The Good
The 2000 Subaru Forester offered a blend of practicality and fun. Its symmetrical all-wheel drive inspires confidence in various conditions (emotional). It’s known for its reliability, making it a cost-effective choice (practical). The comfortable ride and spacious interior add to its appeal, while its efficient engine delivers reasonable fuel economy (practical). The Forester's unique wagon-like SUV design also set it apart (emotional).
The Bad
Potential weaknesses of the 2000 Subaru Forester include head gasket issues, a common Subaru problem. Rust, especially in areas with road salt, is another concern. The timing belt should be inspected and replaced according to schedule to prevent engine damage. The automatic transmission can also be a point of concern at higher mileages. Oil leaks are also common.
2000 Subaru Forester: Quick Overview
Key specifications for the 2000 Subaru Forester:
- Engine Options: A 2.5-liter SOHC horizontally opposed four-cylinder (Boxer) engine.
- Horsepower: Approximately 165 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Approximately 20 mpg city / 26 mpg highway (depending on driving conditions and transmission).
- 0-60 Times: Roughly 9.5-10 seconds.
- Towing Capacity: Approximately 2,000 pounds (when properly equipped).
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Model: Included standard all-wheel drive, power windows and locks, air conditioning, and a basic sound system.
- S Model: Added features such as alloy wheels, upgraded cloth upholstery, fog lights, cruise control, and a premium sound system. It may also include optional features like a sunroof and heated seats.
Both trims offered a spacious cargo area and comfortable seating for five passengers. The symmetrical all-wheel-drive system provided excellent traction and handling in various weather conditions. The Boxer engine design contributed to a low center of gravity, enhancing stability. The vehicle also featured a four-speed automatic transmission or a five-speed manual transmission.
2000 Subaru Forester Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 2000 |
Make | Subaru |
Model | Forester |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Wagon |
Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Japan |
Manufacturing City | OTA |
Dimensions
Doors | 4-Door |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 1.8L 4-Cyl. |
Engine Size | 1.8L |
Engine Cylinders | 4 |
Transmission | 5 Manual/Standard |
Transmission Type | Manual |
Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
Drivetrain | All-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | - |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2000 Subaru Forester Have?
Recalls for the 2000 Subaru Forester have addressed issues like potential fuel leakage due to faulty fuel hoses and possible problems with the brake light switch. It's essential to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) to see if any recalls are outstanding.
Long-term reliability concerns include the longevity of the automatic transmission and the potential for catalytic converter failure. The timing belt requires replacement every 105,000 miles; neglecting this can lead to catastrophic engine damage. Regular maintenance and addressing minor issues promptly are crucial for maximizing the vehicle's lifespan. Ignoring coolant leaks or overheating can exacerbate head gasket problems.
How long will the 2000 Subaru Forester last?
Weaknesses over time include rust, worn suspension components, and potential issues with the automatic transmission. Head gasket problems are a persistent concern, especially if the engine has been overheated. The key to longevity is diligent upkeep and proactive repairs.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: Standard features included a basic AM/FM radio with a cassette player. The S trim often featured an upgraded sound system with a CD player. There was no built-in navigation or advanced infotainment system.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were limited. It lacked modern features like adaptive cruise control or lane departure warning.
Safety Features: Standard safety features included dual front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available. Side airbags were not available. It had daytime running lights.
Optional Features: Optional features included a sunroof, heated front seats (on the S trim), and fog lights.
Crash-Test Ratings: The 2000 Subaru Forester received generally good crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for frontal impacts. It received four out of five stars for driver and passenger in the frontal crash test and four out of five stars for the side crash test. These ratings, while respectable for its time, should be considered in the context of modern safety standards.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2000 Subaru Forester Prices and Market Value
The Forester has depreciated significantly. Factors affecting resale value include the vehicle's condition, mileage, maintenance history, and the presence of rust or other damage. Models with complete service records and minimal rust command higher prices.
2000 Subaru Forester Cost of Ownership
2000 Subaru Forester Fuel Efficiency
2000 Subaru Forester Safety Rating
NHTSA
2000 Subaru Forester Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2000 Subaru Forester Compare to Other Wagon?
Reliability is a mixed bag. While Subarus have a reputation for longevity, the head gasket issue is a significant concern compared to the Honda CR-V or Toyota RAV4, known for their exceptional reliability. Price-wise, the Forester was generally competitive.
Similar alternatives include the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, offering similar practicality and often better reliability. The Jeep Cherokee provided more off-road capability but at the expense of fuel economy and on-road comfort. A better alternative, if reliability is a top priority, might be a similarly aged CR-V or RAV4 in comparable condition. If all-wheel drive is not a necessity, a wagon like the Toyota Camry wagon could also be considered for similar practicality with potentially lower maintenance costs.
Ranks #488 Sedan
1 | 2023 Toyota Camry | (5.0★) |
2 | 2023 Honda Accord | (0.0★) |
3 | 2023 Lexus ES | (0.0★) |
4 | 2024 Subaru Legacy | (5.0★) |
5 | 2022 Mazda MX-30 | (4.0★) |
6 | 2024 BMW M3 | (0.0★) |
7 | 2023 Ford Mustang | (5.0★) |
8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT | (0.0★) |
9 | 2023 Audi A3 | (0.0★) |
10 | 2023 Chevrolet Camaro | (5.0★) |
11 | 2023 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid | (0.0★) |
12 | 2023 Nissan Altima | (4.0★) |
488 | 2000 Subaru Forester | (0.0★) |