Forester Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1999 |
| Make | Subaru |
| Model | Forester |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Wagon |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5 L 4-Cyl. |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Subaru Forester Have?
The 1999 Subaru Forester, while generally lauded for its reliability, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns, primarily stemming from its 2.5-liter EJ-series engine. The most infamous issue is head gasket failure. The original multi-layer steel (MLS) head gaskets used in these engines (especially the SOHC EJ251 prevalent in 1999 models) were prone to both external oil leaks and internal coolant leaks. This often manifests as white smoke from the exhaust, coolant consumption, or oil visible around the cylinder heads, typically appearing between 100,000 to 150,000 miles. It's a significant repair, often costing thousands of dollars, making it the primary "Achilles' heel" for this generation.
Beyond head gaskets, owners frequently report other oil leaks. These often originate from the valve cover gaskets, the oil separator plate at the rear of the engine, and the oil pump O-ring. These leaks, while less catastrophic than head gasket failure, can be messy and require attention. Rust is another major long-term concern, particularly in regions that use road salt. Areas prone to rust include the rear wheel arches, rocker panels, subframes, and rear shock towers. Thorough inspection for structural rust is critical when considering a purchase.
The 4-speed automatic transmission (4EAT) is generally robust but can develop issues like harsh shifting or solenoid problems if maintenance, especially regular fluid changes, has been neglected. Front lower control arm bushings and rear lateral link bushings are also common wear items, leading to clunks and imprecise handling over time.
Regarding recalls, the 1999 Forester had few major mechanical recalls specific to its model year at launch. However, like many vehicles of its vintage, it has been subject to broader, later recalls, most notably the Takata airbag inflator recall, which affects a vast number of older vehicles. Some minor recalls related to electrical components or brake light switches might also exist. For any specific vehicle, checking its VIN against NHTSA's recall database is always recommended to ensure all applicable recalls have been addressed.
Beyond head gaskets, owners frequently report other oil leaks. These often originate from the valve cover gaskets, the oil separator plate at the rear of the engine, and the oil pump O-ring. These leaks, while less catastrophic than head gasket failure, can be messy and require attention. Rust is another major long-term concern, particularly in regions that use road salt. Areas prone to rust include the rear wheel arches, rocker panels, subframes, and rear shock towers. Thorough inspection for structural rust is critical when considering a purchase.
The 4-speed automatic transmission (4EAT) is generally robust but can develop issues like harsh shifting or solenoid problems if maintenance, especially regular fluid changes, has been neglected. Front lower control arm bushings and rear lateral link bushings are also common wear items, leading to clunks and imprecise handling over time.
Regarding recalls, the 1999 Forester had few major mechanical recalls specific to its model year at launch. However, like many vehicles of its vintage, it has been subject to broader, later recalls, most notably the Takata airbag inflator recall, which affects a vast number of older vehicles. Some minor recalls related to electrical components or brake light switches might also exist. For any specific vehicle, checking its VIN against NHTSA's recall database is always recommended to ensure all applicable recalls have been addressed.
How long will the 1999 Subaru Forester last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1999 Subaru Forester can easily achieve 200,000 to 300,000 miles, with many owners reporting even higher figures, often providing 15-20+ years of service. Its core drivetrain components, including the transmission and differentials, are known for their long-term durability when properly cared for. The engine block itself is robust, provided major issues are addressed.
However, long-term durability is heavily impacted by the notorious head gasket issues; failure between 100,000 and 150,000 miles is common and, if not addressed, can lead to catastrophic engine damage. Rust, particularly in regions exposed to road salt, is another significant weakness over time, affecting chassis integrity and bodywork. Suspension components, exhaust systems, and various seals also naturally degrade, requiring replacement to maintain optimal performance and safety.
However, long-term durability is heavily impacted by the notorious head gasket issues; failure between 100,000 and 150,000 miles is common and, if not addressed, can lead to catastrophic engine damage. Rust, particularly in regions exposed to road salt, is another significant weakness over time, affecting chassis integrity and bodywork. Suspension components, exhaust systems, and various seals also naturally degrade, requiring replacement to maintain optimal performance and safety.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1999 Subaru Forester, being a vehicle from the late 20th century, featured a very minimalist approach to "tech" by today's standards. There were no infotainment screens, Bluetooth connectivity, or sophisticated digital displays.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard equipment included power windows, power door locks, and power side mirrors. The entertainment system typically comprised an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player. Higher trims, like the 'S' model, often included a single-disc CD player as standard or an option. The audio output was generally through a four-speaker system, adequate for its time but basic compared to modern offerings. Air conditioning was a standard comfort feature across most trims.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or blind-spot monitoring were entirely absent. Driver assistance was limited to standard power steering for easier maneuvering and a strong, well-engineered braking system. The 'S' trim offered a standard cruise control system for highway driving convenience.
Safety Features: The 1999 Forester did, however, incorporate essential safety features for its era:
Optional Features: Beyond the trim level differences, optional features generally included an alarm system, keyless entry, fog lights, and various cargo accessories like a cargo tray or net.
Crash-Test Ratings: For crash-test ratings, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided results that were generally good for a vehicle of its class and time. The 1999 Forester typically received 4 stars for both driver and front passenger in frontal impact crash tests. Side impact testing was less comprehensive than today, but its sturdy construction and standard AWD system instilled confidence. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct the extensive array of tests for vehicles of this vintage as they do today, but the Forester was considered a relatively safe vehicle in its segment due to its solid unibody construction and standard AWD.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard equipment included power windows, power door locks, and power side mirrors. The entertainment system typically comprised an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player. Higher trims, like the 'S' model, often included a single-disc CD player as standard or an option. The audio output was generally through a four-speaker system, adequate for its time but basic compared to modern offerings. Air conditioning was a standard comfort feature across most trims.
Driver-Assistance: Modern driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or blind-spot monitoring were entirely absent. Driver assistance was limited to standard power steering for easier maneuvering and a strong, well-engineered braking system. The 'S' trim offered a standard cruise control system for highway driving convenience.
Safety Features: The 1999 Forester did, however, incorporate essential safety features for its era:
- Dual Front Airbags: Standard for both driver and passenger.
- Front Seatbelt Pretensioners: Designed to tighten seatbelts in a collision.
- Side-Impact Door Beams: Integrated into the doors for enhanced side-collision protection.
- 4-Wheel Anti-lock Braking System (ABS): Standard on the 'S' trim and available as an option on the 'L' trim, providing improved stopping control in adverse conditions.
- Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive: While primarily a performance and traction feature, the permanent AWD system significantly contributed to safety by enhancing grip and stability in slippery conditions like rain, snow, or gravel.
Optional Features: Beyond the trim level differences, optional features generally included an alarm system, keyless entry, fog lights, and various cargo accessories like a cargo tray or net.
Crash-Test Ratings: For crash-test ratings, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided results that were generally good for a vehicle of its class and time. The 1999 Forester typically received 4 stars for both driver and front passenger in frontal impact crash tests. Side impact testing was less comprehensive than today, but its sturdy construction and standard AWD system instilled confidence. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct the extensive array of tests for vehicles of this vintage as they do today, but the Forester was considered a relatively safe vehicle in its segment due to its solid unibody construction and standard AWD.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1999 Subaru Forester Prices and Market Value
When new in 1999, the Subaru Forester 'L' trim had an MSRP of approximately $20,037, while the more equipped 'S' trim started around $22,037. Today, as a 25-year-old vehicle, its used market price varies wildly based on condition. Well-maintained examples with documented head gasket repairs and minimal rust can fetch between $4,000 and $7,000+, sometimes more for exceptionally clean specimens. Average condition models typically range from $2,000 to $4,000, while those needing significant work or with extensive rust can be found for under $2,000.
Depreciation insights show that these vehicles have largely "bottomed out." Well-preserved examples are now showing signs of slight appreciation among enthusiasts. Factors affecting resale value are paramount: engine health (especially head gaskets), absence of significant rust, comprehensive maintenance records, and overall cosmetic condition are crucial. Lower mileage and the presence of the 'S' trim's additional features also positively influence value.
Depreciation insights show that these vehicles have largely "bottomed out." Well-preserved examples are now showing signs of slight appreciation among enthusiasts. Factors affecting resale value are paramount: engine health (especially head gaskets), absence of significant rust, comprehensive maintenance records, and overall cosmetic condition are crucial. Lower mileage and the presence of the 'S' trim's additional features also positively influence value.
1999 Subaru Forester Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 1999 Subaru Forester can be a mixed bag regarding cost. Insurance is generally very economical due to the vehicle's age and low market value. Fuel costs are reasonable for an AWD vehicle, consuming regular unleaded gasoline, though not exceptionally efficient by modern standards. Routine maintenance (oil changes, tires, brakes) is typically affordable. However, repair costs can be substantial, primarily due to the notorious head gasket issue, which is a major expense. Other age-related repairs, such as rust mitigation and suspension component replacement, can add up.
Overall, the 1999 Forester can be an economical vehicle to own if you acquire a well-maintained example where major issues like head gaskets have already been addressed, or if you're capable of DIY repairs. Otherwise, potential major repairs could make it costly.
Overall, the 1999 Forester can be an economical vehicle to own if you acquire a well-maintained example where major issues like head gaskets have already been addressed, or if you're capable of DIY repairs. Otherwise, potential major repairs could make it costly.
1999 Subaru Forester Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1999 Subaru Forester Safety Rating
NHTSA
1999 Subaru Forester Insurance
Insurance for a 1999 Subaru Forester is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Wagon with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Subaru Forester Compare to Other Wagon?
The 1999 Subaru Forester competed in the burgeoning compact crossover SUV segment, facing rivals like the 1st-generation Honda CR-V (1997-2001), Toyota RAV4 (1996-2000), and later, vehicles such as the Suzuki Grand Vitara. Each offered a distinct proposition.
Performance: The Forester generally offered superior performance in terms of all-weather capability and engine power. Its standard 165 hp 2.5L boxer engine and Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system were robust, providing better acceleration and more confident traction than many rivals. The Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, for instance, typically offered engines in the 120-130 hp range, and their AWD systems were often part-time or reactive, engaging only when slippage occurred, making the Forester's full-time AWD a distinct advantage, especially in snowy or unpaved conditions. The Forester also handled more like a car than a truck, striking a good balance.
Features: Feature sets were broadly similar across these Japanese rivals, including air conditioning, power accessories, and basic stereos. However, the Forester 'S' trim distinguished itself by offering desirable standard features like heated front seats, heated mirrors, and a heated windshield de-icer, which were less common or unavailable on competitor models. The Forester's standard AWD was also a significant "feature" advantage over rivals where AWD was often optional and less advanced.
Reliability: All these Japanese brands generally boasted good reliability. However, the Forester's major reliability weak point was its propensity for head gasket failure and associated oil leaks from its EJ25 engine, which was a costly and common repair. The Honda CR-V (with its B-series engine) and Toyota RAV4 (with its 3S-FE engine) were often regarded as slightly more bulletproof in terms of major engine component longevity, though they had their own minor issues like transmission fluid leaks or rust.
Price: New, their prices were competitive within the ~$20,000-$25,000 range. On the used market today, all have largely depreciated, but condition and maintenance history significantly dictate current values. A Forester with a documented head gasket replacement often commands a premium.
Recommended Alternatives:
Performance: The Forester generally offered superior performance in terms of all-weather capability and engine power. Its standard 165 hp 2.5L boxer engine and Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system were robust, providing better acceleration and more confident traction than many rivals. The Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, for instance, typically offered engines in the 120-130 hp range, and their AWD systems were often part-time or reactive, engaging only when slippage occurred, making the Forester's full-time AWD a distinct advantage, especially in snowy or unpaved conditions. The Forester also handled more like a car than a truck, striking a good balance.
Features: Feature sets were broadly similar across these Japanese rivals, including air conditioning, power accessories, and basic stereos. However, the Forester 'S' trim distinguished itself by offering desirable standard features like heated front seats, heated mirrors, and a heated windshield de-icer, which were less common or unavailable on competitor models. The Forester's standard AWD was also a significant "feature" advantage over rivals where AWD was often optional and less advanced.
Reliability: All these Japanese brands generally boasted good reliability. However, the Forester's major reliability weak point was its propensity for head gasket failure and associated oil leaks from its EJ25 engine, which was a costly and common repair. The Honda CR-V (with its B-series engine) and Toyota RAV4 (with its 3S-FE engine) were often regarded as slightly more bulletproof in terms of major engine component longevity, though they had their own minor issues like transmission fluid leaks or rust.
Price: New, their prices were competitive within the ~$20,000-$25,000 range. On the used market today, all have largely depreciated, but condition and maintenance history significantly dictate current values. A Forester with a documented head gasket replacement often commands a premium.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Honda CR-V (1st Gen): A strong alternative for those prioritizing overall interior space, extreme reliability (fewer major engine issues than the Forester), and a slightly more refined city ride, albeit with less capable AWD.
- Toyota RAV4 (1st Gen): For buyers seeking a smaller, highly reliable option, though its AWD system is also less robust than Subaru's.
- Subaru Outback (2nd Gen, 2000-2004): If more passenger room and a slightly more comfortable, car-like ride are desired, with similar robust AWD. Be aware it shares the same EJ25 engine and associated head gasket concerns.
- Toyota 4Runner (3rd Gen, 1996-2002): For those needing genuine off-road capability and rugged, truck-based durability, though it comes with a higher price tag, worse fuel economy, and a less car-like driving experience.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Subaru Forester a Good Wagon?
The 1999 Subaru Forester is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a highly practical, versatile, and capable all-wheel-drive vehicle. It's perfect for outdoor enthusiasts, those living in areas with challenging weather, or anyone needing dependable utility without a large footprint. It appeals to individuals who value mechanical simplicity and a "go-anywhere" attitude.
Is it worth buying today? Yes, but with crucial conditions. You should only consider buying a 1999 Forester if it's a used model that has had its head gaskets replaced, ideally with verifiable documentation. A pre-purchase inspection by a Subaru specialist is absolutely essential to check for rust (especially in the subframe and rear shock towers) and other common age-related issues. The 'S' trim is generally recommended for its added comfort and safety features like ABS and heated seats, often for a minimal price difference. For those willing to perform some DIY maintenance or budget for potential repairs, it represents excellent value as a robust, all-weather workhorse that has largely bottomed out in depreciation.
Is it worth buying today? Yes, but with crucial conditions. You should only consider buying a 1999 Forester if it's a used model that has had its head gaskets replaced, ideally with verifiable documentation. A pre-purchase inspection by a Subaru specialist is absolutely essential to check for rust (especially in the subframe and rear shock towers) and other common age-related issues. The 'S' trim is generally recommended for its added comfort and safety features like ABS and heated seats, often for a minimal price difference. For those willing to perform some DIY maintenance or budget for potential repairs, it represents excellent value as a robust, all-weather workhorse that has largely bottomed out in depreciation.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.